【Abstract】Objective To explore the feasibility that the recipient against donor antigen-specific T lymphocytes clones are formed,and the suicide genes are induced into the clone. In the end it may induce the transplanted-organ tolerance. Methods The recipient rats were immunized by the donor rats-splenocytes, then the recipient’s T cell were isolated, purified and diluted with limited-dilute methods into single cell.The T cells were cultured by adding raise cells,ConA or IL2 under the different concentration and at last the T cell clone were formed. Results A stable recipient against donor antigen-specific T cell clone was established. The difference among the different immune groups was very significant(tgt;t0.05). The T cell clone was not formed without raise cells or only with raise cells. The rare clone could be formed by ConA stimulation but without IL-2. The clone-forming rate was associated with concentration of IL-2. ConclusionThe mature T cell is able to proliferate to form clone when the condition is suitable. The recipient is immunized with donor rats spleen cellular antigen. The T cells clones selected in the end are donor antigen-specific.
Out of 4500 patients with gastro-intesinal disorders coming to our department from January 1970 to May 1994,31 of them were fund to be suffering from gastric adenomotous polyps(GAP).The detective rat of GAP was 0.7% with two malignant adenomatous polyps detected and 13 percent of GAP cases complicated with adenocarcinoma of the stomach(4/31).The size of the polyps is closely relevant to the malignant change.Twelve patients underwent surgical therapy and 19 gastrocopic polypectomy.On follow up.2 cases of recurrence were detected in both surgical and endoscopic removal proups.
ObjectiveTo compare the postoperative complications following laparoscopic and open radical resection for rectal cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 681 patients with rectal cancer from January 2011 to December 2014 in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were analyzed retrospectively, of whom 583 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery (laparoscopic group) and 98 patients underwent open surgery (open group). The complications were compared between the two groups. Results①There were no statistically significant differences in the gender, age, total protein, albumin, and body mass index between the two groups (P > 0.05). As compared with the open group, the proportions of previous abdominal operation, Dixon operation, and TNM stageⅡandⅢwere lower (P < 0.05), while the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was more common (P < 0.05), the distance of the tumor lower margin from the anal verge was shorter (P < 0.05) in the laparoscopic group.②No differences were seen in terms of anastomotic leakage, pulmonary infection, urinary retention, intestinal obstruction, wound infection, abdominal sepsis, urinary tract infection, stoma complications, poor incision healing, bleeding, intestinal hemorrhage, and deep vein thrombosis between the two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe development of postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group is similar to the open group, which are both available approach to the treatment of rectal cancer. But more randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm which one is better.