west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "恶心" 19 results
  • Status Survey on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting

    Objective To investigate the patient’s psychological anticipation and occurrence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), and to assess the influence of CINV on quality of life, so as to provide evidence for clinical doctors to recognize and pay attention to CINV. Methods The patients in the Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology who took either moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) were randomly sampled with a questionnaire for two circles. Patients were asked to record the following indexes before chemotherapy, on the second day and the sixth day of chemotherapy: acute and delayed nausea and vomiting, independently taking antiemetics, and functional living index-emesis (FLIE). Then, descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were adopted for the outcomes of investigation. Results A total of 344 patients were investigated, of which 303 fulfilled the questionnaire finally. For the single-day chemotherapy, the acute nausea and vomiting, delayed nausea vomiting and overall complete remission in the MEC group were 86.1%, 76.6%, and 71.5%, respectively; while those of the HEC group were 84.1%, 71.0%, and 66.7%, respectively. For the multi-day chemotherapy, the acute nausea and vomiting, delayed nausea vomiting and overall complete remission were 93.8%, 64.9%, and 64.9%, respectively. Patients’ expectation of nausea and anticipatory anxiety was closely related to the delayed nausea in their prior circle of chemotherapy. Based on the FLIE assessment, about 30% of all patients reported reduced daily living function. Conclusion CINV remains a significant problem among patients in China, especially in controlling the reaction during delayed phase and nausea as well. It requires that more attention should be paid to CINV and more effective prophylaxis should be adopted in clinical practice.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Cause Analysis on Nausea and Vomitting in 128 Inpatients in the Department of Digestive Disease

    目的:探讨恶心呕吐的病因,为临床诊断提供依据,避免漏误诊发生。方法:消化内科住院患者128例出现恶心和(或)呕吐症状,对其病因统计分析。结果:恶心呕吐常见病为反流性食管炎、巨幼贫、胆系结石、颅内占位和功能性消化不良。其它尚有十二指肠溃疡、粪石梗阻、肝功损害、肠系膜动脉缺血、急性阑尾炎、腹部术后和流行性出血热(EHF)等。乙型肝炎与十二指肠溃疡有关,急性支气管炎、白细胞减少症和溃疡性结肠炎可有恶心呕吐表现。结论:恶心呕吐常见,病因有时难以确定,尤其是慢性起病者。病因的诊断应详询病史、仔细诊查、结合诊断学有关知识及有关检查,不应圉于消化系疾病。

    Release date:2016-08-26 02:21 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effectiveness of P6 Stimulation on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: A Meta-Analysis

    Objective To compare the effectiveness of P6 stimulation and sham stimulation/ drug intervention on prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Methods We searched PubMed (1990 to 2010), OVID (1990 to 2010), EBSCO (1990 to 2010), The Cochrane Library (1996 to 2010), PNAI (1990 to 2010), Hight Wirepres (1990 to 2010), and Chinese Digital Hospital Library (www.chkd.cnki.net) (1999 to 2010) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about P6 stimulation and sham stimulation/drug intervention on prevention of PONV. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed and the data was extracted according to the Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 4.2.2. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 4.2 software. Results A total of 21 studies were included. The results of meta-analyses indicated that: (1) Compared with sham stimulation, P6 stimulation could be effective in preventing postoperative nausea (beginning to termination) (Plt;0.000 01), postoperative early nausea (lt;after surgery 6 h) (P=0.000 6) and postoperative late nausea (gt;after surgery 6 h) (P=0.001). (2) Compared with sham stimulation, P6 stimulation could be effective in preventing postoperative vomiting (beginning to termination) (Plt;0.0.000 1) and postoperative early vomiting (P=0.002), but as to postoperative late vomiting (gt;after surgery 6 h), P6 stimulation had no effective preventive effect (P=0.08). (3) Compared with the drug intervention, P6 stimulation had little effect on preventing postoperative nausea (P=0.29) and vomiting (P=0.15). Conclusion Compared with sham stimulation, P6 stimulation can be effective in preventing postoperative early nausea and vomiting as well as postoperative late nausea, but not effective in preventing postoperative late vomiting. In comparison with drugs, a large number of clinical trials are needed to prove P6 stimulation can replace drugs to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting.

    Release date:2016-09-07 11:23 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Efficacy and Safety of Tropisetron for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Objective?To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5 HT-3 receptor inhibitor tropisetron injected in the postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after general anesthesia. Methods?We searched the PubMed, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, and CNKI to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about tropisetron in preventing PONV after general anesthesia from January 1995 to September 2009. We also consulted references of the included studies for omission. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was assessed and data were extracted according to the standard of the Cochrane Handbook 5.0.1. The meta-analyses were performed by RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results?A total of 17 RCTs involving 4 678 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that: (1) Efficacy: tropisetron injected could decrease the incidence of PONV after general anesthesia (RR=0.41, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.60), and decrease the incidence of PONV after general anesthesia with opioid drugs in patient controlled analgesia (RR=0.30, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.60); tropistron injected once or more could decrease the incidence of PONV in combination of PCA with tramadol (RR=0.41, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.56; RR=0.10, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.19); and tropisetron combined with dexamethasome could also lessen the incidence of PONV (RR=0.27, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.57). (2) Safety: Tropisetron injected could lessen the incidence of postoperative headache and dizziness (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.75), but could not significantly decrease the pruritus and somnolence. Conclusion?Tropisetron injected can significantly decrease the incidence of PONV after general anesthesia, and it will not increase the adverse effect and the incidence of postoperative complications. Furthermore, it has also the advantage of decreasing postoperative headache and dizziness.

    Release date:2016-09-07 11:23 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Acupuncture in the Treatment of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: A Report of One Case and Review of Related Literature

    目的 探讨针刺治疗在防治术后恶心呕吐(PONV)中的作用与疗效。 方法 通过对2012年6月收治的1例全身麻醉下行小脑血肿清除术后出现持续性恶心呕吐症状,后辅以针刺治疗好转的病例报道,就针刺治疗对PONV的穴位选择,刺激方式,介入时间等相关研究进行复习和总结。 结果 患者恶心呕吐症状在选取中脘、足三里(双)、内关(双)穴针刺治疗3次后(30 min/次)明显减少,自诉恶心程度较前缓解,连续针灸6次后呕吐现象得到有效控制。 结论 目前有关针刺治疗PONV的研究越来越多,但尚无统一的治疗标准。

    Release date:2016-09-07 02:33 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effects of Tramadonl Preemptive Analgesia on Postoperative Pain,Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hysterectomy

    【摘要】 目的 观察曲马多超前镇痛对经腹子宫切除术患者术后疼痛和恶心呕吐的影响。 方法 2008年11月-2009年5月,40例全身麻醉下行经腹子宫切除术的患者,分为超前镇痛组和对照组(n=20)。超前镇痛组和对照组于麻醉诱导前30 min分别静脉注射曲马多(3 mg/kg)和生理盐水。术后12、24 h,观察Bolus次数和芬太尼的用量,患者疼痛评分及术后恶心呕吐的发生率。 结果 术后12、24 h,曲马多超前镇痛组Bolus次数和芬太尼的用量均小于对照组(Plt;0.05),术后恶心呕吐的发生率差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05)。 结论 经腹子宫切除术手术前给予曲马多超前镇痛能够减少术后镇痛药的需要量,且不增加术后恶心呕吐的发生率。【Abstract】 Objective To observe the effects of tramadonl preemptive analgesia on postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients with hysterectomy. Methods Form November 2008 to May 2009, fourty patients who had undergone hysterectomy were divided into preemptive analgesia (PA) group and control group, 20 patients in each. The PA and control group were intravenously injected with tramadol (3 mg/kg) and normal saline respectively. Twelve and 24 hours after hysterectomy, the Bolus times, consumption of fentanil, pain score and incidence of PONV were observed. Results Twelve and 24 hours after hysterectomy, the Bolus times and consumption of fentanil were both lower than those in control group(Plt;0.05), the difference of PONV incidences between two groups was not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Intravenously injected with tramadol before hysterectomy can recduce the dosage of analgesic, and don′t increase the incidence of PONV.

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:51 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Megestrol Acetate Used To Prevent Chemotherapyinduced Gastrointestinal Reactions:A Clinical Trial

    目的:观察醋酸甲地孕酮(MA)在预防化疗引起的消化道反应中的作用。方法:收集2007年6月~2008年6月病理学和细胞学证实的消化道恶性肿瘤60例,采用自身前后交叉对照研究,随机分为AB和BA两组。AB组第一周期止吐方案用格拉司琼+胃复安+MA,第二周期止吐方案用格拉司琼+胃复安;BA组第一周期止吐方案用格拉司琼+胃复安,第二周期止吐方案MA+格拉司琼+胃复安。结果:化疗同时配合使用MA恶心、呕吐发生率下降(Plt;0.05);恶心、呕吐程度改善(P.001),并且可以预防化疗引起的急性期和延迟期恶心、呕吐反应(Plt;0.05)。结论:化疗同时配合使用MA可以改善化疗患者的恶心呕吐反应

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Study on Complications Associated Pneumoperitoneum of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

    目的 探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)中不同CO2气腹压力对患者肝功能、动脉血气及对颈、肩痛的影响。方法 选择行择期LC术患者120例,采用随机数字表法,按住院先后顺序对应入组,随机均分为气腹压力10mmHg (1 mm Hg=0.133kPa)组、12mmHg组及14mmHg组3组;对比分析3组患者手术后肝功能、血气指标以及术后当天、第1和第2天恶心、呕吐及颈肩部疼痛的发生率。结果 3组患者术前各参数组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后肝功能及血气分析指标的改变3组间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),气腹压力越大,其术后AST、ALT及TBIL水平升高越明显,而pH及PO2的下降越明显,PCO2的升高也越明显;术后患者颈、肩痛及恶心呕吐发生率3组间比较差异也有统计学意义(P<0.05),气腹压力越大,术后颈、肩痛及恶心呕吐发生率越高。结论 CO2气腹压力对术后肝功能及动脉血气指标的改变以及术后颈、肩痛和恶心呕吐发生率有明显影响。

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:38 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 以恶心、呕吐为主要症状的腹部卒中一例

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 醋酸甲地孕酮在肿瘤化学疗法患者中的应用及护理

    目的观察醋酸甲地孕酮(MA)对肿瘤患者化学疗法(化疗)期间恶心、呕吐症状的抑制效果及不良反应。 方法采用前瞻性、自身前后对照研究,将2013年3月-9月入院的60例化疗肿瘤患者随机分为A、B两组。每组30例。A组在第1周期化疗前2 d开始口服MA,160 mg/d,连续口服5 d;托烷司琼5 mg/d,化疗前30 min静脉滴注,化疗第1~3天;第2周期单用托烷司琼。B组在第2周期口服MA+静脉滴注托烷司琼,第1周期单用托烷司琼,余同前。化疗结束后比较用MA和不用MA时的恶心、呕吐发生率和程度,以及便秘、血栓、面色潮红、阴道出血、血糖升高及水钠潴留等不良反应发生率。 结果患者用MA时恶心、呕吐发生率较不用MA时明显降低(P<0.05),恶心、呕吐程度也较不用MA时减轻(P<0.05)。用MA和不用MA的便秘发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组均未见血栓、面色潮红、阴道出血、血糖升高及水钠潴等不良反应。 结论与不使用MA比较,肿瘤患者使用MA能明显减轻化疗引起的恶心、呕吐反应,且不增加其他不良反应发生率。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
2 pages Previous 1 2 Next

Format

Content