Running an infection control regular meeting is an effective way to develop and improve the communication between the infection control team and clinical units. This paper introduces the infection control regular monthly meeting which is held in the last week of each month in a newly-opened branch hospital of a university teaching hospital in China. Through collecting the issues for discussion beforehand, feeding back the surveillance data of last month including nosocomial infection, hand hygiene, multidrug-resistant organisms, occupational exposure, and medical waste, discussing the current infection control issues from each ward and trying to solve them together, and delivering and sharing new knowledge, skills, and information in terms of infection control, the monthly meeting achieves remarkable successes in the aspects of promoting the hospital infection control-related cultural construction, enhancing the supervision and implementation of infection control measures, and running new projects on hospital infection management, etc. Infection control regular monthly meeting builds up a study and work platform, promotes the multidisciplinary and multi-department communication and collaboration, and improves the quality of infection control eventually.
【摘要】 目的 了解学生对医院感染职业防护的基础知识的认知程度和学习需求。 方法 2010年3月采用自行设计问卷，对参加《医院感染与职业防护》课程学习的医学学生进行摸底调查。 结果 92.73%不知道标准预防措施和锐器伤后的正确处理方法及补救措施；27.27%不知道抽血时应戴手套；25.45%不清楚医务人员“六步洗手法”；90.91%不知晓工作服应交医院统一洗涤。 结论 学生防护知识薄弱，防护行为不全面、不规范。教学应重点帮助学生树立标准预防观念，掌握正确职业防护知识，在临床工作中以避免和减少各种危险因素的侵袭。【Abstract】 Objective To examine and evaluate the students’ knowledge and needs in studying hospital infection control and occupational protection. Methods Using a self-designed questionnaire in March 2010, we did a survey on students who attended the course of hospital infection control and occupational protection. Results Among all the students, 92.73% did not know standard prevention measures, and the correct treatment and remedial measures for sharp injuries; 27.27% did not know gloves should be worn at the time of blood drawing; 25.45% did not know the "six-step" hand-washing; and less than one out of ten students used hospital laundry to wash their uniform. Conclusions The students have a low level of relevant knowledge on occupational protection, and their protection behaviors were not complete or standard. Therefore, the teaching should help and support students to have a concept of standard prevention, and acquire sound knowledge and behavior of occupational protection in order to avoid and reduce the risk factors from their future clinical practices.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors for hospital infection in the medical physical examination center of a newly opened hospital, and to explore its prevention and control measures. MethodsBetween April and December 2012, we analyzed the risk factors for hospital infection in the physical examination center of a new hospital. A series of hospital infection prevention and control measures such as carrying out education and training of medical personnel, strengthening the prevention of needle stick injuries, implementing strict disinfection and sterilization, improving environmental hygiene, and implementing medical waste management, were developed. ResultsMedical staff's knowledge of disinfection and sterilization was improved; hand hygiene compliance was increased; hospital environmental hygiene was promoted, and medical waste was properly sorted out. ConclusionTaking reasonable measures for infection prevention and control can increase medical staff's awareness of hospital infection prevention and control, improve their practices of infection control and prevent hospital infections from occurring eventually.
ObjectiveTo compare the point prevalence of nosocomial infection in a comprehensive hospital between 2014 and 2015, and to put forward prevention and control measures so as to reduce the incidence of nosocomial infection. MethodsBy means of reviewing electronical medical records and beside investigation, the prevalence rates of nosocomial infection in patients hospitalized on June 4, 2014 and June 16, 2015 were investigated. Data were collected by a uniform questionnaire and analyzed by Excel 2007 and SPSS 18.0. ResultsThe nosocomial infection rates in those two time points were respectively 4.51% and 3.21% without a significant difference (χ2=2.246, P=0.134). Intensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery and Department of Orthopedics were listed in the top five in terms of nosocomial infection rate for two consecutive years. The nosocomial infection sites were mainly lower respiratory tract, and a total of 64 strains were detected including mainly G? bacteria accounting for 76.6%. Antimicrobial agent usage covered 34.05% and 33.33% at those two time points. The purpose was mainly for therapy, and the pathogenic bacteria specimen detection rate was 68.06% and 59.73%, without statistically significant difference (χ2=0.114, 3.311; P>0.05). ConclusionThe prevalence of nosocomial infection in this hospital is at average national level but higher than the average level in Sichuan Province. Infection surveillance, prevention and control measures should be strengthened in key departments and key infection sites, and antimicrobial agent should be rationally used so as to reduce the incidence of nosocomial infection.
ObjectiveTo understand the characteristics of and risk factors for nosocomial infection in a newly built branch of a university teaching hospital, in order to investigate the control measures for prevention and control of nosocomial infection. MethodsA total of 598 cases of nosocomial infection from April 2012 to June 2014 were enrolled in this study. We analyzed statistically such indexes as nosocomial infection rate, infection site, pathogen detection, and use of antibiotics. Meantime, infection point-prevalence survey was introduced by means of medical record checking and bedside visiting. ResultsAmong all the 44 085 discharged patients between April 2012 and June 2014, there were 598 cases of nosocomial infection with an infection rate of 1.36%. Departments with a high nosocomial infection rate included Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (9.79%), Department of Orthopedics (2.98%), Department of Geriatrics (2.62%), and Department of Hematology (1.64%). The top four nosocomial infection sites were lower respiratory tract (45.32%), urinary tract (13.21%), operative incision (8.86%), and blood stream (8.86%). The samples of 570 nosocomial infections were delivered for examination with a sample-delivering rate of 95.32%. The most common pathogens were acinetobacter Baumanii (17.02%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.21%), Escherichia coli (13.68%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11.93%), and Staphylococcus aureus (9.12%). And urinary tract intubation (42.81%), admission of ICU (28.60%), and application of corticosteroid and immunosuppressive agents (26.42%) were the top three independent risk factors for nosocomial infection. ConclusionGeneral and comprehensive monitoring is an effective method for the hospital to detect high-risk departments, factors and patients for nosocomial infection, providing a theoretical basis for prevention and control of nosocomial infection.
ObjectiveTo investigate the management of hospital infection control of 23 hospitals in Sichuan province, China for making the questionnaires and providing basic data of the China-U.S. cooperative program on emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases "The Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Project in China". MethodsWe selected 23 representative hospitals from different regions of Sichuan in the survey for the management of hospital infection control. The survey included basic situation of the hospital such as the hospital level, ownership, number of beds, employees and discharged patients, the situation of hospital infection management such as the organization of management, the previous surveillance for prevalence of nosocomial infection, the composition of the staff, and the distribution pattern of important pathogens. ResultsThere were 18 Triple A hospitals, 1 Double A hospital, 4 Triple B hospitals were investigated, of which there were21 general hospitals and 2 specialty hospitals. The total number of patient beds were 26 801. The total numbers of staff were 32 757 including 8 571 doctors, 13 611 nurses, 1 391 technicians and 1 014 pharmacists. In 2010, the total numbers of out-patients, operations, and discharged patients were 16 127 038, 334 057, and 776 806, and the length of mean hospital stays were 11.30 days. All hospitals established the hospital infection control department with 105 infection control professionals. Most of the staffs of infection control department had medical or nursing background with college, or undergraduate level. Nineteen hospitals (82.61%) did the surveillance for the prevalence of nosocomial infection. The last surveillance showed the mean rate of hospital infection was 2.58%. Lower respiratory tract, upper respiratory tract and surgical site infection were top three infections. The annual number of culture specimens totalled 267 061; the average positive rate was 33.06%. Escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumoniae, pseudomonasaeruginosa, staphylococcus aureus and acinetobacter baumannii were top five infectious bacteria. ConclusionThe survey on the hospital infection control management could help us understand the overall situation of the hospital infection control. Also it could found the weaknesses and targeted interventions for the future project, and ensure the authenticity and reliability of the data for this research project eventually.
ObjectiveTo optimize procedures of going out for examination for patients with multidrug-resistant organism, strengthen prevention and control management of nosocomial infection, and prevent nosocomial infection.MethodsPatients with multidrug-resistant organism who went out for examination were selected from April to November 2018. April to July 2018 (before implementation) was process construction stage, and August to November 2018 (after implementation) was process optimization implementation stage. In April 2018, process and management system of going out for multidrug-resistant organism patients were formulated, training of transporters was strengthened, and measures such as checklist identification, accompany patients for examination, patient handover, isolation and protection, and disinfection of materials were implemented, to realize the infection prevention and control management in the whole process of going out for multidrug-resistant organism patients. We compared relevant indicators before and after implementation.ResultsA total of 262 cases times of patients with multidrug-resistant organism were included, including 134 cases times before implementation and 128 cases times after implementation. Compared with before implementation, the hand hygiene, wearing gloves, disinfection of inspection instruments and articles, patient transfer, isolation measures in waiting process (special elevator, isolation after waiting for inspection, arrange inspection time reasonably), education and training after implementation improved(P<0.05). Before and after implementation, the Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus detection rate difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionsThe optimization of procedures of examination for patients with multidrug-resistant organism can increase implementation rate of indirect indicators such as hand hygiene, disinfection of inspection instruments and articles, isolation and protection, education and training in the prevention and control of multidrug-resistant organism in nosocomial infection. And it is important for the prevention and control of multi-disciplinary collaboration of multidrug-resistant organism.
目的 了解艾滋病高发区医务人员血源防护情况以及培训所取得的效果。 方法 采用自行设计的问卷，对凉山州某医院参加培训的职工进行培训前后调查。 结果 培训前89人参加调查，培训后93人参加调查；女性、护士和初级职称者占绝大多数；培训前调查参加者中84.3%接受过预防锐器伤培训，79.8%工作中被锐器刺伤，38.2%报告过职业暴露，95.5%接种过乙肝疫苗；6道知识考核题培训后答对率比培训前均有不同程度的提高，其中4道比较具有统计学上的意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 该院医务人员已具备一定职业防护意识，对一些知识点掌握较好，但培训强化可提高职业暴露报告依从性和预防治疗及时性，更好维护艾滋病高发区医务人员的职业健康。
ObjectiveTo study the feasibility of using paper hand towels instead of sterilized hand towels in non-rinse surgical hand antisepsis, and make a hygienic and economic evaluation on sterilized hand towels and paper hand towels.MethodsFrom July to September 2016, a cluster sampling method was used to study the hand samples of all health care workers who performed surgical hand sanitization in the operating room on Thursday. According to their work contents, they were asigned into the intervention group (using paper hand towels to dry hands) and the control group (using sterilized hand towels to dry hands); further, according to the odd or even number of the staff identification number, the intervention group was divided into Group A (using Likang hand towels to dry hands) and Group B (using Qingfeng hand towels to dry hands). The packing specifications and costs of hand-drying items in the warehouse were surveyed, as well as the average number of medical workers performing an operation and the number of sheets of sterilized hand towels or paper hand towels used per person, and the cost of different hand dryers for each procedure was calculated. Finally, the hygienic and economic effects of using paper hand towels were evaluated.ResultsThere were 30, 39, and 30 hand hygiene samples collected in the control group, Group A, and Group B, respectively. The total bacterial count of each group was less than 5 cfu/cm2, which met the hygienic requirements of surgical hand disinfection in the manual hygiene standard for medical personnel (WS/T 313－2019), i.e., the passing rate of each group was 100%. According to the calculation that each operation required at least 4 medical workers, each operation consumed 8 sterilized hand towels at a cost of 15.2 yuan; if using paper hand towels, each operation consumed 16 sheets at a cost of 0.8 yuan.ConclusionThe hygienic effect of surgical hand disinfection is not affected by the use of paper hand towels before applying hand sanitizer, while the operating cost of hospital operating room can be significantly reduced by using paper hand towels instead of sterilized hand towels.