为了解我国南方地区肺栓塞的现状,通过检索中国医院数字图书馆近9年(1999年～2008年)南方地区正式发表的与肺栓塞和深静脉血栓有关的论文共1288篇,进行了统计分析,发现:1、中国南方地区肺栓塞的发现数量逐年增加,且增幅明显;2、诊断水准达到一定程度的部分南方医院,诊断治疗肺栓塞的数量明显高于其他医院,并不比中国北方同类医院低;3、肺栓塞的漏诊、误诊现象依然普遍存在,提高认知和诊治水准仍然是今后工作的方向。
Objective To study the effectiveness of substitute valve at the popliteal vein in treatment of deep venous valve insufficiency of lower extremities. Methods From January 1996 to August 2002, 27 patients were diagnosed having deep venous valve insufficiency of lower extremities by color Doppler and radiography with an average disease course of 17.4 years.All 27 patients had varicose vein, 25 pain, 22 swelling,25 pigmentation in ankle area and 19 chronic ulcerations.Two cases had been treated with great saphenous vein ligation and striping.Averagevein pressure in resting position was (11.00±0.73)kPa,and the ambulatory venous pressure was (9.14±0.68)kPa.All patients were treated with substitute valve at the popliteal vein,and great saphenous vein ligation and stripping, some were treated with subfascial endoscopic perforating veins ablation. Results The average ambulatory venous pressure after operation was (5.94±0.82)kPa,were significantly different from that before operation(P＜0.01). The curative results were satisfactory,and all symptom and physical sign disappeared.After a mean follow-up period of2-6 years,21 cases had satifactory results. Conclusion Substitute valve at the popliteal vein have the value of widespread application.
Objective To investigate the incidence and management of CTEPH in the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in Xijing Hospital to enrich the epidemiological data of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in China.Methods We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the incidence and management of CTEPH in the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in Xijing Hospital from 2008 to 2012. Results The incidence of CTEPH was 5.24% . About 62.90% of venous thromboembolism/pulmonary embolism (VTE/PE) patients were unprovoked, and about 53.85% of CTEPH patients was unprovoked. About 38% of CTEPH patients had no history of VTE, and 62% of CTEPH patients had no history of acute pulmonary embolism. None of the CTEPH patients was treated by pulmonary thromboendarterctom (PTE) , and about 53.85% of patients were only given anticoagulant monotherapy. Conclusions The incidence of CTEPH is higher in our hospital than reported. This phenomenon may be related to the lack of awareness of risk factors of CTEPH and the insufficient thrombolytic and anticoagulant therapy to acute pulmonary embolism. It’s very urgent to standardize the diagnosis and management of CTEPH in pulmonologists.
ObjectiveTo investigate the significance of catheter thrombolysis combined with one-stage iliac vein percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (or stent implantation) in the treatment of acute left lower extremity deep venous thrombosis secondary to Cockett syndrome.MethodsForty-one cases of Cockett syndrome complicated with acute left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis were retrospectively analyzed and summarized in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2019. Catheter directed thrombolysis was performed under the protection of filter, and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stent implantation was performed in the first stage of the iliac vein stenosis or occlusion after thrombolysis. Compared the circumference of upper and lower legs of 15 cm above and below patella of the healthy and affected limbs, before and after treatment, and analyzed the venous patency rate.ResultsThe average time of using thrombolytic catheter were (7±3) days, and the average dosage of urokinase was (358.32±69.38) ×104 U. A total of thirty-five Bard stents were implanted (35 cases), four cases underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and two cases gave up treatment. Before and after treatment, the circumference difference of the higher leg, the circumference difference of the lower leg, and the venous patency were significantly different before and after thrombolysis (P<0.01). The venous patency rate was 58%–75% in this group, and the average venous patency rate was (61±10)%. There was no severe bleeding complication occurred. Thirty-five patients were followed up for 3–26 months, the preservation rate of the valve was 82.86% (29/35), and the first patency rate of iliac vein was 100% (39/39). During the follow-up period, thrombosis recurred in one case of untreated iliac vein, and acute thrombosis in the right side of one case was caused by long iliac vein stent entering the inferior vena cava. No pulmonary embolism was found.ConclusionOn the basis of catheter thrombolysis, one stage removal of iliac vein obstruction in the treatment of acute left lower extremity deep venous thrombosis can relieve the clinical symptoms, reduce the recurrence rate of thrombosis, and reduce the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis syndrome after catheter thrombolysis.
目的:比较不同部位、不同方式深静脉置管的优缺点。方法:根据患者病情及能否配合操作,分别采用锁骨下静脉穿刺置管术、颈内静脉穿刺置管术、股静脉穿刺置管术并将三种术式的优缺点及所致的并发症进行比较。结果:276例深静脉置管术中(1) 经锁骨下置管者220例,占79.71%。其中术后感染2例,占0.91%;误入动脉2例,占0.91%;纵膈血肿1例,占0.45%;(2) 经颈内静脉置管者35例,占12.68%。其中术后感染3例,占1.40%;误入动脉者1例,占2.86%;气胸1例,占2.86%;术后导管脱落者1例,占2.86%;(3) 经股静脉置管者21例,占7.60%。其中术后感染5例,占23.8%;误入动脉者1例,占4.76%。结论:几种深静脉穿刺术中,尤以经锁骨下穿刺者并发症相对较少,是深静脉置管方式中的首选。
Varicocele is a common disease.The treatment of varicocele. is verea-tile. Eighteen cases were treated byanastomosis of the testicular vein withthe profundus circumflexa iliac vein,The intra-operative measurement ofthe venous pressure has shown to bea singnificant improvement. Follow-up lasted from 9 months to 2 years.Good resulss were achieved in 17 caseswith 1 failure from dead sperm.
ObjectiveTo compare the differences of incidence rate and severity of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) of patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) treated by catherter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) or via peripheral vein thrombolysis (PVT).MethodsThe patients with unilateral lower extremity DVT who had received anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapy in the Nanchong Central Hospital from January 2012 to January 2015 were collected. These patients were divided into CDT group and PVT group according to the different thrombolysis methods, and then the thrombolytic rates, thrombolytic complications, and the incidence rate and severity of PTS of 5-year follow up results were calculated and compared.ResultsA total of 137 cases of DVT were collected, 79 in the CDT group and 58 in the PVT group. There were no significant differences in the gender, age, course of disease, thrombus type, and other baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The thrombolytic rate of the CDT group was (78.6±16.3)% and PVT group was (27.3±12.1)%, the difference was significant (t=21.14, P<0.001). The rate of thrombolytic complications between the PVT group and CDT group had no statistical significance (32.8% versus 21.5%, χ2=2.18, P=0.134). The 5-year follow up was completed in 116 cases, 74 patients from the CDT group and 42 patients from the PVT group respectively, the result showed that the incidence rate of the PTS in the CDT group was lower than that in the PVT group (35.1% versus 88.1%, χ2=30.28, P<0.001), and theseverity of PTS in the CDT group was milder than that in the PVT group too (Z=16.52,P<0.001).ConclusionFrom the results of this study, CDT is able to increase thrombolytic rate and effectively reduce incidence rate and severity of PTS.
目的探讨低分子肝素预防下肢静脉曲张术后深静脉血栓形成的临床效果。 方法将2011年1月至2013年12月期间于笔者所在医院行大隐静脉高位结扎＋分段剥脱术＋腔内激光闭合术的513例下肢静脉曲张患者随机分为2组：低分子肝素组238例，下肢静脉曲张术后采用低分子肝素预防性治疗；对照组275例，术后不采用任何抗凝药物。比较2组患者深静脉血栓形成和并发症发生情况。 结果低分子肝素组发生浸透敷料的出血14例（5.9%），切口出血或皮下血肿25例（10.5%），血小板减少1例（0.4%），肝功能异常2例（0.8%），无深静脉血栓形成发生；对照组发生浸透敷料的出血19例（6.9%），切口出血或皮下血肿27例（9.8%），肝功能异常2例（0.7%），深静脉血栓形成7例（2.5%），无血小板减少发生。2组患者浸透敷料的出血、切口出血或皮下血肿、血小板减少及肝功能异常发生率比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05），但低分子肝素组深静脉血栓形成的发生率低于对照组（P＜0.05）。术后获访487例，随访时间为4～12个月，平均10个月。其中低分子肝素组获访225例，对照组获访262例。获访患者随访期间发生下肢静脉曲张复发9例（低分子肝素组4例，对照组5例），隐神经损伤11例（低分子肝素组5例，对照组6例），无远期下肢深静脉血栓形成病例。2组患者的下肢静脉曲张复发率和隐神经损伤发生率比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。 结论采用低分子肝素预防下肢静脉曲张术后下肢深静脉血栓形成具有良好的临床效果和安全性，值得临床推广应用。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the treatment effective of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of low extremities. MethodsThe clinical data of 86 patients with DVT were analyzed retrospectively, which were divided into thromboectomy group (12 patients) and thrombolysis group (74 patients) according to the therapy methods. The thromboectomy group patients were treated by thromboectomy using Fogarty balloon catheter plus thrombolytie, thrombolysis group patients were treated by thrombolysis (urokinase or antithrombus enzyme of viper). ResultsThere were 8 cases healed, 4 cases relieved, 0 invalidated in the thromboectomy group and 15 cases healed, 50 cases relieved, 9 cases invalidated in the thrombolysis group at discharge. During 3-100 months of following up with an average 27 months, 10 cases and 62 cases were examined by Bultrasonic in the thromboectomy group and thrombolysis group, respectively, 6 cases were not damaged in the function of valves of the thromboectomy group, 9 cases were not damaged in the function of valves of the thrombolysis group. The rates of acute response, longtime patency, and normal valve in the thromboectomy group were higher than those in the thrombolysis group (Plt;0.05), the rate of post-thrombotic syndrome in the thromboectomy group was lower than that in the thrombolysis group (Plt;0.05). ConclusionsEarly thromboectomy is an effective way of restoring the fluency of deep vein and protecting the efficiency of the vein value organization, and reducing the sequela of DVT. Thrombolysis can only relieve the symptomation, but it can not protect the crawling and relapsing of thrombus.