Objective To compare endoscopic sinius surgery plus middle meatus fenestration with endoscopic sinius surgery plus middle and inferior meatus fenestration for fungus ball maxillary sinusitis. Methods Applying a prospective randomized controlled trial, 80 patients with fungal ball maxillary sinusitis from January, 2010 to March, 2011 were collected and then divided into two groups, including experiment (40 cases) and control groups (40 cases). The trial group received endoscopic sinius surgery plus middle and inferior meatus fenestration, which the control group received endoscopic sinius surgery plus middle meatus fenestration. Then a follow-up was conducted from the end of surgery to February 28th, 2013. All patients took subjective and objective assessment before and after the surgery, including VAS, SNOT-20, Lund-Mackay CT system scores and Lund-Kennedy endoscopic mucosal score. Results with the trial group was superior to the control group in VAS score, SNOT rating and Lund-Kennedy mucosa score 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery (Plt;0.01). Lund-Mackay CT score of the control group was significantly higher than the trial group after 1 year of surgery (Plt;0.01). According to the Haikou standard to assess the efficacy of surgery, we found that the total effectiveness rate of the trial group (100.0%; recovery: 36 cases; improved: 4 cases) was higher than that of the control group (87.5%; recovery: 28 cases; improved: 4 cases), with a significant difference (P=0.021). Conclusion Endoscopic sinius surgery plus middle and inferior meatus fenestration with a lower reoccurrence rate is superior to endoscopic sinius surgery plus middle meatus fenestration for fungus ball maxillary sinusitis in clinical efficacy.
Objective To investigate the safety and effectiveness of the operation of integrate subparagraph, fenestration, exclusion, cut expansion, seton, tube, and drainage (ISFECSTD) to cure complex anal fistula. Methods Using randomized comparison and multicenter parallel experiment, the total number was 240: 120 patients in study group treated by ISFECSTD, and 120 patients in control group treated by extended cutting and seton operation. Then compared the safety and effectiveness between two groups. Results The clinical recovery rate of the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group （Plt;0.05）. The operation time and wound healing time in study group were significantly less than those in control group, and the scar area after wound healing was smaller than that in control group （Plt;0.01）. The decreased extents of anorectal pressures and rectal capacity feeling function after operation in study group were smaller than those in control group (Plt;0.01). Rectal and anal reflex function and healing of the endostoma, stem, and branch in study group were better than those in control group (Plt;0.05, Plt;0.01). Incidence of anal incontinence after operation in study group was significantly less than that in of anus-rectum structure and function, and has the merits of higher cure rate, shorter time of healing, smaller scar, less pain, etc. The method of ISFECSTD is worth being a new standardized operation in the clinical application.
The authors analysed the medical records of 30 patients with congenital cystic disease of the liver treated in this hospital and with a review of the article some problems of diagnosis and treatment are discussed. B-altrasonic scaner (B-US), computerized tomographic scanning and magnetic resonance imaging appeared to be most helpful in diagnosing and treating this disease. After comparing different treatments, such as aspiration .alcohol sclerotherapy, fenetration, cyst resection and partial hepatectomy, the arthors state the best results could be achieved by alcohol sclerotherapy under B-US guidence (6 cases) or fenestration (15 cases) with no postoperative complication. Malignant change was found in one patient of this group.
To compare the effectiveness of microdiscectomy and macrodiscectomy on the single-level lumbar disc protrusion (LDP). Methods Between November 2002 and October 2005, 241 patients with LDP underwent 2 surgical procedures: microdiscectomy (group A, 93 cases) and macrodiscectomy (group B, 148 cases). All patients had singlelevel LDP. In group A, there were 51 males and 42 females with an average age of 32.3 yeares (range, 18-47 years); there were 23cases of protrusion, 52 cases of prolapse, and 18 cases of sequestration with an average disease duration of 8.5 months (range, 1-18 months), including 8 cases at L2,3 level, 11 cases at L3,4 level, 35 cases at L4,5 level, and 39 cases at L5, S1 level. In group B, there were 81 males and 67 females with an average age of 31.8 years (range, 16-50 years); there were 37 cases of protrusion, 85 cases of prolapse, and 26 cases of sequestration with an average disease duration of 9.3 months (range, 1-20 months), including 9 cases at L2,3 level, 15 cases at L3,4 level, 63 cases at L4,5 level, and 61 cases at L5, S1 level. There was no significant difference in age, sex, segment level, type, or disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results Immediate back and sciatic pain rel ief was achieved in 225 (93.4%) patients after operation. The satisfactory rates were 91.4% in group A and 87.8% in group B at 1 week after operation, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). The length of incision, amount of bleeding, amount of drainage, and hospital ization time in group A were significantly fewer than those in group B (P lt; 0.05); while the operative time in group A was longer than that in group B, but showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). Dural laceration occurred in 4 cases of groupA and 5 cases of group B, superficial infections of incision occurred in 5 cases of group B and intervertebral space nfections occurred in 4 cases of group B, and epidural hematoma occurred in 1 case of group A. The perioperative compl ication rate (5.4%, 5/93) in group A was significantly lower (P lt; 0.05) than that in group B (9.5%, 14/148). LDP recurred in 4 cases (4.3%) of group A and in 9 cases (6.1%) of group B postoperatively, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); of them, 11 cases received second operation and 2 cases were treated conservatively. All cases were followed up 36-77 months (mean, 51.4 months). There were significant differences in visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disabil ity index (ODI) between 2 groups at the last follow-up and preoperation (P gt; 0.05), but there was significant difference in VAS at 1 week postoperatively between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). VAS and ODI were obviously improved at 1 week and last follow-up when compared with preoperation (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement rates of VAS and ODI between 2 groups at last follow-up (P gt; 0.05). According to cl inical evaluation of Modified Macnab criteria, the excellent and good rate was 90.3% in group A and 86.5% in group B at final follow-up (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Both macrodiscectomy and microdiscectomy are effective for LDP, furthermore microdiscectomy is less invasive than macrodiscectomy. Microdiscectomy is recommended to treat single-level LDP.
To assess long-term outcomes of reoperation for recurrent lumbar disc herniation, and to compare results of different methods. Methods There were 95 patients who had reoperation for recurrent lumbar discherniation between February 1998 to February 2003, among whom a total of 89 (93.7%) were followed up and their primary data were reviewed. There were 76 patients, with the mean age of 42 years (range from 23 to 61), who met the inclusion criteria and were included. Among them, there were 55 males and 21 females. All patients had the history of more than one sciatic nervepain. The mean recurrent time was 69 months(range from 8 to 130 months). There were 48 patients in L4,5 and 28 patients in L5, S1, of whom we chose 30 to undergo larger vertebral plate discectomy (or two-side fenestration) and nucleus pulpose discectomy (group A), 24 to undergo the whole vertebral discectomy (group B) and 22 to undergo the whole vertebral discectomy and 360degrees intervertebral fusion(group C). The patients’ cl inical results in the three groups were compared, and the cl inical curative effects were evaluated by using cl inical functional assessment standard. Results Cl inical outcomes were excellent or good in 80.3% of the patients, including 80.0% of group A, 79.2% of group B and 81.8% of group C. There was no significant difference in each group (P gt; 0.05). These three groups were not different in age, pain-free interval and follow-up duration (P gt; 0.05). The mean intraoperative blood losses in the three groups were (110.7 ± 98.8), (278.7 ± 256.3), (350.7 ± 206.1) mL, respectively. The mean surgery time were (65.9 ± 22.8), (111.6 ± 24.3), (127.3 ± 26.7) minutes, respectively, and the mean hospital ization time were (6.7 ± 1.4), (10.2 ± 1.8), (12.2 ± 2.3) days, respectively. Group A was significantly less than group B or C (P lt; 0.05) and there was no significant difference between group B and C. All the patients were followed up for 36 to 96 months with an average of 86 months, and with (87.6 ± 27.0), (84.5 ± 19.8), (83.6 ± 13.5) months of group A, B and C, respectively. At the endof the follow-up, there were more cases of spinal instabil ity at the same level in group B (19 patients) than in group A (1 patient) or group C (no patient) in X-ray, and the difference was significant (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Reoperation for recurrent lumbar disc herniation is effective. Larger vertebral plate discectomy or tow-side fenestration is recommended for managing recurrent lumbar disc herniation.
目的 探讨老年人腰椎间盘突出合并侧隐窝狭窄症的临床特点及手术方式，总结和介绍小切口单侧椎板开窗椎间盘摘除联合侧隐窝扩大术的优点和可行性。 方法 2006年7月－2011年1月对76例患者行后正中切口4.0～6.0 cm，在C臂X线机定位下，保留棘上、棘间韧带和棘突，骨膜下剥离骶棘肌，显露椎板、椎板间隙和关节突起，在椎板间隙间开骨窗，切除关节突内侧小部分后，环形切除突出的纤维环取出髓核，扩大成形侧隐窝，解除所有卡压脊神经根组织，彻底松解脊神经根。 结果 术后76例随访15～24个月，平均18个月，均按中华脊柱外科学会脊柱学组腰腿痛手术评定标准评定：优63例，良10例，一般及差3例，优良率达96.05%。手术前后Oswestry功能障碍指数评分与腰痛及腿痛视觉模拟评分法评分比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 小切口单侧椎板开窗椎间盘摘除联合侧隐窝扩大术，是一种手术创伤小，能在直视下操作，避免手术失误，彻底去除神经根致压物，不仅能够扩大神经根管，而且可行侧隐窝的探查及松解，同时兼顾脊柱稳定结构基本不被破坏，疗效满意，尤其在老年人中值得推广。
目的 探讨腹腔镜下输卵管妊娠开窗取胚术后缝合与否对输卵管再通、宫内妊娠率的近期影响。方法 回顾分析2008年4月－2010年4月112例有保留生育功能意愿且具备随访条件的输卵管妊娠患者行腹腔镜手术的临床资料。根据手术方法将患者分为两组：A组54例，行患侧输卵管开窗取胚术，术后缝合输卵管；B组58例，行患侧输卵管开窗取胚术，术后不予缝合输卵管。两组术毕均予甲氨喋呤20 mg注射于病变输卵管处系膜，并行通液了解患侧输卵管通畅情况（对侧输卵管均通畅）。3个月后比较两组患侧输卵管的再通情况，并随访其近期（12个月内）宫内妊娠率、重复性异位妊娠率情况。 结果 A组54例患者术中患侧输卵管通畅48例，通而不畅6例；术后3个月B型超声监测下通液43例通畅，10例通而不畅，1例不通，通畅率79.63%。B组58例患者术中患侧输卵管通畅54例，4例通而不畅；术后3个月B型超声监测下通液37例通畅，13例通而不畅，8例不通，通畅率63.79%。近期（12个月内）宫内妊娠率、重复性异位妊娠率情况：A组54例，实访42例，宫内妊娠29例，占69.05%；重复性异位妊娠6例，占14.29%。B组58例，实访44例，宫内妊娠18例，占40.91%，重复性异位妊娠12例，占27.27%。A组术后患侧输卵管通畅率、宫内妊娠率高于B组，而重复性异位妊娠率明显降低，两组差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 腹腔镜下输卵管妊娠开窗取胚术后行输卵管缝合，可以减少对患侧输卵管损伤并恢复其正常的解剖结构，从而有效地保留患者生育功能。术后患侧输卵管通畅率、宫内妊娠率明显高于术后不缝合者，而重复性异位妊娠率明显降低。
目的比较外剥内扎（注射）加开窗治疗环状混合痔和传统外剥内扎法治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效。方法80例环状混合痔患者分别接受外剥内扎（注射）加开窗治疗和传统外剥内扎法治疗，对两种术式的疗效进行比较。结果2组患者术后均未发生肛门失禁症状，肛门功能的差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05），而治疗组患者肛门狭窄、肛门水肿和疼痛明显轻于对照组（Plt;0.05），尿潴留、切口愈合时间以及复发也明显少于对照组（Plt;0.05）。结论外剥内扎（注射）加开窗术是环状混合痔的较好治疗方案。