Objective To evaluate the efficiency and associated factors of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation( NPPV) in the treatment of acute lung injury( ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome( ARDS) .Methods Twenty-eight patients who fulfilled the criteria for ALI/ARDS were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized to receive either noninvasive positive pressure ventilation( NPPV group) or oxygen therapy through a Venturi mask( control group) . All patients were closely observed and evaluated during observation period in order to determine if the patients meet the preset intubation criteria and the associated risk factors. Results The success rate in avoiding intubation in the NPPV group was 66. 7%( 10/15) , which was significantly lower than that in the control group ( 33. 3% vs. 86. 4% , P = 0. 009) . However, there was no significant difference in the mortality between two groups( 7. 7% vs.27. 3% , P =0. 300) . The incidence rates of pulmonary bacteria infection and multiple organ damage were significantly lower in the NPPV success subgroup as compared with the NPPV failure group( 2 /10 vs. 4/5, P =0. 01;1 /10 vs. 3/5, P = 0. 03) . Correlation analysis showed that failure of NPPV was significantly associated with pulmonary bacterial infection and multiple organ damage( r=0. 58, P lt;0. 05; r =0. 53, P lt;0. 05) . Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that pulmonary bacterial infection was an independent risk factor associated with failure of NPPV( r2 =0. 33, P =0. 024) . In the success subgroup, respiratory rate significantly decreased( 29 ±4 breaths /min vs. 33 ±5 breaths /min, P lt; 0. 05) and PaO2 /FiO2 significantly increased ( 191 ±63 mmHg vs. 147 ±55 mmHg, P lt;0. 05) at the time of 24 hours after NPPV treatment as compared with baseline. There were no significant change after NPPV treatment in heart rate, APACHEⅡ score, pH and PaCO2 ( all P gt;0. 05) . On the other hand in the failure subgroup, after 24 hours NPPV treatment, respiratory rate significantly increased( 40 ±3 breaths /min vs. 33 ±3 breaths /min, P lt;0. 05) and PaO2 /FiO2 showed a tendency to decline( 98 ±16 mmHg vs. 123 ±34 mmHg, P gt; 0. 05) . Conclusions In selected patients, NPPV is an effective and safe intervention for ALI/ARDS with improvement of pulmonary oxygenation and decrease of intubation rate. The results of current study support the use of NPPV in ALI/ARDS as the firstline choice of early intervention with mechanical ventilation.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of home mechanical ventilation (HMV) for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with respiratory failure in Tongzhou district of Beijing city. MethodsTwenty stable COPD patients with respiratory failure were included in the study.During the one-year follow-up period,4 patients died and 1 withdrew and 15 patients finished the follow-up.The patients was followed up by telephone each month and guided in drug administration,HMV,and rehabilitation therapy.At the beginning of the study and one year later,the patients were interviewed and accessed on the general data,nutritional status,COPD assessment test (CAT),Borg dyspnea and respiratory fatigue score,Hamilton depression scale,Hamilton anxiety scale,and arterial blood gas analysis. ResultsAt the end of one-year follow-up,nutrition index,CAT,Borg dyspnea and respiratory fatigue score,Hamilton depression scale,Hamilton anxiety scale,pH,and PaO2 did not change significantly (P>0.05),while PaCO2 decreased significantly compared with those at the beginning of the study (P<0.05).Compared with the past year,the times of hospitalization due to acute exacerbation of COPD was significantly reduced during the follow-up year (P<0.05). ConclusionHMV can ameliorate carbon dioxide retention and reduce times of hospitalization due to acute exacerbation of COPD for COPD patients with respiratory failure.
Objective The risk factors of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) combined with failure of respiratory failure were identified by meta-analysis, so as to provide a basis for early clinical prevention and treatment failure and early intervention. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP and CBM Data were searched to collect studies about risk factors about failure of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in AECOPD and respiratory failure published from January 2000 to January 2021. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, literature data extraction and quality assessment. Meta-analysis was performed on the final literature obtained using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Totally 19 studies involving 3418 patients were recruited. The statistically significant risk factors included Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHEⅡ) score, pre-treatment PCO2, pre-treatment pH, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), respiratory rate (RR) before treatment, body mass index (BMI), age, C-reactive protein (CRP), renal insufficiency, sputum disturbance, aspiration of vomit. Conclusions High APACHE-Ⅱ score, high PCO2 before treatment, low pH value before treatment, low GCS score, high RR before treatment, low BMI, advanced age, low albumin, high CRP, renal insufficiency, sputum disturbance, and vomit aspiration were the risk factors for failure of respiratory failure in patients with COPD treated by NIPPV. Failure of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in COPD patients with respiratory failure is affected by a variety of risk factors, and early identification and control of risk factors is particularly important to reduce the rate of treatment failure.
Objective To explore the effects of enteral tube feeding on moderate AECOPD patients who underwent noninvasive positive pressure ventilation ( NPPV) . Methods Sixty moderate AECOPD patients with NPPV admitted from January 2009 to April 2011 were recruited for the study. They were randomly divided into an enteral tube feeding group (n=30) received enteral tube feeding therapy, and an oral feeding group (n=30) received oral feeding therapy. Everyday nutrition intake and accumulative total nutrition intake in 7 days, plasma level of prealbumin and transferrin, success rate of weaning, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, rate of trachea cannula, and mortality rate in 28 days were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the oral feeding group, the everyday nutrition intake and accumulative total nutrition intake in 7 days obviously increased (Plt;0.05) , while the plasma prealbumin [ ( 258.4 ±16.5) mg/L vs. (146.7±21.6) mg/L] and transferrin [ ( 2.8 ±0.6) g/L vs. ( 1.7 ±0.3) g/L] also increased significantly after 7 days in the enteral tube feeding group( Plt;0.05) . The success rate of weaning ( 83.3% vs. 70.0%) , the duration of mechanical ventilation [ 5. 6( 3. 2-8. 6) days vs. 8. 4( 4. 1-12. 3) days] , the length of ICU stay [ 9. 2( 7. 4-11. 8) days vs. 13. 6( 8.3-17. 2) days] , the rate of trachea cannula ( 16. 6% vs. 30. 0% ) , the mortality rate in 28 days ( 3. 3% vs. 10. 0% ) all had significant differences between the enteral tube feeding group and the oral feeding group. Conclusions For moderate AECOPD patients with NPPV, enteral tube feeding can obviously improve the condition of nutrition and increase the success rate of weaning, shorten the mechanical ventilation time and the mean stay in ICU, decrease the rate of trachea cannula and mortality rate in 28 days. Thus enteral tube feeding should be preferred for moderate AECOPD patients with NPPV.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) combined with left heart failure. MethodsA total of 152 patients (70-85 years old) diagnosed with COPD combined with left heart failure and treated in our hospital between June 2011 and January 2015 were randomly divided into trial group (noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation with routine treatment, n=76) and control group (routine treatment, n=76). Respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, pH, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were analyzed and compared between the two groups after treatment. We did t-test to analyze the difference of these indexes between the two groups statistically. ResultsRespiratory rate, heart rate and PaCO2 in both of the two groups after the treatment were significantly lower than those before the treatment (P<0.001), while PaO2 and LVEF in both of the two groups after the treatment were significantly higher than those before the treatment (P<0.001). The systolic pressure and diastolic pressure in both of the two groups after the treatment didn't differ much from those before the treatment (P>0.05). The pH value after the treatment increased only in the trial group compared with that before the treatment (P<0.05). The respiratory rate, heart rate, pH value, PaO2, PaCO2 and LVEF after the treatment in trial group were meliorated compared with those in the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionTreatment with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for elderly patients with COPD combined with left heart failure is more efficient than the routine treatment.
Objective To explore the effects of different humidification and heating strategies during non-invasive positive pressure ventilation( NIPPV) in patients with ALI/ARDS. Methods A total of 45 patients with ALI/ARDS were randomly divided into three groups to receive NIPPV with different humidification and heating strategies, ie. Group A ( humidification with a 370 Humidifier without heating) ,group B ( humidification with a 370 Humidifier along with a MR410 Heater) , and group C ( humidification and heating with aMR850 Humidifier, and a RT308 circuit heater) . The changes of air temperature, absolute humidity, relative humidity, sputum thickness and patient comfort were compared between the three groups. Sputum thickness was evaluated with AWSS scoring system. Results After humidification and heating, the air temperature, absolute humidity and AWSS score improved significantly in group B [ elevated from ( 23. 9 ±1. 0) ℃, (9.8 ±1. 3) mg/L and 2. 0 ±0. 7 respectively to ( 30. 3 ±1. 7) ℃, ( 31. 0 ±2. 3)mg/L and ( 3. 0 ±0. 9) respectively, P lt; 0. 001] and group C [ elevated from( 23. 8 ±1. 0) , ( 9. 8 ±1. 5)mg/L and ( 2. 1 ±0. 7) respectively to ( 34. 0 ±1. 1) ℃, ( 43.8 ±2. 5) mg /L and 3. 5 ±1. 0 respectively,P lt; 0. 001] . Air temperature and absolute humidity were significantly higher in group C than those in group B( P lt; 0. 001) . Of all the parameters, only absolute humidity showed a significant improvment in group A [ elevated from( 9. 9 ±1. 6) mg/L to ( 11. 9 ±0. 9) mg/L, P lt; 0. 001] . The degree of comfort in group C was significantly higher than that in group A and B [ 8. 0 ±1. 7 vs 5. 0 ±1. 2 and 3. 0 ±0. 4, respectively, P lt;0. 001] . In group A seven patients were switched to group C because of discomfort, four accepted NIPPV continuously, and two avoided invasive mechanical ventilation eventually. In group B three patients were switched to group C because of intolerance of too much condensed water in the breathing circuit, all of them accepted NIPPV continuously, and one avoided invasive mechanical ventilation eventually. Conclusions Compared with mere humidification or humidification with heating humidifier, humidification with heating humidifier and circuit heating during NIPPV can improve the absolute humidity, air temperature and patient comfort,meanwhile decreasing the sputumthickness of patients with ALI/ARDS.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) on the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) combined with lung injury [acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)] in emergency treatment. MethodsFifty-six patients with SAP combined with ALI/ARDS treated between January 2013 and March 2015 were included in our study. Twenty-eight patients who underwent NPPV were designated as the treatment group, while the other 28 patients who did not undergo NPPV were regarded as the control group. Then, we observed patients' blood gas indexes before and three days after treatment. The hospital stay and mortality rate of the two groups were also compared. ResultsBefore treatment, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of pH value and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) (P>0.05). Three days after treatment, blood pH value of the treatment group and the control group was 7.41±0.07 and 7.34±0.04, respectively, with a significant difference (P＜0.05); the PaO2 value was respectively (60.60±5.11) and (48.40±3.57) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa), also with a significant difference (P＜0.05). The hospital stay of the treatment group and the control group was (18.22±3.07) and (23.47±3.55) days with a significant difference (P＜0.05); and the six-month mortality was 17% and 32% in the two groups without any significant difference (P>0.05). ConclusionIt is effective to treat patients with severe acute pancreatitis combined with acute lung injury in emergency by noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.