摘要:目的:分析微创外科室间隔缺损(ventricular septal defect,VSD)封堵失败原因,以期提高术前超声心动图筛查水平。方法:回顾性分析25例微创外科VSD封堵失败改行修补术病例,对比超声表现及手术所见,归纳总结产生并发症的原因。结果:残余分流与VSD假性膜部瘤右室面具有多个出口和低估VSD大小密切相关;VSD合并主动脉瓣右冠瓣脱垂是主动脉瓣反流的主要原因;封堵器移位与低估VSD大小且使用偏心封堵器有关;原有三尖瓣反流加重和发生Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞VSD均位于隔瓣下方;封堵失败组较封堵成功组缺损偏大,差异具有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。结论:超声心动图对VSD及其毗邻结构的细致评估,有助于严格适应证,提高手术成功率。 Abstract: Objective:To analyze the failure of perventricular closure of ventricular septal defect (VSD), in order to improve the preoperative echocardiography examination. Methods: Twentyfive cases underwent surgical repair after failure of perventricular closure of VSD were included in this study. With combination of echocardiographic and surgical findings, retrospective analysis of the failure of perventricular closure of VSD were attempted to summarize the cause of complications.Results: Residual ventricular communication was due to underestimation of size of VSD and pseudomembranous aneurysm resulting in multiple outlets of VSD on the right ventricle side; preoperative prolapse of rightcoronary cusp was the main reason for mild or greater than mild aortic valve regurgitation after eccentric device closure of VSD; Underestimation of the size of VSD and using eccentric occluder device were responsible for the displacement of VSD occluder device. Postoperative aggravated tricuspid regurgitation and Ⅲ°atrialventricular block (AVB) were attributed to VSDs located under the septal leaflet of tricuspid valve. The size of VSD in group of failed perventricular device closure of VSD was larger than that in group of successful device closure of VSD,and the difference was significant(Plt;0.05). Conclusion: Echocardiography vividly reveals VSD and adjacent structures, which should be used in accessing the anomaly and defect and formulating surgical plans to reduce surgical morbidity and mortality.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of minimally invasive osteosynthesis using the helical plate for complex humeral shaft fractures involved proximal metaphysis, and to explore its feasibility and security. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 16 patients with complex humeral shaft fractures involved proximal metaphysis who underwent minimally invasive osteosynthesis with the helical plate between December 2009 and May 2015. There were 11 males and 5 females, aged from 18 to 56 years (mean, 34.6 years). The causes of fracture included falling injury in 5 cases, falling injury from height in 3 cases, traffic accident injury in 4 cases, sports injury in 3 cases, and belts twisted injury in 1 case. Accroding to Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classifications, 6 cases were rated as type 12-C1, 3 cases as type 12-C2, and 7 cases as type 12-C3. The time between injury and operation was 2-13 days (mean, 7.2 days). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, union time were recorded, the functional outcome of the elbow joint was evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score, and the function of the shoulder was assessed by the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale. ResultsThe mean operation time was 92 minutes (range, 51-127 minutes), and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 212 mL (range, 100-450 mL). All incisions healed by first intention without neurologic complications or wound infection. All patients were followed up 8-28 months (mean, 16.6 months), and bony union was obtained at 13-36 weeks (mean, 19.2 weeks). No loosening or breakage of internal fixation occurred. The Mayo elbow performance score was 90-100 (mean, 99), and the UCLA shoulder rating scale was 31-35 (mean, 34.6). ConclusionThe technique of minimally invasive osteosynthesis using the helical plate is safe and feasible for humeral shaft fracture, especially for complex humeral shaft fractures involved proximal metaphysis, and it has the advantages of minimal invasion and low risk for iatrogenic nerve injury and satisfactory effectiveness.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of a novel minimally invasive Achilles tendon suture instrument in the treatment of fresh closed Achilles tendon rupture. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 150 patients who underwent surgical intervention for fresh closed Achilles tendon rupture. Eighty patients were treated with the novel minimally invasive Achilles tendon suture instrument (minimally invasive group) and 70 patients with traditional open surgery (traditional group). The two groups were comparable in terms of gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, the interval between injury and operation, and the distance from the fracture end to the calcaneal tuberosity (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, hospital stays, hospitalization expenses, and complications were recorded and compared. At 1 year after operation, the ankle joint function was evaluated by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score. Results The minimally invasive group demonstrated significantly shorter operation time, smaller incision length, and lower intraoperative blood loss when compared with the traditional group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in terms of hospital stays and hospitalization expenses between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-24 months after operation (mean, 15.5 months). In the traditional group, 6 cases of incision necrosis and 7 cases of Achilles tendon adhesion occurred, while in the minimally invasive group, all incisions healed at first intention and no Achilles tendon adhesion occurred. The differences in the incidences of the two complications between the two groups were significant (P<0.05). At 1 year after operation, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score in the minimally invasive group was superior to that of the traditional group (P<0.05). Conclusion In comparison with traditional open surgery, the use of self-designed novel minimally invasive Achilles tendon suture instrument proves to be an ideal technique for treating fresh closed Achilles tendon ruptures. This approach offers the benefits of smaller incisions, fewer complications, and better postoperative functional recovery, without increasing hospital costs.
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of decompression without gastric tube after minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery.MethodsSeventy-two patients who underwent minimally invasive esophageal cancer resection at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from 2016 to 2018 were selected as a trial group including 68 males and 4 females with an average age of 58.5±7.9 years, who did not use gastric tube for gastrointestinal decompression after surgery. Seventy patients who underwent the same operation from 2013 to 2015 were selected as the control group, including 68 males and 2 females, with an average age of 59.1±6.9 years, who were indwelled with gastric tube for decompression after surgery. We observed and compared the intraoperative and postoperative indicators and complications of the two groups.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative level of serum albumin, postoperative nasal jejunal nutrition, whether to enter the ICU postoperatively, death within 30 days after surgery, anastomotic leakage, lung infection, vomiting, bloating or hoarseness (P>0.05). No gastroparesis occurred in either group. Compared with the control group, the recovery time of the bowel sounds and the first exhaust time after the indwelling in the trial group were significantly shorter, and the total hospitalization cost, the incidence of nausea, sore throat, cough, foreign body sensation and sputum difficulty were significantly lower (P<0.05).ConclusionIt is feasible to remove the gastric tube for gastrointestinal decompression after minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery, which will not increase the incidence of postoperative complications, instead, accelerate the postoperative recovery of patients.
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in pancreatic cancer.MethodRecent literatures related to robot-assisted surgery in treatment of pancreatic cancer compared with traditional open surgery or traditional laparoscopic surgery were collected to make an review.ResultsCompared with the traditional laparoscopic surgery, the robot-assisted surgery was expensive, with the obvious advantages in terms of anastomosis and reconstruction. Compared with the open operation, both robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy had longer operation time, but the length of hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss were obviously shortened, robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy also had higher spleen preservation rate. Compared with the traditional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, the number of lymph node retrieved, R0 resection rate, and splenic preservation rate were also higher in the robot-assisted group. Simultaneously, robot-assisted total pancreatectomy and midsection pancreatectomy were deemed as safe in some high-volume centers.ConclusionsRobot-assisted pancreatic cancer surgery is safe and feasible, but many surgeries are restricted to a small number of high-volume medical centers, and most cases selected to undergo robot-assisted surgery are often early stage patients with small tumor size. A lot of efforts should be made and problems should be solved.
Objective To explore an effective micro-traumatechnic with small incision for hallux valgus. Methods From August 2002 to June 2004, 136 cases (263 feet) with hallux valgus were treated with micro-trauma technic with small incision and postoperative external elastic fixation. Of all the cases, 7 were males and 129 werefemales. Their ages ranged from 19 to 84 years. According to Coughlin classification, there were 24 gentle cases, 63 medium cases, and 49 severe cases. All the feet were with some degree of pain and flatfoot. Symptom, sign and theresults of X-ray were evaluated. Results Wound healed at stage Ⅰ.All cases were followed up for 8 to 26 months, 19 months on average. Hallux valgus of the 263 feet were completely healed, feet pain disappeared, and no nonunion or osteonecrosis was observed. Xray examination indicated that 105 feet’s hallux valgus angle was less than 12°, inter metatarsal angle less than 9°, and remedy subluxation of the tibial sesamoid less than 50%. Evaluation on the result indicated that there were 84 cases of excellent result, 48 cases of good result, 3 cases of fair result, and 1 case of poor result. The rate of excellent and good was 97%. Conclusion With less injury, less pain, complete restoration, and fewer possibility of relapse, microtrauma technic with small incision is effective in treating hallux valgus.
ObjectiveTo investigate and compare the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stone. MethodsThe eligible patients with gallbladder stones hospitalized in our department between January 2007 and December 2011 were included, and all of them received either laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy (observation group) or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (control group) minimally-invasive surgery. The operation time, bleeding volume, enterokinesia recovery time, hospital stay, post-operative complication and follow-up results were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 148 patients were included, with 68 patients in the observation group and 80 patients in the control group. In this cohort, the success rate of surgery for the observation group and the control group was 100.0% (68/68) and 98.8% (79/80), respectively; and the success rate of complete stone removal was 100% for both two groups. B-ultrasound examination after 2 weeks of treatment showed that gallbladder wall was normal and gallbladder contraction rate was more than 30% for all patients with laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy. The operation time was (49.6±5.2) minutes for the observation group and (50.5±6.2) minutes for the control group, and bleeding volume was (9.5±1.4) mL for the observation group and (50.2±8.1) mL for the control group; the difference in bleeding volume was significant between the two groups (P<0.05). The difference in enterokinesia recovery time[(33.9±2.2) and (34.4±2.6) minutes] or hospital stay[(3.4±1.0) and (3.6±1.2) days] between the observation group and the control group was not significant (both P >0.05). The post-operative complications of bleeding, bile leakage and wound infection were not observed in both two groups, and all patients were followed up for 6 to 12 months with no stone recurrence; and only 2.7% of patients (1/37) had stone recurrence after 3-year follow-up. ConclusionBoth laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures are safe and efficient. However, laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy not only reserves gallbladder but also has superiority of less bleeding volume.
ObjectiveTo investigate the early effctiveness of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with pedicle screw fixation via small incision Wiltse approach for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.MethodsBetween January 2016 and December 2016, 21 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated with OLIF and pedicle screw fixation via small incision Wiltse approach. There were 9 males and 12 females, aged 57-73 years, with an average age of 64.5 years. The disease duration was 24-60 months, with an average of 34.6 months. All cases were spondylolisthesis at L4 (15 cases of degreeⅠ, 6 cases of degreeⅡ); 1 case had vertebral arch isthmus, and 20 cases had spinal stenosis. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system was used to evaluate the effectiveness before operation and at last follow-up. Before operation and at 2 days after operation, anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and CT were taken to measure the sagittal diameter and cross-sectional area of the spinal canal, and calculate the intervertebral height and degree of spondylolisthesis. At 6 months after operation, the intervertebral fusion was evaluated by CT.ResultsThe operation time was 120-180 minutes, with an average of 155 minutes; the intraoperative blood loss was 100-340 mL, with an average of 225.5 mL. One patient had slight injury of lower endplate, 1 patient had numbness of thigh and weakness of hip flexion after operation, 1 patient had sympathetic nerve trunk injury. All the cases were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 14.3 months. The symptoms of low back pain, leg pain, and numbness of lower limbs significantly relieved after operation, and there was no complication such as protrusion of fusion cage, screw breakage, and endplate collapse. At 2 days after operation, the intervertebral height, degree of spondylolisthesis, sagittal diameter of spinal canal, and cross-sectional area of spinal canal significantly improved compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, CT showed that 1 patient had poor interbody fusion (grade Ⅲ), the other 20 patients had good interbody fusion (grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ), and the interbody fusion rate was 95.2%. At last follow-up, JOA score of lumbar spine significantly increased compared with that before operation (t=24.980, P=0.000).ConclusionOLIF combined with pedicle screw fixation via small incision Wiltse approach for the lumbar spondylolisthesis has minimally invasive features, such as less trauma, fewer complications, and higher intervertebral fusion rate. It is a safe and effective method.