Objective To evaluate the short-term effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic versus conventional open left hepatectomy. Methods Databases including CENTRAL (Issue 1, 2012), MEDLINE/PubMed (1978 to 2012), EMbase (1966 to 2012), CBM (1978 to 2012), CNKI (1979 to 2012) and the Chinese Medical Association Figures Journal Systems (1990 to 2012) were searched to collect clinical trials on laparoscopic versus conventional open left hepatectomy. Relevant proceedings and references of the included studies were also retrieved manually. According to the inclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed quality. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan5.0 software. Results No randomized controlled trials were collected, and a total of 5 clinical concurrent controlled trials involving 319 patients were included finally. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the conventional open group, the laparoscopic group was longer in the operation time (WMD=40.89, 95%CI 29.39 to 55.38, Plt;0.000 01), and was lower in the intraoperative blood loss (WMD=−107.84, 95%CI −208.96 to −6.73, Plt;0.04); but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of hospital stays (WMD=−3.78, 95%CI −9.60 to 2.04, P=0.20) or postoperative complications (WMD=0.69, 95%CI 0.37 to 1.29, P=0.25). Conclusion As a minimally invasive technique, laparoscopic left hepatectomy has advantages of small abdominal incision and less intraoperative blood loss, and it is helpful to improve the quality of life for patients. Due to the limitation of quantity and quality of the included studies, it is hard to estimate the impact of bias on the reliability of this conclusion. We advise to perform more high quality, large scale and multicenter studies with adequate follow-up in the future.
Objective To assess the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) for women with benign gynecological diseases. Methods Such databases as CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library, Issue 5, 2012), MEDLINE, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM were searched from the date of their establishment to May 2012, meanwhile the relevant gray literature was also retrieved to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about LH versus abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for benign gynecological diseases. The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers independently, and the methodology quality was evaluated after extracting the data, then RevMan 5.1 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 22 RCTs involving 3 304 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with AH, LH was shorter in the time of both hospital stay (MD=–2.31, 95%CI –3.03 to –1.60, Plt;0.000 01) and postoperative recovery (MD=−13.86, 95%CI −17.70 to −10.03, Plt;0.000 01), and lower in the incidences of both postoperative fever and other nonspecific infections (OR=0.72, 95%CI 0.54 to 0.95, P=0.02), but it was higher in the incidence rate of intraoperative urinary systematic injuries (OR=2.41, 95%CI 1.21 to 4.82, P=0.012), and longer in the operation time (MD=20.27, 95%CI 3.95 to 36.59, P=0.03). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of complications such as intraoperative intestinal injuries, vessel injuries, postoperative fistulizaion, postoperative urethral dysfunction, postoperative vaginal infection, etc. (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion This systematic review shows when treating benign gynecological diseases, LH is superior to AH in shortening the time of hospital stay and postoperative recovery, and in decreasing the incidence of operative fever and other nonspecific infections, but it results in a higher incidence of intraoperative urinary systematic injuries and longer operative time. Because there is no result regarding to the postoperative long-term life quality, so it expects to be further proved by more high quality RCTs.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and cost of laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) vs. traditional abdominal myomectomy (TAM) in treating Chinese patients with hysteromyoma. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2012), PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data were searched from their inception to September, 2012 to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about LM vs. TAM in treating Chinese patients with hysteromyoma, and the references of the included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data and assessed the methodological quality. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. Results A total of 8 RCTs involving 1 000 Chinese patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, LM was superior to TAM in postoperative exhaust time (WMD= ?15.21, 95%CI ?20.19 to ?10.24, Plt;0.000 01) and postoperative hospital stay (WMD= ?3.07, 95%CI ?4.25 to ?1.90, Plt;0.000 01), with significant differences. But it was inferior to TAM in operation time (WMD=28.33, 95%CI 18.07 to 38.59, Plt;0.000 01) and hospital costs (WMD=2 028.87, 95%CI 1 190.75 to 2 866.98, Plt;0.000 01), with a significant difference. There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding amount between the two groups (WMD= ?2.78, 95%CI ?41.56 to 36.00, P=0.89). Conclusion This study shows LM is superior to TAM in fastening postoperative recovery and shortening hospital stay, but it is longer in operation time and higher in cost. The intraoperative bleeding amount is similar in the two groups. Due to low methodological quality and small sample size of the included studies, this conclusion has to be further proved by more high-quality RCTs.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) versus open hepatectomy (OH) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, MEDLINE, SCI, CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2012) were searched to collect the randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and non-RCTs about LH versus OH for HCC. The retrieval time was from inception to August 2012. The studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data were extracted and the quality was evaluated by 2 reviewers independently. Then the meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 13 non-RCTs involving 701 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: Compared with OH, LH had lesser amount of intraoperative bleeding (MD=?144.09, 95%CI ?194.25 to ?93.94, Plt;0.000 01), shorter hospital stay (MD=?5.48, 95%CI ?7.10 to ?3.85, Plt;0.000 01), and lower postoperative complications (OR=0.43, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.66, P=0.000 1). But there were no differences between the 2 groups in operation time (MD=?0.64, 95%CI ?22.95 to 21.68, P=0.96), perioperative death rate, 3-5 year survival rate, and tumor free survival rate. Conclusion LH is superior to OH in treating HCC for it is associated with smaller wound, lesser operative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and lower postoperative complications. And it is similar as OH in operation time, perioperative death rate and 3-5 year survival rate. So LH is safe and feasible for treating HCC when its indications are strictly controlled. However, for the quantity and quality limitation of the included studies, this conclusion still requires to be further proved by performing large scale and high quality RCTs. It suggests that doctors should choose a best therapy for HCC patients according to an integrative disease assessment.
Objective To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for endometrial cancer. Methods The databases such as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Ovid, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP were searched to collect the randomized control trials (RCTs) about the clinical effectiveness and safety of laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer. The retrieval time was from January 1998 to September 2012. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then the meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 10 RCTs involving 6 993 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that, compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy had lesser amount of intraoperative bleeding, lower decrease of hemoglobin before and 1-day after operation, shorter time of both waiting for postoperative gas and hospital stay, lower incidence of postoperative complications, longer operation time, and higher incidence of intraoperative complications. Additionally, there were no differences between the 2 groups in the number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes removed during operation, as well as the postoperative recurrence and mortality rates in 3-5 year follow-up. Conclusion Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy shows lesser amount of intraoperative bleeding, lower decrease of hemoglobin before and 1-day after operation, shorter time of both waiting for postoperative gas and hospital stay, lower incidence of postoperative complications. But laparotomy shows lower incidences of intraoperative complications, and shorter operation time. Both operations are similar in the number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes removed during operation, as well as the postoperative recurrence and mortality rates in 3-5 year follow-up. For quantity limitation and low methodological quality of included studies, this conclusion still needs to be further proved by performing more high-quality and large scale RCTs.
Objective To evaluate the efficiency and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and conventional open hepatectomy (OH) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1966~2008.3), EMBASE (1966~2008.3), CBM (1979~2008.3), we also handsearched some Chinese journals. Using a defined search strategy, randomized controlled trails and controlled clinical trials of comparing OH with LH for hepatocellular carcinoma were identified. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. The quality of the included trails was evaluated by Deeks JJ’s evaluation criterion. Meta–analysis was done using the Cochrane collaboration’s Revman 4.2.10. Results Seven controlled clinical trials (309 patients) were included, The meta–analysis showed that: (1) Four studies (n=198) reported mortality, the mortality rate of the LH group was not significantly different from that of the OH group [OR=1.14, 95%Cl (0.15, 8.65), P=0.90]; (2) Two studies (n=91) reported blood transfusion. There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in terms of the blood transfusion [OR=0.20, 95%Cl (0.03, 1.19), P=0.08]; (3) Four studies (n=165) reported operation time. There were significant differences in operating time between the two groups [SMD=1.05, 95%CI (0.72, 1.38), Plt;0.000 01]; (4) Four studies (n=165) reported intraoperative blood loss. There were significant differences in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups [SMD= – 1.56, 95%Cl (– 2.39, – 0.73), P=0.000 2]; (5) Five studies (n=210) reported the duration of hospital stay. There were significant differences in duration of hospital stay between the two groups [WMD= – 3.89, 95%CI (– 5.54, – 2.23), Plt;0.000 01]; (6) Two studies (n=248) reported complications. There were significant differences in complications between the two groups [OR=0.31, 95%Cl (0.13, 0.72), P=0.006]; (7) Two studies (n=97) reported ALT. There were significant differences in ALT between the two groups [SMD= – 1.54, 95%Cl (– 207, – 1.01), Plt;0.000 01]. Conclusion LH is associated with less postoperative complications, operative blood loss, duration of hospital stay and lower ALT, but longer operation time. However, the trails available for this systematic review are limited, so a prospective randomized controlled trial is warranted to fully investigate these and other outcome measures.
目的比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)与开腹阑尾切除术(OA)治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效和手术安全性。方法回顾性分析2010年7~12月期间的50例LA患者的临床资料，与同期55例施行OA的患者进行比较。结果LA组与OA组在手术时间及术中出血量方面差异均无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05); LA组术后肠功能恢复时间、下床活动时间及住院时间均明显短于OA组(Plt;0.05)，LA组镇痛药使用率及术后并发症发生率明显少于OA组(Plt;0.05); 但住院费用LA 组高于OA组(Plt;0.05)。结论LA在治疗阑尾炎方面有明显优势，值得推广。
Objective To compare the effectiveness between conventional open repair (OR) and endovascular repair (EVRAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods Between March 2000 and July 2011, 48 cases of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm were treated by conventional OR in 40 cases (OR group) or by EVRAR in 8 cases (EVRAR group). There was no significant difference in age, sex, the neck length (less than 2 cm), the neck angulation of aneurysm (more than60°), il iac severe tortuosity, preoperative systol ic pressure, and preoperative comorbidity between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The blood transfusion volume, operation time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative complications, reinterventions, and mortality were analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in 24-hour and 30-day mortality rates and non graft-related complications between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). EVRAR group was significantly better than OR group in blood transfusion volume, operation time, and ICU stay (P lt; 0.05), but OR group was significantly better than EVRAR group in reinterventions and graftrelated complications (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion EVRAR has obvious advantages in blood transfusion volume, operation time, and ICU stay, so it is feasible for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with precise anatomical suitability.
Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic resection for gastric stromal tumors. Methods The Literature published before November of 2010 was searched in PubMed, EMbase, Wiley Online Library, MEDLINE, CNKI, VIP, and CBM to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs about laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric stromal tumors. The literature was screened according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria by two reviewers independently, and the methodology quality was evaluated after abstracting the data, then the RevMan 5.0 software was used for Meta-analyses. Results Four quasi-RCTs and eight CCTs involving 496 patients were included. The results of Meta-analyses showed that, compared with the open resection surgery, the laparoscopic resection surgery significantly reduced the hospitalization duration (MD= –2.81, 95%CI –4.51 to –1.11), and the incidence of recurrence and metastasis (OR=0.36, 95%CI 0.13 to 1.01). No significant differences were found between the two groups in operation time, amount of bleeding, postoperative first flatus and oral intake, and total complication rate (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic resection surgery is safe to treat the patients with gastric stromal tumors, which may reduce the hospitalization duration and the incidence of recurrence and metastasis. Due to the poor quality and small sample size of included trials, more well-designed RCTs should be performed.
Objective To compare and assess the effectiveness between total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH), Laproscopical hysterectomy (LH) and minilaporotomy hysterectomy (MiniLPT). Methods We searched CBM, CKNJ, MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane DSR, ACP Journal Club, DARE, CCTR, CMR, HTA, and NHSEED to screen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing one surgical approach to another of extrafascial hysterectomy (between TVH, LH and miniLPT) which were done to those women with benign gynecological diseases. As to economy assessment, studies of cost-effective analysis were also included. Those observational studies reporting rare or important long-term outcome were also included. The quality of the included studies was evaluated by GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system and principle of Cochrane Reviewer Handbook 4.2.3 RCT. Results Finally, we identified 12 trials including 10 RCTs, 1 retrospective cohort study and 1 respective cohort study. Cost-effective analy- sis showed when in indication of VH, TVH was more cost-effective than LH. When TVH was less but still accessible, metaanalysis showed TVH had significant advantages than the other two approaches in many sides. Compared with LH arm, operation time was shorter at a WMD 47.2 min and 95%CI 32.2 to 62.3 min, blood loss was less at a WMD 158.7 ml and 95%CI – 190.9 to – 126.4 ml, hospital stay was shorter at a WMD 23.9 h and 95%CI – 25.4 to – 13.9 h, and the first stool or to break wind was quicker at a WMD – 8.1 h and 95%CI – 10.8 to – 5.3 h in TVH arm. But on the other side, the incidence rates of bad wound healing (such as vaginal cuff infection, abdominal wall infection, wound dehiscence, etc.), of secondary infection (such as UTI, URI, unknown infection, etc.), and of febrility were less common in LH arm than those in TVH arm with no significant difference. Meanwhile, ratio of sexual hypofunction, declined marital life quality and worse body image were more in TVH arm than those in LH arm, implying LH arm provided a better post-operation sexual life recovery. Operation time was longest in miniLPT arm at a WMD 37.0 h and 95%CI 13.5 to 60.5 h and blood loss was most at a WMD 208.5 ml and 95%CI 141.4 to 375.7 ml, too. The febrility rate was also the most common in miniLPT arm at a Peto OR 3.8 and 95% CI 1.1 to 12.6. The differences were significant. Conclusion TVH is the least invasive approach and better in cost-effectiveness when accessible. However, when inaccessible, the limitations remain unclear, depending on surgeons’ own techniques and experience as well as patients’ individual conditions. LH does better in improving quality of life and body image. Cost-effectiveness of LH may become much better by reducing blood loss during operation through improving techniques or instruments of hemostasis. Limited application of non-reproducible instrument or cost and promotion of their recycle may help a lot in bringing down LH operation cost, too. Owing to limited studies, the advantage of miniLPT should be evaluated more precisely by its technical development and more penetrating researches. There are huge gaps in standardized high-quality RCTs, performance and research of long-term outcomes and health economy comparing different approaches to total hysterectomy in China.