Objective?To compare the effect of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with that of multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) in the patients with newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes, and to provide evidence for clinical treatment. Methods?We searched MEDLINE and Chinese Science and Technology Full-text Database up to Dec. 2009 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that had been conducted with patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. The selection of studies, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0.23 software. The following outcomes were assessed: glycaemic control, insulin requirements, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, hypoglycaemia and diabetic remission after follow-up. Results?Eight RCTs involving 597 newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients were included. The methodological quality of the most studies was lower. The funnel plot comparing insulin requirement of CSII therapy with that of MDI therapy showed asymmetry, indicating that there was publication bias. The results of meta-analyses showed that: CSII had the same effect on improving fasting blood glucose (WMD= –0.21, 95%CI –0.42 to 0.00, P=0.05) and postprandial blood glucose (WMD= –0.24, 95CI% –0.57 to 0.08, P=0.14) as MDI in newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes. CSII therapy took 2.74 days fewer than MDI therapy (WMD= –2.74, 95CI% –3.33 to –2.16, Plt;0.000 01) and needed lower insulin requirements (reducing 7.78 units per day) (WMD= –7.78, 95CI% –9.25 to –6.31, Plt;0.000 01) to get target glucose control. The rate of hypoglycaemia of CSII therapy decreased 69% (OR= 0.31, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.80, P=0.01) compared with that of MDI. The rate of diabetes remission after short-term intensive insulin therapy increased 46% (OR=1.46, 95%CI 1.01 to 2.10, P=0.04) in CSII therapy compared with that in MDI therapy. Conclusion?In newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes, CSII therapy is better than MDI therapy. But because of the low quality of the included studies, the conclusion should be combined with patients and physicians’ experience, advantages and disadvantages in the clinical application.
【摘要】 目的 探讨胰岛素强化治疗对2型糖尿病（type 2 diabetes mellitus，T2DM）患者血清脂联素（adiponectin，APN）的影响。 方法 2007年7—12月，研究纳入连续使用胰岛素治疗至少3个月但血糖控制欠佳[6.5%≤糖化血红蛋白（hemoglobin A1c， HbA1c）≤11.0%]的T2DM患者40例，其中男18例，女22例；年龄29~〖JP2〗69岁；平均诊断T2DM病史11年。治疗方案为进行16周的胰岛素强化治疗，血糖控制目标为空腹血糖≤7 mmol/L，〖JP〗餐后2 h血糖≤8 mmol/L。分别于强化治疗前、强化治疗4周后及强化治疗16周后测定HbA1c以及血清APN水平。 结果 与强化治疗前相比，胰岛素治疗4周后空腹及三餐后2 h血糖明显下降（Plt;0.05），但HbA1c和血清APN水平差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）；强化16周后，HbA1c水平明显低于治疗前和治疗4周后且差异具有统计学意义（Plt;0.05），APN水平高于治疗前和治疗4周后且差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。体质量指数在强化治疗16周后明显增加且与强化治疗前和强化治疗后4周相比差异具有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。APN与空腹血糖（b=-0.225，P=0.013）、早餐后2 h血糖（b=-0.229，P=0.012）呈负相关。 结论 胰岛素强化治疗可以提高T2DM患者血清APN水平。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effect of intensive insulin therapy on serum adiponectin (APN) level in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods Forty patients with T2DM who had undergone insulin therapy for at least three months but with their blood glucose poorly controlled [glycosylated hemoglobin Alc (HbA1c) level ranged from 6.5% to 10.0%] from July to December 2007 were enrolled in this study. There were 18 males and 22 females with their age ranged from 29 to 69 years. They had an average time of T2DM history of 11 years. Intensive insulin therapy was carried out for 16 weeks with a target of less than 7 mmol/L for fasting blood glucose and 8 mmol/L for postprandial blood glucose. HbA1c and serum adiponectin concentrations were detected at baseline, at week 4 after intensive therapy and at the end of the study. Results After 4 weeks of intensive blood glucose control, fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels decreased significantly (Plt;0.05), but the HbA1c and serum APN concentrations did not reduce remarkably (Pgt;0.05). After 16 weeks of treatment, the level of HbA1c was significantly lower than those at baseline and 4 weeks after treatment (Plt;0.05), and serum APN concentration increased significantly (Plt;0.05), compared with those two time points. However, an evident increase of body mass index (BMI) was found while compared with BMI at baseline and 4 weeks after treatment (Plt;0.05). The linear regression analysis indicated that APN was negatively associated with fasting blood glucose (b=-0.225,P=0.013) and blood glucose level 2 hours after breakfast (b=-0.229,P=0.012). Conclusion Intensive insulin therapy can improve serum adiponectin level in type-2 diabetic patients.
摘要:目的:了解糖尿病患者胰岛素泵强化治疗的护理特点并观察其疗效。方法:对158例糖尿病胰岛素泵治疗的患者进行心理、技术等综合护理。结果:158例患者用胰岛素泵强化治疗后血糖控制良好,生活质量明显提高。结论:胰岛素泵在强化治疗糖尿病方面提供了前所未有的安全、可靠、方便及灵活性,是强化治疗的最佳手段。综合护理是胰岛素泵强化治疗的保障。Abstract: Objective: To understand the insulin pump treatment of diabetes care characteristics and observe the effect. Methods: 158 patients with diabetes insulin pump therapy in patients with psychological, technology and other comprehensive care. Results: 158 patients were treated with insulin pump therapy a good blood sugar control and quality of life improved markedly. Conclusion: The diabetic insulin pump in intensive therapy has provided an unprecedented security, reliability, convenience and flexibility, is to strengthen the best means of treatment. Integrated care is the protection of insulin pump therapy.