Objective?To approach feasibility, safety, and the application range of pure laparoscopic resection (PLR), hand-assisted laparoscopic resection (HALR), and robotic liver resection (RLR) in the minimally invasive liver resection (MILR). Methods?The clinical data of 128 patients underwent MILR in the Surgical Department of the Shanghai Ruijin Hospital from September 2004 to January 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different methods, the patients were divided into PLR group, HALR group, and RLR group. The intraoperative findings and postoperative recovery of patients in three groups were compared.?Results?There were 82 cases in PLR group, 3 cases of which were transferred to open surgery;the mean operating time was (145.4±54.4) minutes (range:40-290 minutes);the mean blood loss was (249.3±255.7) ml (range:30-1 500 ml);abdominal infection was found in 3 cases and biliary fistula in 5 cases after operation, but all recovered after conservative treatment;the mean length of hospital stay was (7.1±3.8) days (range:2-34 days). There were 35 cases in HALR group, 3 cases of which were transferred to open surgery;the mean operating time was (182.7±59.2) minutes (range:60-300 minutes);the mean blood loss was (754.3±785.2) ml (range:50-3 000 ml);abdominal infection was found in 1 case, biliary fistula in 2 cases, and operative incision infection in 2 cases after operation, but all recovered after conservative treatment;the mean length of hospital stay was (15.4±3.7) days (range:12-30 days). There were 11 cases in RLR group, 2 cases of which were transferred to open surgery; the mean operating time was (129.5±33.5) minutes (range:120-200 minutes); the mean blood loss was (424.5±657.5) ml (range:50-5 000 ml); abdominal infection was found in 1 case and biliary fistula in 1 case after operation, but all recovered after conservative treatment; the mean length of hospital stay was (6.4±1.6) days (range:5-9 days). The operating time (P=0.001) and length of hospital stay (P=0.000) of the RLR group were shortest and the blood loss (P=0.000) of the PLR group was least among three groups. Conclusions?Minimally invasive resection is a safe and feasible. Different surgical procedures should be chosen according to different cases. The robotic liver resection provides new development for treatment of liver tumor.
目的 总结手助式腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床经验。方法 回顾性分析我科2002年7月至2007年5月期间40例采用手助式腹腔镜结肠癌根治术治疗的结肠癌患者的临床资料。结果 40例手术均获成功,无中转开腹手术,无死亡病例。全部患者均未发生切口感染、吻合口漏、肠梗阻等并发症。随访0.5~4.0年,平均2.8年,未见肿瘤复发。结论 对于肿块直径大于5 cm的结肠癌患者采用手助式腹腔镜实施结肠癌根治术,可以保证手术的安全性和有效性。