ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of seven types of cognitive interventions for older adults with mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD).MethodsWe searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases to collect randomized controlled trials on cognitive interventions for mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) from inception to January 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. STATA 14.0 software was then used to perform a meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 49 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The results of network meta-analysis revealed that each cognitive intervention had significantly improved the cognitive ability of AD patients. Specifically, nursing intervention (NI) (MD=3.01, 95%CI 1.70 to 4.50, P<0.005) was the most effective enhancer of cognitive ability, followed by music therapy (MT) (MD=2.60, 95%CI 0.96 to 4.30, P<0.001), physical exercise (PE) (MD=2.4, 95%CI 1.0 to 3.9, P<0.001), cognitive rehabilitation (CR) (MD=2.3, 95% CI 0.92 to 3.7, P=0.013), cognitive simulation (CS) (MD=1.7, 95%CI 1.2 to 2.3, P=0.037), computerized cognitive training (CCT) (MD=1.6, 95%CI 0.42 to 2.8, P<0.001), and pharmacological therapies (PT) (MD=1.5, 95%CI 0.24 to 2.8, P=0.041).ConclusionsThe seven types of cognitive interventions are helpful in improving the cognitive ability of Alzheimer's patients, and nursing intervention is the most effective cognitive intervention. Moreover, non-pharmacological therapies may be better than pharmacological therapies.
Objective To systematic review the international interventions on mental health of involuntary migrants, and evaluate the effects of different interventions. Methods We searched 10 international electronic databases and 3 grey literature databases to November 2008. Websites of relevant organizations and Google were searched for any missing information. Research papers that reported describing or evaluating any interventions on preventing and treating mental health problems of involuntary migrants were included. Two reviewers independently screened, appraised and extracted the data, disagreements were resolved by discussion. Implemented interventions were summarized and analyzed by qualitative synthesis method. As there was heterogeneity in the type of interventions, study design, and outcomes, the study results were not pooled statistically in meta analysis. Results Of the 35 studies included in the analysis, 16 studies aimed to describe intervention strategies, while 19 studies were to evaluate effectiveness of interventions. The targeted population were mainly refugees and asylum seekers caused by the war, violence and other tortures, while only one study targeted at reservoir migrants. All the psychological interventions were divided into prevention intervention and treatment intervention. The main interventions include: integrated psychological intervention, group treatment, cognitive behavior therapy, testimony, narrative exposure therapy, supportive counseling service, family support and therapy, etc. Of which, integrated psychological interventions are the most common intervention. Most of the studies evaluating effectiveness are observational studies, while only six are controlled trials. The results of most evaluation studies show that the implemented psychological interventions have positive impact on mental health of involuntary migrants. Conclusions There are limited intervention studies on mental health of involuntary migrants, and evaluation studies are lack of rigorous design. More research especially preventive intervention study is required. High-quality trials with large sample and rigorous design are needed to evaluate the most effective psycho-interventions for different groups of involuntary migrants.
Objective To know the status quo of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) infection in primary general hospitals, analyze the differences among various intervention measures, and put forward guiding principles for MDRO infection control in primary general hospitals. Methods We investigated all patients (n=51 612) admitted into the hospital between January 2013 and December 2015, and found out 6 types of MDRO. Pre-interventional investigation was carried out between January 2013 and June 2014 (before intervention) during which no intervention measures were taken; Intervention was carried out between July 2014 and December 2015 (after intervention). All departments in the hospital (6 groups) were matched with intervention measures (6 groups) randomly. Then, we compared the MDRO detection rate, nosocomial infection case rate and intervention compliance rate among the groups. Results We detected altogether 611 MDRO cases (without duplication) out of the 51 612 cases. The total detection rate of MDRO was 1.18%. The detection rate of MDRO before and after intervention was 1.37% and 1.01%, respectively. The difference between the two was of statistical significance (P<0.05). After the intervention, the detection rate in groups 1, 5 and 6 was significantly lower than before (P<0.05); the differences in detection rate among groups 2, 3, and 4 were not significant (P> 0.05). Nosocomial infection rate decreased from 0.28% before intervention to 0.14% after intervention (P<0.05). After the intervention, MDRO nosocomial infection case rate of groups 1, 5 and 6 was significantly lower than before (P<0.05); the rate was lower in groups 3 and 4 than before without any significance (P>0.05); no MDRO cases were detected in group 2 and comparison was meaningless. The knowledge rates of medical workers and of nursing staff increased from 52.97% and 20.00% before intervention to 78.76% and 66.34% after intervention, respectively (χ2=30.670, 38.604;P<0.05). The compliance to all kinds of protection measures improved significantly (P<0.05) except compliances to equipment of hand antiseptic agent and patient transfer order (P> 0.05). Conclusion Promoting the compliance rate to hand hygiene and environmental cleaning and disinfection, primary general hospitals can decrease the detection rate and nosocomial infection case rate of MDRO.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of bundle strategies on the prevention and control of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in intensive care unit (ICU), in order to effectively prevent and control the severe situation of multiple drug-resistant bacteria in ICU.MethodsWe selected patients who admitted into the ICU from January 2016 to December 2017 as study subjects, and monitored 6 types of MDROs. Basic information was surveyed and collected from January to December 2016 (before intervention), while bundle strategies on MDROs were implemented from January to December 2017 (after intervention), including issusing isolation orders, hanging isolation marks, wearing isolation clothes, using medical articles exclusively, cleaning and disinfecting environment, implementing hand hygiene, etc. Then we compared the MDRO detection rate, nosocomial infection rate, MDRO nosocomial infection rate, and compliance rates of interventions between the two periods.ResultsThe MDRO detection rate before intervention was 77.10%, and that after intervention was 49.12%, the difference between the two periods was statistically significant (χ2=69.834, P<0.001). The nosocomial infection rate of ICU decreased from 23.51% before intervention to 15.23% after intervention, the MDRO nosocomial infection rate decreased from 13.70% before intervention to 5.84% after intervention, and the differences between the two periods were statistically significant (χ2=8.594, P=0.003; χ2=13.722, P<0.001). The compliance rates of doctor’s isolation orders, hanging isolation marks, wearing isolation clothes, using medical articles exclusively, cleaning and disinfecting environment, and hand hygiene, as well as the correct rate of hand hygiene after intervention (92.12%, 93.55%, 81.77%, 84.24%, 82.90%, 77.39%, and 96.37%) were significantly higher than those before intervention (31.94%, 52.00%, 23.43%, 48.18%, 67.16%, 59.46%, and 88.64%), and the differences were all statistically significant (P<0.001).ConclusionThe implementation of the above bundle strategies on the prevention and control of MDROs can decrease the MDRO detection rate and MDRO nosocomial infection rate.
Objective To systematically review the psychological resilience intervention in China, so as to evaluate its effectiveness. Methods Studies published as of October 2012 were searched in CBM, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled before-and-after trials (CBAs) about psychological resilience intervention were included. Two reviewers independently performed screening, quality assessment and data extraction, and then reached a consensus after cross-check and discussion. Qualitative synthesis was adopted instead of meta-analysis for the existed significant deviations in outcomes of included studies. Results A total of 8 studies including 3 RCTs and 5 CBAs were included for the analysis. All the studies referred to the objects of students, including 6 for college students, 1 for secondary school students and 1 for left behind students in rural junior school. All 8 studies evaluated the effectiveness of group psychological guidance, 1 of which also compared the outcomes of psychological lectures. All the included trials suggested that group psychological guidance and psychological lectures might significantly improve the psychological resilience of subjects. Conclusion Current studies on psychological resilience intervention are limited, the measure has been taken seems relatively single, which mainly focuses on students and lacks of high-quality research design. It suggests take more diverse psychological resilience interventions for different population, and evaluate both short-term and long-term effectiveness by performing large sample, strictly designed and high-quality trials.
ObjectiveTo systematically interpret the updated risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions version 2 (ROBINS-I V2) in 2024, summarizing its key improvements, operational procedures, and clinical application value. MethodsThrough literature review and case studies, the improvements of ROBINS-I V2 were compared with the 2016 version, including the expansion of bias domains, refinement of signaling questions, and optimization of decision flowcharts. A retrospective study in stomatology was used to demonstrate the practical application of the tool. ResultsThe ROBINS-I V2 tool has restructured the hierarchy and refined the definitions of bias domains, optimized the evaluation processes across seven risk-of-bias dimensions, and minimized subjective judgment errors through standardized decision flowcharts. ConclusionROBINS-I V2 significantly improves the rigor of bias assessment in non-randomized intervention studies through its scientific design and standardized workflow. It is recommended for evidence quality grading and decision-making support in clinical research.
ObjectiveTo explore the influence of nursing interruption event intervention on the incidence of nursing risk events. MethodsIn January 2012, we carried out intervention on nursing interruption events. And general situation questionnaire was used on December 30th, 2011 (control group) and December 30th, 2012 (intervention group) respectively to investigate 190 clinical nurses. ResultsThe occurrence of the interruption events was positively correlated with the incidence of nursing risk events. Effective intervention significantly reduced the incidence of risk events (P<0.05). ConclusionEffective prevention of adverse outcomes caused by interruption events reduces the risk of nursing, improves the quality of care, and ensures the safety of the patient.
针刺平行随机对照试验通常没有准确报告试验组和对照组的干预方法.为促进标准化,国际上有经验的针刺医师和研究者组成的小组制定了一些原则,即针刺临床对照试验中干预措施报告的标准(缩写为STRICTA).在征求意见过程中,一些期刊编辑协助对此标准进行了修改,使之与随机对照试验报告的标准(CON-SORT)格式一致,作为该指南对针剌研究报告的延伸.参与此事的杂志编辑已确定要发表该标准,建议其作者群按照此标准准备论文,并将邀请更多杂志采用该标准.目的是使针剌对照试验的干预措施充分报告,从而有利于对这些研究的严格评价、分析及这些措施的推广.