west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "气管插管" 48 results
  • Comparison of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway with Endotracheal Intubation in General Anesthesia during Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery

    目的 探讨双管喉罩与气管插管用于全身麻醉妇科腹腔镜手术的安全性和可行性。 方法 2009年1月-5月择期妇科腹腔镜手术患者60例,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级,随机分为喉罩组(P组)和气管插管组(T组)。记录入室基础值(T0),置罩(管)前(T1),置罩(管)后即刻(T2),置罩(管)后5 min(T3 ),拔除罩(管)即刻(T4),拔除罩(管)后5 min(T5)的收缩压(systolic pressure, SBP),舒张压(diastolic pressure, DBP),心率(heart rate, HR)和脉搏血氧饱和度(pulse oxygen saturation, SpO2),喉罩和气管插管控制呼吸时气腹前后不同时段的气道峰压(airway. maximum pressure, Pmax),潮气量(vital volume, VT)和呼气末二氧化碳分压(end tidal CO2, PETCO2)。记录插罩(管)成功率,及相关并发症。 结果 T2时T组SBP,DBP和HR显著高于P组(P<0.05),两组术中通气均满意;Pmax,VT和PETCO2组间比较各时点无差异(P>0.05)。气腹后Pmax和PETCO2组内比较均高于气腹前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。置罩(管)成功率组间比较差异无统计学意义,拔罩(管)期及术后24 h并发症,喉罩组明显低于气管导管组,差异显著(P<0.05)。 结论 双管喉罩用于全麻妇科腹腔镜手术通气效果满意,安全可行。

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 经口与经鼻气管插管在急诊抢救中的应用对比分析

    目的对比经口气管插管和经鼻气管插管在急诊抢救的优缺点。 方法回顾分析2010年1月-2013年1月155例急救气管插管患者,其中80例患者为明视经口气管插管(KC组),75例患者为明视经鼻气管插管(BC组),比较两组患者的一次插管成功率、插管时间、并发症以及患者耐受性等。 结果KC组和BC组一次插管成功率分别为86.2%和88.0%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);KC组平均插管时间为(50±20)s,BC组平均插管时间(74±22)s,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);插管过程中出现的并发症发生率KC组明显多于BC组,而患者耐受性BC组明显好于KC组。 结论经口气管插管操作简单、快速,适合急诊抢救。但经鼻气管插管对患者体位要求低,并发症较低以及患者耐受性较好,值得推广。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • The efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis

    ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery from inception to April, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 593 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no significant difference in the success rate of the first insertion (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.02, P=0.55). The airway pressure of patients whose position were head higher than foot was significantly lower in the laryngeal mask group than in the tracheal intubation group (MD=–1.20, 95%CI –1.81 to –0.59, P=0.000 1), but there was no significant difference between two groups in reverse position patients (MD=0.48, 95%CI –0.90 to 1.87, P=0.49). The incidence of sore throat (RR=0.58, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.74, P<0.000 01), the incidence of blood stain (RR=0.48, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.77, P=0.002), the incidence of laryngeal spasm/bronchial spasm (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.80, P=0.02) and the incidence of cough/hiccup (RR=0.10, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.15, P<0.000 01) in the laryngeal mask group were significantly lower than those in the tracheal intubation group.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that compared with tracheal intubation, laryngeal mask can effectively reduce airway pressure of patients whose position are head higher than foot. The risks of various complications are significant higher in tracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgery. Laryngeal mask can maintain patients' normal respiratory functions while reduce damage and do not increase the occurrence of reflux aspiration. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.

    Release date:2017-08-17 10:28 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Investigation and analysis of influence factors of thirst in ICU patients with oral tracheal intubation and ventilator assisted ventilation

    Objective To investigate the thirst status of patients in intensive care unit (ICU) who underwent oral tracheal intubation and ventilator assisted ventilation, and explore its influence factors. Methods A total of 172 patients with oral tracheal intubation admitted in ICU from June 2020 to September 2021 were investigated, and a numerical rating scale was employed for rating their thirst feelings. The patients were divided into a thirst group and a non-thirst group based on thirst status. The thirst status and influence factors of thirst distress were analyzed. Results The incidence of thirst in the ICU patients with oral tracheal intubation and ventilator assisted ventilation was 88.4%, and the thirst score in the thirst group was 7.70±1.17. Single factor analysis showed statistically significant difference between the two groups in sex, medical payment, smoking, drinking, duration of mechanical ventilation, humidification effect, sputum viscosity, gastrointestinal decompression, fasting, continuous renal replacement therapy, diuretics, 24-hour urine volume and liquid balance, heart function grading, sedatives, agitation, sweating, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ, endotracheal intubation depth, body mass index, PCO2, PO2, HCO3–, tidal volume, and sodium ion (all P<0.05). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that diuretics, sputum viscosity, sodium ion, alcohol consumption, smoking, intubation depth, and cardiac function were independent influence factors for the occurrence of thirst in the ICU patients who received tracheal intubation (P<0.01). Conclusions The incidence of thirst was high in ICU patients with airway intubation and ventilator assisted ventilation. Diuretics, sputum viscosity, sodium ion, alcohol consumption, smoking, 24-hour urine volume, and cardiac function grading were independent influence factors for the occurrence of thirst in ICU patients with tracheal intubation. It is necessary to implement targeted intervention to prevent and alleviate the thirst degree of patients, reduce the occurrence of related complications, and improve patient comfort.

    Release date:2022-10-27 10:51 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Clinical Evaluation of Induced Rescue Intubation by Ketamine and Midazolam in Patients with Respiratory Failure

    Objective To evaluate the rescue intubation induced by ketamine and midazolam in patients with acute respiratory failure.Methods 81 patients with acute respiratory failure admitted between June 2010 and June 2012 were recruited in the study. They were randomly divided to a MF group to receive 0. 05 mg/kg of midazolam + 1 to 2 μg/kg of fentanyl ( n =41) , and aMK group to received 0. 05 mg/kg of midazolam + 0. 5 to 1 mg/kg of ketamine ( n =40) for rescue intubation. The APACHEⅡ score on initial24 hours after admission in ICU, length of ICU stay, and 28-day mortality were recorded. The differences in arterial blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, and blood oxygen saturation before intubation and 10 minutes after intubation were compared. Incidences of hypotension and other adverse events and difficult intubation were also recorded.Results The midazolamdose in the MK group was significantly less than that in the MF group ( P lt; 0. 01) . The blood pressure in both groups decreased. The systolic blood pressure dropped most significantly in the MF group ( P lt;0. 05) . The incidence of hypotension was 41. 5% in the MF group, significantly higher than that in the MK group ( 20. 0% , P lt;0. 05) . The incidence of hypotension had no correlation with midazolamdosage ( P gt;0. 05) . There was no significant difference in adverse events except for the arrhythmia between two groups. The length of ICU stay and 28-day mortality were similar in both groups ( P gt; 0. 05) . The incidence of difficult tracheal intubation was nearly 50% in both groups.Conclusions In patients with respiratory failure, rescue intubation induced by ketamine can reduce the dose of midazolam and reduce the incidence of hypotension without more complications. The optimal dose of ketamine in induced tracheal intubation requires further study.

    Release date:2016-09-13 03:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Safety and Effectiveness of SLIPA versus Endotracheal Tube for Intraoperative Airway Management during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

    Objective To systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA) compared with endotracheal tube (TT) for airway management in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Methods Databases such as PubMed (1992 to February 2012), EMbase (1984 to February 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1964 to February 2012), SCI (1992 to February 2012), CNKI (1992 to February 2012), CBM (2002 to 2012) as well as WanFang Data (1992 to February 2012) were searched for relevant literature. The references of the included articles were also manually traced. Two reviewers independently screened the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of methodology. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 664 patients were included. Results of meta-analysis showed that: a) as for side effects, none of the patients experienced regurgitation or hypoventilation during operation; b) as for extubation response, SLIPA was proved fewer than TT during extubation with a significant difference (RR=0.14, 95%CI 0.05 to 0.36, Plt;0.000 1); c) SLIPA was superior to TT with regard to reducing postoperative sore throat (RR=0.15, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.38, Plt;0.000 1); d) SLIPA was similar to TT with regard to Ppeak after peritoneal insufflations (WMD=–0.07, 95%CI –0.73 to 0.59, P=0.83); e) as for PETCO2, the SLIPA group was lower than the TT group obviously after peritoneal insufflations (WMD=–1.09, 95%CI –1.70 to –0.49, P=0.000 4); f) as for hemodynamic change, the SLIPA group was more stable than the TT group during the operation with significant differences (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Current studies suggest that it is safe and effective to apply SLIPA for ventilation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. However, due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are need.

    Release date:2016-09-07 11:00 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Perioperative outcomes of single-lumen versus double-lumen endotracheal tubes in totally thoracoscopic cardiac surgery: A retrospective cohort study

    Objective To investigate the relationship between two-lung ventilation (TLV) with single-lumen endotracheal tube (SLT), one-lung ventilation (OLV) with double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after total thoracoscopic cardiac surgery. Methods The clinical data of patients who underwent totally thoracoscopic cardiac surgeries in the Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital from October 2019 to October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 group according to the type of endotracheal tube, including a SLT group and a DLT group. Baseline data, surgical variables and PPCs were compared. The influencing factors of PPCs in the two groups were analyzed by binary logistic regression analysis. Results Finally 349 patients were enrolled, including 180 males and 169 females with an average age of (50.0±14.8) years. There were 219 patients in the SLT group and 130 patients in the DLT group. There was no statistical difference in baseline data, surgical variables or PPCs between the two groups (P>0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that PPCs were related to body mass index in the SLT group (OR=0.778, 95%CI 0.637 to 0.951, P=0.014) and preoperative smoking history in the DLT group (OR=0.058, 95%CI 0.004 to 0.903, P=0.042). Conclusion For the patients who undergo totally thoracoscopic cardiac surgery, TLV with SLT and OLV with DLT show no significant association with PPCs. At the same time, PPCs are associated with body mass index in the SLT group, while associated with preoperative smoking history in the DLT group.

    Release date:2024-11-27 02:45 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 气管插管全身麻醉术后患者肺部感染现状

    对采用气管插管进行全身麻醉(全麻)术后发生肺部感染的文献进行回顾,从术前、术中、术后3个方面分析其危险因素,总结预防控制措施。分析显示,高龄、长期吸烟史、麻醉时间与导管留置时间、术前呼吸道护理、术后镇痛及无菌操作技术等均可影响全麻术后肺部感染的发生率,需对上述危险因素进行针对性处理,如术前戒烟、缩短麻醉时间、术前雾化吸入、插管过程严格无菌操作等,均可有效地预防肺部感染。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of Tetracaine Sprayed through Thyrocricoid Puncture before Intubation in Intensive Care Unit

    Objective To study the application, safety and efficiency of tetracaine sprayed through thyrocricoid puncture before intubation in intensive care unit ( ICU) . Methods Forty-one patients ready to undergo intubation, admitted in ICU from November 2009 to February 2010, were recruited in the study. They were randomly divided into a tetracaine group and a control group. 2% tetracaine was sprayed through thyrocricoid puncture before intubation in the tetracaine group but not in the control group. The hemodynamic variables and SpO2 at baseline ( T0 ) , beginning of intubation ( T1 ) , 1 min after intubation ( T2 ) , and 5 min after intubation ( T3 ) were recorded. The dosage of propofol and vasoactive agents, the incidence of hypotension, the times of intubation, and complications were also recorded. Results The variance rate about heart rate ( HR) , mean arterial pressure ( MAP) and rate pressure production on time of T1 and T2 were significantly lower in the tetracaine group than those in the control group ( P lt; 0. 05) . There was no difference about the incidence of successful intubation and hypoxia ( P gt; 0. 05) . The dosage of propofol during induction and vasoactive agents after intubation in the tetracaine group were less than those in the control group ( P lt;0. 05) . The incidence of hypotension after intubation in the tetracaine group was 35% , which was lower than 61. 9% in the control group ( P lt;0. 05) . There was no any complications and adverse accidents in the tetracaine group. Conclusions It is safe and simple to spray tetracaine through thyrocricoid puncture before intubation in ICU, which can effectively stabilize the hemodynamics, and decrease the dosages of propofol and vasoactive agents.

    Release date:2016-09-13 04:00 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 气管插管固定器在中毒洗胃中的应用

    目的研究在洗胃过程中应用气管插管固定器固定胃管的可行性。 方法将2014年1月-2015年1月就诊的急性中毒需要洗胃的80例患者随机分为研究组和对照组,每组各40例。研究组洗胃采用气管插管固定器固定胃管,对照组采用传统手持牙垫固定,观察比较两种固定方法的稳妥性、安全性、口腔损伤例数、意外拔管率。计数资料采用χ2检验进行分析。 结果研究组的固定性(97.5%)、方便性(90.0%)均优于对照组(分别为22.5%、20.0%),恶心发生率(5.0%)、呕吐发生率(5.0%)、咽喉部刺激反应发生率(25.0%)和并发症发生率(12.5%)均低于对照组(分别为72.5%、65.0%、85.0%、40.0%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组一人独立操作性、一次性插管成功率、堵管率、胃管脱出率、辅助器材使用率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论在洗胃中使用气管插管固定器固定胃管优于传统固定方式,值得在临床推广应用。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
5 pages Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

Format

Content