Objective To analyze the relationship between age and prognosis of colorectal patients in the database from colorectal cancer (DACCA). Methods The DACCA version selected for this data analysis was updated on January 5, 2022. The data items analyzed included age, sex, tumor site, tumor pathological nature, obstruction, pathological TNM (pTNM) stage, positive lymph node ratio, survival status and survival time. According to China’s age segmentation standard, the included data were grouped into younger group (<35 years old), middle-aged group (35–59 years old) and elderly group (>59 years old). Overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DFS) were analyzed in three age group, and OS and DSS in three age group were analyzed in pTNM stage stratification. Results Three thousand six hundred and twenty-five rows of data were obtained from DACCA database according to the screening conditions. The survival analysis results of different age groups show that: The middle-aged group had better OS compared with the elderly group at 1-year (97.4% vs. 96.0%, P=0.037), 3-year (90.9% vs. 88.0%, P=0.030) and 5-year (81.7% vs. 75.7%, P=0.002). Also, the middle-age group had better 5-year DSS (82.2% vs. 77.7%, P=0.020). There was no statistical difference in survival between the younger group and the elderly group (P>0.05). The survival analysis results of different age groups in each pTNM stage show that: ① The middle-aged group had better medium-term and long-term OS than the elderly group. In the pTNM Ⅰ stage, the 3- and 5-year OS in the middle-aged group were better than those in the elderly group (100% vs. 93.4%, P=0.004; 100% vs. 91.4%, P=0.005). In the pTNM Ⅱ stage, the 5- and 10-year OS in the middle-aged group were better than those in the elderly group (96.5% vs. 91.3%, P=0.018; 88.2% vs. 54.3%, P<0.001). In pTNM Ⅲ stage, 10-year OS in the middle-aged group was better than that in the elderly group (36.5% vs. 36.0%, P<0.001). In pTNM Ⅳ stage, the 5- and 10- year of OS in the middle-aged group were better than those in the elderly group (67.7% vs. 58.4%, P=0.016; 19.1% vs. 7.2%, P=0.049). ② The middle-aged group had better medium-term and long-term DSS than the elderly group. In the pTNM Ⅰ stage, the 3- and 5- year DSS in the middle-aged group wrer better compared to the elderly group (100% vs. 96.9%, P=0.047; 100% vs. 94.9%, P=0.049). In the pTNM Ⅱ stage, the 10-year DSS in the middle-aged group outperformed that in the elderly group (88.2% vs. 61.9%, P=0.002). In the pTNM Ⅳ stage, the 5- and 10-year DSS in the middle-aged group were better than the elderly group (68.3% vs. 59.1%, P=0.020; 20.9% vs. 7.7%, P=0.040). ③ Except pTNM I stage, there was no significant difference in survival of other pTNM stages between young group and old group (P>0.05). In the pTNM Ⅰ stage, 3- and 5- year OS were better in the younger group compared with the elderly group (100% vs. 93.4%, P=0.004; 100% vs. 91.4%, P=0.005), and better 3- and 5- year DSS in the younger group (100% vs. 96.9%, P=0.047; 100% vs. 94.9%, P=0.049). Conclusions The age of colorectal cancer patients may have an impact on long-term survival. Middle-aged patients have better prognosis compared with elderly patients, and the younger group patients have better prognosis in pTNM stage Ⅰ only.
ObjectiveTo understand the relation between the occupation and long-term prognosis of the patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) based on the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA). MethodsThe selected updated DACCA database as of June 29, 2022 was used for this study. The demographic variables selected in this study included the gender, age, and occupation; The oncology variables included pathological TNM (pTNM) stage, tumor location, tumor pathology, and differentiation; And the outcome variable was survival status, including overall survival rate and disease-specific survival rate. The included patients were divided into an intellectual occupations group (intellectual group) and manual occupations group (manual group) referring to relevant regulatory documents in China. The survival status of the intellectual group and the manual group was compared, and then which were stratified comparison by pTNM stage. ResultsA total of 1 974 pieces of patients data were included from the DACCA database according to the selection criteria, 349 of whom in the intellectual group and 1 625 of whom in the manual group. The intellectual group had better 5-year cumulative overall survival rate (92.1% vs. 84.5%, P<0.001) and disease-specific survival rate (92.1% vs. 85.8%, P=0.002), as well as better 10-year cumulative overall survival rate (72.4% vs. 55.2%, P<0.001) and disease-specific survival rate (75.4% vs. 59.1%, P<0.001) compared to the manual group. The stratified analysis by pTNM staging found that, for the patients with pTNM stage Ⅲ, the 5- and 10-year cumulative overall survival rate of the intellectual group were better than the manual group (94.0% vs. 82.3%, P<0.001; 67.1% vs. 43.7%, P=0.014), while the 5- and 10-year cumulative disease-specific survival rate were the same as the overall survival rate (94.0% vs. 83.5%, P=0.001; 69.5% vs. 47.9%, P=0.026). Furthermore for the the patients with pTNM stage Ⅱ, it was found that the the 10-year cumulative disease-specific survival rate of the intellectual group was better than the manual group (93.5% vs. 78.7%, P=0.009). ConclusionsFrom the analysis results of this study, occupation might be related to long-term prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. A general trend is that the long-term prognosis of patients with intellectual occupations might be better than that of patients with manual occupations, and this difference might be relatively significant in the patients with pTNM Ⅱ and pTNM Ⅱ stages, but it is need to be autious and objective.