目的 研究七氟醚诱导气管插管减轻短期内行两次手术的脑性瘫痪患儿术前焦虑的效果。 方法 2009年12月－2011年7月选择需要短期内行两次全身麻醉（全麻）手术的痉挛性脑性瘫痪患儿60例，美国麻醉医师协会（ASA）Ⅰ～Ⅱ级。随机分为A组常规麻醉诱导气管插管（30例）和B组七氟醚诱导气管插管（30例）；分别在一期及二期手术术前访视时（M1、M3）、入手术室时（M2、M4）对两组患儿进行改良耶鲁围术期焦虑量表评估；并分别在一期及二期手术麻醉诱导期（N1、N2）对两组患儿进行诱导期合作度量表的标准评定。 结果 同组一期、二期手术比较，A组患儿二期手术术前焦虑更明显（P＜0.05），二期入手术室时焦虑更明显（P＜0.05），二期手术合作度更差（P＜0.05）；B组患儿两次手术术前焦虑无明显变化（P＞0.05），一期入手术室时焦虑明显（P＜0.05），一期手术合作度较差（P＜0.05）。两组之间，一期手术两组患儿焦虑情况无明显区别（P＞0.05），二期手术A组比B组的患儿焦虑更明显（P＜0.05），两次手术B组都比A组的患儿合作度更好（P＜0.05）。 结论 七氟醚麻醉诱导气管插管能够有效减轻短期内需要进行两次手术的痉挛性脑性瘫痪患儿的术前焦虑，提高患儿二期手术的合作度，提供良好的手术麻醉条件，保证患儿的围术期安全。
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) in preoperative anxiety in patients with local anesthesia. Methods From May to December 2020, a convenient sampling method was used to conduct an APAIS questionnaire survey on patients undergoing percutaneous renal biopsy in the Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and the reliability and validity of the scale were analyzed. ResultsA total of 460 questionnaires were distributed and 444 valid questionnaires were returned, with a valid response rate of 96.5%. The Cronbach α of APAIS was 0.896, the Guttman split-half reliability was 0.811, and the content validity index was 0.891. The model fit was 12.122 for the chi-square fit index/degree of freedom, 0.916 for the goodness-of-fit index, 0.902 for the value-added fit index, 0.079 for the root mean square error of approximation, and 0.946 for the comparative fit index. The APAIS anxiety subscale score was positively correlated with the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale score (r=0.518, P<0.001). Conclusion The APAIS has good reliability and validity for evaluating the level of preoperative anxiety in patients with local anesthesia, but the application of the scale in other conditions requires further testing.