ObjectiveTo Affiliated systematically review the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for resistant hypertension (RH) patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2015), CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to March 2016, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about CPAP for RH patients with OSA. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 5 RCTs involving 395 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: After 3 months of follow-up, compared with the antihypertensive drug therapy alone, CPAP plus antihypertensive drug therapy could significantly reduce the 24 h diastolic blood pressure (DBP), day DBP, night DBP, 24 h diastolic blood pressure (SBP) and night SBP of RH patients with OSA (MD=-4.79, 95%CI -7.39 to -2.18, P=0.000 3; MD=-2.94, 95%CI -4.99 to -0.89, P=0.005; MD=-3.19, 95%CI -5.84 to -0.55, P=0.02; MD=-4.36, 95%CI -7.38 to -1.33, P=0.005; MD=-4.90, 95%CI -8.72, -1.08, P=0.01), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in day SBP. After 6 months of follow-up, compared with the antihypertensive drug therapy alone, CPAP plus antihypertensive drug therapy could significantly reduce the 24 h DBP, day DBP of RH patients with OSA (MD=-4.89, 95%CI -6.76 to -3.02, P<0.000 01; MD=-5.01, 95%CI -9.58 to -0.45, P=0.03), but there were no significant differences between the two groups in night DBP, 24 h SBP, day SBP, and night SBP. ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that CPAP on the basis of antihypertensive drug therapy could effectively reduce the DBP and SBP of RH patients with OSA at short-term follow-up, but the long-term effect on SBP is not obvious. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, the above conclusions need to be verified by more high quality studies.
Objective To assess the effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment (CPAP) on subjective and objective sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrom (OSAHS). Methods We conducted a thorough literature search to identify all published randomized controlled trials of CPAP in patients with OSAHS. We use computer to search Pubmed (1990-2008.5), CNKI (1994-2008.5), google (1995-2008.5), Springer Link (1997-2008)、 and many meeting articals. We chose the literatures that divided patients randomly into two groups as CPAP group and subtheraputic CPAP or drug group. Meta-analysis were performed to access the effect and bias. Results A total of 15 trials involving 1 052 patients were included. A Meta-analysis showed that (1) The total effect was that compared with the control group, CPAP treatment group significantly depressed the degree of sleepiness in ESS [WMD= – 2.61, 95%CI (– 3.92, – 1.29)] and in MWT/ MSLT [WMD= 1.42, 95%CI (– 0.01, 2.85)]. (2) Results of subgroups on ESS were that: 1. CPAP vs CT: there was a significant effect on CPAP therapy [WMD= – 3.15, 95%CI (– 4.84, – 1.47)]. 2. CPAP vs sham CPAP: there was no significant difference between the two groups. 3. CPAP vs drugs: CPAP was more efficient than drugs. CPAP may be more efficient in improving patients’ life quality. Conclusion CPAP is a valuable treatment for OSAHS no matter in subjective or objective sleepiness .But more attention should be paid to the lone-time treatment of CPAP.
Objective To evaluate the changes of right ventricular function in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) before and after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI). Methods Fifty patients with moderate and severe OSAHS were selected for CPAP treatment, and another 40 healthy volunteers were selected as a control group. 2D-STI and traditional echocardiography were conducted in the study group before treatment, after 3 months of continuous treatment and after 6 months of continuous treatment and in the control group. Results The differences between the control subjects and the OSAHS patients were statistically significant in right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS), right ventricular free lateral wall longitudinal strain (RVLLS), apical segment of the right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (Apical RV-SL), basal segment of the right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (Basal RV-SL), and media segment of the right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (Media RV-SL) (all P<0.05). RVGLS, RVLLS and Apical RV-SL were significantly improved after 3 months of CPAP treatment (all P<0.05). Basal RV-SL was significantly improved after 6 months of CPAP treatment (P<0.05). Conclusions The right ventricular function of patients with OSAHS is abnormal. CPAP treatment can improve the right ventricular function of OSAHS patients. 2D-STI can accurately assess the changes of right ventricular function.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2017), CBM, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI were searched up to March 27th, 2017 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of HHHFNC vs. NCPAP for NRDS. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 1 104 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: 1) The HHHFNC group reduced the rate of reintubation (OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.98, P=0.04), shortened the time of assisted ventilation (MD=–11.12, 95%CI –13.31 to –8.93, P<0.000 01), hospitalization time (MD=–2.99, 95%CI –3.54 to –2.44, P<0.000 01) and neonatal aspiration of milk (MD=–17.82, 95%CI –21.19 to –14.45, P<0.000 01), shortened partial pressure of carbon dioxide at 48 hours (MD=–4.86, 95%CI –5.94 to –3.78, P<0.000 01), reduced the rate of frequent hemorrhoid (OR=0.32, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.90, P=0.03), the rate of abdominal distension (OR=0.17, 95%CI 0.09 to 0.30, P<0.000 01), the rate of injury of nose (OR=0.08, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.20, P<0.000 01), and the rate of head shape change (OR=0.03, 95%CI 0.00 to 0.23, P=0.000 7). 2) There were no significant differences between two groups in mortality rate, nosocomial infection rate, oxygen exposure time, arterial oxygen pressure and oxygen saturation at 48 hours, intraventricular hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus, retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, respectively. ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that HHHFNC can reduce the rate of reintubation, shorten the time of assisted ventilation, length of hospital day and neonatal aspiration of milk, reduce the rate of frequent hemorrhoid, abdominal distension, injury of nose, head shape change. Due to the limitation of quantity and quality of included studies, the long-term follow-up results of HHHFNC for NRDS are needed to analyze with large-scale and multicenter RCTs.
ObjectiveTo analyze the application and efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as an initial support measure for respiratory diseases in premature infants. MethodsWe retrospectively studied the clinical data of 160 premature infants hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit from January to December 2014. These infants accepted CPAP as the initial respiratory support. ResultsThe average birth weight and the average gestational age of the 160 premature infants were (1 581±440) g and (31.6±1.9) weeks, respectively. The main diagnosis of the primary diseases in these infants included neonatal pneumonia (81.3%), neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (57.5%), neonatal apnea (53.8%) and neonatal asphyxia (22.5%). The CPAP success rate in those infants whose birth weight was less than 1 000 g was significantly lower than those whose birth weight was equal or greater than 1 000 g (χ2=4.882, P=0.027). The perinatal period analysis showed that premature rupture of membranes, intrauterine fetal distress and maternal pregnancy complications were factors correlating with the effect of CPAP. CPAP treatment analysis showed that early application of CPAP within 24 hours after birth had a success rate of 82.4% (108/131), and initial inhaled oxygen concentration and oxygen pressure were the primary factors affecting CPAP efficacy. ConclusionApplication of CPAP is effective in respiratory support for premature infants and has a high success rate. Early application can reduce the use of mechanical ventilation and intubation. Regulating appropriate parameters helps raise the efficacy of CPAP therapy. Clinically, the standardized application of CPAP and monitoring the failure of CPAP are important for the improvement of the treatment efficacy.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of the auto-continuous positive airway pressure (Auto-CPAP) versus the fixed-continuous positive airway pressure (Fixed-CPAP) in patients with obstructive sleep Apnea syndrome (OSAS). Methods Such databases as PubMed (1990 to 2010), SpringerLink (1995 to 2010), CNKI (1990 to 2010), WanFang Data (1995 to 2010), and Google academic (1994 to 2010) were searched, the relevant conference theses were retrieved, and the experts in this field were enquired to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on Auto-CPAP versus Fixed-CPAP for patients with OSAS. Two reviewers independently screened the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, abstracted the data, and assessed the methodology quality. Meta-analyes was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 11 RCTs involving 327 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that, compared with the Fixed-CPAP group after treatment, the Auto-CPAP group significantly reduced the mean effective therapeutic pressure (WMD=-1.79, 95%CI -3.39 to -0.20), won much better treatment adherence (WMD=0.43, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.56), but got much higher scores of the Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (WMD=1.17, 95%CI 0.25 to 2.08) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) (WMD=0.88, 95%CI 0.42 to 1.33) as well. There was no significant difference between those two groups in patients’ subjective preference for treatment (OR=2.06, 95%CI 0.46 to 9.10). Conclusion Compared to the Fixed-CPAP, the Auto-CPAP significantly reduces the mean effective therapeutic pressure and improves the treatment adherence of the patients, but is inferior in decreasing AHI and ESS. However, more high-quality and large-scale RCTs are required to verify the above conclusion because of the limitation of research quality and sample at present.
Objective To investigate the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on sleep disorder and neuropsychological characteristics in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) combined with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Methods A total of forty-two early AD patients with OSAHS were randomly divided into a CPAP combined treatment group (20 cases) and a simple medicine treatment group (22 cases). The changes of neurocognitive function were assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised (HVLT). Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) was used to evaluate the depression mood changes. The sleep characteristics and respiratory parameters were evaluated by polysomnography. The changes of the patients’ sleep status were assessed by Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The changes of sleep status, cognitive function and mood in the CPAP combined treatment group were compared before and three months after CPAP treatment, and with the simple medicine treatment group. Results After three months of CPAP treatment, the ESS, PSQI and PHQ9 scores in the CPAP combined treatment group were significantly decreased compared with those before treatment, whereas MoCA, MMSE and HVLT (total scores and recall ) in the CPAP combined treatment group were increased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05). After CPAP treatment, the respiratory parameters apnea hypopnea index in the CPAP combined treatment group was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), and the minimum blood oxygen saturation was significantly higher than that before treatment (P<0.05). However, the sleep characteristics and parameters did not show statistically significant changes compared with those before treatment (P>0.05). The ESS, PSQI and PHQ9 scores were significantly reduced in the CPAP combined treatment group compared with the simple medicine treatment group (P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant changes of cognitive scores between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions The degree of low ventilation and hypoxia is alleviated, and the daytime sleepiness and depression is improved in early AD patients with OSAHS after three-month continuous CPAP treatment. Cognitive function is significantly improved, whereas there is no significant change in sleep structure disorder.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of oral appliance (OA) vs. continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in treating patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Methods The following databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, WanFang data and CNKI were searched from inception to November 30, 2012 to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on OA vs. CPAP in treating OSAHS. The relevant conference proceedings were also retrieved without limitation of type and publication time. In accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated quality. And then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Besides, the level of evidence was graded using GRADEpro 3.6 software. Results A total of 7 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) compared with OA, CPAP significantly reduced the degree of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (WMD=9.13, 95%CI 8.77 to 9.50, Plt;0.000 01); and b) there was no significant difference in the Epworth sleeping scale (ESS) between OA and CPAP (WMD=0.00, 95%CI −0.12 to 0.12, P=0.97). Conclusion Compared with OA, CPAP takes remarkable effects in improving AHI for mild to moderate OSAHS, but it shows no significant difference in improving ESS. For the quality and quantity limitation of the included studies, this conclusion still needs to be proved by conducting more high quality RCTs.