west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "电子胃镜" 2 results
  • 综合干预法对减轻胃镜下手术中的反应

    【摘要】 目的 观察运用音乐疗法配合穴位按压的综合干预方法对减轻胃镜下行高频电凝电切术患者术中反应的作用。 方法 2008年10月-2009年12月,将行胃镜下高频电凝电切术的96例患者随机分为两组,对照组给予胃镜下高频电凝电切术常规护理,观察组在常规护理的基础上给予音乐疗法配合手法按压合谷、内关穴。 结果 观察组在术中反应程度及紧张恐惧程度上明显优于对照组(Plt;0.01); 结论 音乐疗法配合穴位按压的综合干预法能减轻胃镜下高频电凝电切术中患者反应程度及紧张恐惧程度。

    Release date:2016-08-26 02:21 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • A comparison of clinical effects of removing foreign bodies from esophagus by rigid esophagoscope and flexible esophagoscope

    ObjectiveTo collect the data of esophageal foreign body patients, and to evaluate the clinical effects of two different surgical methods in our hospital.MethodsThe clinical data of 294 patients who were treated in Gansu Provincal Hospital from January 2012 to June 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical data were collected and analyzed by SPSS 22.0. In order to to evaluate the efficacy of flexible esophagoscope (FE) and rigid esophagoscope (RE) in the treatment of esophageal foreign bodies.The patients were divided into two groups: a RE group including 118 patients with 62 males and 56 females at age of 6 (3-37) years and a FE group including 176 patients with 84 males and 92 females at age of 6 (3-59) years.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, age stratification, gender and foreign body type between the two groups. There was a statistical difference in the initial clinical symptoms (P=0.041) or in esophageal foreign bodies position (P=0.037) between the two groups. The success rate of foreign body removal was similar between the two groups (P=0.632). The success rate was 88.9% (105/118) in the RE group, 87.5% (154/176) in the FE group. The operation time was significantly longer in the RE group than that in the FE group (10.8 ±17.4 min vs. 17.5±21.6 min, P<0.001). The postoperative hospitalization time in the RE groups was longer than that in the FE group (21.5 ±24.2 hours vs. 12.5 ±21.3 hours, P<0.05). There was a statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P=0.034). In the RE group, the main complication was mucosal edema (15.3%). And the rate of bleeding was higher (15.9%) in the FE group. There were 30 patients (25.5%) in the RE group with minor postoperative complications versus the FE group with 40 patients (22.7%); and 1 patient (0.8%) in the RE group with severe complications versus the FE group with 5 paients (2.8%).ConclusionBased on the analysis of this study, it is found that RE has higher safety. But the indications are strict, the professional requirements of the operator and the selection of patients are stronger. The FE is convenient to use, the operation crowd is wide, and the suitable crowd is wide. Therefore, for specific patients, after improving the relevant examination and preoperative evaluation of patients, clinicians need to choose appropriate surgical methods to ensure the success of the operation, and reduce the postoperative complications as far as possible.

    Release date:2019-12-13 03:50 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content