目的 比较低频与高频探头超声对急性阑尾炎的诊断价值。 方法 对2010年1月－2011年6月120例急性阑尾炎的手术病理结果与超声检查结果进行回顾性分析，比较低、高频探头超声对急性阑尾炎的诊断价值。 结果 120例急性阑尾炎中，通过低频探头超声检出67例（55.8%），通过高频探头超声检出105例（87.5%）；单纯性阑尾炎以及化脓性和坏疽性阑尾炎高频探头超声检出例数明显大于低频探头超声，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；阑尾周围脓肿低、高频探头超声均全部检出。 结论 高频探头超声对急性阑尾炎的检出率高于低频探头超声，但二者各有所长，在临床中联合应用能有效提高急性阑尾炎的超声诊断符合率。
ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA) for the acute appendicitis patients based on our extensive experiences. MethodsThe data of all the acute appendicitis patients who underwent appendectomy from January 2013 to December 2014 in our department were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 201 patients were enrolled and divided into LA group (n=102) and OA group (n=99). The relevant clinical indexes during and after operation of two groups were compared. ResultsThere were no significant difference in age, gender, and underlying disease between LA and OA patients (P > 0.05). And the abdominal cavity infection rate, abdominal drainage rate and 30-day readmission rate were also similar (P > 0.05). But LA group had less operative time, lower infection operative wound rate, less intestinal function recovery time, shorter inhospital days and higher hospital expenses than OA group (P < 0. 05). In addition, perforated appendix and LA could increase the rate of abdominal drainage[OR=2.710, 95% CI(1.129, 6.507), P=0.026]. ConclusionsBoth LA and OA are safe and effective methods for the treatment of acute appendicitis. But LA has several advantages over OA on less operative time and postoperative complications, earlier recovery, and shorter inhospital days. While LA have higher hospital cost than OA, it still should be considered as a prefer way to cure acute appendicitis. LA is a independent risk factor of abdominal drainage.
目的 探讨急性阑尾炎手术后切口感染的相关因素。方法 观察我院2002年5月至2007年5月期间收治的665例急性阑尾炎患者采用术前预防使用抗生素、术中保护切口、术后加强切口管理等处理后切口感染情况，并分析切口感染与阑尾炎的病程、手术时间、切口选择、留置引流和病理类型之间的关系。结果 本组患者中32例发生切口感染，感染率为4.81% (32/665)，急性阑尾炎术后切口感染与性别无关（ P ＞ 0.05），与病程长短、切口选择、手术时间、腹腔留置引流与否以及病理类型均有关（ P ＜ 0.01）。结论 病程长、手术时间久、炎症较重的急性阑尾炎病例切口感染率较高； 做好围手术期的处理，术中尽量保护切口可以降低切口感染率。
截止至2002年6月,有关阑尾炎治疗的临床证据如下:①辅助性抗生素治疗:1项RCT和1项回顾性RCT发现,经阑尾切除术的复杂性和单纯性阑尾炎的成人和儿童,预防性使用抗生素可显著减少伤口感染和腹腔内脓肿.②辅助性抗生素治疗(儿童复杂性阑尾炎):1项系统评价的亚组分析发现,使用抗生素可显著减少伤口感染.③辅助性抗生素治疗(儿童单纯性阑尾炎):1项系统评价的亚组分析发现,使用抗生素不减少伤口感染.1项儿童单纯性阑尾炎的回顾性RCT发现,预防性使用抗生素不能减少伤口感染,但该RCT的样本量太小,不能排除有临床差别.④抗生素治疗和手术:1项成人疑诊阑尾炎的RCT发现,与手术治疗比较,抗生素保守治疗可减少治疗开始后12 h到10 d的疼痛和吗啡的使用.但采取抗生素保守治疗的患者有35%在1年内再次因急性阑尾炎入院,并行阑尾切除术.⑤腹腔镜手术和开腹手术(成人):1项系统评价发现,腹腔镜手术可以减少伤口的感染,减轻手术后第1天的疼痛,减少住院时间以及恢复工作的时间,但增加手术后腹腔内脓肿的发生.⑥腹腔镜手术和开腹手术(儿童):1项系统评价发现,腹腔镜手术可以减少伤口的感染,减少住院时间,但不能减轻手术后第1天的疼痛,不能减少恢复的时间和腹腔内脓肿的发生.⑦开腹手术和不治疗:无RCT证据.⑧开腹阑尾切除术中对残端的内翻处理:1项RCT发现,两次包埋和单纯结扎比较,不能减少伤口的感染、住院时间和腹腔内脓肿的发生.
ObjectivesTo assess the predictive value of neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio (NLR) in the diagnosis of children complicated appendicitis.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with acute appendicitis treated in Department of Pediatric Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from January 2014 to June 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Based on the pathology results, patients were divided into two groups: simple appendicitis and complicated appendicitis. The differences of age, gender, disease time, fever, highest temperature, emesis, right lower abdominal pain, blood indicators, and ultrasound results between the two groups were analyzed. Useful parameters to aid in the diagnosis of children complicated appendicitis were screened through single-factor and multiple-factor analysis. The predictive value of the parameters was evaluated by ROC analysis, sensitivity and specificity.ResultsA total of 235 patients was evaluated and divided into simple appendicitis group (179 patients) and complicated appendicitis group (56 patients). Logistic regression analysis revealed that NLR was the independent risk factor for diagnosis of children complicated appendicitis. When NLR>11.74, the Youden index for predictive complicated appendicitis was the biggest, reaching 0.325, and the sensitivity and specificity were 47.8% and 84.7%, respectively (OR=3.121, 95%CI 2.036 to 4.783).ConclusionsThe preoperative NLR is a certain indicator for predicting children complicated appendicitis, and can be used as reference to whether or not receive an operation.
目的比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术（LA）与传统开腹阑尾切除术（OA）在治疗老年（60岁）急性阑尾炎患者的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2008年6月至2009年12月期间我院收治的67例老年急性阑尾炎患者的临床资料，根据接受的不同手术方式分为LA组（n=28）和OA组（n=39），对2组患者术中及术后相关指标进行比较。结果 LA组患者均顺利完成手术，无中转开腹; 术后无切口感染; 1例出现腹腔残余感染，经抗感染治疗后痊愈。OA组患者术后6例发生切口感染，经换药后痊愈; 5例发生腹腔残余感染，经抗感染治疗后痊愈。2组患者均无出血、阑尾残端漏、残株炎、粘连性肠梗阻等并发症发生。LA组患者手术时间与OA组比较差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。尽管LA组患者综合费用明显多于OA组（Plt;0.05），但术中出血量、术后下床时间、肛门排气时间、止痛剂使用率、切口感染率、腹腔残余感染率以及住院时间均小（少）于OA组（Plt;0.05）。 结论对老年急性阑尾炎患者的治疗，LA明显优于OA，且可作为老年急性阑尾炎患者治疗的首选术式。
目的:探讨盲部憩室炎的诊断和手术方式的选择。方法:回顾性分析18例盲部憩室炎的临床资料,包块临床表现、腹部体征、辅助检查、手术方式及随访结果。结果:18例均有右下腹疼痛及右下腹压痛。术前诊断困难,仅通过钡灌肠结肠造影和结肠镜确诊各1例,误诊为急性阑尾炎12例、阑尾周围脓肿1例、回盲部肿瘤3例。憩室单发3例,多发性15例,其中2个憩室9例,3个憩室6例。单纯憩室切除9例,回盲部切除2例;右半结肠切除7例。全组患者均获治愈,无严重并发症发生。结论:盲肠憩室炎的临床特征与急性阑尾炎相似,极易误诊为急性阑尾炎等。术中应注意探查,避免遗漏病变。根据憩室具体情况决定手术方式。