Nowadays, the development of the medical instrument industry makes rapid changes in clinical practice. Hybridization of latest technology is playing an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and treatment of disease. Especially, the trend of the integration of three-channel hybrid technology in diagnosis and treatment of early lung cancer has become increasingly obvious. This paper will focus on the technical advance of the three-channel multi- mirror robot and its application in the diagnosis and treatment of early lung cancer.
Objective To compare the short and mid-term outcomes of open surgery and hybrid technique for the treatment of complex type B aortic dissection (AD). Methods A total of 45 patients (37 acute AD and 8 chronic AD) with complex type B AD were admitted to Nanjing First Hospital from January 2012 to June 2016, including 37 males and 8 females. All patients were confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA), and ultrasonic cardiogram (UCG) to rule out valvular diseases, aortic root and ascending aorta lesion, and pericardial effusion. According to different treatments, patients were divided into two groups: the open surgery group (OS group) with a total of 25 patients (20 males, 5 females, a mean age of 50.16±10.87 years); the hybrid technique group (HT group) with a total 20 patients (18 males, 2 females, mean age of 51.31±8.11 years). The short and mid-term outcomes of open surgery and hybrid technique for the treatment of complex type B AD were compared. Results All the patients were discharged successfully. There was no death, cognitive impairment, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, paraplegia, coma and other neurological complications in both groups. In the OS group, one patient suffered acute kidney injury and received renal replacement therapy (RRT), whose renal function was returned to normal prior to discharge; one patient was transferred to ICU again owing to pericardial effusion, respiratory failure and lung infection; one patient underwent debridement surgery because of postoprative sternal dehiscence. In the HT group, one patient with recurrent chest pain five days after endovascular aortic repair, whose CTA showed hematoma of aortic arch and ascending aorta caused by reverse tear, underwent Sun’s procedure immediately. All patients received CTA examination three months after operation in outpatient room. In the OS Group, the tear of AD was closed well by stent-graft and no leakage or shunt was detected in CTA. The rate of thrombosis formation in thoracic aortic false lumen was 100.0%. Meanwhile, in the HT Group, there was one patient with type Ⅱ leakage and the rate of thrombosis formation in thoracic aortic false lumen was 94.7%. Conclusion For complex type B AD without optimal "landing zone" in descending aorta, open surgery is recommended as the first choice for experienced team because of its less costs and perfect results; hybrid technique which can achieve quicker recovery with less surgical trauma still has serious complications such as leakage, reverse tear, and so on.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and safety of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD).MethodsA total of 50 patients with MVCAD who underwent HCR technique in our heart center from May 2016 to April 2019 were included in this study (a HCR group), including 38 patients who underwent two-stage HCR and 12 patients one-stop HCR. There were 39 males and 11 females, with an average age of 62.4 (46-82) years. Another 482 patients who underwent conventional median incision under off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) at the same period were selected as control (an OPCAB group), including 392 males and 90 females, with an average age of 64.2 (48-84) years. The safety and feasibility of HCR were evaluated and compared with conventional OPCAB technique.ResultsThere was no perioperative death in both groups. Compared with the OPCAB, HCR was associated with shorter operation time, less chest tube drainage, lower requirement of blood transfusion, shorter mechanical ventilation time and shorter postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events during the follow-up of 6 to 36 months between the two groups.ConclusionHCR provides favorable short and mid-term outcomes for selected patients with MVCAD compared with conventional OPCAB.
The treatment of chronic thoracoabdominal aortic dissection aneurysm remains a major challenge in aortic surgery. Open surgery is the mainstream treatment at present. New devices for endovascular treatment of chronic thoracoabdominal aortic dissection are gradually applied in clinical practice. The hybrid procedure is a combination of open and endovascular procedures. The appropriate treatment should be selected according to the patient's age, anatomy, genetic aortic disease, and comorbidities.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is known to be associated with stroke, dementia, heart failure, and increased mortality. For patients with drug-refractory AF, ablation therapy using surgical or catheter-based techniques is recommended. In the evolution of surgical AF treatment, the Maze Ⅲ procedure marked a significant milestone as the first surgical approach to achieve a high success rate in restoring sinus rhythm. However, due to its technical complexity and demanding requirements, researchers have extensively modified the technique using innovative approaches, leading to the development of new surgical ablation methods, including the Maze Ⅳ procedure, minimally invasive Maze Ⅳ surgery, and hybrid ablation techniques. This review focuses on these surgical treatment strategies and discusses the latest research advancements in the field.
Abstract: Objective To summarize the clinical experiences of onestage hybrid operation for treating typeB aortic dissection and aortic aneurysm involving distal aortic arch, explore the indication for this special technique and analyze shortterm followup results. Methods From October 2008 to May 2010, 16 consecutive patients received onestage hybrid operation in Fu Wai Hospital for aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm involving distal aortic arch. There were 12 males and 4 females. Their age ranged from 38.0 to 67.0 years (54.0±9.2 years). There were 14 patients of typeB aortic dissection, 1 patient of thoracic aortic aneurysm involving the aortic arch, and 1 patient of penetrating aortic ulcer. Among them, 10 were acute ones and 6 were chronic ones. Brachiocephalic artery bypass using neck incision with retrograde endovascular stent graft implantation was used. Four patients received bypass from the left common carotid artery to the left subclavian artery; 11 patients underwent bypass from the right common carotid artery to the left common carotid artery; and 1 patient had both of the bypasses. Intensive care unit(ICU) stay, hospital stay， and incidence of complications were closely monitored after operation. Computed tomography(CT) and general condition of the bypass grafts and its blood flow were followed up at three months and one year after operation. Results No death or severe complications occurred perioperatively. All onestage surgeries were technically successful with stent grafts implanted. Angiography during the operation showed 100% patency of all the bypass grafts and no obvious translocation or endoleakage of the stent grafts. One patient had mild paraplegia and recovered soon after treatment. Ventilation time of these patients was 2.010.0 hours (5.3±2.7 hours). The ICU stay was 0.0-2.0 days (1.1±0.4 days) and hospital stay was 4.0-7.0 days (5.3±0.8 days). The expenditure of blood products was 0.0-1 016.5 RMB (134.5±281.8 RMB). All patients were followed up with a followup period of 3.0 to 26.0 months (130±5.1 months). All patients recovered to normal social life. Enhanced CT scanning at three months and one year after operation showed no endoleakage or translocation of the stent grafts and 100% patency of the bypass grafts. There was no obvious change of the distal part of the dissection except some thrombosis formation in nine patients. Conclusion Onestage hybrid operation is safe and effective in shortening the duration of the operation and hospital stay, reducing the surgical trauma and sufferings of the patients, and lowering the risk of staged operations with satisfactory shortterm results. This special technique may expand the indications of simple endovascular repair. The mid and longterm results still need to be followed up.
ObjectiveTo explore the single-center experience of hybrid therapy in treatment of Stanford type A aortic dissection, and to make a comparison of the clinical results of this hybrid therapy with total arch replacement surgery in the same period.MethodsFrom March 2017 to April 2020, 272 patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent surgical treatment in our center, including 147 patients (126 males and 21 females) who received the aortic arch surgery. Among them, 106 patients underwent replacement of ascending aorta+aortic arch+stent trunk (total arch replacement group), while 41 patients underwent one-stop compound total arch type Ⅱ hybrid surgery (compound total arch replacement group). We tried to identify whether hybrid surgery really simplified total arch replacement surgery of the aortic dissection by comparing the operative mortality, postoperative complication rate, operative time, extracorporeal circulation time, etc.ResultsThere was no statistical difference in preoperative clinical data or death rate between the two groups. However, blood transfusion (6.74±7.35 U vs. 4.65±6.87 U, P<0.05), postoperative respiratory insufficiency [16 (15.09%) vs. 2 (4.88%), P<0.05], and apoplexy [3 (2.83%) vs. 0, P<0.05], paraplegia [2 (1.89%) vs. 0, P<0.05], in the compound total arch replacement group was significantly better than those of the total arch replacement group. The compound total arch replacement group did not shorten the total operation time, but it was significantly better in terms of extracorporeal circulation time (175.50±55.70 min vs. 129.70±48.80 min, P<0.05), aortic block time (103.10±23.70 min vs. 49.70±30.10 min, P<0.05), and the time of stopping the circulation or avoiding stopping the circulation (32.10±7.20 min vs. 0 min, P<0.05). The postoperative mechanical ventilation time was shorter in the compound total arch group (62.60±31.70 h vs. 41.30±32.60 h, P<0.05), and the time of staying in ICU (124.50±61.50 h vs. 63.40±71.20 h, P<0.05) and the postoperative hospital stay (13.50±11.20 d vs. 9.20±7.20 d, P<0.05) were significantly shorter than those in the total replacement group. A total of 138 patients were followed up for 6-38 (15.8±6.4) months. There was no statistical difference in one-year mortality or three-year mortality (P>0.05).ConclusionHybrid surgery shortens extracorporeal circulation time, while reduces or avoids the time of deep hypothermia circulatory arrest, the incidence of complications and the time of hospital stay. In conclusions, hybrid surgery simplifies the arch management of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.
Objective To observe the short-term efficacy and the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in patients aged over 80 years with multivessel coronary artery disease following two-stage Hybrid surgery. Methods We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 67 patients aged over 80 years with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing surgery in our hospital. The were 44 males and 23 females with an anverage age of 82.4±2.1 years. According to the operation pattern, the patients were divided into two groups: a two-stage Hybrid surgery group (n=29, 19 males, 10 females, aged 83.2±3.1 years) and a traditional thoracotomy group (n=38, 25 males, 13 females, aged 83.3±3.4 years). We compared the clinical results of perioperation between the two groups. Results Conpared with the traditional thoracotomy group, the two-stage Hybrid surgery group had shorter postoperative duration of mechanical ventilation (6.7±2.2 hvs. 18.2±3.4 h) and hospitalization stay (15.7±3.0 dvs. 20.7±5.6 d) and had less volume of chest drainage during the first 24 h after surgery (176.5±32.3 mlvs. 443.8±51.5 ml). The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in the two-stage Hybrid surgery group was significantly lower than that in the traditional thoracotomy group (6.9%vs. 23.1%, P<0.05). Conclusion The two-stage Hybrid surgery in patients aged over 80 years with multivessel coronary artery disease can significantly decrease the postoperative incidence of adverse cardiovascular events, shorten the postoperative duration of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization stay, reduce the volume of chest drainage during the first 24 h after surgery and improve prognosis of surgery for the elderly patients.