目的：讨论剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的早期正确诊断方法和适当的治疗措施。方法：回顾性分析我院35例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病例的临床表现、超声影像和治疗方法。结果：33例病例经血βhCG测定、B超或彩超确诊，2例行清宫术或诊刮术时发生大出血，后经彩超修正诊断。31例接受药物、清宫等保守性治疗，4例接受介入治疗，所有病例均好转或痊愈。结论：广大临床医师对剖宫产瘢痕妊娠认识的提高，以及超声检查技术的发展，使早期明确诊断和成功保守治疗该病成为可能。
摘要:目的: 探讨经子宫动脉介入化疗栓塞治疗剖宫产切口瘢痕妊娠的应用价值。 方法 :回顾分析本院自2006年7月至2007年12月子宫动脉介入治疗的15例剖宫产切口瘢痕妊娠病例资料。 结果 :15例介入治疗均成功,其中8例化疗及明胶海绵栓塞后加用弹簧圈栓塞,术后阴道流血停止,孕囊明显缩小,血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素明显下降。术后清宫无大出血,病理检查示子宫瘢痕部位绒毛、蜕膜或胎盘组织,有变性、坏死。 结论 :经子宫动脉介入治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠,能有效预防和控制出血,减小清宫危险,并保留子宫,是剖宫产瘢痕妊娠安全、有效的治疗方法之一。 Abstract: Objective: To investigate the value of uterine artery chemotherapy and embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Methods : Fifteen cases with cesarean scar pregnancy performed with uterine artery interventional therapy were retrospectively analyzed from July, 2006 to December, 2007 in our hospital. Results : All cases were treated successfully by uterine artery chemotherapy and embolism. All cases were embolized with gelatin sponge after chemotherapy, and eight with spring ring additionally. Vaginal bleedings were stopped after uterine artery embolization. Gestation sacculi deflated obviously. Serum human chorionic gonadotrophin descended dramatically. There was no severe vaginal bleeding by curettage after interventional therapy. The villi, decidua, or placental tissues were observed with degeneration and necrosis by pathology. Conclusion : Uterine artery chemotherapy and embolization was proved to be a safe and useful procedure for preventing and controlling vaginal bleeding, diminishing the risk of curettage and avoiding the loss of uterus.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of methotrexate perfusion combined with interventional treatment and the traditional treatment with methotrexate and mifepristone for cesarean scar pregnancy. MethodA total of 589 patients diagnosed with cesarean scar pregnancy after surgery between January 2012 and March 2015 in our hospital were selected to be our study subjects. The patients were informed of the two kinds of treatment, and based on their own will, they were arranged into corresponding groups. Group A had 234 patients who were willing to undergo the conventional therapy:intramuscular injection of methotrexate (20 mg, once per day for 5 days); oral mifepristone (50 mg once per day for 3 to 5 days); and the continuation of drugs was determined by local pregnancy tissue blood flow on B ultrasound and liver function of the patients. Group B had 255 patients who selected uterine artery perfusion and arterial embolism. There was no significant difference in terms of age, serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and uterine incision gestation sac size between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). Then we compared the treatment effect between the two groups. ResultsThe differences in the amount of bleeding, the time of blood HCG dropped to normal, and hospitalization duration between the two groups were significant (P<0.05), while in the rate of hysterectomy, drug-induced liver injury were not (P<0.05). ConclusionsMethotrexate perfusion combined with interventional treatment is better than the traditional treatment with methotrexate and mifepristone for cesarean scar pregnancy in terms of clinical efficacy and safety.
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and uterine artery embolization (UAE) in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). Methods A total of 152 patients with CSP diagnosed by B-type ultrasonography were enrolled prospectively in this study from June 2014 to May 2016 in Chengdu Women and Children’s Central Hospital and Suining Central Hospital. Six patients from Chengdu Women and Children’s Central Hospital and 84 from Suining Central Hospital for Volunteered HIFU treatment were regarded as observation group. The other 62 patients from Chengdu Women and Children’s Central Hospital were selected to accept UAE treatment voluntarily were designated as control group. The clinical efficacy and therapeutic safety of the two groups were compared after the treatment. Results Eighty-two patients (91.1%) in the observation group and 32 (51.6%) in the control group had a bleeding volume equal to 100 mL or lower during complete curettage of uterine cavity (P<0.05). The hospitalization expenses of the above two groups were respectively (25 126.51±1 473.49) and (32 928.42 ±1 579.35) yuan (P<0.05). The hospitalization time was (11.03±1.52) and (10.65±1.87) days respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the normal rate of human chorionic gonadotropin recovery between the observation group and the control group at 14 days after treatment (P>0.05). Eighty-seven patients (96.7%) in the observation group and 51 (82.3%) in the control group had their menstrual recovery to normal level at 2 months after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 1.1% and 6.4% in the observation group and the control group, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusions HIFU in the treatment of CSP is safe and effective. Compared with UAE, HIFU requires less cost with fewer complications, which is worth promoting.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of intramuscular injection of methotrexate on hysteroscopic treatment of endogenous cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). Methods A prospective analysis was conducted on 94 patients diagnosed with endogenous CSP who visited the Department of Gynecology in Liuzhou Workers’ Hospital between January 2013 and January 2018, and they were randomly divided into two groups, the intramuscular injection of methotrexate followed by hysteroscopic surgery group (the methotrexate group, n=39) and the direct hysteroscopic surgery group (the non-methotrexate group, n=55). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, surgical complications, length of hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, the recovery time of blood human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and treatment outcomes of the two groups were compared. The normally distributed data were expressed as mean±standard deviation, and the non-normally distributed data were expressed as median (lower quartile, upper quartile). Results There was no statistically significant difference in age, gestational sac diameter, uterine scar thickness, number of cesarean sections, time from cesarean section to present, time of menopause, or preoperative blood HCG value between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss [75 (35, 120) vs. 65 (35, 130) mL, P=0.821], incidence of complications (5.1% vs. 5.5%, P=1.000), postoperative blood HCG recovery time [(5.22±2.17) vs. (4.96±1.81) weeks, P=0.559] or the effective rate of treatment (94.9% vs. 90.9%, P=0.747) between the two groups. The methotrexate group had longer operation time [43 (34, 55) vs. 32 (28, 35) min, P=0.001], longer length of hospital stay [(10.89±1.42) vs. (5.82±1.47) d, P<0.001], and higher hospitalization cost [(8596.46±3336.59) vs. (7058.84±2638.49) yuan, P=0.014]. Conclusion For patients with endogenous CSP, intramuscular injection of methotrexate before hysteroscopic surgery is not necessary, for it has no significant impact on the treatment effect, instead, it may prolong the operation time and length of hospital stay, and increase the hospitalization cost.