Objective To summarize contents of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and understand it’s status and prospect in application of patients with hepatolithiasis. Methods The descriptions of ERAS in recent years and applications in hepatolithiasis were reviewed. Results The ERAS programme mainly included the preoperative managements, such as the education, nutrition management, and gastrointestinal tract management; the intraoperative managements, such as the minimally invasive surgery, reasonable choice of anesthesia, infusion volume management, and maintenance of body temperature, analgesia, and preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting medication selection; the postoperative early feeding, early exercise, early extubation, multimodal analgesia, T tube management, reasonable discharge standard and follow-up management. Although the ERAS was rarely reported in patients with hepatolithiasis, it had some advantages of promoting recovery and improving patient satisfaction, and it was still effective and safe. Conclusions Application of ERAS concept in patients with hepatolithiasis has achieved precision management and individualized treatment during perioperative period. It could achieve a good short-term therapeutic effect and optimize medical management model. However, there are still some problems at the present stage in implementation and promotion of patients with hepatolithiasis, such as lacks of criteria and specifications, evidence-based medicine. It is needed to further strengthen communication and collaboration among multiple disciplinary teams so as to further improve ERAS programme and popularize it.
Objective To explore the variation about the application of fast-track surgery and laparoscopy in treatment for colorectal cancer in recent years． To investigate the probability of combining protocols of the two for treatment for colorectal cancer. Methods The clinical and basic literatures of related researches about colorectal treatment of laparoscopy and fast-track surgery were collected and reviewed. Results Compared with the traditional treatment modalities, both of fast-track surgery and laparoscopy used for the treatment of colorectal cancer have better clinical effects. Conclusions Fast-track surgery and laparoscopic techniques used for the treatment of colorectal cancer are feasible, but the combination of the two should be confirmed by further randomized controlled trials.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of fast track surgery (FTS) on clinical parameters and postoperative complications in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). MethodFifty Patients with AAA treated in our hospital between December 2009 and May 2015 were enrolled in this study. Ten patients between December 2009 and December 2012 received conventional standard care (conventional group), while 50 between January 2013 and May 2015 received FTS (FTS group). The first exhaust time, the first time of off-bed activities, the duration of hospital stays, and the complications after AAA surgery were analyzed. ResultsThe first exhaust time of patients in the FTS group and conventional group was (2.5±0.9) and (4.0±1.1) days; the first time of off-bed activities was (2.9±1.0) and (4.1±0.9) days; and the duration of hospital stays was (13.5±2.1) and (17.9±2.8) days. All those differences were significant (P<0.05). The incidences of incision infection, renal inadequacy, lower limb swelling, and weakened gastric function in the FTS group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). On the third day after surgery, C-reactive protein in the FTS and conventional group was respectively (57.5±9.0) and (65.0±13.1) mg/L, and interleukin-6 was respectively (10.2±3.9) and (15.5±5.1) pg/L, both of which were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). ConclusionsFast track surgery is effective and safe in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm, and it may lower trauma stress after surgery and incidence of postoperative complications.
ObjectiveTo analyze the postoperative drainage volume and its influencing factors in lumbar posterior surgery.MethodsA total of 158 patients undergoing lumbar posterior surgery in West China Hospital, Sichuan University between October 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The data about general information and perioperative drainage were collected retrospectively according to recording tables and analyzed by SPSS (version 22) software. The drainage volume was presented with median (lower quartile, upper quartile).ResultsThe final average drainage volume was 360 (200, 650) mL, and the length of time for drainage tube placement was from 9 to187 hours with the median (lower quartile, upper quartile) of 61 (40, 86) hours. The result of multiple linear regression showed that immediate drainage volume when returning to the ward [non-standardized partial regression coefficient (b)=0.268, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.191, 0.345), P<0.001], length of time for drainage tube placement [b=0.554, 95%CI (0.338, 0.769), P<0.001], intra-operative bleeding volume [b=0.161, 95%CI (0.044, 0.277), P=0.007], and surgical methods [Method 3 as the reference, Method 1: b=0.599, 95%CI (0.369, 0.828), P<0.001; Method 2: b=0.574, 95%CI (0.336, 0.812), P<0.001] were the main factors affecting the final drainage volume.ConclusionsThe final drainage volume of lumbar posterior surgery is so large that it should be paid attention to. It is also necessary to take effective interventions according to different surgical methods, intraoperative bleeding, immediate drainage when returning to the ward, length of time for drainage tube placement, and other different circumstances to reduce the drainage to achieve enhanced recovery after surgery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of fast track surgery (FTS) in rib fracture fixation. MethodsFifty-two patients with chest trauma who underwent rib fracture fixation surgery in Mingji Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from October 2010 to June 2013 were enrolled in this study. All the patients were divided into FTS group and control group. In the FTS group, there were 26 patients including 22 males and 4 females with their age of 45.62±8.20 years, who received FTS strategies. In the control group, there were 26 patients including 21 males and 5 females with their age of 46.42±7.60 years, who received traditional treatment strategies. Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), gastrointestinal function recovery time, postoperative hospital stay and hospitalization cost were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsVAS at 6 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively of FTS group (4.5±0.3, 4.2±0.2, 3.2±0.1) were significantly lower than those of the control group (6.5±0.1, 6.1±0.3, 4.8±0.2) respectively (P < 0.05). Gastrointestinal function recovery time of FTS group (0.8±0.2 days) was significantly shorter than that of the control group (1.5±0.5 days, P < 0.05). Length of hospital stay (21.0±2.6 days) and hospitalization cost (5.18±0.75 ten thousand yuan) of FTS group were significantly shorter or lower than those of the control group (26.2±3.4 days and 5.78±0.64 ten thousand yuan) respectively (P < 0.05). ConclusionFTS strategies can effectively reduce postoperative VAS, shorten length of hospital stay, decrease hospitalization cost, and promote postoperative recovery of rib fracture patients.
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in radical gastrectomy. MethodsThe Cochrane library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Chinese biomedical literature databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trails including patients undergoing radical gastrectomy surgery who were treated by ERAS or traditional methods.The five outcome variables were the time to passage of first flatus and first defecation, the length of postoperative hospital stay, medical cost, and postoperative complications. ResultsFifteen published reports involving 1 533 participants met the inclusion criteria.Compared with traditional methods, ERAS had better outcomes with shorter time to the passage of flatus (WMD=-26.557 hours, 95%CI:-34.097～-19.018, P < 0.05), shorter time to the passage of defecation (WMD=-34.071 hours, 95%CI:-53.449～-14.693, P < 0.05), shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD=-2.824 days, 95%CI:-3.638～-2.010, P < 0.05), less medical cost (WMD=-0.342 ten thousand yuan, 95%CI:-0.501～-0.184, P < 0.05), and lower postoperative complication rate (RR=0.597, 95%CI: 0.435-0.820, P < 0.05).Especially, ERAS had a significant lower rate of postoperative digestive tract complications (RR=0.492, 95%CI: 0.350-0.693, P < 0.05).However, there were no significant differences between two methods in the incidence of complications including postoperative pulmonary infection, infection or liquefaction of incision, fistula of anastomosis, and postoperative readmission rate (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe application of ERAS in the perioperated period of radical gastrectomy surgery shortens the time to passage of first flatus and first defecation, the postoperative hospital stay, as well as lowers the medical cost, and the postoperative complication rate.The results suggest that ERAS is safe and effective in perioperated period of radical gastrectomy and it is very promising in clinical application.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of tubless therapy for pulmonary bulla resection under the concept of fast track surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 45 patients (29 males and 16 females at an average age of 26.1 years) with pulmonary bullae in our hospital between January 2015 and December 2017. These patients were divided into two groups. Among them, 25 patients were treated with preoperative gastric tubes and catheters, tracheal intubation anesthesia and postoperative drainage tubes (a tube group). And 20 patients were treated with no preoperative gastric tube or catheter, sublaryngeal anesthesia and no postoperative drainage tube (a tubless group). ResultsThere was a statistical difference in postoperative pain index (2.60±1.14 vs. 5.16±1.24, P<0.001) and larynx complication (P=0.00) between the two groups. Shorter period of epidural analgesic tubes (1.40±0.50 d vs. 2.84±0.75 d, P<0.001), shorter operation and anesthesia time (15.00±2.59 min vs. 18.56±2.10 min, P<0.001; 95.30±4.38 min vs. 105.50±4.59 min, P<0.001), shorter hospital stay (9.45±1.66 d vs. 12.80±1.87 d, P<0.001), and less expense (20 245.96±1 113.02 yuan vs. 22 147.06±1 735.01 yuan, P<0.001) in the tubless group were found compared with the tube group. But there was no statistical difference in incidence of complication of lung (P=0.43) between the two groups.ConclusionTubless therapy in the treatment of pulmonary bulla resection can accelerate the postoperative recovery with shorter hospital stay and less expense, and is an advantageous treatment.
Objective To evaluate the effect of fast track surgery (FTS) after esophageal cancer surgery. Methods The randomized controlled trial (RCT) and observational studies about FTS for esophageal cancer in PubMed、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CBM、CNKI and WanFang databases were searched up to May 2017. Then the studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two researchers. Data were analyzed by Stata12.0 software. Results Totally 13 RCTs and 5 observational studies with 2 447 patients were eligible for analysis. Compared with the control group, incidence of postoperative complications (OR=0.53, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.71, P<0.05) significantly reduced in the FTS group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups in readmission rate (OR=1.21, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.76, P=0.313) and 30 d mortality rate (OR=0.72, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.20, P=0.207). Conclusion FTS can safely and effectively accelerate the recovery of patients with esophageal cancer and it owns important clinical values.
Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative period of pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods This article conducted the forward-looking analysis on the information of 227 patients undergoing the pancreatoduodenectomy in West China Hospital from January 2016 to June 2017, and then compared the differences between the patients subjected to ERAS (ERAS group) and thosesubjected to regular measures (control group) with respect to time of setting in sickbed, time of mobilizing out ofsickbed, time of starting drink water, time of resumption of diet, exhaust time, defecation time, the time of nasogastric tube, postoperative hospitalization duration and expenses, postoperative complications, and postoperative pain scores. Results ① Postoperative indexes: by comparison of the ERAS group and the control group, it was found that the ERAS group had shorter (or lower) time of setting in sickbed, time of mobilizing out of sickbed, time of starting drink water, time of resumption of diet, exhaust time, defecation time, the time of nasogastric tube, postoperative hospitalization duration and expenses (P<0.05). ② Postoperative complications: of all postoperative complications, including pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, biliary fistula, abdominal infection, incision complication, lung infection, and heart complication were without statistically significant differences (P>0.05) between the 2 groups.③ Reoperation and readmission: there was no significant difference on the incidences of reoperation and readmission between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ④ Postoperative pain scores: except 22 : 00 of the 6-day after operation, the pain scores in the ERAS group were all lower than those in the control group at 2 h and 8 h after operation, and the time points of 1–6 days after operation (8 : 00, 16 : 00, and 22 : 00), with statistically differences (P<0.05). Conclusion Without increasing the incidence of complications, ERAS may speed up the rehabilitation of patients undergoing the pancreatoduodenectomy and mitigate the pain of patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility strategy for patients’ fast track after the operation of thyroid papillary carcinoma with no drainage tube application.MethodsPatients undergone the operation of thyroid papillary carcinoma from June 2017 to March 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients were from the same medical teams composed with the same attending doctors. They were divided into two groups according to the drainage tube applied or not. Finally the incidence of postoperative hematoma, incisional infection, and subcutaneous effusion were compared between the two groups, while the length of stay, pain score after operation, and satisfaction of patients were also analyzed.ResultsThe incidences of postoperative hematoma, incisional infection, and subcutaneous effusion were totally similar between the two groups. While the length of stay and pain score were significantly shorter or lower, satisfaction of patients were higher in group of no drainage tube applied (P<0.05).ConclusionsThe operation of total thyroidectomy plus bilateral central lymph node dissection for papillary thyroid cancer without drainage tube will not increase the probability of complications such as hematoma, incisional infection and subcutaneous effusion. On the contrary, it can shorten hospitalization time, reduce wound pain and improve patient satisfaction in the concept of rapid rehabilitation.