目的 探讨乳腺癌改良根治术后影响局部复发与远处转移的相关因素。方法 对陕西省汉中市铁路中心医院略阳医院2000年3月至2007年3月期间行乳腺癌改良根治术且资料完整的637例原发性乳腺癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 66例（10.36%）患者术后发生局部复发和远处转移，其中局部复发50例（7.85%），远处转移16例（2.51%）；术后3～4年内发生复发与远处转移者47例（71.21%）。术后复发和远处转移与患者年龄、肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结转移情况、TNM分期、激素受体（ER/PR）表达情况及术后是否接受正规的辅助治疗有关，与患者有无家族史无关。结论 肿瘤大小、腋窝淋巴结转移情况、TNM分期、ER/PR表达情况及术后是否接受正规的辅助治疗是影响乳腺癌改良根治术后复发与远处转移的危险因素，重视乳腺癌术后随访，规范乳腺癌的手术方式，强化乳腺癌的综合治疗是降低乳腺癌改良根治术后复发与远处转移率的主要措施。
【摘要】目的探讨乳腺癌根治术式改良的方法及其在减少术后早期并发症中的意义。方法398例乳腺癌患者，行乳腺癌根治术22例，Patey氏手术83例，Anchincloss手术247例，改良Anchincloss手术46例。比较不同术式术后早期并发症发生情况。结果乳腺癌根治术术后的早期并发症发生率明显高于其它术式（Plt;0.01）； Patey氏手术与Anchincloss手术相比，皮下积液、皮瓣坏死的发生率差异无显著性意义（Pgt;0.05），但患侧上肢水肿的发生率前者高于后者（Plt;0.01）； 改良Anchincloss手术的并发症发生率明显低于前3种术式（Plt;0.01），且其手术时间比其它术式平均缩短20 min。结论改良Anchincloss手术能明显减少术后早期并发症发生率并缩短手术时间。
ObjectiveTo investigate effectiveness of the combination of serratus anterior muscle flap and breast implants for breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy.MethodsBetween January 2015 and December 2015, 25 female patients with breast cancer were enrolled, aged 24-62 years (mean, 40.6 years). The tumor located at left side in 9 cases and right side in 16 cases; 14 cases were in the left upper quadrant, 4 cases were in the left lower quadrant, 7 cases were on the top of the breast. All cases were invasive ductal carcinoma. According to TNM staging, 14 cases were at stageⅠand 11 cases were at stageⅡA. The diameter of lumps were all less than 3 cm. All those lumps were solitary and without distant metastasis. The sentinel nodes were all negative. After modified radical mastectomy, the breasts were reconstructed by serratus anterior muscle flap and breast implants. The nipples were spared in 22 cases.ResultsThe operation time was 113-148 minutes (mean, 136 minutes). All breasts survived and incisions healed at stageⅠ. There was no complication such as hematoma, infection, etc. All patients were followed up 6-18 months (mean, 15 months). Except 1 case, the others were evaluated according to the criteria of the reconstructed breast at 12 months after operation. Among them, 23 cases were evaluated as good and 1 case as fair. There was no tumor recurrence during the follow-up period.ConclusionThe combination of serratus anterior muscle flap and breast implants after the modified radical mastectomy is a handy approach of breast reconstruction which is less harmful with few postoperative complications. It also gains a high degree of satisfaction from patients for good breast shape.
【摘要】 目的 比较在乳腺癌Auchincloss改良根治术中使用超声刀及电刀手术的优、缺点。 方法 2009年6月－2010年7月将176例乳腺癌患者通过信封法随机分为超声刀组和电刀组，每组88例，分别比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结检出数目、术后引流量、皮下积液及术后出血量的差异。 结果 手术时间:超声刀组为（145.72±50.76） min，电刀组为（171.27±66.68） min，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.005）；术中出血量:超声刀组为（71.56±31.34） mL，电刀组为（84.99±36.39） mL，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.009）；清扫出的淋巴结个数:超声刀组为（20.92±9.09）个，电刀组为（17.90±6.74）个，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.013）。而在术后平均引流量和术后积液例数方面两组的差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。两组均无术后出血的情况。 结论 在乳腺癌Auchincloss改良根治术中使用超声刀，较单独使用电刀能缩短手术时间，减少出血量，并增加淋巴结检出的数量。【Abstract】 Objective To compare the disadvantages and advantages between modified radical mastectomy with harmonic scalpel (HS) and conventional electro-scalpel (ES) for patients with breast cancer. Methods Between June 2009 and July 2010, 176 patients with breast cancer were randomly divided into two groups including the HS group and the ES group. The operation time, intra-operative bleeding volume, the number of lymph nodes detected, postoperative drainage volume, subcutaneous hydrops, and postoperative hemorrhage volume between the two groups of patients were compared. Results There were significant differences between the HS and ES groups in terms of operation time [(145.72±50.76) minutes vs. (171.27±66.68) minutes, P=0.005], intra-operative bleeding volume [(71.56±31.34) mL vs. (84.99±36.39) mL, P=0.009], and number of lymph nodes detected (20.92±9.09 vs. 17.90±6.74, Plt;0.05). The postoperative drainage volume and subcutaneous hydrops were not significantly different between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). No postoperative hemorrhage occurred in both groups. Conclusion Compared with ES, the use of HS can reduce operation time and intra-operative bleeding volume, and increase the number of lymph nodes detected during modified radical mastectomy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the value of ultrasound knife in modified radical mastectomy for remaining pectoral nerve and intercostobrachial nerve. MethodsOne hundred and sixty patients with breast cancer were divided into ultrasound knife group and electroscalpe group and then performed modified radical mastectomy with pectoral nerve and intercostobrachial nerve remainning. the pectoralis major thickness and paresthesia of skin of inner upper arm and axillary fossa were detected on the different time after operation. Results①The age, body mass index, and mean opera-tion time had no significant differences between these two groups (P > 0.05).②On 6 months after operation, the thickness of bilateral pectoralis major was not significantly different in the ultrasound knife group (P > 0.05), which of injuried pectoralis major was significantly thinner than that of uninjuried pectoralis major in the electroscalpe group (P < 0.05).③The rates of paresthesia of skin on postoperative 3 months and 6 months in the ultrasound knife group were signifi-cantly lower than those in the electroscalpe group (P < 0.05). ConclusionCompared with monopolar electro diathermy, the use of ultrasonic harmonic scalpel in modified radical mastectomy could better protect pectoral nerve and intercosto-brachial nerve, and thus decrease nerve parafunctional rate.
ObjectiveTo investigate the anatomy and function of pectoralis fascia in breast cancer operation, and the choice of resection and preservation of pectoralis fascia in different operation methods.MethodWe searched the articles related to pectoralis fascia and breast cancer through PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, WanFang Medical Network, SinoMed, and other databases, and then selected the Chinese and foreign articles that met the objective of this paper, and made an review after reading the articles.ResultsIn the immediate breast reconstruction of breast prosthesis after breast cancer operation, the preservation of pectoralis fascia was beneficial to the complete coverage of breast prosthesis and improved the cosmetic effect after operation. The purpose of preserving pectoralis fascia adipose tissue in breast-conserving surgery was to reduce the loss of breast volume and to pursue the cosmetic effect after operation. At present, there had been reports on the safety of pectoralis fascia oncology, but there was no final conclusion on the safe distance between tumor and pectoralis fascia, and the current research could not provide sufficient evidence for the preservation of pectoralis fascia.ConclusionsThe question of whether the pectoralis fascia needs to be removed in breast cancer surgery is still controversial. The preservation of pectoralis fascia is more for better immediate breast reconstruction after operation. However, the current evidence of evidence-based medicine is not sufficient. Clinicians need to conduct multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trials to improve the evidence.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prognosis after breast conserving surgery (BCS) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) in patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer, and analyze the factors related to locoregional recurrence (LRR).MethodsThe clinicopathologic and prognostic data of patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer who underwent the surgical treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2011 to December 2014 were analyzed. The clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic differences of the BCS group and MRM group were compared. The factors related to LRR of patients underwent the BCS and MRM were analyzed.ResultsA total of 1 330 patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer were included in this study, including 230 in the BCS group and 1 100 in the MRM group. Compared with the MRM group, the patients in the BCS group had higher height (P<0.001), younger age (P<0.001), smaller tumor diameter (P<0.001), and less axillary lymph node metastasis (P<0.001). Up to August 2019, 149 cases (18 cases in the BCS group and 131 cases in the MRM group) were lost, with a follow-up rate of 88.8%. The median follow-up time was 71 months (4－103 months). The LRR rate of the BCS group was higher than that of the MRM group (6.1% versus 2.5%, χ2=7.002, P<0.01). The locoregional recurrence-free survival of the MRM group was better than that of the BCS group (χ2=7.886, P<0.01). However, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of the distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival (P>0.05). In the patients underwent the BCS, the HER-2 was associated with the LRR (P<0.05), and the axillary lymph node metastasis was associated with the LRR in the patients underwent the MRM (P<0.05).ConclusionsAccording to results of this study, although there is a significant difference in locoregional recurrence-free survival between BCS group and MRM group in patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer, there are no statistical differences in distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival between the two groups. Therefore, it is safe and feasible for choosing appropriate patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer to underwent breast-conserving treatment.
ObjectiveTo compare the differences in preventing subcutaneous effusion, skin flap necrosis, and patient comfort between simple negative pressure drainage and negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging after radical mastectomy for breast cancer. MethodsOne hundred and ninety-six patients underwent radical mastectomy for breast cancer from January 2010 to December 2012 in this hospital were collected.The simple negative pressure drainage (SNPD group, n=84) and negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging (NPD+CB group, n=112) after radical mastectomy for breast cancer were used to prevent postoperative subcutaneous effusion.The postoperative complications, postoperative 3 d drainage volume, and patient comfort were compared in two groups. ResultsOne hundred and ninety-six patients with breast cancer were females.The differences of general clinical data were not statistically significant in two groups (P > 0.05).The differences of chest wall mean extubation time, axillary mean extubation time, postoperative 3 d mean drainage volume, and incidences of subcutaneous effusion and skin flap necrosis were not statistically significant in two groups (P > 0.05).The rate of comfort satisfactory in the SNPD group was significantly higher than that in the NPD+CB group [76.2%(16/84) versus 22.3%(25/112), P < 0.001].The chemotherapy was not affected after operation in two groups. ConclusionsComparing with negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging, simple negative pressure drainage do not increase postoperative subcutaneous effusion and skin flap necrosis, but it greatly improves the patients satisfactory rate.
Objective To evaluate the value of extended latissimus dorsi flap (ELDF) in immediate breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy. Methods Thirty-six patients with breast cancer who accepted modified radical mastectomy and 12 patients with breast cancer who accepted immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy from January 2008 to June 2009 were included. The complications, cosmetical results and quality of life of these patients were compared. The shape of breast reconstruction was also evaluated. Results All of 12 patients succeeded in proceeding immediate breast reconstruction with ELDF. The evaluation of shape of breast reconstruction was good in 6 cases, secondary in 4 cases, and bad in 2 cases, which was beyond that in patients of radical operation group (Plt;0.001). There was no statistical difference in operation complications as hydrops, necrosis, affecting limb shoulder joint motion, drainage time, hospital stay, and starting time for adjuvant therapy between two groups (Pgt;0.05). The patients in breast reconstruction group had a better quality of life compared with the patients in radical operation group (Plt;0.001). In breast reconstruction group, 10 patients received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and no necrosis was showed in local flap grafting. After the follow-up of 2-17 months (median 8 months), no local recurrence and metastasis was demonstrated in two groups patients. Conclusions There are good cosmetic results after immediate breast reconstruction with ELDF, and it is easy to operate. It is a safe and feasible therapeutics method for early breast cancer.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical application value of immediate breast reconstruction using silicon implant after skin-sparing modified radical mastectomy for patients with breast cancer. MethodsA total of 28 patients with breast cancer undergoing immediate breast reconstruction using silicon implant after skin-sparing modified radical mastectomy from January 2006 to December 2009 were included in this study. The perioperative results, breast appearance evaluation and followup results were analyzed. ResultsAll 28 patients received axillary lymph node dissection and the number of lymph node dissected was 14-32 (median 21). The operation time was 117-140 min (mean 126 min), blood loss was 82-124 ml (mean 98 ml), and the time to drainage tube removal was 3-5 d. No wound infection, skin necrosis, and foreign body reaction occurred in all the patients, especially in 22 patients underwent nippleareola complex-sparing mastectomy, no ischemia or necrosis occurred in nippleareola complex. For evaluation of breast appearance, excellent was in ten cases and good in 18 cases, thus, the excellent and good rate was 100%. All patients were followed up for 12-48 months (median 24 months) after operation, and distant metastasis, local recurrence, upper extremity edema, and dysfunction were not found. No fiber kystis contracture was found and all patients were satisfied with breast appearance and good handfeels. ConclusionsImmediate breast reconstruction using silicon implant after skinsparing modified radical mastectomy has the advantage of minimal invasion, safety, simple operation, and quick postoperative recovery for patients with breast cancer and the appearance of reconstructed breast is excellent, which can be clinically used widely.