west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "引流管" 33 results
  • 鼓泡式改良左心引流管在心内直视手术中的应用

    目的介绍鼓泡式改良左心引流管在心内直视手术中的应用。方法138例先天性心脏病、风湿性心瓣膜病及其它心脏疾病患者在心内直视手术中采用鼓泡式改良左心引流管进行左心减压引流。结果全部患者置入鼓泡式改良左心引流管顺利,拔除不困难,引流效果良好。结论鼓泡式改良左心引流管在负压吸引过程中侧孔不容易因吸附被软组织堵塞,引流效果可靠。

    Release date:2016-08-30 06:25 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 食管癌术后不同引流方法的临床效果比较

    目的 探讨食管癌术后更有利于患者术后恢复及减少并发症发生的胸腔引流方法。 方法 泸州医学院附属医院对200例食管癌患者行外科手术治疗,按手术后放置胸腔引流管的数量不同分为两组,双胸腔引流管组(双引流管组):2008年8月至2009年8月收治的100例食管癌患者(男80例,女20例;年龄61.8±11.4岁),术后行双胸腔引流管引流;单胸腔引流管组(单引流管组):2006年1月至2008年7月收治的100例食管癌患者(男76例,女24例;年龄57.5±9.3岁)作为对照,术后均行单胸腔引流管引流。术后观察两组患者胸腔引流时间、胸腔引流总量、气胸或肺不张发生情况、术后拔管后胸腔穿刺或再次胸腔引流情况,并进行对比分析。 结果 双引流管组患者术后胸腔引流时间明显短于单引流管组(50.8±7.3 h vs. 75.6±9.4 h,Plt;0.05),术后气胸或肺不张发生率明显低于单引流管组(2% vs.12%,Plt;0.05)。双引流管组患者术后拔管后仅有2例因术侧胸腔内有残余积液需行胸腔穿刺,无须行再次胸腔引流;单引流管组拔管后有10例因胸腔内有积液或气胸需行胸腔穿刺,有6例需行再次胸腔引流,两组间比较差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。 结论 食管癌患者手术后放置双胸腔引流管引流更有利于肺充分复张,缩短胸腔引流时间,减少患者术后并发症的发生。

    Release date:2016-08-30 05:57 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Different methods to treat injured pleural following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting using an internal mammary artery: A randomised controlled trial

    ObjectiveThe pleural injury caused by harvesting internal mammary artery (LIMA) can significantly increase the possibility of early pleural effusion after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). We compared the differences in pleural effusion, pain severity, and early lung function in different treatments to find the optimal strategy.MethodsA total of 300 patients receiving OPCABG using LIMA with left pleural lesion were selected (176 males and 124 females, mean age of 63.1±8.7 years). After bypass surgery, patients with pleural rupture were randomly divided into three groups: group A (n=100) received a pericardial drainage tube and a left chest tube inserted from the midline (subxyphoid); group B (n=100) had a pericardial drainage tube and a tube placed in the sixth intercostal space at the midaxillary line; group C (n=100) with the broken pleura sutured, had a pericardial drainage tube and a mediastinal drainage tube inserted. All patients underwent pulmonary function testing and arterial blood gas analysis on postoperative days (PODs) 5. The three methods were analyzed and evaluated.ResultsTotal drainage: group B (852±285 ml)>group C (811±272 ml)>group A (703±226 ml); there was no significant difference between the group B and group C, but they were statistically different from the group A (P<0 05="" patients="" with="" pleural="" effusion="" after="" removal="" of="" drainage="" tubes:="" group="" a="" 13="" patients="">group B (7 patients)>group C (3 patients), and there was significant difference among the three groups (P<0 05="" pain="" sensation="" the="" day="" after="" extubation:="" group="" b="" 2="" 4="" 0="" 8="" 3="" 8="" 0="" 9="">group A (1.9±0.7, 3.3±0.8)>group C (1.1±0.6, 2.5±0.8), there was significant difference among the three groups (P<0 05="" pain="" sensationon="" on="" postoperative="" days="" 5:="" group="" b="" 0="" 3="" 0="" 2="" 0="" 6="" 0="" 5="">group A (0.3±0.3, 0.5±0.4)>group C (0.2±0.2, 0.5±0.3), and there was no significant difference among the three groups. Vital capacity on postoperative days 5: there was no significant difference between the group B and group C, and both groups were greater than group A (P<0.05). There was no difference in FEV1 and PCO2 among the three groups. Group C was better than group A in PO2 on postoperative day 5 (P<0.05).ConclusionSuturing the broken pleura during the operation can not only reduce the degree of postoperative pain but also have less pleural effusion and better pulmonary function. It can be used as the preferred method.

    Release date:2017-06-02 10:55 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 引流管固定器在“T”管固定中的效果分析

    目的 对比引流管固定器与传统固定方法在胆道术后患者“ T ”管固定中的效果。 方法 2012年2月-5月,将102例胆道术后留置“ T ”管的患者,按住院号随机分为试验组(52例)和对照组(50例),试验组在传统固定方法的基础上加用引流管固定器固定“ T ”管,对照组采用传统的方法固定“ T ”管,观察比较两种固定方法的效果。 结果 试验组“ T ”管固定良好,无松动和脱落情况发生,仅5例患者存在“ T ”管周围有疼痛刺激,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 采用引流管固定器固定“ T ”管能防止“ T ”管的松动和脱落,减轻患者“ T ”管周围的疼痛,且便于医护人员的观察和操作,值得临床推广使用。

    Release date:2016-09-07 02:34 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effect of metal-supported multi-sided foramen ultrafine drainage tube on the formation of thoracic residual cavity after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic upper lobectomy: A retrospective study in a single center

    ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of multi-sided foramen ultrafine drainage tube with metal support on the formation of thoracic residual cavity after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) upper lobectomy. MethodsThe clinical data of the patients who underwent uniportal VATS upper lobectomy for lung cancer in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from January 2021 to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the type of ultrafine drainage tube used in the surgery, the patients were divided into a test group (using metal-supported multi-sided foramen ultrafine drainage tube) and a control group (using ordinary 12F ultrafine drainage tube). The incidence of postoperative thoracic residual cavity and operation-related data were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 200 patients were enrolled, including 126 males and 74 females, with a mean age of 57.52 years. There were 90 patients in the test group, and 110 patients in the control group. The incidence of postoperative thoracic residual cavity in the test group was lower than that in the control group (P=0.045). The differences in the postoperative bedtime, postoperative visual analogue scale, postoperative analgesic pump using time, postoperative hospitalization time, times of postoperative thoracentration and drainage, postoperative drainage time and hospitalization cost between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidences of postoperative lung infection, pleural effusion and atelectasis complications were lower in the test group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The differences in the preoperative anesthesia time, operation time, intraoperative bleeding and postoperative lung leakage were not statistically significant (P>0.05). ConclusionThe use of multi-sided foramen ultrafine drainage tube with metal support can reduce the incidence of thoracic residual cavity after uniportal VATS upper lobectomy, and can reduce pain and economical burdens and the incidence of operation-related complications, accelerating the recovery of patients after surgery. The application of multi-sided foramen ultrafine drainage tube with metal support in uniportal VATS upper lobectomy can be widely used in the clinic.

    Release date:2024-02-20 04:11 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of non-drainage tube in thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection through the subxiphoid approach: A retrospective cohort study in a single center

    ObjectiveTo explore the clinical application effects of using no drainage tube in mediastinal tumor resection via thoracoscopic subxiphoid approach. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients who underwent mediastinal tumor resection via thoracoscopic subxiphoid approach at the Fourth People's Hospital of Zigong City from January 2020 to February 2024. Patients were divided into a non-drainage tube group and a drainage tube group, and their perioperative data were compared. ResultsA total of 149 patients were included, and there were 111 patients of thymoma, 5 patients of teratoma, and 33 patients of cyst. There were 77 patients in the non-drainage tube group, including 40 males and 37 females, aged 28-79 (53.72±13.34) years; there were 72 patients in the drainage tube group, including 33 males and 39 females, aged 26-80 (55.60±11.06) years. The differences in postoperative pain score at 48 hours, maximum postoperative pain score, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative drainage tube-related complications, and the number of temporary analgesics used after surgery between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). ConclusionThe use of non-drainage tube technology in mediastinal tumor resection through thoracoscopic subxiphoid approach can reduce postoperative pain and the number of temporary analgesics used, as well as decrease the incidence of drainage tube-related complications.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Clinical analysis of single mediastinal chest drains in perioperative period after thoracoscopic resection of esophageal carcinoma: A randomized controlled study

    ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effect of single mediastinal drainage tube and both mediastinal drainage tube and closed thoracic drainage tube for the patients who received thoracoscopic radical resection of esophageal carcinoma.MethodsWe enrolled 96 esophageal carcinoma patients who received thoracoscopic radical resection from June 2016 to October 2018. Of them, 49 patients were indwelt with both mediastinal drainage tube and closed thoracic drainage tube (a chest & mediastinal drainage group, a CMD group) while the other 47 patients were indwelt with single mediastinal drainage tube (a single mediastinal drainage group, a SMD group). The total drainage volume, intubation time and incidence of postoperative complications (postoperative atelectasis, pulmonary infection, pleural effusion and anastomotic leakage) between the two groups were compared. The pain score and comfort score were also compared between the two groups.ResultsThe total drainage volume and intubation time in the SMD group were not significantly different from those in the CMD group (1 321±421 mL vs. 1 204±545 mL, P=0.541; 6.1±3.7 d vs. 6.4 ±5.1 d, P=0.321). The incidence of postoperative complications (postoperative atelectasis, pulmonary infection, pleural effusion and anastomotic leakage) in the SMD group was not significantly different from that in the CMD group (10.6% vs. 6.1%, P=0.712; 4.3% vs. 10.2%, P=0.656; 6.4% vs. 12.2%, P=0.121; 2.1% vs. 4.1%, P=0.526). The numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores on the first to the fifth day after surgery and during extubation in the SMD group were significantly lower than those in the CMD group (3.2±2.1 vs. 5.1±2.4, P=0.041; 2.8±0.6 vs. 4.8±1.4, P=0.015; 2.1±0.4 vs. 4.5±0.4, P=0.019; 1.7±0.7 vs. 4.0±0.8, P=0.004; 1.8±0.7 vs. 3.2±1.2, P=0.006; 1.4±0.2 vs. 2.5±3.4, P=0.012). The VAS comfort scores in the SMD group were significantly lower than those in the CMD group (3.6±1.7 vs. 6.6±3.7, P=0.018; 2.9±2.0 vs. 5.1±3.4, P=0.007; 2.1±1.4 vs. 5.5±2.4, P=0.004; 3.0±0.9 vs. 4.6±3.8, P=0.012; 1.8±1.1 vs. 4.2±2.7, P=0.003; 2.4±3.2 vs. 5.3±1.7, P=0.020).ConclusionThe clinical effect of single mediastinal drainage tube in thoracoscopic resection of esophageal carcinoma is similar to that of both mediastinal drainage tube and closed thoracic drainage tube, but it can significantly improve the comfort of the patients.

    Release date:2019-12-13 03:50 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Analysis of Effect and Quality of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Common Bile Duct Exploration,Built-in-Tube Drainage, and Primary Suture

    ObjectiveTo compare and evaluate the effect and quality of T-tube drainage and bulit-in-tube drainage plus primary suture after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsA clinical trial was taken in 79 cases with T-tube drainage (control group) and 62 cases with built-in-tube drainage (observation group). The treatment success rate, incidence of complications, bilirubin recovered time, length of stay, recuperation time, and treatment cost were measured and compared between the two groups. ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in treatment success rate, incidences of complications, and bilirubin recovered time of patients (Pgt;0.05), while length of stay, recuperation time, and treatment cost of patients in observation group were significantly less than those in control group (Plt;0.05). ConclusionsBuilt-in-tube drainage plus primary suture after LC and common bile duct exploration could achieve the same therapeutic effect as the traditional T-tube drainage with less length of stay, recuperation time, and treatment cost.

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:41 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Assessment on Curative Effect of Peritoneal Drainage Tube Fixation with Titanium Clamp in 210 Patients During Laparoscopic Operation

     Objective To investigate the curative effect of peritoneal drainage tube fixation with titanium clamp in 210 patients during laparoscopic operations.  Methods The clinical data of 210 patients with peritoneal drainage fixation via titanium clamp during laparoscopic operations in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively.  Results In 210 patients, drainage tube placement lasted for 5-20 d with an average of 8.5 d. No complications such as drainage tube drifting, position changing or obstructed drainage occurred, and all the patients were successfully extubated.  Conclusion During laparoscopic operations, the method that drainage tube fixed with titanium clamp is simple with reliable drainage results, affirmed curative efficacy and obviously decreased operative complications, which is worthy of clinical practice and generalization.

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:52 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 胸外术后患者管道意外拔出原因分析及护理对策

    【摘要】 目的 总结胸外术后患者意外拔管的原因,积极完善护理管理措施。 方法 回顾性分析2010年1月-2010年12月术后发生的48例患者意外拔管事件的相关因素及处理措施。 结果 拔管者主要为60岁以上老年患者,夜间为意外拔管高发时段,拔管时间主要发生在术后3 d,多数患者因疼痛不适导致自行拔管,导管固定欠妥仅6例,占12.5%。 结论 增加夜间薄弱环节护士人手,加强巡视;充分镇痛,改善患者的疼痛度;妥善固定管道等护理措施,可以保证患者的护理安全,提高护理质量。

    Release date:2016-08-26 02:18 Export PDF Favorites Scan
4 pages Previous 1 2 3 4 Next

Format

Content