Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of ascending aorta banding technique combined with typeⅠhybrid aortic arch repair for the aortic arch diseases. Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing ascending aorta banding technique combined with type Ⅰ hybrid arch repair for aortic arch diseases from March 2019 to March 2022 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The technical success, perioperative complications and follow-up results were evaluated. Results A total of 44 patients were collected, including 35 males and 9 females, with a median age of 63.0 (57.5, 64.6) years. The average EuroSCORE Ⅱ score was 8.4%±0.7%. The technical success rate was 100.0%. All patients did not have retrograde type A aortic dissection and endoleaks. One patient died of multiple organ failure 5 days after operation, the in-hospital mortality rate was 2.3%, and the remaining 43 patients survived and were discharged from hospital. The median follow-up period was 14.5 (6-42) months with a follow-up rate of 100.0%. One patient with spinal cord injury died 2 years after hospital discharge. One patient underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair at postoperative 3 months due to new entry tears near to the distal end of the stent. Conclusion Ascending aorta banding combined with typeⅠhybrid arch repair for the aortic arch diseases does not need cardio-pulmonary bypass. Ascending aorta banding technique strengthens the proximal anchoring area of the stent to avoid risks such as retrograde type A dissection, endoleak and migration. The operation owns small trauma, rapid recovery, low mortality and a low rate of reintervention, which may be considered as a safe and effective choice in the treatment of the elderly, high-risk patients with complex complications.
Abstract: Objective To summarize the clinical experiences of onestage hybrid operation for treating typeB aortic dissection and aortic aneurysm involving distal aortic arch, explore the indication for this special technique and analyze shortterm followup results. Methods From October 2008 to May 2010, 16 consecutive patients received onestage hybrid operation in Fu Wai Hospital for aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm involving distal aortic arch. There were 12 males and 4 females. Their age ranged from 38.0 to 67.0 years (54.0±9.2 years). There were 14 patients of typeB aortic dissection, 1 patient of thoracic aortic aneurysm involving the aortic arch, and 1 patient of penetrating aortic ulcer. Among them, 10 were acute ones and 6 were chronic ones. Brachiocephalic artery bypass using neck incision with retrograde endovascular stent graft implantation was used. Four patients received bypass from the left common carotid artery to the left subclavian artery; 11 patients underwent bypass from the right common carotid artery to the left common carotid artery; and 1 patient had both of the bypasses. Intensive care unit(ICU) stay, hospital stay， and incidence of complications were closely monitored after operation. Computed tomography(CT) and general condition of the bypass grafts and its blood flow were followed up at three months and one year after operation. Results No death or severe complications occurred perioperatively. All onestage surgeries were technically successful with stent grafts implanted. Angiography during the operation showed 100% patency of all the bypass grafts and no obvious translocation or endoleakage of the stent grafts. One patient had mild paraplegia and recovered soon after treatment. Ventilation time of these patients was 2.010.0 hours (5.3±2.7 hours). The ICU stay was 0.0-2.0 days (1.1±0.4 days) and hospital stay was 4.0-7.0 days (5.3±0.8 days). The expenditure of blood products was 0.0-1 016.5 RMB (134.5±281.8 RMB). All patients were followed up with a followup period of 3.0 to 26.0 months (130±5.1 months). All patients recovered to normal social life. Enhanced CT scanning at three months and one year after operation showed no endoleakage or translocation of the stent grafts and 100% patency of the bypass grafts. There was no obvious change of the distal part of the dissection except some thrombosis formation in nine patients. Conclusion Onestage hybrid operation is safe and effective in shortening the duration of the operation and hospital stay, reducing the surgical trauma and sufferings of the patients, and lowering the risk of staged operations with satisfactory shortterm results. This special technique may expand the indications of simple endovascular repair. The mid and longterm results still need to be followed up.
Nowadays, the development of the medical instrument industry makes rapid changes in clinical practice. Hybridization of latest technology is playing an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and treatment of disease. Especially, the trend of the integration of three-channel hybrid technology in diagnosis and treatment of early lung cancer has become increasingly obvious. This paper will focus on the technical advance of the three-channel multi- mirror robot and its application in the diagnosis and treatment of early lung cancer.
ObjectiveTo explore the single-center experience of hybrid therapy in treatment of Stanford type A aortic dissection, and to make a comparison of the clinical results of this hybrid therapy with total arch replacement surgery in the same period.MethodsFrom March 2017 to April 2020, 272 patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent surgical treatment in our center, including 147 patients (126 males and 21 females) who received the aortic arch surgery. Among them, 106 patients underwent replacement of ascending aorta+aortic arch+stent trunk (total arch replacement group), while 41 patients underwent one-stop compound total arch type Ⅱ hybrid surgery (compound total arch replacement group). We tried to identify whether hybrid surgery really simplified total arch replacement surgery of the aortic dissection by comparing the operative mortality, postoperative complication rate, operative time, extracorporeal circulation time, etc.ResultsThere was no statistical difference in preoperative clinical data or death rate between the two groups. However, blood transfusion (6.74±7.35 U vs. 4.65±6.87 U, P<0.05), postoperative respiratory insufficiency [16 (15.09%) vs. 2 (4.88%), P<0.05], and apoplexy [3 (2.83%) vs. 0, P<0.05], paraplegia [2 (1.89%) vs. 0, P<0.05], in the compound total arch replacement group was significantly better than those of the total arch replacement group. The compound total arch replacement group did not shorten the total operation time, but it was significantly better in terms of extracorporeal circulation time (175.50±55.70 min vs. 129.70±48.80 min, P<0.05), aortic block time (103.10±23.70 min vs. 49.70±30.10 min, P<0.05), and the time of stopping the circulation or avoiding stopping the circulation (32.10±7.20 min vs. 0 min, P<0.05). The postoperative mechanical ventilation time was shorter in the compound total arch group (62.60±31.70 h vs. 41.30±32.60 h, P<0.05), and the time of staying in ICU (124.50±61.50 h vs. 63.40±71.20 h, P<0.05) and the postoperative hospital stay (13.50±11.20 d vs. 9.20±7.20 d, P<0.05) were significantly shorter than those in the total replacement group. A total of 138 patients were followed up for 6-38 (15.8±6.4) months. There was no statistical difference in one-year mortality or three-year mortality (P>0.05).ConclusionHybrid surgery shortens extracorporeal circulation time, while reduces or avoids the time of deep hypothermia circulatory arrest, the incidence of complications and the time of hospital stay. In conclusions, hybrid surgery simplifies the arch management of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation has a high morbidity. Cox Ⅲ surgery is the gold standard for treating all kinds of atrial fibrillation. However, which needs to be performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and the trauma caused by it is severe. It is placed emphasis on minimal invasion, safety and efficacy for contemporary surgery so as to minimally invasive intervention is important in the treating non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Although the results of epicardial ablation with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) are better than that of transcatheter ablation, it also has some disadvantages and shortages under certain circumstance. Epicardial ablation with VATS combined with transcatheter ablation is complemantary which becomes the hot spot for treatment of novalvular atrial fibrillation.
ObjectiveTo summarize and share the surgical nursing experiences for hybrid procedures in the treatment of congenital heart disease with diminished pulmonary blood flow and aortopulmonary collateral arteries (APCA). MethodWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data, including nursing problems, interventions and outcomes, of 15 patients with congenital heart disease with diminished pulmonary blood flow and APCA treated between May 2011 and February 2012. ResultsAll operations were completed successfully with effective nursing interventions. No complications like low cardiac output syndrome, lung over-perfusion, vital organ dysfunction, neuropsychological disorder, or systemic infection were noticed. ConclusionsHybrid procedure in the treatment of congenital heart disease with diminished pulmonary blood flow and APCA with complex surgical procedures, intraoperative variables and high surgical risks requires multi-disciplinary collaboration. Effective surgical nursing intervention is important to ensure the successful completion of surgery, and reduce possible complications.
Objective To compare the short and mid-term outcomes of open surgery and hybrid technique for the treatment of complex type B aortic dissection (AD). Methods A total of 45 patients (37 acute AD and 8 chronic AD) with complex type B AD were admitted to Nanjing First Hospital from January 2012 to June 2016, including 37 males and 8 females. All patients were confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA), and ultrasonic cardiogram (UCG) to rule out valvular diseases, aortic root and ascending aorta lesion, and pericardial effusion. According to different treatments, patients were divided into two groups: the open surgery group (OS group) with a total of 25 patients (20 males, 5 females, a mean age of 50.16±10.87 years); the hybrid technique group (HT group) with a total 20 patients (18 males, 2 females, mean age of 51.31±8.11 years). The short and mid-term outcomes of open surgery and hybrid technique for the treatment of complex type B AD were compared. Results All the patients were discharged successfully. There was no death, cognitive impairment, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, paraplegia, coma and other neurological complications in both groups. In the OS group, one patient suffered acute kidney injury and received renal replacement therapy (RRT), whose renal function was returned to normal prior to discharge; one patient was transferred to ICU again owing to pericardial effusion, respiratory failure and lung infection; one patient underwent debridement surgery because of postoprative sternal dehiscence. In the HT group, one patient with recurrent chest pain five days after endovascular aortic repair, whose CTA showed hematoma of aortic arch and ascending aorta caused by reverse tear, underwent Sun’s procedure immediately. All patients received CTA examination three months after operation in outpatient room. In the OS Group, the tear of AD was closed well by stent-graft and no leakage or shunt was detected in CTA. The rate of thrombosis formation in thoracic aortic false lumen was 100.0%. Meanwhile, in the HT Group, there was one patient with type Ⅱ leakage and the rate of thrombosis formation in thoracic aortic false lumen was 94.7%. Conclusion For complex type B AD without optimal "landing zone" in descending aorta, open surgery is recommended as the first choice for experienced team because of its less costs and perfect results; hybrid technique which can achieve quicker recovery with less surgical trauma still has serious complications such as leakage, reverse tear, and so on.
ObjectiveTo review current research on aortic arch management strategies in type A aortic dissection (TAAD) and provide a reference for surgical decision-making. MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted on aortic arch management techniques globally. ResultsCurrent research shows three managment for type A aortic dissection surgical startegies:open surgery remains the gold standard but is associated with elevated perioperative mortality and significant postoperative complication rates;endovascular repair,while demonstrating reduced complication incidence, presents substantial technical challenges that hinder widespread clinical adoption;Hybrid procedures exhibit lower acute complication rates, yet long-term outcomes remain uncertain. ConclusionsAs one of the most lethal emergencies of cardiovascular surgery , TAAD requires immediate intervention. While open surgery is the current gold standard, it presents clinical challenges including elevated mortality and morbidity. Future research must focus on reducing operative duration without compromising success rates.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the early and mid-term results of robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (RACAB) in the treatment of multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD). Methods Patients with MV-CAD who underwent RACAB from April 2018 to December 2021 in our hospital were included. Patients who underwent hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) which combined RACAB with percutaneous coronary intervention were allocated to a HCR-RACAB group, and patients who underwent multi-vessel RACAB were allocated to a MV-RACAB group. Perioperative and follow-up data were collected and compared between the two groups. Results A total of 102 patients were included, including 81 males and 21 females with a mean age of 61.7±10.8 years. Two (2.0%) patients were transferred to conventional CABG due to sudden ventricular fibrillation and pleura adhesion. In the remaining 100 patients who underwent RACAB, 100 left internal mammary arteries (LIMA) and 46 right internal mammary arteries (RIMA) were harvested with a 100.0% success rate. Besides, all patients undergoing RACAB achieved LIMA/RIMA-left anterior descending branch reconstruction, with an average number of 2.5±0.6 target vessels revascularized by stent or graft. One patient had perioperative myocardial infarction with an outcome of death. The incidence of major perioperative adverse events was 1.0%. There was no perioperative stroke or re-sternotomy for hemostasis. The mean follow-up time was 28.2 months, with a follow-up rate of 99.0% and an overall major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rate of 7.0%, including 3 all-cause deaths (3.0%), 2 strokes (2.0%) and 3 re-revascularizations (3.0%). The HCR-RACAB group had fewer red blood cell transfusion (P=0.030) and intraoperative blood loss (P=0.037) compared with the MV-RACAB group, and there was no statistical difference in the incidence of major perioperative adverse events or MACCE between the two groups during the follow-up period (P>0.05). ConclusionRACAB can be safely applied in the treatment of MV-CAD with good early and mid-term outcomes. High-quality harvesting of LIMA/RIMA and aortic no-touch technique are crucial to achieve these results.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of hybrid perventricular device closure (PVDC) for the treatment of muscular ventricular septal defect (MVSD) in pediatric patients. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 35 pediatric patients with MVSD who received hybrid PVDC in West China Hospital between 2009 and 2012. There were 16 males and 19 females with their median age of 3.9 years (range, 1 month to 7 years). There were 10 patients with single MVSD, 12 patients with multiple MVSD, 6 patients with other congenital heart defects, and 7 patients with post-surgical residual MVSD. ResultsAmong the 35 patients, immediate complete closure was achieved in 28 (80.0%) patients. Residual shunt was noted in 7 (20.0%) patients. Median device size was 5 mm. Cardiopulmonary bypass was avoided in 19 patients. Two (5.7%) patients died postoperatively due to postoperative heart failure resulted from complex congenital heart defect. All survival patients were followed up for a mean duration of 6 months, and there was no late death. Thirty-one (93.9%) patients had good positioning of the closure devices but no residual shunt. Small residual shunt at the apex was noted in 2 (6.1%) patients. ConclusionHybrid PVDC is an effective treatment for MVSD with relatively high successful rate but low mortality and morbidity, and its short-term results are satisfactory.