This article introduced the structure and features of the medical safety and quality management system of New South Wales (NSW) of Australia. The system was funded by government with overall design, multi-sectors involvement, and explicit roles of government, hospitals, and independent third parties. The system also developed national and state-wide regulations, policies, standards and their certification. The NSW Health Incident Information Management System (IIMS), the guidelines and interventional programs were also established to decrease the medical risk and ensure the healthcare quality. This system will be used for reference to the national medical risk and quality management system of China.
Objective To summarize and analysis the working experience of healthcare performance evaluation and reporting experience in local health administration department of Australia, and provide decision support to China on such work as establishing objective, scientific, effective healthcare performance evaluation system, strengthening government’s supervision over health service and improving healthcare system management efficiency. Methods Searching official networks and databases of Australia, and finding out relevant policy, reports, and documents on healthcare performance evaluation. Results Typical healthcare performance evaluation systems in Australian are as follos: National Health Performance Framework (NHPF), the National Healthcare Agreement（NHA）and Review of Government Service Provision. Conclusions These programs in Australian is enlightening to these work in China that performance evaluation should be the prior tool in health system to management and reform, the performance measurement indicators systems should emphasize the quality safety and health fair.We should set up scientific and flexible index inclusion criteria and open report and compare performance information.
In order to understand the latest progress of health decision support system (HDSS) construction, grasp the law of HDSS development and adopt the international advanced experience, this paper took Australia for example, presented a comparative analysis on the construction practices, including the contents, features and system functions of national construction guidelines for HDSS in different periods, and showed the integral development level of Australia HDSS was still in the exploratory stage, and its construction goal, function orientation and construction mechanism got improved gradually with the deep development of public health information. Additionally, to assure the accuracy and safety of HDSS function, Australia has been laying stress on the standard specification construction and system function authentication.