Variceal bleeding in cirrhosis is one of the most challenging problems in gastroenterology. Bleeding from gastro-oesophageal varices is a main cause of early death (approximately 30%-50% at the first bleeding) in cirrhosis. The aim of our therapy is to locate the place of bleeding, control active bleeding and prevent rebleeding, but it is difficult sometimes. A number of treatment strategies, such as somatostain analogs, vasopressin, endoscopic therapy, transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt (TIPS) have evolved over time, but which is better? New evidence of therapy for variceal haemorrhage will be introduced in Cirrhosis that includes: 1.Somatostatin, vasopressin, ligation, schlerotherapy and balloon tamponade for acute variceal bleeding; 2.β-blockers, ligation, schlerotherapy and shunt surgery for prophylaxis of primary variceal bleeding; 3.β-blockers, ligation, schlerotherapy, shunt surgery and TIPS for prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding; 4. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cirrhosis with gastrointestinal bleeding.
Objective To formulate the treatment of Barrett esophagus and provide evidence-based solutions for doctors and patients. Methods We attempted to obtain evidence for treating Barrett esophagus by searching MEDLINE (1978 to 2005), CBMdisc (1978 to 2005) and The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2005). The quality of the retrieved evidence was evaluated. Results The therapies for Barrett esophagus include dietary intervention, change of life style, drug therapy, endoscopic therapy and surgery. We should choose different therapies according to the specific conditions of patients. Conclusions Endoscopic therapy has been developed a lot in recent years. The combination of two or more therapies may produce better effects.
Objective To provide evidence of the role of helicobacter pylori eradication in the treatment of functional dyspepsia. Methods We searched VIP, CBMdisc, MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library for systematic reviews, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials and clinical guidelines involving helicobacter pylori and functional dyspepsia, so as to provide the best evidence for clinical practice. Results We included two systematic reviews, one meta-analysis and eleven randomized controlled trials. The evidence identified showed that helicobacter pylori infection was more prevalent in functional dyspepsia than in asymptomatic patients, but the effect of H pylori infection in the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia remained controversial. H pylori eradication therapy had a relatively weak effect in H pylori positive functional dyspepsia. An economic model suggested that this modest benefit may still be cost-effective, but more studies are needed to assess this. Conclusion According to the current evidence, it can be concluded that helicobacter pylori eradication for the treatment of functional dyspepsia should be individualized.
Objective To determine the effectiveness and safety of pneumatic balloon dilatation in patients with achalasia. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, issue 1, 2007), MEDLINE or PUBMED (1978-2007), Embase (1978-2007), OVID Database (1978-2007), Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBMDisc, 1978-2007), CNKI (1979-2007), Chinese VIP Database (1989-2007) and Wanfang Database (1978-2007). We also checked the reference lists of retrieved articles and relevant proceedings. We used the methods recommended by The Cochrane Collaboration to conduct this systematic review. Results Twenty four trials involving 1045 patients were included. Meta-analyses showed that the short-term total effective rate was much higher with pneumatic dilatation than intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection (P=0.0007). The long-term total effective rate was higher with pneumatic dilatation compared to intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection (P=0.005). Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection was superior to pneumatic dilatation in terms of clinical relapse rate (Plt;0.0001). Our analyses of complications and adverse effects found that pneumatic dilatation was superior to intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection (P=0.0008), and endoscopic sphincterotomy was superior to balloon dilatation (P=0.0006). Conclusions The limited current evidence shows that: pneumatic dilatation is safe and effective for the short- or long-term treatment of achalasia.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of histamine H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) for the prevention of stress ulcer bleeding (SUB) in critically ill patients. Methods Trials were identified by searching Cochrane Controlled Trials (Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE (1980 to October 2006),EMbase (1984 to October 2006) and the Chinese Biological Medicine Database (1978 to October), Chinese VIP Database (1989 to October 2006) and Chinese EBM Database. We also handsearched the proceedings of relevant conferences, 5 kinds of important Chinese journals and the references of all included trials. Two reviewers assessed the quality of studies and extracteddata independently. Disagreement was resolved by discussion . The primary outcomes included were incidence of SUB, incidence of nosocomial pneumonia (NP), mortality and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were gastric pH, length of hospital stayand length of ICU stay. RevMan4.2.7 software was used for meta-analyses. Results Sixteen trials involving 2 014 patients were included. Most of the trials were of poor quality. Meta-analyses showed that H2RA significantly less SUB comparedwith patients in the placebo or non-prophylaxis group (RR 0.39, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.56; Plt;0.000 01, NNT=6), but but there was no significant difference in the incidence of clinically important bleeding (RR 0.51 , 95%CI 0.17 to 1.53; P=0.11). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of NP(RR 1.02, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.89,P=0.95). H2RA significantly decreased mortality in comparison with placebo or non-prophylaxis (RR 0.68, 95%CI 0.52 to 0.90; P=0.007, NNT=18). H2RA had a good safety profile. We did not perform meta-analysis for gastric pH due to the methodological limitations. Conclusion H2RA may significantly reduce the incidence of SUB and mortality, but cannot reduce the incidence of clinically important bleeding. Due to the poor quality of included studies, the conclusion should be interpreted cautiously. More randomized controlled trials with sufficient sample size, uniform standards, higher quality and scientifically sound methodology should be performed.
目的 针对近期收治的1例常规治疗疗效不理想的溃疡性结肠炎患者,我们进行了证据检索和评价,以期找到更有效的治疗方法.方法 计算机检索MEDLINE(1978～2004)、CBMdisc(1978～2004)及Cochrane图书馆(2004年第3期),查找 5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)灌肠液治疗溃疡性结肠炎及与病情缓解有关的系统评价、临床随机对照试验等,并对所获证据进行评价.结果 高质量的临床证据表明,5-ASA灌肠液治疗溃疡性结肠炎及帮助病情缓解均优于口服5-ASA及柳氮磺胺嘧啶局部灌肠治疗.据此临床证据,结合医生经验及病人意愿,对该例患者实施5-ASA 1g+生理盐水100 ml qd,睡前保留灌肠治疗.1周后,患者临床症状明显缓解,腹泻基本停止,每天解黄色黏液便1～2次.肠镜复查,炎症较前明显减轻.出院后继续用上述方案维持治疗,每周2次.门诊随访1年,患者未再复发,也无明显副作用发生.结论 5-ASA灌肠液是控制溃疡性结肠炎活动期间病情及帮助缓解、减少复发的有效药物.
目的:探讨幽门螺杆菌(Hp)感染与各种常见上消化道疾病的关系。 方法:回顾性地分析了2008年于我院采用快速尿素酶试验(RUT)检测Hp的6636例门诊及住院患者Hp感染情况,及与性别、年龄、病种的关系。结果:6636例患者中,Hp阳性3248例,检出率为48.9%;其中男性4391例,检出率为49.97%,女性2 245例,检出率为46.9%,男性略高于女性,差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05);20～29岁和30～39岁这两个年龄段Hp检出率最高,分别为58.4%和54.6%,lt;20岁Hp检出率最低(38.8%),各组间差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.01);各种常见的上消化道疾病,复合性溃疡和上消化道恶性肿瘤Hp检出率最高,分别为86.2%和84.1%,其次是幽门管溃疡和十二指肠溃疡,检出率分别为54.2%和51.9%,慢性胃炎、残胃炎、胃溃疡和食管静脉曲张Hp检出率分别为46.9%、40.0%、36.6%和34.2%,各组间的差异有显著的统计学意义(Plt;0.005)。 结论:本组资料Hp总检出率为48.9%,男性略高于女性,慢性胃炎、消化性溃疡和上消化道恶性肿瘤与Hp感染密切相关,尤以复合性溃疡和上消化道恶性肿瘤更为显著。
Background Though nitrates have been used in achalasia for a long time, the effectiveness of nitrates for achalasia is still controversial. Objectives To quantify short-term and long-term effects of nitrate therapy in patients with achalasia. Search strategy Trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1966-2001), EMBASE (1980-2001), LILACS-Latin American and Caribbean health science literature (1982-2001) and CBM-Chinese Biomedical Database (1980-2000). Additionally, all references in the identified trials were checked for further relevant trials. Selection criteria All randomised controlled trials involving achalasia patients given any type of nitrates were included. Data collection amp; analysis Data were extracted By two independent observers based on the intention-to-treat principle. Odds ratios for the patients need to treat by invasive procedures, improvement of symptoms, LES pressure decrease, oesophageal emptying, and side effects were calculated. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) for avoiding invasive procedure, improvement of symptoms, oesophageal emptying, and numbers needed to harm (NNH) of side effects were also determined. Main results Two randomised cross-over studies were found, But no results are included. Due to the design of the studies and the method of reporting the results in the original paper it was not possible to extract the necessary information to examine any of the outcomes. Authors have been contacted to obtain this information. Reviewers’ conclusion We can conclude no implications for practice at this stage. Much more RCT data are needed to determine the effects of nitrates.