Objective To compare the anesthetic effects of traditional digital block with single-injection digital block in digital injury patients for subcutaneous digital blocks. Methods Patients with one or two digits injured were randomized to the traditional digital block group and single-injection digital block group. All of the blocks were conducted by one investigator. The patients and outcome assessor were blinded to the treatment allocation. Both of the per-protocol-population (PP) analysis and the intention-to-treatment (ITT) analysis were performed to compare the two block techniques in terms of the pain during infiltration, the onset time of anesthesia and the failure rate of anesthesia. Results A total of 93 patients (109 digits) were included with 51 (61 digits) in the traditional block group and 42 (48 digits) in the single-injection block group.Two patients (3 digits) dropped out. Both of the PP analysis and ITT analysis showed that no significant difference between the two groups were detected in terms of the pain during infiltration, the onset time of anesthesia and the failure rate of anesthesia (P﹥0.05). Conclusions The subcutaneous single-injection digital block is as effective as the traditional digital block, but is much easier to perform. This technique is indicated for the digital anesthesia of palmar aspect distal to the proximal digital crease and dorsal aspect of the distal and middle phalanxes.
Objective To compare the effectiveness and complications of various surgical techniques in the treatment of the osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966 to 2005), Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 3, 2005) and CBM (1978 to 2005), and handsearched the references of relevant studies. Only randomized controlled trials were included. We assessed the methodological quality of the included studies, extracted data, and performed quantitative and qualitative analyses. Results Seven studies were included, and all had some methodological shortcomings. There was b evidence that in the short term, ligamentous reconstruction, tendon interposition (LRTI) and trapeziectomy alone provide similar results with regard to pain relief, grip and pinch strength, range of thumb motion, hand function and overall satisfaction of patients, but more complications occur with LRTI than with trapeziectomy alone. Conflicting evidence was found about whether LRTI resulted in less subsidence of the first metacarpal bone than trapeziectomy alone. There was moderate evidence that LRTI and ligament reconstruction without tendon interposition (LR) did not have significant differences in thumb strength, patient satisfaction and subsidence of the first metacarpal bone. Limited evidence showed that LR produced better functional scores than LRTI and similar results in pain relief to LRTI. Conflicting evidence supported that LR resulted in greater motion range of thumb than LRTI. Only limited evidence showed that effectiveness was similar between LRTI and Swanson implant. We did not find randomized controlled trials about other surgical techniques. Conclusion Not enough evidence supports superiority of one technique over another. More high quality randomized controlled trials and long term follow-up are necessary.
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of serum soluble CD26 （sCD26） on the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Methods The serum sCD26 concentration of 59 colorectal cancer patients, 51 colorectal benign disease patients, and 41 healthy volunteers were detected by ELISA. The diagnostic efficiency of sCD26 and carcinoma embryonic antigen （CEA） was assessed by receiver operating characteristics （ROC） analysis. The association between sCD26 and colorectal cancer was assessed by logistic regression which included CEA in the model. Results Increased serum sCD26 was observed in colorectal cancer patients （P＜0.01）, but the differences of sCD26 in different Dukes stages were not statistic significance （P=0.78）. The area under cure （AUC） of sCD26 confirmed by ROC analysis was 0.72 〔95% confidence interval （CI）：0.63-0.82, P＜0.01〕. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for sCD26 at 526 μg/L, the optimal diagnostic threshold, were 0.59 （95% CI： 0.48-0.72） and 0.80 （95% CI： 0.67-0.90）, respectively. Positive serum sCD26 was associated with colorectal cancer after adjusted for CEA with odds ration （OR） 5.17 （95% CI：1.72-15.53, P＜0.01）, as confirmed by logistic regression. Increased positive rate of serum sCD26 was observed in patients at Dukes A stage （P=0.03）, but not Dukes B, C, and D stage （P＜0.05）. Conclusions Serum sCD26 has high diagnostic performance for colorectal cancer. The association of sCD26 is independent of serum CEA. Compared to serum CEA, sCD26 has more potential to be an early biomarker for colorectal cancer diagnosis.
ObjectiveTo observe the changes of macular structure and choroidal capillary blood flow density in patients with acute central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).MethodsProspective cross-sectional study. A total of 24 eyes of 24 patients with monocular acute CSC (case group) diagnosed by clinical examination from Shanxi Eye Hospital during January and March 2018 were included in the study. The eyes (24 eyes) and contralateral eyes (24 eyes) of the patients in the case group were set to CSC group and contralateral eye group, respectively. Twenty-one eyes of 21 healthy volunteers with age and gender matching were selected as normal control group. The macular structure of the eyes were observed by OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA), and the blood vessel density of choroidal capillary layer in the circular area of the macular area with a radius of 1 mm was measured. The paired t-test was used to compare the differences in blood flow density in the choroidal capillaries between the three groups.ResultsThe results of OCT showed that the serous neuroepithelial detachment in the macular area was observed in all eyes of the CSC group, with or without RPE detachment being 20 or 4 eyes, respectively. Of the 24 eyes in the contralateral eye group, 13 eyes (54.2%) had thick choroidal RPE lesions (PPE). There was no abnormality in the retina and choroidal structure in the macular area of the normal control group. The results of OCTA showed that the blood flow density of choroidal capillaries in the CSC group, the contralateral eye group and the normal control group were 1.759±0.132, 1.924±0.463, and 1.940±0.033, respectively. Compared with the eyes of the contralateral eye group and the normal control group, the blood flow density of choroidal capillaries in the CSC group was significantly lower (t=6.611, 6.474; P=0.000, 0.000). There was no significant difference in the blood flow density of choroidal capillary layer between the contralateral eye group and the normal control group (t=1.328, P＞0.05). In the contralateral eye group, there was no significant difference in the blood flow density of choroidal capillary layer between PPE eyes and no RPE eyes (t=0.806, P＞0.05).ConclusionsThere is 54.2% of the contralateral eyes in the monocular acute CSC patients with PPE. The choroidal capillary layer blood flow density is lower than that of the contralateral and normal eyes.