Objectives To train postgraduate medical students the ability of effectively using network resources and independently studying, and to explore new model of clinical liver cancer teaching. Methods The teaching model of problembased learning (PBL) to clinical liver cancer teaching was applied. Results The teaching model of PBL changed graduate student the status of passive acceptance to active participation. The teaching process was full of livingness, and the teaching quality was improved.Conclusion The teaching model of PBL can break through the limitations of passive acceptance of book knowledge in traditional teaching model and improve the ability to handle the comprehensive clinical knowledge of liver cancer, which provides a new model to the teaching of liver cancer to graduate medical students in clinic.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of problem-based learning (PBL) and traditional teaching method (lecture-based learning) on clinical practical teaching of orthopedic surgery. MethodsBetween May 2012 and December 2013, 55 orthopedic interns were chosen to be divided into two groups: PBL group (n=29) and traditional lecture group (control group, n=26). Case report and examination on a completion of orthopedic surgery were used to assess the teaching outcomes. ResultsPerformance differences in content of presentation and capability of answers to questions were significant between PBL group and the traditional group in the report test (P<0.05). The test scores of case analysis examination in PBL group were significantly higher than those in the traditional lecture group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in other types of questions (P>0.05). ConclusionThe participants in PBL group have performed significantly better in culturing clinical thinking and comprehensive analysis, competence and in no circumstance did they perform worse than traditional lecture method.
Objective To explore the teaching ability of the neurology refresher doctors by case teaching method combined with flipped classroom teaching mode. Methods The refresher doctors who were studying in the infection group of Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University between March 2019 and September 2020 were selected. According to the time of admission, the enrolled refresher doctors were divided into control group (grade 2019) and observation group (grade 2020). The control group adopted the traditional teaching mode, and the observation group adopted the case teaching method combined with the flipped classroom teaching mode. A self-designed questionnaire was used to compare the teaching ability of the two groups of refresher doctors. Results A total of 44 refresher doctors were included. Among them, there were 24 refresher doctors in the control group and 20 refresher doctors in the observation group. The self-evaluation of the teaching ability of the two groups of refresher doctors and the evaluation of their teaching ability by the teachers showed that, except for the item “enthusiasm for teaching and willingness to spend enough time to participate in the evaluation of teaching work” of humanistic quality (P>0.05), the observation group was better than the control group in professional knowledge, teaching ability, teaching methods and humanistic quality (P<0.05). Conclusions Through the case teaching method combined with flipped classroom teaching mode, the teaching ability of refresher doctors can be cultivated, which is helpful for training more high-quality doctors for the country and promoting the sustainable and coordinated development of medical education. However, the awareness and enthusiasm of the refresher doctors to teaching work need to be improved.
Objective To explore the application and effects of Seminar case teaching method in teaching surgical nursing. Methods Nursing students of the Yiyang Junior Medical College were divided into two groups (140 students/group). Seminar case teaching was applied in the trial group, while traditional teaching method (classroom teaching or instruction) was applied in the control group. The two groups used the same materials, and were taught by the same teacher team during the same course. After the courses, surgical knowledge and skills were evaluated using theory exams and operation tests (tools included communication ability scale as well as the California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory Scale for students’ ability and quality levels, and an anonymous questionnaire for teaching satisfaction) were analyzed between the two groups. Results The scores of the trial group were higher than those of the control group in theory exams and operation tests, with a significant difference (Plt;0.01). The before-after score differences of communication skills and critical thinking ability of the trial group were also higher than those of the control group, with a significant difference (Plt;0.01). The result of the anonymous questionnaire showed that, the students in the trial group had better satisfaction about Seminar case teaching method. Conclusion Seminar case teaching method applied in surgical nursing teaching is feasible and effective, which is better than traditional teaching method in improving knowledge, ability, and quality of nursing students.
Objective To assess the affect of problem-based learning (PBL) versus literature based learning(LBL) in clinical medicine students. Methods Computer retrieval was conducted to search for controlled studies comparing PBL with LBL. The quality of included studies was critically evaluated and data was analyzed by using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0 software. Results Finally 11 articles were included in the review, but most of them were of low quality.There are clinical heterogeneity between different studis which cause descriptive results. The PBL tended to be superior to LBL in the analysis-skill, self-directed learning skill, data-searching skill, and original skill.Conclusion PBL tends to be associated with better learning results among clinical medicine students compared withLBL methods. We need large-scale, randomized controlled trials of higher quality to confirm this.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the teaching effects of Seminar teaching model versus lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching model on clinical medical students in China.MethodsPubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet, WanFang Data and VIP database were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on Seminar versus LBL applied in clinical medical students in China, from the establishment of database to October 2017. The Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software.ResultsA total of 12 RCTs with 741 students were enrolled, including 380 in Seminar teaching group and 361 in LBL teaching group. The results of Meta-analysis demonstrated that the basic theory score [standard mean difference (SMD)=1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.72, 1.62), P<0.000 01], the clinical skill score [SMD=1.33, 95%CI (0.82, 1.83), P<0.000 01], the classroom atmosphere score ［SMD=1.51, 95%CI (1.13, 1.90), P<0.000 01］, the team score [SMD=0.86, 95%CI (0.50, 1.22), P<0.000 01], and the autonomous learning ability score [SMD=2.25, 95%CI (0.31, 4.18), P=0.02] of Seminar teaching group were superior to those in the LBL teaching group.ConclusionThe Seminar teaching model is superior to the LBL teaching model in clinical medical students.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of the application of team-based learning (TBL) pedagogy and traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) pedagogy in radiology education.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the application of TBL and LBL pedagogy in radiology education from inception to March 31st, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies; meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata/SE 16.0 software.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 721 participants were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that TBL significantly improved students’ theoretical assessment scores (SMD=1.70, 95%CI 1.05 to 2.36, P<0.001), practical assessment scores (SMD=2.00, 95%CI 1.02 to 2.98, P<0.001), preference to the curriculum design (RR=1.53, 95%CI 1.19 to 1.97, P=0.001), agreed to more effective promotion in aspects of teamwork ability (RR=2.46, 95%CI 1.69 to 3.59, P<0.001), self-directed learning ability (RR=2.41, 95%CI 1.33 to 4.39, P=0.004), and clinical practice ability (RR=2.09, 95%CI 1.46 to 3.00, P<0.001) compared with LBL pedagogical method. However, no significant difference was found in the subjective evaluation of theoretical knowledge between two pedagogies.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that TBL pedagogy based on active learning and team cooperation has obvious advantages over traditional LBL mode in radiology education. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.