摘要:目的:评价塞来昔布(Celecoxib)联合希罗达(Xeloda)节拍化疗(metronomic chemotherapy)治疗老年晚期胃癌的客观疗效及毒副反应,探讨老年晚期胃癌高缓解率、低毒性的治疗方法。方法:45例患者随机分为两组。治疗组23例,采用塞来昔布与希罗达节拍化疗, Celecoxib 200 mg Bid, Xeloda 500 mg Bid,连续服药,直至病情进展。4周为一周期,至少1周期后评定疗效。对照组22例,采用FOLFOX4方案化疗:LOHP 85 mg/m2 iv gtt 2h d1,CF 200 mg/m2 iv gtt 2h d1、d2,5FU 400 mg/m2 iv bolus d1、d2,5FU 600 mg/m2 civ 22h d1、d2。每2周重复,4周为1周期,至少1周期后评定疗效。结果: 45例患者均获得随访。治疗组与对照组总有效率(RR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、生活质量改善率(QOL)分别为47.8%(11/23)、50.0%(11/22);91.3%(21/23)、63.6%(14/22);826%(19/23)、54.5%(12 /22)。 两组患者中位疾病进展时间(mTTP)、中位生存期(MST)分别为9.5个月、5.5个月;13.5个月、9个月。治疗组与对照组1年生存率分别为56.5％(13/23)、27.3％(6/22)。两组总有效率差异无统计学意(Pgt;0.05),生活质量改善率、疾病控制率、1年生存率差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。治疗组毒副反应轻微。结论:塞来昔布联合希罗达节拍化疗治疗老年晚期胃癌安全、有效,患者得到生存受益,依从性好,效价比高,值得临床进一步研究。
目的:评价多西他赛(D)联合拓扑替康(T)治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效和毒性反应。方法:用DT方案治疗晚期胃痛患者47例。结果:可评价疗效者47例,完全缓解(CR)4例,占8.5％:部分缓解(PR)28例,占59.6％:稳定(SD)11例．占23.4％:进展(PD)4例,占8.5％。总有效率:(CR+PR)为68.1％,临床获益率(CR+PR+SD)为91.5％。中位肿瘤进展期(TTP)8.4个月,中位生存期(MST)12.8个月。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制、白细胞减少、胃肠道反应、恶心呕吐、腹泻、口腔粘膜炎,无治疗相关性死亡病例。结论:多西他赛联合拓扑替康治疗晚期胃癌临床缓解率颇高,提高了生存质量,不良反应可耐受,患者治疗依从性好,可以作为晚期胃癌一线治疗方案。
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion chemotherapy (CHPPC) and intravenous chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients, and find better nursing methods. MethodsSixty advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy between June 2013 and June 2014 were divided into CHPPC group (group C, n=30) and intravenous chemotherapy group (group V, n=30). We recorded the nursing methods for both the two groups, patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment, peritoneal metastasis rate and quality of life during the chemotherapy. ResultsThe life quality in group V was lower than that in group C (P<0.05). The differences in patients' satisfaction rate, peritoneal metastasis rate, and one-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor patients with advanced gastric cancer requiring chemotherapy, in spite of higher cost and more complicated operations, CHPPC is superior in lower adverse events rate, better quality of life during chemotherapy and doesn't decrease patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment.
摘要:目的：观察复方苦参注射液配合化疗治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效。方法：将60例晚期胃癌患者分为两组,两组均采用FOLFOX方案化疗,21天为1个周期；2个周期评价效疗。治疗组30例加用复方苦参注射液治疗,14天为1疗程,2个疗程评价疗效。观察近期疗效及临床证候变化、生存质量及毒副反应变化。结果:两组近期疗效比较,治疗组与对照组总缓解率分别为433%和400%（P＞005）；两组临床证候变化比较,治疗组与对照组总改善率分别为800%和600%（P＜005）；两组生存质量变化比较,治疗组与对照组提高稳定率分别为867%和567%（P＜005）；中位生存期分别为8个月和5个月；两组毒副反应比较,治疗组毒副反应明显低于对照组（P＜005）。结论:复方苦参注射液配合化疗治疗晚期胃癌具有一定抗肿瘤作用,能缓解疼痛症状及临床症状,减轻化疗毒副反应,提高生活质量,延长生存期。Abstract: Objective: To study the effect of combination FuFang Ku Shen Zhusheye and chemotherapy for treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Sixty patientswith advanced gastric cancer were divided into two groups, all used with FOLFOXregimen, 21 days a cycle; twocycle assessment of treatment effect. The treatment group were treated with the FuFang Ku Shen Zhusheye plus treatment, a course of treatment for 14 days, the effect were evaluated after two courses. The clinical symptoms and living quality, toxicity were dynamically observed. Results: Both shortterm effect of comparison, the overall response rates of the treatment group and the control group were 433% and 400% (P＞005); The rates of clinical symptoms of the treatment group and the controlgroup were 800% and 600% respectively (P＜005); the rates of increasing of living quality were respectively 867% and 567% (P＜005); the median survival time was 8 months and 5 months; the toxicity of the treatment group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P ＜005).Conclusion: Treating advanced gastric cancer by use of FuFang Ku Shen Zhusheye combination with chemotherapy is helpful to reducing the pain symptoms, promoting the clinical symptoms, reducing the chemotherapy side effects, improving quality of life and prolonging the survival time.
ObjectiveTo summarize controversy and progress of multi-slice spiral CT in efficacy evaluation of transformation therapy for advanced gastric cancer.MethodThe recent studies published at home and abroad on the spiral CT in evaluating the therapeutic effect of transformation therapy for the advanced gastric cancer were reviewed and analyzed.ResultsIn recent years, though the energy spectrum and dual-energy CT examinations had appeared, the most common tool in evaluating of the efficacy of transformation therapy for the advanced gastric cancer was the spiral CT. The most common evaluation standard was still the RECIST standard.ConclusionsSpiral CT has its outstanding diagnostic significance in therapeutic evaluation of transformation therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Although there is some controversy, with advancements of a large number of studies, it will greatly help diagnosis and treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of lentinan on immune function in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1969-2006), EMBASE (1984-2006), OVID (1969-2006), CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library) (Issue 4, 2006), the Chinese Biomedicine Database (1978-2006) and CNKI (1978-2006). We also handsearched relevant journals. Pharmaceutical companies were contacted to identify additional randomized controlled trials. We assessed the identified studies in order to include high quality studies. Results Ten studies (containing 786 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Six trials shown that lentinan+FAM had significant efficacy upon patients with advanced gastric cancer compared with FAM in overall response [Plt;0.01, RR1.70, 95%CI (1.39,2.09)]. In three trials, a significant effect of lentinan+FAM group compared with FAM group in quantity of CD3+ T, T4/T8, NK was found, but lower than FAM group in side- effect of digestive system [RR0.71, 95%CI (0.55,0.91)]. The other trail identified there were fewer side effects in lentinan+FAM group compared with FAM group, though did not discribe the overall response. In case the significant heterogeneity, meta-analysis could not be used for the other three trails included, since the components of chemotherapeutic agents (ATP+Co-A+Vc; DDP+ Epirubicin+5FU; 5FU+CF+VP16) were not the same. In the three trials, overall response was statistically significant better in the lentinan group than in the control group, and lentinan group could significantly increase the quantity of CD3+ T, T4/T8, NK compared with control group. Conclusions The present meta-analysis suggested that addition of lentinan to standard chemotherapy provided a significant advantage over chemotherapy alone in terms of efficacy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, most of trials included in the review were of low quality, therefore, it is of necessity to conduct multi-center randomized-controlled trials of high quality.
Objective To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy for HER-2 positive patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods We searched ClinicalTrails.gov, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2016), CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data, VIP and major meeting proceeding databases (ASCO and ESMO) from inception to May 2016, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or non-RCTs about trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Nine studies involving 1 034 HER-2 positive patients were included, of which three were RCTs and the other six were non-RCTs. Meta-analysis results indicated that the trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy group (the trial group) was superior to the chemotherapy alone group (the control group) in complete remission (OR=2.76, 95%CI 1.40 to 5.44,P=0.003), partial remission (OR=1.81, 95%CI 1.40 to 2.33,P<0.000 01), overall response rate (OR=2.09, 95%CI 1.63 to 2.68,P<0.000 01) and disease control rate (OR=2.20, 95%CI 1.63 to 2.98,P<0.000 1), while there was no statistical significances in stable disease (OR=0.87, 95%CI 0.66 to 1.14,P=0.31). In terms of safety, the incidence of diarrhea (OR=1.51, 95%CI 1.10 to 2.06,P=0.01) and erythra (OR=4.35, 95%CI 1.25 to 15.10,P=0.02) in the trial group were higher than the control group. However, other adverse reactions were no significant differences in two groups. Conclusion Compared with chemotherapy alone, trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of HER-2 positive patients with advanced gastric cancer can significantly improve response rate, but it may increase the incidence of diarrhea and erythra. Because of the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, the above conclusion needs to be verified by conducting more high quality studies.
ObjectiveTo understand the latest research progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and explore the optimal treatment strategy. Method The latest literature on the treatment of AGC was retrieved and reviewed. Results For patients with AGC, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, palliative therapy, nutritional support, and traditional Chinese medicine therapy were currently adopted in clinic, the combination of them were used usually. Some patients obtained good therapeutic effects by new chemotherapy drugs and antibody conjugated drugs. In the era of first-line immunotherapy or targeted therapy, first-line immunotherapy alone, immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy, double immunotherapy, and immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenesis targeted drugs for AGC had represented some survival benefits. ConclusionsThe research, development, and widespread application of new anti-tumor drugs have continuously expanded the treatment methods for AGC. The development of tumor molecular biology provides an opportunity for the treatment of AGC, and the precise diagnosis and treatment pattern guided by molecular typing is gradually maturing. However, the treatment of AGC is still facing challenges. In the era of precision medicine, facing the higher heterogeneity of gastric cancer, the dilemma of precise treatment of drugs for AGC, and the research and development of new anti-tumor drugs, the optimal treatment mode of AGC still needs more clinical exploration. It is necessary to comprehensively consider various aspects such as the patient’s physical condition, previous treatment status, and drug accessibility.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel (DOC) combined with oxaliplatin (OXA) regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. MethodsSixty patients with advanced gastric cancer treated in our hospital from January 2008 to January 2011 were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group (n=30) was given DOC combined with OXA regimen. Patients in this group were treated with DOC 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; OXA 130 mg/m2, ivgtt, d4; with 21 days as a cycle. The control group (n=30) was given DCF regimen. Patients in the control group were treated with DOC 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; cisplatin 75 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1; calcium folinate 200/m2, ivgtt, 2 h, d1-2; fluorouracil 400 mg/m2, bolus 10 minutes, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 civ 22 h d1-2; also with 21 days as a cycle. All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy at least. The effective rate (complete remission+partial remission), adverse reactions, median survival time and quality of life were analyzed and compared between the two groups. ResultsThe effective rates in the treatment group and the control group were 60.0% and 46.7% respectively, showing a non-significant difference (P>0.05). The appetite increasing rate (70.0% vs 43.3%), the weight gain rate (60.0% vs 33.3%), and the Karnofsky score improvement rate (63.3% vs 30.0%) of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The adverse reactions were fewer in the treatment group, and most of them were between grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ. The median time of disease progression (5.8 months vs 5.6 months) and the median survival period (11.8 months vs 9.2 months) of the treatment group were longer than those in the control group. ConclusionDOC combined with OXA regimen is effective in treating advanced gastric cancer. It can significantly improve the quality of life of the patients, and it has fewer adverse reactions. Meanwhile, the median survival period is prolonged. DOC combined with OXA regimen is worth to be applied in clinic.
【摘要】 目的 探讨替吉奥胶囊联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌的近期疗效和毒性反应。 方法 2010年1-7月，16例晚期胃癌患者根据体表面积来确定初始剂量，体表面积lt;1.25 m2，替吉奥胶囊40 mg/次，2次/d；体表面积1.25~1.5 m2，替吉奥胶囊50 mg/次，2次/d；体表面积gt;1.5 m2，替吉奥胶囊60 mg/次，2次/d，早、晚饭后分别口服1次，连续服用28 d，停药14 d。奥沙利铂注射液130 mg/m2加入5%葡萄糖注射液500 mL避光缓慢静gt;2 h，第1、21天重复，连用2周期。按RECIST 1.1标准评价客观疗效和不良反应。 结果 16例患者中PR 9例（56.3%），SD3例（18.8%），PD 4例（25%），总有效率为69.0%。不良反应主要是血液学毒性、胃肠道反应及外周神经毒性，且均在Ⅰ~Ⅱ。 结论 替吉奥胶囊联合奥沙利铂方案治疗晚期胃癌的近期疗效较好，不良反应可以耐受，值得进一步研究应用。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the early efficacy of Oxaliplatin combined with S1 capsule on advanced gastric cancer and observe the toxicity. Methods A total of 16 patients with advanced gastric cancer from January to July 2010 were treated with chemotherapy: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 mixed with 5% glucose injection 500 mL in the first day and repeated in the 21st day; Po after breakfast and dinner: S1 capsule with an initial dose according to the body surface area. Body surface lt;1.25 m2, 40 mg once, twice per day; body surface:1.25-1.5 m2,50 mg once, twice per day; body surface gt;1.5 m2, 60 mg once, twice per day. The medication lasted for 28 days, withdrew for 14 days. All of the patients underwent the treatment for two cycles. Efficacy and toxicities were evaluated according to the RECIST 1.1 standard. Results Of the 16 patients, partial remission (PR) was in nine (56.3%), stable disease was in three (18.8%) (SD), and progression disease was in four (PD). The total response rate was 69.0%. The major toxicities included leucopenia, nausea, vomiting and neurosensory abnormity. Conclusion Oxaliplatin combined with S1 capsule is effective on advanced gastric cancer, and the adverse effects are tolerable.