west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "狼疮性肾炎" 4 results
  • Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Cyclophosphamide in Induction Therapy for Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review

    Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus cyclophosphamide (CTX) in the induction treatment for lupus nephritis (LN). Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCIE, The Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, CBM, and CNKI were searched from their establishment date to August of 2010 to retrieve the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about MMF versus CTX for LN. The methodology quality of included studies was evaluated. The efficacy indexes i.e. the clinical total remission (TR), complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), pathological activity index, the chronicity index and complete induction therapy rate (CIR), and the safety indexes i.e. the rate of patient intolerance-to-drug, the incidence of infection, leukopenia and diarrhea, were abstracted. Finally the Meta-analyses were conducted by using Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2. Results Eight RCTs involving 773 patients met the inclusive criteria. The results of meta-analyses showed that the total remission rate (OR=1.49, 95%CI 1.10 to 2.02) and complete remission rate (OR=1.67, 95%CI 1.08 to 2.57) were significantly higher in the MMF group than the CTX group. There was no significant difference in the rate of partial remission, the complete induction rate, the rate of patient intolerance-to-drug, the incidence of infection and leukopenia. However, the incidence of diarrhea was higher in the MMF group (OR=2.99, 95%CI 1.87 to 4.78). The results of meta-analyses for type IV LN were the same. Conclusion MMF is superior to CTX in the induction therapy to Lupus Nephritis (type III, IV, V), but the incidence of diarrhea is higher.

    Release date:2016-09-07 11:06 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 三种自身抗体和补体C3水平检测对狼疮性肾炎患者的诊断意义

    目的探讨抗心磷脂抗体(ACA)、抗核小体抗体、抗核糖体p蛋白抗体3种自身抗体与补体C3水平检测对狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者的诊断意义。 方法2005年7月-2010年12月对406例系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者(其中LN 122例)和120例健康体检者采用酶联免疫吸附测定法测定ACA,应用欧蒙印迹法测定抗核小体抗体和抗核糖体p蛋白抗体,应用散射比浊法测定补体C3水平。 结果ACA和抗核糖体p蛋白抗体阳性率在LN组均为21.31%,在非LN组分别为17.61%、14.08%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);抗核小体抗体在LN组为56.56%,在非LN组为39.08%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);LN组和非LN组3种抗体阳性率与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);LN组、非LN组和对照组补体C3水平分别为(0.52±0.22)、(0.67±0.29)、(1.28±0.32)g/L,3组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);LN组ACA、抗核小体抗体和抗核糖体p蛋白抗体同时阳性率(10.66%)高于非LN组(3.17%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论ACA、抗核小体抗体、抗核糖体p蛋白抗体及补体C3的联合检测对狼疮性肾炎的诊断及鉴别诊断、预后判断等方面具有一定意义。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Research progress of vimentin in lupus nephritis

    Systemic lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease involving multiple organs of the body. Lupus nephritis is one of the most serious organ manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Vimentin, a member of the intermediate filament protein family, is involved in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases, including lupus nephritis. More and more studies have shown that vimentin plays an important role in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis, and has an important influence on the disease development, treatment and prognosis of lupus nephritis. This review focuses on the structure, function and post-translational modification of vimentin, the relationship between vimentin and the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis, and the significance of vimentin expression levels in renal tissues, serum and urine, in order to provide theoretical basis for future mechanism research and clinical application.

    Release date:2021-07-22 06:32 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Methodological quality assessment of clinical guidelines and consensus for lupus nephritis

    Objective To assess the methodological quality of clinical guidelines and consensus of lupus nephritis, to collect the recommendations of each guideline, and to provide references for clinical decision-making. Methods PubMed, CNKI, and CBM databases and related websites such as NGC, NICE, GIN, SIGN, and Medive were electronically searched from January 2012 to December 2020 to collect the clinical guidelines and expert consensus for lupus nephritis. After consistency evaluation by four evaluators, the methodological quality of the included guidelines or expert consensus was evaluated using AGREE Ⅱ. The relevant recommendations, evidence level, and recommended strength of each guideline in treating lupus nephritis were summarized. Results A total of eight guidelines and two consensus statements were included. Among them, eight guidelines or consensus statements were level B (generally recommended guidelines), and two were level C (non-recommended guidelines). Relevant recommendations mainly gave the corresponding treatment scheme according to the pathological type of lupus nephritis. Conclusion The methodological quality of lupus nephritis guideline formulation in China needs to be improved. The included guidelines and consensus can provide reference for clinical decision-makers. However, higher-quality clinical practice guidelines for the Chinese population are needed to be developed in the future.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content