Objective Making an individualized pharmacological treatment plan for a patient of acute respiratory distress syndrome after operation. Methods First, six clinical problems were put forward after assessing the patient’ s health state. Then we searched OVID versions of the ACP Journal Club (1991~2009), CENTRAL (1st Quarter 2009), CDSR (1st Quarter 2009), and MEDLINE (1991~2009) databases. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized clinical trials about treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome were included. The pharmacological treatment plan was made accordingly.Results After evaluation, 13 studies were eligible. The evidence indicated that the restrictive strategy of fluid management, corrected hypoproteinaemia, diuresis, and low-dose corticosteroids given in the early phase could improve oxygenation and prognosis; inhaled nitric oxide, exogenous surfactant supplement, other pharmacological drugs were associated with limited improvement in oxygenation in patients with ARDS but confer no mortality benefit and may cause harm, so we did not recommend their routine use in ARDS patients. The individual treatment plan was made based on the evidence found. After 8 days of treatment, the patient was out the ICU. He recovered and was discharged after 1 month. Conclusions The individual treatment plan, which was made based on high quality evidence and patient’s condition, improved treatment efficacy, shortened the stay in ICU, reduced mortality, and decreased adverse reactions.
ObjectiveTo summarize and analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with acute diffuse lung changes and respiratory failure.MethodsThe clinical data of patients in the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Dazhou Central Hospital between January 2016 and December 2018 were retrospectively collected, whose main clinical manifestation was acute respiratory distress syndrome with acute onset (<3 weeks) and main imaging manifestation was diffuse changes in both lungs. The clinical characteristics of patients were summarized, and the causes of the disease were explored.ResultsA total of 65 patients with acute diffuse lung changes and respiratory failure were enrolled, including 42 males (64.6%) and 23 females (35.4%). The average age was (57.1±18.4) years, the average time from onset to treatment was (7.5±5.9) d, and the average length of stay in the intensive care unit was (8.9±4.1) d. A total of 23 cases died, with a case-fatality rate of 35.4%. Among the 65 patients, there were 50 case (76.9%) of infectious diseases, including 36 cases of bacterial infections (including 4 cases of tuberculosis), 8 cases of viral infections (all were H1N1 infections), and 6 cases of fungal infections (including 1 case of pneumocystis infection); and there were 15 cases (23.1%) of non-infectious diseases, including 4 cases of acute left heart failure, 2 cases of interstitial pneumonia, 2 cases of vasculitis, 1 case of myositis dermatomyositis, 1 case of aspiration pneumonia, 1 case of acute pulmonary embolism, 1 case of acute drug lung injury, 1 case of neurogenic pulmonary edema, 1 case of drowning, and 1 case of unknown origin.ConclusionsInfectious diseases are the main cause of acute diffuse lung changes and respiratory failure, while among non-infectious diseases, acute heart failure and immune system diseases are common causes.
ObjectiveTo retrospectively compare the clinical effects of high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and conventional ventilation (CV) on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) induced by smoke inhalation injury. MethodsForty-three patients with smoke inhalation induced ARDS were admitted in the Center Hospital of Hu Ludao between October 2004 and June 2015.Among the patients, 19 cases were treated with CV (CV group) and 24 cases were treated with HFOV (HFOV group).The clinical data were collected and compared between two groups including blood gas at certain time points (6 h, 24 h, 48 h, 96 h, and 7 d) as well as complications and prognosis. ResultsThere was no significant difference in arterial blood gas between two groups before treatment (P > 0.05).After ventilation treatment, there were significant differences in arterial blood gas parameters between two groups except arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure at 48 and 96 h.And the patients in the HFOV group improved more obviously.The hospitalization time and ventilation time in the HFOV group were significantly shorter than those in the CV group (P < 0.05).No significant difference was found between two groups in the incidences of mortality, complications or 30-day survival rate (P > 0.05). ConclusionsBoth high frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional ventilation can improve the clinical status in patients with smoke inhalation induced ARDS.These two ventilation modes do not present any difference with respect to prognosis by present evidence.
ObjectiveTo discuss the risk factors of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with severe pneumonia.MethodsData of 80 patients with severe pneumonia admitted in our ICU were analyzed retrospectively, and they were divided into two groups according to development of ARDS, which was defined according to the Berlin new definition. The age, gender, weight, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health EvaluationⅡscore, lactate, PSI score and LIPS score, etc. were collected. Statistical significance results were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis after univariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to analyze the predictive value of the parameter for ARDS after severe pneumonia.ResultsForty patients with severe pneumonia progressed to ARDS, there were 4 moderate cases and 36 severe cases according to diagnostic criteria. Univariate analysis showed that procalcitonin (t=4.08, P<0.001), PSI score (t=10.67, P<0.001), LIPS score (t=5.14, P<0.001), shock (χ2=11.11, P<0.001), albumin level (t=3.34, P=0.001) were related to ARDS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that LIPS ［odds ratio (OR) 0.226, 95%CI=4.62-5.53, P=0.013］ and PSI (OR=0.854, 95%CI=132.2-145.5, P=0.014) were independent risk factors for ARDS. The predictive value of LIPS and PSI in ARDS occurrence was significant. The area under ROC curve (AUC) of LIPS was 0.901, the cut-off value was 7.2, when LIPS ≥7.2, the sensitivity and specificity were both 85.0%. AUC of PSI was 0.947, the cut-off value was 150.5, when PSI score ≥150.5, the sensitivity and specificity were 87.5% and 90.0% respectively.ConclusionsPSI and LIPS are independent risk factors of ARDS in patients with severe pneumonia, which may be references for guiding clinicians to make an early diagnosis and treatment plan.
As an extracorporeal life support technology, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) has been demonstrated its role in the treatment of patients with severe respiratory failure. Its main advantages include the ability to maintain adequate oxygenation and remove excess CO2, increase oxygen delivery, improve tissue perfusion and metabolism, and implement lung protection strategies. Clinicians should accurately assess and identify the patient's condition, timely and accurately carry out VV-ECMO operation and management. This article will review the patient selection, cannulation strategy, anticoagulation, clinical management and weaning involved in the application of VV-ECMO.
Objective We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the ECMO versus mechanical ventilation through a rapid health technology assessment. Methods PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, complete economic evaluations, and CRD database for HTA reports from inception to December 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Descriptive analysis and summary were then performed. Results A total of 21 references were involved, including 2 HTA reports, 5 RCTs, 11 systematic reviews or meta-analyses, and 3 economic evaluations. The quality of the literature evidence was heterogenous, and only 2 RCTs of high quality were included for meta-analysis. The results showed that the difference of 60-day mortality between ECMO and mechanical ventilation was statistically significant (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.92, P=0.007). The majority of recent meta-analysis literature showed that short-term mortality of ECMO treatment was lower than that of mechanically ventilated patients. The cost-effective literature from different countries all showed that it was cost-effective in their respective health system, however, the quality of the literature varied. Conclusions Current evidence shows that ECMO has better safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for ARDS compared with mechanical ventilation. However, it still required to be verified by high-quality studies with a long-term follow-up. Validate conclusions are needed through rigorous health technology assessments.
Objective To compare the effects of high and low positive end-expiratory pressure( PEEP) levels on mortality and risk of barotrauma in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ( ARDS) . Methods Randomized controlled trials ( RCTs) were recruited from PubMed( 1966-2008. 9) ,EMBASE( 1980-2008. 9) , Cochrane Database ( Issue 2, 2008) , Chinese Cochrane Centre Database and CBMdisc ( 1978-2008. 9) . Related published and unpublished data and attached references were hand searched. All RCTs about ventilation with PEEP for patients with ARDS were included, then a systematic review were performed. Results Five eligible trials were enrolled in the systematic review. According to ventilation strategy, all trials were divided into subgroup A( low tidal volumes + high PEEP vs traditional tidal volumes + low PEEP) and subgroup B( low tidal volumes + high PEEP vs low tidal volumes + low PEEP) . In subgroup A, high PEEP was associated with a lower mortality[ RR 0. 59, 95%CI( 0. 43, 0. 82) ] and a lower prevalence of barotraumas [ RR 0. 24, 95% CI( 0. 09, 0. 70) ] in patients with ARDS. In subgroup B, the difference in mortality[ RR 0. 97, 95%CI( 0. 83, 1. 13) ] and barotraumas[ RR 1. 13, 95% CI( 0. 78, 1. 63) ]were not significant. Conclusions As compared with conventional ventilation, low tidal volumes and high PEEP ventilation strategy is associated with improved survival and a lower prevalence of barotraumas in patients with ARDS. It is necessary to further confirm the role of sole high PEEP in the ventilation strategy.
Objective To investigate the current status and influencing factors of the awake prone position in patients with mild and moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods A total of 210 patients with mild to moderate ARDS admitted between December 2022 and January 2023 were investigated by general information questionnaire and self-made prone position knowledge questionnaire. The daily prone position time during hospitalization was recorded. The influencing factors of awake prone position were analyzed by univariate and multivariate linear regression. Results The 210 mild and moderate ARDS patients had an average daily prone position length of stay of (4.97±3.94)h/d, showing a low level. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that prone position knowledge score, age, waist circumference and BMI were the influencing factors of awake prone position (P<0.05). Conclusions Daily awake prone position length was at a low level in mild and moderate ARDS patients. Healthcare workers can prolong the time in the prone position by developing an individualized treatment plan for the prone position, improving the patient’s perception of the prone position, and resolving the discomfort from the prone position.