west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "疗效比较" 18 results
  • EFFECTIVENESS COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN REDUCTION COMBINED WITH INTERNAL FIXATION AND ARTIFICIAL RADIAL HEAD REPLACEMENT IN TREATING MASON TYPE-III COMMINUTED FRACTURES OF RADIAL HEAD

    To compare the effectiveness between open reduction combined with internal fixation and artificial radial head replacement in treating Mason type-III comminuted fracture of radial head, to provide the evidence for available treatment methods. Methods Between January 2004 and June 2008, 65 cases of Mason type-III comminuted fractures were treated with open reduction, AO mini plate and screw system or a combination of Kirschner treatment (internal fixation group, n=35) and with artificial radial head replacement (replacement group, n=30). In internal fixation group, there were 21 males and 14 females with an age range of 21 to 35 years (mean, 30.7 years); the causes of injury were traffic accidentin 12 cases, fall ing from height in 8 cases, and a fall in 15 cases; the locations were left side in 23 cases and right side in 12 cases; and the time between injury and surgery was 1-7 days (mean, 3 days). In replacement group, there were 19 males and 11 females with an age range of 23 to 67 years (mean, 32.5 years); the causes of injury were traffic accident in 7 cases, fall ing from height in 8 cases, and a fall in 15 cases; the locations were left side in 17 cases and right side in 13 cases; and the time between injury and surgery was 1-6 days (mean, 1.5 days). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease cause, disease duration, or other general information between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05), so that 2 series of patients had comparabil ity. Results Incisions healed primarily in 2 groups. All patients were followed up 1 to 4 years with an average of 2.5 years. There were significant differences in elbow flexion angle, extension angle, and forearm rotation angle between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference in elbow pronation or supination weakness (P gt; 0.05). In internal fixation group, primary union occurred in 29 cases, delayed union in 2 cases, nonunion with ectopic ossification in 2 cases, and internal fixation failure in 2 cases. In replacement group, elbow flexion angle lost beyond 30º in 1 case after 1 year, elbow stiffness occurred in 1 case because prosthesis was too long. According to Broberg and Morrey elbow scores system, the scores were 69.51 ± 10.23 in internal fixation group and 81.55 ± 12.06 in replacement group, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05). The results were excellent in 15 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 11 cases, and poor in 4 cases with an excellent and good rate of 57.1% in internal fixation group; the results were excellent in17 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 6 cases, and poor in 2 cases with an excellent and good rate of 73.3%. Conclusion Artificial radial head replacement can achieve better joint function compared with open reduction combined with internal fixation in treating Mason type-III comminuted fractures of radial head.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:48 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparison of visual outcomes between intravitreal ranibizumab injection combined with or without photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

    ObjectiveTo compare the visual outcomes of treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab alone or in combination with photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). MethodsIn this retrospective and comparative study, 36 eyes of 36 patients with PCV were enrolled. Eighteen eyes received 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) ranibizumab injection only (simple injection group) and the other 18 eyes underwent combination therapy of ranibizumab injection and PDT (combination treatment group). Intravitreal ranibizumab was given at the third day after PDT. Re-treatment was considered in clinic examination. The minimum re-treatment interval was 3 months for combination therapy and 1 month for ranibizumab. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at baseline and each follow-up visit at 1, 3, 6, 12 month was measured as a primary outcome, and complications also observed in every follow-up. ResultsNo complications occurred in these 36 patients during the treatment or follow-up, such as retinal detachment, sustained high intraocular pressure, retinal holes, intraocular inflammation, and systemic adverse reactions. The average times of ranibizumab injections of simple injection group and combined treatment group were (3.00±0.84) and (1.89±0.68) times respective, and the difference was significant (t=4.370, P=0.000). The logMAR BCVA of the first and third month after initial treatment between two groups were significant different (t=0.668, 0.940; P>0.05). However, there was no significant difference between them at the 6th and 12th month (t=2.188, 2.547; P<0.05). In the last follow-up, the logMAR BCVA were improved in simple injection group and combination treatment group compared to the pre-treatment values (t=3.351, 9.408; P=0.012, 0.000). In simple injection group, visual acuity was improved in 3 eyes (16.7%), stable in 13 eyes (72.2%) and decreased in 2 eyes (11.1%). In combination treatment group, visual acuity was improved in 4 eyes (22.2%), stable in 13 eyes (72.2%) and decreased in 1 eyes (5.6%). ConclusionsIntravitreal ranibizumab injection and combined with PDT are both effective to improve vision in patients with PCV. Visual acuity was the same between the two treatments in 3 months after initial treatment; however 6 to 12 months after first treatment, patients received PDT combined with intravitreal ranibizumab injection had better visual acuity than those received the intravitreal ranibizumab injection only.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • EFFICACY COMPARISON BETWEEN ANTERIOR SUBCUTANEOUS AND SUBMUSCULAR TRANSPOSITION OF ULNAR NERVE TO TREAT CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME

    Objective To evaluate and compare the efficacy of anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in treating cubital tunnel syndrome. Methods From August 2006 to August 2008, 66 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome were treated with anterior subcutaneous transposition (subcutaneous group, 24 cases) and with anterior submuscular transposition (submuscular group, 42 cases). According to McGowan stages, all patients were at Stage2 or 3 entrapment neuropathy with paresthesia in the ring and small fingers. Respectively, 3 cases and 8 cases compl icated by interosseous muscle atrophy in subcutaneous group and in submuscular group. No significant difference was found in gender, age, duration of the disease, and compl ication between two groups (P lt; 0.05). The surgical features, distribution of Bishop rates, two-point discrimination test, muscular strength, and compl ications were recorded. Results The operation time was (28.4 ± 5.2) minutes in subcutaneous group and (43.8 ± 5.6) minutes in submuscular group, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.01). The incision length was (12.2 ± 2.5) cm in subcutaneous group and (13.6 ± 2.8) cm in submuscular group, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 1-3 years. According to Bishop scoring system, the results were excellent in 18 cases, good in 4 cases, and poor in 2 cases in subcutaneous group; excellent in 36 cases, good in 3 cases, and poor in 3 cases in submuscular group; and showing no significant difference between two groups (P gt; 0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, twopoint discrimination and grip strength were improved when compared with that of preoperation (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between two groups (P gt; 0.05). Pain and dysesthesia of the scar were noted in 1 patient of the subcutaneous group and 3 patients of the submuscular group. No infection or hematoma was found and no patient needed reoperation. Conclusion Both operative methods are effective alternative for treating cubital tunnel syndrome. The anterior ubcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve has fewer traumas, and it is a better choice for some old patients.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:48 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Efficacy of internal limiting membrane peeling and transplantation for the treatment of idiopathic macular hole

    ObjectiveTo compare the results of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling with and without ILM transplantation to treat idiopathic macular hole (IMH) with hole form factor (HFF)<0.6. MethodsForty patients (40 eyes) of IMH with HFF<0.6 who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) were enrolled in this study. 20 eyes was performed PPV combined with ILM peeling (ILM peeling group), the other 20 eyes was performed PPV combined with ILM peeling and ILM transplant (ILM transplant group). The follow-up was ranged from 3 to 6 months with an average of 4 months. The changes of closing rate of hole, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), photoreceptor inner segment/outer segment (IS/OS) junction defect diameter and amplitude of wave P1 of ring 1 and ring 2 by multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) were comparatively analyzed for the two groups. ResultsIn 3 months after surgery, the IMH closing rate was 70% (14/20) in the ILM peeling group, and 100% (20/20) in the ILM transplant group, the difference between these two groups was significant (χ2=7.059, P<0.05). Postoperative BCVA was improved obviously in the two groups compared to preoperative BCVA, the difference was significant (t=4.017, 4.430; P<0.05). The rate of BCVA improvement in the ILM peeling group and ILM transplant group were 80% and 85%, the difference was not significant (χ2=0.173, P>0.05). The rate of significantly BCVA improvement in the ILM peeling group and ILM transplant group were 35% and 70%, the difference was significant (χ2=4.912, P<0.05). IS/OS junction defect (t=6.368, 6.635; P<0.05) and amplitude of wave P1 of ring 1 (t=2.833, 4.235) and ring 2 (t=2.459, 4.270) by mfERG in the two groups were improved after operation. The differences of postoperative IS/OS junction defect (t=2.261, P<0.05) and amplitude of wave P1 of ring 2 between the two groups were significant (t=2.282, P<0.05), but the differences of postoperative amplitude of wave P1 of ring 1 between two groups was not different (t=1.800, P>0.05). ConclusionPPV combined with ILM peeling and ILM transplantation can significantly improve the closure rate and vision of IMH with HFF<0.6.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • COMPARASIVE STUDY ON A SHORT-TERM CURATIVE RESULT BETWEEN NISSEN, THAL AND TOUPETFUNDOPLICATIONS

    Objective To compare the short-term curative results between Nissen, Thal and Toupet fundoplications in treatment of gastroesophageal reflux(GER) and to provide the basis for operative procedure. Methods Thirty-three male Japan rabbits were randomly divided into six groups: group reflux(n=7), transabdominal Heller’s esophagomyotomy (TAHE);group Nissen(n=7),TAHE and Nissen fundoplication;group Thal(n=7),TAHE and Thal fundoplication;group Toupet(n=7),TAHE and Toupet fundoplication; control group (n=5),ventrotomy. The anti-reflux efficacy of fundoplication was evaluated by intraesophageal pH monitoring and MGV(maximal gastric volume sustained by lower esophageal sphincter)4 weeks postoperatively. Results ① The total number of reflux episodes and the reflux ratio(0.83±0.41,2.20%±1.12%) of group Nissen were significantly lower than those of group Thal (2.20±0.45, 4.32%±0.82%) and group Toupet (1.80±0.45, 4.20%±0.57%), respectively (Plt;0.05). ② MGV of group Nissen (233.00±9.44)ml was significantly larger than those of group Thal (203.40±11.13)ml and group Toupet(197.60±10.99)ml, respectively (Plt;0.05). ③There were no significant difference in total number of reflux episodes, reflux ratio and MGV between group Thal and group Toupet (Pgt;0.05).Conclusion Nissen fundoplication was better than Thal and Toupet fundoplications,Thal and Toupet fundoplications are similar in short-term curative result.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparative study status on therapeutic effects of different treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

    ObjectiveTo summarize the current comparison of the efficacy of different treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.MethodTo search the literatures about the comparative studies on the efficacy of different treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in recent years and analyze them.ResultsIn the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma, percutaneous arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation could improve the survival rate and tumor-free survival rate to some extent, compared with the single use of percutaneous arterial chemoembolization. In the short term, there was no difference in efficacy between radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection, but the local recurrence rate of radiofrequency ablation was higher than that of surgical resection group. Salvage liver transplantation offered potential opportunity to reduce the risk of recurrence and tended to improve long-term survival outcomes, but liver sources were scarce and costly. ConclusionsAt present, there is no systematic staging scheme and treatment system for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. At the same time, most studies are retrospective, and more prospective studies are needed to further explore the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Release date:2021-05-14 09:39 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Curative effect of levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine and sodium valproate postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy

    ObjectiveTo compare the curative effect of levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine and sodium valproate on postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. MethodsA total of 186 postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy during August 2012 to August 2014 in our hospital were divided into levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine group (n=98), and sodium valproate group (n=88) based on postoperative different antiepileptic drugs treatment. Antiepileptic treatment were followed up for 12~48 months.Curative effect and adverse reaction were observed. Reservation rates and incidence rates of adverse reaction were calculated in the two groups. ResultsIn levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine group, EngelⅠratio was 72.4%(71), EngelⅡratio was 17.3%(17), EngelⅢratio was 7.1%(7), and EngelⅣratio was 3.2%(3);in sodium valproate group, EngelⅠratio was 67.0%(59), EngelⅡratio was 21.6%(19), EngelⅢratio was 9.1%(8), and EngelⅣratio was 2.3%(2), and the difference was not statistically significant in the same grade of two groups (P > 0.05).Reservation rate and incidence rate of adverse reaction in levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine group were 90.8%(89) and 15.3%(15) respectively.While those in sodium valproate group were 80.7%(71) and 36.4%(32) respectively.The differences were statistically significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). ConclusionsLevetiracetam combined with lamotrigine treatment on postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy may have better curative effects than sodium valproate treatment, and levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine has its advantage in reservation rate and less adverse reaction.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparative study of 27G vs 25G vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane

    Objective To evaluate the effect of 27G pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and 25G PPV on idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IMEM). Methods Thirty-eight eyes of 38 patients with IMEM were enrolled into this retrospective and comparative study. Eighteen eyes were treated with 27G PPV (group A), 20 eyes underwent 25G PPV (group B) voluntarily. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), slit-lamp microscope, indirect ophthalmoscopy, fundus color photograph, ocular coherence tomography (OCT) and counting of corneal endothelial cells (CEC) were examined before the surgery. BCVA results were converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of BCVA, IOP, foveal macular thickness (FMT), the counting of CEC and CEC hexagon rate before the surgery (t=1.627, 0.860, 0.293, 1.238, 0.697;P>0.05). All operations were performed by the same doctor. Operation time for vitrectomy and peeling membrane was recorded. BCVA, IOP, OCT, FMT, counting of CEC and the improvement of metamorphopsia were observed on 1, 7 days and 1, 3 months after PPV. Results The mean operation time for vitrectomy in group A and B were (6.7±2.8), (10.5±3.3) min, respectively. The mean operation time for vitrectomy in group A was significantly longer than that in group B (t=3.084,P<0.05). The mean operation time for peeling membrane in group A and B were (10.2±5.2), (11.0±5.9) min, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of the time for peeling membrane (t=1.970,P=0.187). On 1, 7 days and 1, 3 months after PPV, the difference of BCVA (t=1.463, 0.683, 0.961, 1.226;P=0.833, 0.509, 0.699, 0.744) and IOP (t=1.314, 1.262, 0.699, 1.116;P=0.763, 0.721, 0.534, 0.712) between two groups were not statistically significant. On 1 day after PPV, there were 2 eyes and 5 eyes with <9 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) IOP in group A and B. On 7 days and 1, 3 months after PPV, the difference of FMT between two groups were not statistically significant (t=1.257, 1.368, 1.437;P=0.735, 0.745, 0.869). On 3 months after PPV, the difference of CEC between two groups were statistically significant (t=2.276,P<0.05); the difference of hexagon rate between two groups were not statistically significant (t=1.473,P=0.889). Conclusion The efficacy of 27G PPV for IMEM appears similar to 25G PPV. But 27G PPV has a shorter operating time for vitrectomy, a more stable IOP and a minimal damage to CEC.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 关节镜与开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症的临床疗效比较

    目的 比较关节镜和开放手术治疗臀肌挛缩症的可行性及安全性。 方法 2002 年2 月- 2009 年5 月,分别采用关节镜松解(关节镜组,27 例)及传统开放手术(开放手术组,25 例)治疗双侧臀肌挛缩症患者52 例。关节镜组:男 21 例,女6 例;年龄11 ~ 24 岁,平均16.3 岁。病程6 ~ 13 年,平均9.1 年。臀肌挛缩程度参照张忠等的分级标准:中度1 例,重度26 例。开放手术组:男19 例,女6 例;年龄12 ~ 26 岁,平均16.9 岁。病程7 ~ 12 年,平均8.5 年。臀肌挛缩程度:中度1 例,重度24 例。两组患者性别、年龄、病程、分度等一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P gt; 0.05),具有可比性。 结果 两组手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P gt; 0.05),但切口长度及术中出血差异有统计学意义(P lt; 0.05)。关节镜组术后切口血肿发生率及感染发生率均低于开放手术组,差异有统计学意义(P lt; 0.05),但感觉缺失发生率和坐骨神经损伤发生率两组差异均无统计学意义(P gt; 0.05)。两组患者均获随访,随访时间12 ~ 36 个月,平均23.7 个月。术后12 个月,根据蔡斌等疗效评价标准,两组患者步态、交腿试验、并膝下蹲及弹跳感指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P gt; 0.05)。 结论 与开放手术相比,关节镜治疗臀肌挛缩症具有创伤小、出血少、术后并发症发生率低等优点。

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:44 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN TWO SURGICAL METHODS IN TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR BRUCELLA SPONDYLITIS

    ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness between the method of simple posterior debridement combined with bone grafting and fusion and internal fixation and the method of one-stage anterior radical debridement combined with bone grafting and fusion and posterior internal fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar brucella spondylitis so as to provide the reference for the clinical treatment. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 148 cases of thoracolumbar brucella spondylitis between January 2002 and January 2012. Simple posterior debridement combined with bone grafting and fusion and internal fixation was used in 78 cases (group A), and one-stage anterior radical debridement combined with bone grafting and fusion and posterior internal fixation in 70 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, involved vertebral segments, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, neural function grade of America Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), and kyphosis Cobb angle before operation between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The peri operation period indexes (hospitalization time, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss) and the clinical effectiveness indexes (VAS score, ASIA grade, Cobb angle, and ESR) were compared; the bone fusion and the internal fixation were observed. ResultsIncision infection and paravertebral and/or psoas abscess occurred in 2 and 3 cases of group A respectively. All incisions healed by first intention and 2 cases had pneumothorax in group B. The operation time and the hospitalization time of group A were significantly shorter than those of group B (P < 0.05), and the intraoperative blood lossof group A was significantly lower than that of group B (P < 0.05). All of the cases in 2 groups were followed up 14-38 months, 25 months on average. The VAS, ESR, and Cobb angle were significantly decreased at each time point after operation when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The neurological function was significantly improved at 3 months after operation; there were 1 case of ASIA grade C, 14 cases of grade D, and 63 cases of grade E in group A, and there were 1 case of grade C, 11 cases of grade D, and 58 cases of grade E in group B; and difference was not significant (Z=0.168, P=0.682). The grafting bone fusion was observed in both groups. The fusion time was (8.7±0.3) months in group A and (8.6±0.4) months in group B, showing no significant difference (t=0.591, P=0.601) was found. At last follow-up, no loosening or fracture of internal fixation was found. ConclusionBased on regular medicine therapy, the effectiveness of the two methods is satisfactory in the treatment of thoracolumbar brucella spondylitis as long as the operation indications should be controlled strictly.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
2 pages Previous 1 2 Next

Format

Content