Objective To investigate the clinical curative effect of divided excision and plastic combined with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) in treatment for circular mixed hemorrhoids. Methods Clinical observation on 120 patients with circular mixed hemorrhoids between May 2007 and May 2008 treated by divided excision and plastic combined with PPH was carried out. Results The mean hospital stay after operation was 7.6 d. The wound healing average time was 11.9 d. The incidence rate of postoperative urinary retention was 5.8% (7/120). Average scores of pain in 3 d after operation: 5.3 points (1-8 points) on day 1, 3.6 points （2-9 points） on day 2, 2.2 points （1-8 points） on day 3. All patients were followed up for 12 months, there were 3 cases of hematochezia， 1 case of prolapse, and 1 case of remained abnormal outgrowth skin; the anus function was normal in all cases without anal stricture or tightening feeling. Conclusions Divided excision and plastic combined with PPH can better treat circular mixed hemorrhoids. This operation can not only completely clear the lesions, but also repair and reconstruct the anus and anal canal, protect its size and function. It is an ideal operation for treatment for circular mixed hemorrhoids.
目的:探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切吻合术(PPH术)+外痔切除和单纯外剥内扎术治疗重度环状混合痔的临床效果。方法:对收治的48例III,IV度环状混合痔患者随机分为2组,分别采用PPH术+外痔切除术和单纯外剥内扎术予以治疗的疗效进行比较。结果:通过对手术时间、术中出血、疼痛程度、住院时间、患者满意度等进行比较观察,表明PPH术+外痔切除具有明显优势。结论:PPH术+外痔切除术仍能保持单纯PPH优势,克服其不足之处,较传统外剥内扎术治疗重度环状混合痔有明显的优势。
目的比较外剥内扎（注射）加开窗治疗环状混合痔和传统外剥内扎法治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效。方法80例环状混合痔患者分别接受外剥内扎（注射）加开窗治疗和传统外剥内扎法治疗，对两种术式的疗效进行比较。结果2组患者术后均未发生肛门失禁症状，肛门功能的差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05），而治疗组患者肛门狭窄、肛门水肿和疼痛明显轻于对照组（Plt;0.05），尿潴留、切口愈合时间以及复发也明显少于对照组（Plt;0.05）。结论外剥内扎（注射）加开窗术是环状混合痔的较好治疗方案。
目的总结分段齿形结扎加皮桥整形术治疗环状混合痔的优、缺点。方法将我院2007年1月至2009年12月期间收治的80例环状混合痔患者按入院顺序简单随机分成2组，治疗组采用分段齿形结扎加皮桥整形术治疗，对照组采用传统的外剥内扎术，比较2组的疗效。结果治疗组治愈率为95%(38/40),对照组为90%(36/40)，2组比较差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05); 治疗组较对照组的治愈时间明显缩短(Plt;0.05)，术后疼痛、水肿、皮赘残留及肛管狭窄并发症方面更轻(Plt;0.05)。结论分段齿形结扎加皮桥整形术治疗环状混合痔比传统的外剥内扎术有更好的临床实用价值。
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect and the incidence of postoperative complications of Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoids combined with reducing tension of alary incision in the treatment of annular mixed hemorrhoids.MethodsProspectively collected 120 patients with annular mixed hemorrhoids who received treatment from the Department of Colorectal Surgery of Bazhong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicinel during the April, 2016 to October, 2018. All of the 120 patients with annular mixed hemorrhoids were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group, with 60 patients in each one group. Patients in the experimental group was treated with Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoids combined with reducing tension of alary incision, while patients in the control group with conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoid.ResultsIn the experimental group, 49 cases were cured, 11 cases showed obvious effect; in the control group, 39 cases were cured, 20 cases showed obvious effect, and 1 case was effective. The curative effect in experimental groups was better than that of the control group (Z=–2.090, P=0.037), and the effective rates of these two group were both 100% in total. The mean healing time was (19±3) d (14–21 d) in the experimental group and (21±3) d (14–24 d) in the control group, respectively, which was better in the experimental group (Z=–13.636, P<0.001). Experimental group with lower score of wound pain, hemafecia, and anal margin edema, which were much better than control group on 1 d and 3 d after operation (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant differences on incidence of uroschesis and recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsMilligan-Morgan hemorrhoids combined with reducing tension of alary incision in the treatment of annular mixed hemorrhoids has good clinical effect and deserves clinical application.