Objective To summarize the experience in treatment and diagnosis of popliteal artery trauma and to determine the factors for amputation. Methods From February 1995 to January 2006, 28 patients with popliteal artery trauma were treated. The disease course was more than 8 hours. Of them, there were 25 males and 3 females, aging from 3 to 53 years. Trauma was caused by traffic accident in 12 cases, by falling from height in 3 cases, by firearm in 2 cases, by sharp instruments in 3 cases, by strangulation in 2 cases and by others in 6 cases. No arteriopalmus or weak arteriopalmus wereobserved in 18 cases and in 8 cases respectively. Popliteal artery exposure or active bleeding was seen in 2 cases; the popliteal arteries were examined by operation in 8 cases; color ultrasound Doppler flow imaging showed color flood flowsignals were through popliteal artery and its branches in 20 cases. Defect sizeof popliteal artery was less than 5 cm in 7 cases and more than 5 cm in 9 cases. End to end anastomosis reconstruction by saphenous vein graft and direct suture was performed in 16 cases and ampulation in 12 cases. The time of the revascularization of the leg was 8-150 hours (mean 31.8 hours). Results All patients were followed up 6 months to 11 years with an average of 4.2 years. In 16 cases given end to end anastomosis reconstruction, 15 cases achieved revascularization and limb survival; lower limb function restored to normal within 1 year in 12 cases; foot drop and ankle joint contracture occurred in 3 casesand the survival rate of limbs was 94%. Amputation was given in 12 of 28 casesbecause of severe trauma. The rate of amputation was 43% and the rate of disability was 54%. Conclusion Popliteal artery trauma should be treated as soon as the diagnosis is made. If the revascularization is more than 8 hours or circulatory compensation is not complete, it will affect the leg survival. Delayed diagnosis and severe traumas are the cause of high rate ofamputation in popliteal artery trauma.
Objective To compare the single femoral tunnel split-double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction with the singlebundle PCL reconstruction and to discuss the advantages of the modified reconstruction method. Methods Fourteen donated fresh-frozen human knee specimens were biomechanically tested, which included knee specimens from 12 males and 2 females, and their ages ranged from 20 to 31 years. The specimen length of the femur and the tibia was 20 cm. The tibial posterior translation and the PCL strains were first measured when PCL was in an intact state (the intact group, n=14). Then, PCL was cut (the cut group, n=14). The posterior translation was measured when a posterior load was applied. After that, the specimens were randomly divided into twogroups: the single-bundle group (n=7) and the double-bundle group (n=7). When the posterior load was applied to the tibia, the bundle strain and the tibial posterior translation were measured with the knees flexed at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120°, respectively. Results While a 100 N posterior force was applied, the posterior tibial displacement of the intact PCL knee ranged from 1.97±0.29 mm to 2.60±0.23 mm at the different knee flexion angles. In the PCL-cutstate, the tibial displacement increased significantly from 11.27±1.06 mm to14.94±0.67 mm (P＜0.05). After the singlebundle reconstruction, the posterior tibial translation ranged from 1.99±0.19 mm to 2.72±0.38 mm at the different knee flexion angles. In the split-double-bundle reconstruction, the posterior tibial translations ranged from 2.27±0.32 mm to 3.05±0.44 mm. The graft of the single-bundle reconstruction was tensioned from 0° to 120°, and the tibial displacement increased significantly at 90° compared with that at theother angles(P＜0.05). In the doublebundle reconstruction, the anterolateral bundle and the posteromedial bundle were tensioned in a reciprocal fashion, and the tibial displacement had no significant difference at the five kinds of the flexion angles. ConclusionThe single femoral tunnel split-double-bundle PCL reconstruction canrestore the posterior tibial displacement at different flexion angles, and the tibial displacement in the single-bundle PCL reconstruction knee can be increased when the knee flexion is at 90°. In the double-bundle reconstruction, the graftcan be tensioned in a reciprocal fashion and the biomechanical features can be nearer to those of the normal PCL bundles.