目的 比较5种新一代抗癫痫药物对成人全面强直阵挛发作单药治疗的保留率。 方法 选择2010年7月－2011年6月354例确诊为癫痫全面强直阵挛发作患者，分别采用拉莫三嗪、左乙拉西坦、奥卡西平、托吡酯、加巴喷丁5种药物进行单药治疗，对其5种药物的6、12个月保留率进行比较。 结果 5种药物的6、12个月保留率分别为：拉莫三嗪90.8%、79.8%，左乙拉西坦88.0%、66.7%，奥卡西平82.1%、58.2%，托吡酯81.2%、58.0%，加巴喷丁26.5%、20.6%。6个月保留率加巴喷丁与其他4种药物比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.001），其他药物之间差异无统计学意义。12个月保留率拉莫三嗪与其他4种药物比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.005），其他药物之间差异无统计学意义。 结论 拉莫三嗪对成人全面强直阵挛发作单药治疗12个月保留率最高。通过对5种新一代抗癫痫药物12个月保留率比较研究，可以对临床单药治疗癫痫药物选择提供一定参考。
ObjectiveTo observe the children with idiopathic epilepsy who received AED therapy and seizure-free, withdrawal at least 1 year, and analyze the risk factors of seizure recurrence. In order to give better instructions for AED withdrawal of children with idiopathic epilepsy in pediatric department. MethodsChildren with idiopathic epilepsy who were seizure-free and had stopped AED treatment at least 1 year before the deadline of observation were collected from pediatric outpatient and inpatient department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January 2011 to January 2014. The following variables, derived from the case records were analyzed: sex, age at seizure onset, type of seizure, time period between the onset of the first seizure and start of treatment, number of seizures in the time period between the start of AED therapy and the last seizure, number of AEDs before remission, time period between the start of AED therapy and the last seizure, time period between the last seizure and withdrawal of AED treatment (seizure-free period, timing of AED withdrawal), time period between the start of AED withdrawal and total discontinuation(speed of withdrawal), EEG registered at the time of diagnosis, before AED withdrawal, during and after AED withdrawal, and the condition of recurrence, data analysed by multi-variate step-wise Cox regression model analysis. ResultsA total of 16(12.8%) children relapsed in a total number of 125 children with idiopathic epilepsy we collected; date evaluated by multi-variable analysis showed that the children suffering from seizure type of focal seizure, starting withdrawal after a seizure-free period of less than 3 years and with abnormal post-withdrawal EEG recording was associated with a higher risk of seizure recurrence. ConclusionsChildren with idiopathic epilepsy have a low risk of recurrence after AED withdrawal. Those who suffer from seizure type of focal seizure, start withdrawal after a seizure-free period of less than 3 years and with abnormal post-withdrawal EEG recording are associated with a higher risk of seizure recurrence.
ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to identify clinical and electroencephalographic features associated with refractoriness to the initial antiepileptic drug in typical benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS). MethodsA total of 87 children with typical BECTS were retrospectively reviewed in the analyses.The patients were subdivided into two groups:patients whose seizures were controlled with monotherapy, and those requiring two medications. 63 childrenachieved seizure-freedom with monotherapy, while 24 received two medications for seizure control. ResultsDiffusing foci at the follow-up EEG and delayed treatment (duration > 1 year) are two main risk factors associated with more refractory cases (P < 0.001). Delayed diagnosis (37.1%) and non-adherence to treatment (57.2%) contributed to delayed treatment. ConclusionsOur findings suggested that diffusing foci on EEG and delayed treatment are associated with more frequent seizures and refractoriness in BECTS. Diagnostic delays and non-adherence hindered timely care, which may represent opportunities for improved intervention.
ObjectiveAnalysis prophylactic anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) therapy in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTE) to observe whether seizures occurance, frequency will decrease, and the adverse reactions risk assessment of the patient's after using AEDs in 3 months and 12 month. MethodsRetrospective analysis of the cases and follow-up data of patients with the diagnosis of brain tumors in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University in June 2011 to February 2015. Through the strict inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria review, the sixty-eight standard patients were divided into two groups:treatment group (44 cases) and control group (24 cases), and compared in the incidence of epilepsy and seizure frequency two groups of patients, and observe the adverse reactions after using AEDs. And analyzed the outcome of patients with brain tumors at 3 months and 2 months. ResultsThrough at least 1 year follow up, compared the data of patients in the two groups with seizure incidence at 3 months and with seizures frequency≥3 times at 12 months, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).In the treatment group, however, 7 patients experienced mild adverse reactions, such as dizziness, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, mild white blood cell reduction, mild liver damage, menstrual cycle changes, mental and behavioral abnormalities, etc.A patient discontinued due to mental disorder, and a patient change AEDs due to menstrual cycle change. All patients had no serious adverse reactions. Conclusions①prophylactic use of AEDs can significantly reduce the incidence of seizures at 3 months; ②Although prophylactic use of AEDs did not reduce the incidence of seizures at 12 months, but can reduce the frequency of seizures; ③The risk of adverse reactions of prophylactic use of AEDs in patients with BTE is relatively low.