ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress and clinical efficacy of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis.MethodThe literatures of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis were collected and reviewed.ResultsThe incidence of colorectal cancer liver metastasis was high, which affected the prognosis of patients. Surgical treatment was the preferred treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy could be used for preoperative neoadjuvant therapy and postoperative adjuvant therapy.ConclusionsHepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is an effective local treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastasis and can be used as a supplement to surgical treatment. Compared with systemic chemotherapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy can improve the overall survival and disease-free survival, reduce the risk of intrahepatic recurrence, and improve the prognosis of patients.
Objective To evaluate the effect of regiono-perfusional chemotherapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and to seek the management of its complications. MethodsThirty-six patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma received selectively intra-arterial catheterization and perfused with 5-Fu, ADM, DDP. Results Six patients had complete response, 15 partial response, and one underwent radical resection subsequently. Cmplications occurred in 14 patients with 2 patients died of complications.Conclusion Regiono-perfusional chemotherapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is effective, but the complications can not be neglected.
目的:探讨经导管肝动脉灌注化疗栓塞(TACE)与TACE联合三维适形放射治疗(TACE + 3DCRT)原发性肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效.方法:随机分成两组的HCC患者,均不能手术、门脉无癌栓、无远处脏器转移。50例患者行单纯TACE 2次(TACE组)。40例患者在TACE 2次后第四周再行三维适形放射治疗(TACE + 3DCRT组),放疗采用6MVX射线,4～6 Gy/次,隔日一次,3次/周,总剂量45～60 Gy。TACE采用碘化油、顺铂、5氟尿嘧啶、表阿霉素及明胶海绵。结果:TACE组与TACE+3DCRT组近期疗效有效率(完全缓解+部分缓解)分别为68.0%(34/50)、87.5%(35/40),1年生存率分别为78.0%(39/50)、95.0%(38/40),两组差异均有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。TACE的治疗反应主要为栓塞综合征,3DCRT有7.5%(3/40)发生急性放射性肝炎,经对症、保肝处理后缓解。两组患者均能耐受。结论:TACE + 3DCRT治疗不能手术、门脉无癌栓、无远处脏器转移的HCC的疗效较单纯TACE治疗HCC的疗效好。
Abstract: Objective To summarize the method and effective result of thoracoscopic intrapleural perfusion hyperthermochemotherapy(TIPHC) for treating malignant pleural effusion caused by lung cancer. Methods Fiftyeight patients with malignant pleural effusion caused by lung cancer were randomly divided into therapeutic group(30 cases) and control group(28 cases) between February 1999 and March 2005. Pleural biopsy and TIPHC under general ansthesia with unilateral ventilation were performed in the therapeutic group, and intrapleural injection of cisplatin was administered in control group after drainage of pleural effusion. The effect on malignant pleural effusion， the change for the concentration of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)， cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA21-1)， neuronspecific enolase (NSE) and the side effect were compared before and after the treatment. Results The therapeutic group achieved total response rate of 100.0%, but only 53.6% in control group, with significant difference(χ 2=3.863, Plt;0.05). Furthermore, the concentration of CEA， CYFRA21-1， NSE in therapeutic group dramatically descended than control group(t=2.562,Plt;0.05). But there was no significant difference in side effect (Pgt;0.05). The pathological diagnosis of all the patients were determined in the therapeutic group. Conclusion TIPHC has the advantage of both diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusions. It is safe and effective, and also able to determine the diagnosis. Furthermore, it offers the superiority of small wound， best visualization and convenient pleural biopsy.
【摘要】目的 观察介入灌注化疗栓塞后手术切除直肠癌的临床疗效。方法 本组31例患者于术前先行区域性动脉灌注化疗加栓塞术，然后多在3～7 d内限期行直肠癌根治术，其中行Dixon术23例， Miles术7例， Hartmann术1例。结果 本组患者术中出血少，肿瘤剥离容易，一般无须输血； 患者术后的肿瘤复发率、转移率和死亡率均优于我科同期术前未行区域性动脉灌注化疗加栓塞术而直接接受手术治疗者。结论 先行区域性动脉灌注化疗栓塞术后再行直肠癌根治性切除，近期疗效好，不失为直肠癌综合治疗的一种新的有效方法。
ObjectiveTo investigate the significance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC value) for pretrea-tment prediction of short-term treatment effect in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent transca-theter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). MethodsA total of twelve HCC patients with twenty-three HCC lesions who underwent TACE in our hospital from May. 2014 to May. 2015 were enrolled prospectively, to explore the difference between pre-and post-TACE in diameter of tumor, ADC value of HCC lesions, ADC value of liver parenchyma, and analyze the predictive significance of ADC value of HCC lesions for TACE in treatment of HCC. ResultsThere were no statistical difference between pre-and post-TACE in diameter of HCC lesions and ADC value of liver parenchyma (P=0.635, P=0.473), but the ADC value of HCC lesions was higher after TACE than pre-TACE (P=0.003). After TACE, the area of necrosis in HCC lesions was≥50% in 17 lesions (73.9%, good effect group), and <50% in 6 lesions (26.1%, poor effect group). Compared with poor effect group, ADC values of HCC lesions in good effect group were both higher before and after TACE (P<0.050). Area under ROC curve (AUC value) of ADC value in HCC lesions before TACE for predicting the effect of TACE was 0.690 (95% CI:0.510-0.879), with the sensitivity and specificity of 82.3% (95% CI:65.5%-93.2%) and 53.8% (95% CI:25.1%-80.8%) respectively, and the demarcation point for good effect and poor effect was 1.24×103 mm2/s. ConclusionThis preliminary study demonstrates that the ADC value of HCC lesions before TACE may be a useful indicator to predict early response of TACE in treatment of HCC.
ObjectiveTo investigate the curative effects of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyper-thermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treating the hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis. MethodsThe clinical data of 80 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis who were treated in our hospital from January 2004 to January 2012 were collected, and were classified into observation group (n=40) and control group (n=40) according to the treatment. Case of observation group received CRS+HIPEC, and cases of control group received CRS+conventional intraperitoneal injection of chemotherapy. Then the comparison of clinical effect and prog-nosis was performed. ResultsIn observation group, the results of completeness of cytoreduction (CC) grade was:31 cases in grade 0, 6 cases in grade 1, and 3 cases in grade 2. In control group, the results of CC grade was:32 cases in grade 0, 6 cases in grade 1, and 2 cases in grade 3. There was no significant difference between 2 groups in the CC grade (P=0.213). In addition, there were no significant differences between observation group and control group in operation time (6.8 hours vs. 6.5 hours), hospital stay (17.3 days vs.18.7 days), and incidence of adverse reactions[70.0% (28/40) vs. 60.0% (24/40)], P>0.05. All of the cases of observation group and control group were followed up for 10-61 months (average of 42.5 months) and 6-49 months (average of 30.2 months) respectively. During the follow up period, in observation group, there were 18 cases died, 12 cases suffered from recurrence, 5 cases suffered from metastasis, and the rest of 5 cases survived; in the control group, there were 26 cases died, 9 cases suffered from recurrence, and 5 cases suffered from metastasis. However, the survival situation was better in observation group than that of control group (P<0.01). ConclusionCombining CRS and HIPEC for treating hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis was safe and effective, which would be widely applied.
目的 探讨临床治疗原发性肝癌合并门静脉癌栓的有效方法及疗效。方法 对我院2008年1月至2010年1月期间收治的29例原发性肝癌合并门静脉癌栓患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,并按治疗方法的不同将患者分为经动脉导管栓塞术（TAE）治疗组和TAE＋门静脉灌注化疗治疗组，比较2组患者的治疗效果。结果 TAE治疗组治疗有效率、门静脉癌栓缩小率和AFP转阴率分别为43.75%、18.75%和37.50%，TAE＋门静脉灌注治疗组分别为76.92%、61.54%和61.54%，2组比较后者优于前者（P＜0.05）。TAE＋门静脉灌注治疗组患者治疗后半年及1年生存率高于TAE治疗组（P＜0.05）。TAE治疗组患者生存时间为４～18个月，中位生存期为8个月；TAE＋门静脉灌注治疗组患者生存时间为5～18个月，中位生存期为11个月。结论 TAE＋门静脉灌注化疗是一种安全可行的治疗方法，可延长原发性肝癌合并门静脉癌栓患者的生存时间。
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy (IHPC) for ovarian cancer, so as to provide references for clinical practice and studies. MethodsWe electronically searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2013), Web of Science, WanFang Data, CBM, VIP and CNKI for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about IHPC vs. intravenous chemotherapy (IC) for ovarian cancer from the inception of the databases to June 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 723 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the IHPC group was superior to the IC group in clinical efficiency (OR=4.02, 95%CI 2.85 to 5.68, P < 0.000 01), clinical benefit response (OR=3.41, 95%CI 2.13 to 5.45, P < 0.000 01), recurrence and metastasis rates (OR=0.29, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.42, P < 0.000 1), and overall survival rates (OR=3.30, 95%CI 1.82 to 5.99, P < 0.000 1). In the aspect of safety, no significant difference was found in bone marrow suppression, hemoglobin reduction, nausea and vomiting between two groups. ConclusionIHPC for ovarian cancer can improve clinical efficiency, clinical benefit response and overall survival rates, and reduce recurrence and metastasis rates; and it is also safe for patients.