Objective To investigate the effectiveness and the advantage of fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws assisted by robot navigation in the treatment of femoral neck fractures by comparing with the conventional surgery. Methods Between January 2013 and December 2014, 20 patients with femoral neck fracture were treated by internal fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws assisted by robot navigation (navigation group), another 18 patients undergoing conventional surgery with manual positioning were chosen as the control group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, the injury side, time from injury to operation, and the classification of fractures between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The operation time, X-ray fluoroscopy time, blood loss, frequency of guide pin insertion, and healing time were recorded. At 1 week after operation, the parallel degree of screws was measured on the anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films; the Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function. Results All incisions of 2 groups healed by first intention after operation. There was no significant difference in operation time between 2 groups (t= -1.139, P=0.262). The blood loss, frequency of guide pin insertion, and X-ray fluoroscopy time of navigation group were significantly less than those of control group (P < 0.05). There were 2 screws penetrating into the joint cavity in control group. The patients were followed up 12-24 months with an average of 18 months. The navigation group got significantly better parallel degree of screws than control group on the anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films (t=25.021, P=0.000; t=18.659, P=0.000). Fractures healed in all patients of navigation group (100%), and the healing time was (21.8±2.8) weeks; fracture healed in 16 patients of control group (88.9%), and the healing time was (24.0 ± 3.7) weeks. There was no significant difference in healing rate and healing time between 2 groups (χ2=2.346, P=0.126; t=1.990, P=0.055). The Harris score of navigation group (87.1±3.7) was significantly higher than that of control group (79.3±4.7) at last follow-up (t= -5.689, P=0.000). Conclusion Cannulated screw fixation assisted by robot navigation is a good method to treat femoral neck fractures, which has the advantages of more accurate positioning, better hip function recovery, less surgical trauma, and shorter X-ray exposure time.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of computer-assisted and robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation for the treatment of reversible atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). MethodsThe clinical data of 42 patients with reversible AAD admitted between January 2020 and June 2023 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed, of whom 23 patients were treated with computer-assisted surgery (computer group) and 19 patients were treated with Mazor X spinal robot-assisted surgery (robot group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, T value of bone mineral density, body mass index, etiology, and preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Dysfunction Index (NDI) between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, screw implantation time, intraoperative blood loss, hand and wrist radiation exposure, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Gertzbein classification was used to evaluate the accuracy of screw implantation. JOA score and NDI were used to evaluate the function before operation, at 3 days after operation, and at last follow-up. At last follow-up, the status of screws and bone fusion were observed by neck three-dimensional CT. Results The operation time and hand and wrist radiation exposure of the computer group were significantly longer than those of the robot group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the screw implantation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 11-24 months, with an average of 19.6 months. There was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of screw implantation between the two groups (P>0.05). Except for 1 case of incision infection in the computer group, which improved after antibiotic treatment, there was no complication such as nerve and vertebral artery injury, screw loosening, or breakage in the two groups. The JOA score and NDI significantly improved in both groups at 3 days after operation and at last follow-up (P<0.05) compared to those before operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, 21 patients (91.3%) in the computer group and 18 patients (94.7%) in the robot group achieved satisfactory atlantoaxial fusion, and there was no significant difference in the fusion rate between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionComputer-assisted or robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation is safe and effective, and robotic navigation shortens operation time and reduces radiation exposure.