Objective To evaluate effect of massive and complex incisional hernia or defect of abdominal wall by using prosthetic mesh. Method The clinical data of 112 patients with massive and complex incisional hernia or defect of abdominal wall from February 2003 to February 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Results Sixty-three cases were repaired by placing artificial mesh between the peritoneum and the musculus rectus abdominis and 49 cases by opening intraperitoneal mesh placement. The primary healing occurred in 108 cases, the incision infection occured in 4 cases, the seroma occurred in 7 cases. The stretched feeling was found in 39 cases and the mild pain occurred in 17 cases in the operative area at early term after operation. One hundred and two patients were followed up for 9–156 months (mean 78.6 months), the recurrence was observed in 3 cases (2.94%). Conclusion Repair of massive and complex incisional hernia or defect of abdominal wall by using prosthetic mesh has some advantages of minimal invasiveness, rapid convalescence, and low recurrent rate.
ObjectiveTo investigate the technique and early results of hybrid repair of parastomal hernia with the DynaMesh-IPST. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 28 patients who underwent DynaMesh-IPST hybrid repair of parastomal hernia between October 2013 and June 2016. There were 18 males and 10 females, aged 49-84 years (mean, 71 years). The disease duration of parastomal hernia was 6-60 months (mean, 27.6 months). The body mass index (BMI) was 17-35 (mean, 25.6); there were 15 obese patients (BMI > 26). ResultsThe operation was completed smoothly in all patients. The mean stoma diameter was 6 cm (range, 4-9 cm). The mean operation time was 142 minutes (range, 110-190 minutes). The mean hospital stay was 9 days (range, 7-12 days). Seroma was found in 2 patients, and was cured by needle aspiration and pressure bandage. All 28 cases were followed up 1-33 months (mean, 19 months). No recurrence, infection, intestinal fistula, and stoma-related problems were found. The appearance of abdominal wall was symmetrical. ConclusionDynaMesh-IPST hybrid repair is a safe and feasible method for parastomal hernia, and the short-term operative result is satisfactory.
目的 探讨联合血管切除的胰十二指肠切除术的手术效果。方法 回顾总结2000年3月至2006年3月施行的11例联合血管切除的胰十二指肠切除术的临床资料。结果 本组无围手术期死亡。术后病理结果显示，切除的11例血管标本中，5例为血管周围炎性反应导致肿瘤与血管粘连； 6例肿瘤侵犯了血管壁，其中5例侵及到管壁肌层，内膜完整，仅1例侵犯到内膜。随访2～49个月,12月内死亡1例,24个月内死亡2例,36个月内死亡2例,其余仍健在。结论 联合血管切除的胰十二指肠切除术可提高壶腹周围癌的切除率, 延长患者生存时间。
Objective To compare the efficacy of retromuscular repair of incisional hernia by using ProGrip self-gripping mesh and conventional polypropylene mesh. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on clinical data of 83 cases of incisional hernia between May 2012 and May 2016. Of 83 cases, ProGrip self-gripping mesh was used in 46 cases (self-gripping mesh group) and conventional polypropylene mesh (conventional mesh group) in 37 cases. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, types of incision hernia, hernia ring diameter, course of disease, and associated disease between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operative time, hospital stays, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were recorded and compared between 2 groups. Results The self-gripping mesh group was significantly lower than conventional mesh group in operative time and hospital stays (t=2.977,P=0.004;t=2.270,P=0.026). Primary healing of incision was obtained in 2 groups, with no seroma and mesh infection. The VAS score of self-gripping mesh group was significantly lower than that of conventional mesh group at 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days after operation (P<0.05). The follow-up time was 5-53 months (mean, 25.8 months) in 43 patients of self-gripping mesh group, and was 7-54 months (mean, 27.4 months) in 33 patients of conventional mesh group. No chronic pain or hernia recurrence was found in both groups during follow-up time. Conclusion It is a safe and feasible curative way to use ProGrip self-gripping mesh for retromuscular repair of incisional hernia as it can reduce operative time, hospital stays, and postoperative pain.
Objective To summarize the cl inical effect of allogenic acellular dermal matrix in repair of abdominal wall hernia and defect. Methods The cl inical data were analyzed retrospectively from 31 patients with abdominal wall hernia and defect repaired by allogenic acellular dermal matrix between March 2007 and November 2009. There were 19 males and 12females with an age range of 10-70 years (median, 42 years), including 6 abdominal wall defects caused by abdominal wall tumor resection, 4 patchs infection after abdominal wall hernia repair using prosthetic mesh, 2 incisional hernia, 1 parastomal hernia, 1 recurrent parastomal hernia receiving mesh repair, 1 mesh infection caused by parastomal hernia repair using prosthetic patch, 3 mesh infection caused by tension free inguina after hernia repair, and 13 inguinal hernia. There were 12 patients with contaminated or infectious wound. The disease duration was from 1 to 34 months (6 months on average). The defect size of abdominal wall ranged from 6 cm × 4 cm to 19 cm × 10 cm. Abdominal wall hernia or defect underwent repair using allogenic acelluar demall matrix. Results Of the 31 patients, 29 patients recovered with primary wound heal ing. Chronic sinus tract occurred in 1 patient and the wound was cured by change dressing. Wound dehiscence and patch exposure occurred in 1 patient, and second heal ing was achieved after change dressing. All the 31 patients were followed up 6-36 months, no abdominal wall hernia or hernia recurrence occurred in other patients except 1 patient who had abdominal bulge. And no foreign body sensation or chronic pain in wound area occurred. Conclusion It is feasible and safe to use allergenic acellular dermal matrix patch for repair of abdominal wall hernia or soft tissue defect, especially in contaminated or infectious wound.
Objective To summarize the surgical technique and the effectiveness of CK Parastomal patch in laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia. Methods The cl inical data were retrospectively analysed from 24 patients who received laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia using CK Parastomal patch between June 2006 and March 2010. There were 15 males and 9 females with a median age of 55 years (range, 47-80 years). Among them, 19 patients were with colon parastomalhernia in the left lower quadrant and 5 patients with ileum parastomal hernia in the right lower quadrant. The parastomal hernia duration was 1 to 4 years (mean, 2.4 years). The maximal diameter of the hernia ring was 3 to 7 cm (mean, 5.2 cm). All patients did not receive hernia repair. Results Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia was successfully performed in 18 cases, and open repair was used in 6 cases because of extensive adhesion. The average operating time was 121 minutes (range, 78 to 178 minutes). All wounds healed by first intention. Wound seroma occurred in 8 cases at 3 to 7 days after operation and disappeared by aspiration. Eleven patients complained of pain in the operative area within 1 month after operation and it disappeared without intervention. All patients were followed up 6 to 39 months (mean, 27 months). One recurrence occurred at 3 months after operation, and no recurrence occurred in the other patients. Conclusion Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia using CK Parastomal patch is a safe and feasible procedure with a satisfactory short-term effectiveness, but the long-term effectiveness should be further observed.
Objective To summarize the experiences and methods on reoperation of recurrent incisional hernia after mesh repair with prosthetic patch. Methods Sixteen patients who got reoperation from January 2007 to December 2010 because of recurrent incisional hernia after mesh repair were analyzed retrospectively. Results All patients received prosthetic patch repair for reoperation. Thirteen patients received new mesh repair accompanied with old mesh removal, repair conducted by suturing new mesh with old mesh together in two patients, and repair performed by new mesh overlapping the old mesh in one patient. All patients recovered with primary wound healing. Fluid upon the mesh occurred in 3 patients and cured by percutaneous puncture and pressure dressing. Postoperative hospital stay was 7 to 16 days and the average 9 days. The drainage was removed 2 to 7 days after operation and the average was 4 days. All the 16 patients were followed up. And during a follow-up range of 5 to 36 months and the average 20 months, there was slight foreign body sensation in one patient, no chronic pain in wound area occurred. And no abdominal wall hernia recurrence occurred. Conclusions Reoperation of recurrent incisional hernia after mesh repair need to consider the recurrent position, material of the previous mesh, and the previous surgical methods, and should select appropriate prosthetic patch and surgical procedure, then could gain satisfied results.
ObjectiveTo explore the safety, effectiveness, and cosmetic advantage of endoscopic thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer in the cT1N0 stage. MethodsThe clinical data of 148 patients underwent thyroidectomy for the cT1N0 differentiated thyroid cancer in the First Affiliated Hospital of PLA General Hospital and the PLA General Hospital from September 2010 to September 2013 were analyzed retrospectively, including 36 patients by total endoscopic thyroidectomy (TET group), 41 patients by endoscopic-assisted thyroidectomy (EAT group), and 71 patients by open thyroidectomy (OT group). The intraoperative status, early complications, late complications, and cosmetic result were compared among these three groups. ResultsAll the procedures were accomplished successfully.①In the intraoperative status: The operation time of the TET group was significantly longer than that of the EAT group(P < 0.05)or OT group (P < 0.05), drainage on the first day after operation in the TET group was significantly more than that in the EAT(P < 0.05)or OT group (P < 0.05), the intraoperative bleeding of the TET group or EAT group was significantly less than that of the OT group (P < 0.05), there were no statistical significances in the total number of lymph nodes dissection and number of positive lymph nodes among three groups (P > 0.05).②In the early complications: The postoperative pain score of the TET group was significantly lower than that of the EAT group (P < 0.05)or OT group (P < 0.05), there were no statistical significances in the postoperative bleeding, seroma, infection, transient recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, or transient hypoparathyroidism among three groups (P > 0.05).③In the late complications: there was no statistical significance in the perpetual recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, perpetual hypoparathyroidism, or thyroid cancer relapse among three groups (P > 0.05).④The best cosmetic result was obtained by the patients underwent TET as compared with the patients underwent EAT(P < 0.05)or OT (P < 0.05). ConclusionsEndoscopic procedure has the same effectiveness and safety with open procedure for differentiated thyroid cancer in the cT1N0 stage, but endoscopic procedure has a better cosmetic result than that open procedure. Compared with EAT, TET has more advantages in the cosmetic result.
Objective To summarize the surgical technique and curative effect of laparoscopic repair for suprapubic incisional hernia using composite patch. Methods The clinical data of 25 cases performed laparoscopic repair of suprapubic incisional hernia using composite patch from March 2007 to October 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 13 males and 12 females， and aged 35-83 years （median age was 52 years）. Among them 2 patients were recurrences. The distance between the lower margin of hernia defect and pubic arc was less than 5 cm. The composite patch was fixed to the abdominal wall using spiral tacks （Protack） in direct vision. The lower margin of the patch was lower to the pubic arc in 2 cm， and to be fixed to the pubic arc and bilateral pectineal ligament， and it should be extended. Results Laparoscopic repair were successfully performed in all patients without convert to open repair. The max diameter of the hernia ring was 6.1-12.5cm and the average was 9.5 cm. The average operating time was 128 min （ranging from 90 to 180 min）. And the total complication rate was 28% （7/25）， including bladder damage during operation in 1 case， wound seroma upon the patch in 4 cases and cured by aspiration， pain in the operative area and disappeared within one month without intervention in 1 case. Twenty-two patients were followed-up with a follow-up rate of 88%. During a follow-up range of 6-48 months（average 30 months）， one case recurrence occurred in 2 months after the repair with the recurrent rate of 4%. Conclusions Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic incisional hernia is a safe and feasible technique， and the patch should cover and exceed the margin of the defect for 5 cm in all direction. The lower margin of the patch should be fixed to the bilateral pectineal ligament so as to strengthen the fix， and lower the recurrence rate.
ObjectiveTo summarize the method and experience in surgical treatment for mesh infection after prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia. MethodsThe clinical data of 16 patients with mesh infection after ventral hernia repair accepted surgical treatment in our department from June 2007 to May 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 10 males and 6 females, the age range from 24 to 73 years with an average 45.2 years. The patients with mesh infection included 11 cases of infection after incisional hernia repair, 4 cases of infection after abdominal wall defects repair caused by abdominal wall tumor resection, 1 mesh infection combine with urinary fistula caused by parastomal hernia of ileal neobladder repaired by using prosthetic patch. Clinical manifestation included mesh exposion, abscess, chronic sinus, and enterocutaneous fistula. All patients accepted local treatment of change dressing by primary operative surgeon, but the wounds didn’t heal about 3 to 24 months. Then the patients performed radical removal of infected mesh and abdominal wall reconstruction. ResultsAll patients accepted affected mesh removal successfully. Five patients performed abdominal wall reconstruction by using components separation technique. Four cases accepted abdominal wall repair by using polypropylene mesh. Five patients performed abdominal wall repair by using human acelluar dermal matrix. One case accepted change dressing and vacuum aspiration on the infected wound surface without reconstruction. And one case closed the wound immediately after infected mesh removal. The postoperative hospitalization time was 9 to 25 d (average 14 d). Thirteen patients recovered with primary wound healing. The other 3 cases recovered with second healing by local change dressing. All patients were followed up from 6 to 34 months (average 22 months), no abdominal wall hernia recurrence occurred. ConclusionsIt is very difficult to deal with mesh infection after prosthetic patch repair of abdominal wall hernia or defect. The surgical treatment should be done according to specific condition of each individual so as to acquire satisfied results.