Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of oral appliance (OA) vs. continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in treating patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Methods The following databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, WanFang data and CNKI were searched from inception to November 30, 2012 to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on OA vs. CPAP in treating OSAHS. The relevant conference proceedings were also retrieved without limitation of type and publication time. In accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated quality. And then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Besides, the level of evidence was graded using GRADEpro 3.6 software. Results A total of 7 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) compared with OA, CPAP significantly reduced the degree of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (WMD=9.13, 95%CI 8.77 to 9.50, Plt;0.000 01); and b) there was no significant difference in the Epworth sleeping scale (ESS) between OA and CPAP (WMD=0.00, 95%CI −0.12 to 0.12, P=0.97). Conclusion Compared with OA, CPAP takes remarkable effects in improving AHI for mild to moderate OSAHS, but it shows no significant difference in improving ESS. For the quality and quantity limitation of the included studies, this conclusion still needs to be proved by conducting more high quality RCTs.
Objective To evaluate the subjective outcomes of sleepiness behavior and mood status applying continuous positive airway pressure（CPAP） in adults of elderly and middle-aged with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome（OSAS）. Methods Nine randomized controlled trails comparing nocturnal CPAP with inactive control appliances in adults with OSAS with the use of computerized search in related medical databases（MEDLINE，EMBASE，CBMdisk，etc） were included.The quality of literature was reviewed，and all data were extracted by two reviewers independently.Meta analysis was conducted used RevMan 4.2 software.Results 9 RCT involving 665 patients of elderly and middle-aged met the inclusion criteria.Meta analysis indicated that the score of Epworth sleepiness scale（ESS） and general health questionnaire-28（GHQ-28） declined significantly after CPAP treatment on effectiveness with WMD（random） －2.94，95 %CI －4.68 to －1.20，or WMD（fixed） －2.26，95 %CI －3.79 to －0.72，Plt;0.01.Nevertheless，hospital anxiety and depression scale（HADS） was not significantly different between CPAP and control with WMD（random） －0.89，95%CI －1.98 to 0.20，Pgt;0.05.Conclusion Current clinical evidence suggested that CPAP was effective in improving day-time subjective outcomes of sleepiness behavior and general mental health status in OSAS patients of elderly and middle-aged，although evidence of improving emotion disorder of anxiety and depression was not confirmed.
Objective To investigate the antihypertensive effects of continuous airway positive pressure( CPAP) plus antihypertensive drugs on patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome ( OSAHS) and hypertension.Methods 82 OSAHS patients with hypertension were enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into a CPAP treatment group( 44 patients, treated with antihypertensive drugs and CPAP) , and a control group( 38 patients, treated with antihypertensive drugs only) . All the patients were performed polysomnography and 24-hour blood pressure monitoring before and 12 weeks after the treatment. Results After 12 weeks treatment, except the systolic pressure in night time( nSBP) , all the parameters of 24-hour blood monitoring improved better in the CPAP group than in the control group( all P lt; 0. 05) . The blood pressure dropped to normal in 75. 0% ( 33/44) CPAP patients and in 52. 6% ( 20 /38) control patients. In the CPAP group, 8( 18. 2% ) cases were withdrawn from antihypertensive drugs, 13( 29. 5% )cases required single agents, and 9( 20. 5% ) cases required three agents to achieve blood pressure control.But in the control group, all the patients needed two or more antihypertensive agents, in which 23( 60. 6% )patients needed three agents to achieve blood pressure control. After the treatment, the patients with dipping pattern blood pressure increased from10 to 29( 22. 7% -65. 9% , P lt;0. 05) in the CPAP group, and from10to 14( 26. 3% -36. 8%, P gt;0. 05) in the control group. Conclusions Combination therapy with CPAP and antihypertensive drugs controls blood pressure better than antihypertensive medication only for OSAHS patients with hypertension with fewer types of antihypertensive agents or even withdrawal from antihypertensive medication in some patients.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of the auto-continuous positive airway pressure (Auto-CPAP) versus the fixed-continuous positive airway pressure (Fixed-CPAP) in patients with obstructive sleep Apnea syndrome (OSAS). Methods Such databases as PubMed (1990 to 2010), SpringerLink (1995 to 2010), CNKI (1990 to 2010), WanFang Data (1995 to 2010), and Google academic (1994 to 2010) were searched, the relevant conference theses were retrieved, and the experts in this field were enquired to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on Auto-CPAP versus Fixed-CPAP for patients with OSAS. Two reviewers independently screened the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, abstracted the data, and assessed the methodology quality. Meta-analyes was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 11 RCTs involving 327 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that, compared with the Fixed-CPAP group after treatment, the Auto-CPAP group significantly reduced the mean effective therapeutic pressure (WMD=-1.79, 95%CI -3.39 to -0.20), won much better treatment adherence (WMD=0.43, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.56), but got much higher scores of the Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (WMD=1.17, 95%CI 0.25 to 2.08) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) (WMD=0.88, 95%CI 0.42 to 1.33) as well. There was no significant difference between those two groups in patients’ subjective preference for treatment (OR=2.06, 95%CI 0.46 to 9.10). Conclusion Compared to the Fixed-CPAP, the Auto-CPAP significantly reduces the mean effective therapeutic pressure and improves the treatment adherence of the patients, but is inferior in decreasing AHI and ESS. However, more high-quality and large-scale RCTs are required to verify the above conclusion because of the limitation of research quality and sample at present.
Objective To assess the effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment (CPAP) on subjective and objective sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrom (OSAHS). Methods We conducted a thorough literature search to identify all published randomized controlled trials of CPAP in patients with OSAHS. We use computer to search Pubmed (1990-2008.5), CNKI (1994-2008.5), google (1995-2008.5), Springer Link (1997-2008)、 and many meeting articals. We chose the literatures that divided patients randomly into two groups as CPAP group and subtheraputic CPAP or drug group. Meta-analysis were performed to access the effect and bias. Results A total of 15 trials involving 1 052 patients were included. A Meta-analysis showed that (1) The total effect was that compared with the control group, CPAP treatment group significantly depressed the degree of sleepiness in ESS [WMD= – 2.61, 95%CI (– 3.92, – 1.29)] and in MWT/ MSLT [WMD= 1.42, 95%CI (– 0.01, 2.85)]. (2) Results of subgroups on ESS were that: 1. CPAP vs CT: there was a significant effect on CPAP therapy [WMD= – 3.15, 95%CI (– 4.84, – 1.47)]. 2. CPAP vs sham CPAP: there was no significant difference between the two groups. 3. CPAP vs drugs: CPAP was more efficient than drugs. CPAP may be more efficient in improving patients’ life quality. Conclusion CPAP is a valuable treatment for OSAHS no matter in subjective or objective sleepiness .But more attention should be paid to the lone-time treatment of CPAP.
ObjectiveTo Affiliated systematically review the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for resistant hypertension (RH) patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2015), CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to March 2016, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about CPAP for RH patients with OSA. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 5 RCTs involving 395 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: After 3 months of follow-up, compared with the antihypertensive drug therapy alone, CPAP plus antihypertensive drug therapy could significantly reduce the 24 h diastolic blood pressure (DBP), day DBP, night DBP, 24 h diastolic blood pressure (SBP) and night SBP of RH patients with OSA (MD=-4.79, 95%CI -7.39 to -2.18, P=0.000 3; MD=-2.94, 95%CI -4.99 to -0.89, P=0.005; MD=-3.19, 95%CI -5.84 to -0.55, P=0.02; MD=-4.36, 95%CI -7.38 to -1.33, P=0.005; MD=-4.90, 95%CI -8.72, -1.08, P=0.01), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in day SBP. After 6 months of follow-up, compared with the antihypertensive drug therapy alone, CPAP plus antihypertensive drug therapy could significantly reduce the 24 h DBP, day DBP of RH patients with OSA (MD=-4.89, 95%CI -6.76 to -3.02, P<0.000 01; MD=-5.01, 95%CI -9.58 to -0.45, P=0.03), but there were no significant differences between the two groups in night DBP, 24 h SBP, day SBP, and night SBP. ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that CPAP on the basis of antihypertensive drug therapy could effectively reduce the DBP and SBP of RH patients with OSA at short-term follow-up, but the long-term effect on SBP is not obvious. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, the above conclusions need to be verified by more high quality studies.
ObjectiveTo analyze the application and efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as an initial support measure for respiratory diseases in premature infants. MethodsWe retrospectively studied the clinical data of 160 premature infants hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit from January to December 2014. These infants accepted CPAP as the initial respiratory support. ResultsThe average birth weight and the average gestational age of the 160 premature infants were (1 581±440) g and (31.6±1.9) weeks, respectively. The main diagnosis of the primary diseases in these infants included neonatal pneumonia (81.3%), neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (57.5%), neonatal apnea (53.8%) and neonatal asphyxia (22.5%). The CPAP success rate in those infants whose birth weight was less than 1 000 g was significantly lower than those whose birth weight was equal or greater than 1 000 g (χ2=4.882, P=0.027). The perinatal period analysis showed that premature rupture of membranes, intrauterine fetal distress and maternal pregnancy complications were factors correlating with the effect of CPAP. CPAP treatment analysis showed that early application of CPAP within 24 hours after birth had a success rate of 82.4% (108/131), and initial inhaled oxygen concentration and oxygen pressure were the primary factors affecting CPAP efficacy. ConclusionApplication of CPAP is effective in respiratory support for premature infants and has a high success rate. Early application can reduce the use of mechanical ventilation and intubation. Regulating appropriate parameters helps raise the efficacy of CPAP therapy. Clinically, the standardized application of CPAP and monitoring the failure of CPAP are important for the improvement of the treatment efficacy.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2017), CBM, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI were searched up to March 27th, 2017 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of HHHFNC vs. NCPAP for NRDS. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 1 104 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: 1) The HHHFNC group reduced the rate of reintubation (OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.98, P=0.04), shortened the time of assisted ventilation (MD=–11.12, 95%CI –13.31 to –8.93, P<0.000 01), hospitalization time (MD=–2.99, 95%CI –3.54 to –2.44, P<0.000 01) and neonatal aspiration of milk (MD=–17.82, 95%CI –21.19 to –14.45, P<0.000 01), shortened partial pressure of carbon dioxide at 48 hours (MD=–4.86, 95%CI –5.94 to –3.78, P<0.000 01), reduced the rate of frequent hemorrhoid (OR=0.32, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.90, P=0.03), the rate of abdominal distension (OR=0.17, 95%CI 0.09 to 0.30, P<0.000 01), the rate of injury of nose (OR=0.08, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.20, P<0.000 01), and the rate of head shape change (OR=0.03, 95%CI 0.00 to 0.23, P=0.000 7). 2) There were no significant differences between two groups in mortality rate, nosocomial infection rate, oxygen exposure time, arterial oxygen pressure and oxygen saturation at 48 hours, intraventricular hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus, retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, respectively. ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that HHHFNC can reduce the rate of reintubation, shorten the time of assisted ventilation, length of hospital day and neonatal aspiration of milk, reduce the rate of frequent hemorrhoid, abdominal distension, injury of nose, head shape change. Due to the limitation of quantity and quality of included studies, the long-term follow-up results of HHHFNC for NRDS are needed to analyze with large-scale and multicenter RCTs.