ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the additional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and conventional treatment (CT) for treatment primary deep vein thrombosis. MethodsDatabases such as CNKI, WanFang Data, Pubmed, EMBASE.com, Medline, CBM, CSJD, CJFD, and the Cochrane Library were electronically searched from the date of their establishment to 30 June, 2013, and the relevant literatures and conference proceedings were also manually searched to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on comparison of additional CDT versus CT for primary deep vein thrombosis. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and accessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Then the meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.1 software. Publication bias was assessed by STATA software. A meta-regression model was used to describe between study variability. ResultsTwo RCTs including 3 literatures contain 224 patients reporting data on safety and efficacy of CDT versus CT were included. There were no publication bias (Begg'S test, Z=1.02. P > 0.05;Egger'S test, t=0.98, P > 0.05). The results of meta-analysis showed that:in 6 months after surgery iliofemoral vein patency rate of CDT group was higher than that of CT group (OR=3.62, 95% CI:1.51-8.64, P=0.004), in 6 months after surgery CDT group with a lower rate than CT group of the iliofemoral vein occlusion and (or)venous reflux rate (OR=0.24, 95% CI:0.11-0.53, P=0.000), and the incidence rate of PTS in 24 months after surgery in CTD group was less than that of CT group (OR=0.55, 95% CI:0.31-0.96, P=0.040). There were no statistically significant of the major complications after surgery between CDT group and CT group (OR=1.34, 95% CI:0.12-15.69, P=0.810). But the incidence rates of minor complications and total complications after surgery in CT group were lower than those of CDT group (OR=13.67, 95% CI:4.08-45.83, P < 0.00 01 and OR=11.67, 95% CI:4.40-30.99, P < 0.000 01). ConclusionsCDT is a effective and positive way to treat early deep venous thrombosis especially in terms of the patency of vascular and prevent the occlusion and PTS. Due to the limitation of the included studies, large sample size, multicenter, and high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion, such as the ATTRACT Study. The intracavitary therapy could be applied to clinic combining individual conditions of patients.
Objective To investigate the application of abdominal aorta and bilateral abdominal perineal artery ligation in a hindlimb ischemia model of rats for research. Methods According to the random digits table, 38 SD rats were divided into 3 groups randomly, sham operation group (SO group, n=12), abdominal aorta ligation group (AAL group, n=12) and abdominal aorta and bilateral abdominal perineal artery ligation group (AAL+BAPA group, n=14). Rats were anesthetized by 6 mg/100 g ketamine via intraperitoneal injection. Blood vessels were ligated via laparotomy according to different procedures. Movement and pale skin color of rat’s hindlimb were observed on 2 and 4 weeks after operation, meanwhile venous blood from unilateral iliac vein was obtained for blood gas analysis and hindlimb skeletal muscle for HE stain. Results Two rats were dead during 3 d after operation in AAL+BAPA group, other rats survived. Rats in SO group had no obviously abnormal appearance. AAL group and AAL+BAPA group immediately presented hindlimbs pale, lower skin temperature, hypofrontality of limb motion after procedure. Symptoms above mentioned had improved gradually after 2 weeks and completely recuperated 4 weeks after operation in AAL group. Ischemia symptoms were still remained obviously such as cold, dried and thin on the 4th weekend in AAL+BAPA group. Each group had no hindlimbs necrosis. Two weeks after operation, pale limbs and muscle strength in AAL+BAPA group were more severe than those of SO group (Plt;0.05); Pale limbs was still worse than that of AAL group on 4 weeks after operation (Plt;0.05). There were no significant differences on different time in each group (Pgt;0.05). Venous blood partial pressure of oxygen of AAL+PABA group was significantly lower than that of the other two groups on 2 and 4 weeks after operation (Plt;0.05). Normal striated muscle structure was presented in SO group pathologically. AAL group revealed coloretur unevenness, swelling and distension, muscle cellular transverse striation elimination, skeletal muscle cell nucleolus deeply stained on the 2nd weekend and no difference with the SO group on the 4th weekend. AAL+BAPA group presented skeletal muscles decoration unevenness, cells swelling and distension, muscle cellular transverse striation elimination, skeletal muscle cell nucleolus stained deeply and intensively, intercellular space widening until the 4th weekend， but no obviously necrocytosis. Conclusion The method of ligating abdominal aorta and bilateral abdominal perineal artery can make a stable SD rat model of hindlimb ischemia
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular implantation of bare-metal stent (BMS) and endovascular implantation of drug-eluting stent (DES) in treatment of infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease by using Meta-analysis. MethodsRandomized controlled trial about endovascular implantation of BMS and endovascular implantation of DES in treatment of infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease were searched in domestic and international databases, literature screening in accordance with inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria was taken firstly, and then quality assessment was performed. Comparison of 1-year restenosis rate, 1-year patency rate, incidence of limb salvage, mortality, and 1-year target lesion revascularization rate after operation between BMS group and DES group were performed by using RevMan 5.2 software for Meta-analysis. ResultsSix literatures included 572 cases who suffered from infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease were included at all, including 302 cases in DES group and 270 cases in BMS group. The results of Meta-analysis showed that, compared with BMS group, 1-year patency rate after operation in DES group was higher (OR=1.64, 95% CI:1.35-1.98, P < 0.000 1), but 1-year restenosis rate (OR=0.19, 95% CI:0.12-0.30, P < 0.000 1) and 1-year target lesion revascularization rate after operation (OR=0.09, 95% CI:0.02-0.32, P=0.000 2) were both lower. There were no significance difference between the BMS group and DES group on incidence of postoperative limb salvage (OR=1.29, 95% CI:0.58-2.86, P=0.530 0) and postoperative mortality (OR=0.98, 95% CI:0.58-1.65, P=0.940 0). ConclusionsCompared with endovascular implantation of BMS, endovascular implantation of DES can increase the 1-year patency rate and reduce 1-year restenosis rate or 1-year target lesion revascularization rate after operation for infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate effectiveness and safety of total thyroidectomy(TT) plus prophylactic central neck dissection(PCND) versus TT for stage cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma(PTC). MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library(Issue1, 2015), WanFang Data, CBM, and CNKI were searched to collect the randomized controlled trails(RCTs) and non-RCTs about TT+PCND versus TT for stage cN0 PTC. The retrieval time was from inception to March 2015. The studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data were extracted and the quality was evaluated independently by 2 reviewers. Then the meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA total of 10 non-RCTs involving 3 661 patients were included. There were 1 774 cases in the TT+PCND group and 1 887 cases in the TT group. The results of meta-analysis showed that: Related to postoperative complications, compared with TT group, the postoperative transient hypocalcemia rate〔OR=0.40, 95% CI(0.33, 0.49), P < 0.000 01〕and permanent hypocalcemia rate were higher〔OR=0.32, 95% CI(0.19, 0.55), P < 0.000 1〕, the recurrence rate was lower〔OR=1.51, 95% CI(1.07, 2.13), P=0.02〕in the TT+PCND group. But there were no differences in the transient laryngeal nerve palsy rate〔OR=0.73, 95% CI(0.49, 1.09), P=0.13〕and permanent laryngeal nerve palsy rate〔OR=0.87, 95% CI(0.50, 1.52), P=0.62〕between the 2 groups. ConclusionsTT+PCND is superior to TT in treating stage cN0 PTC for it's lower recurrence, but it is raising transient hypocalcemia and permanent hypocalcemia rate at the same time. And it is similar as TT in transient laryngeal nerve palsy and permanent laryngeal nerve palsy rate. So TT+PCND is safe and feasible for treating stage cN0 PTC when its indications are strictly controlled. However, for the quantity and quality limitation of the included studies, this conclusion still requires to be further proved by performing large scale and high quality RCTs. It suggests that doctors should choose a best therapy for stage cN0 PTC patients according to an integrative disease assessment.
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of low-(10 mg) and high-dose (20 mg) of recombinant tissue typeplasminogen activator (rt-PA) catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower limb ischemia by using meta-analysis. MethodsThe literatures of randomized clinical trials (RCT) concerning low-versus high-dose rt-PA catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower limb ischemia study were searched using the national and international electronic databases.The literatures were screened and quality evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and analyzed by using the Cochrane Center the RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 4 RCT studies, with a total of 360 patients (192 patients in low dose group and 168 patients in high-dose group) were included.No statistical difference were noted in low-versus high-dose group with regard to ankle-brachial index (RR=0.20, 95%CI=-0.43-0.02, P=0.07), 30 days amputation-free survival (RR=1.00, 95%CI=0.94-1.08, P=0.91), 6 months the probability of restenosis (RR=1.00, 95%CI=0.60-1.67, P=1.00), and the incidence of groin hematoma (< 5 cm, RR=1.24, 95%CI=0.56-2.77, P=0.59).But the incidence of bleeding and the incidence of stress ulcer in low-dose group were lower than those in high-dose group (RR=2.38, 95%CI=1.10-5.15, P=0.03;RR=2.49, 95%CI=1.21-5.13, P=0.01). ConclusionTwo doses of rt-PA treatment of limb ischemia similar efficacy, but the incidence of low-dose regimen of complications is significantly lower than the high dose regimen.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic central neck dissection (PCND) for stage cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2015), WanFang Data, CBM and CNKI were searched to collect the studies about total thyroidectomy (TT)+PCND versus TT alone for stage cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma from inception to March 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA total of 10 studies involving 3 661 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with TT alone, TT+PCND had higher transient hypocalcemia (OR=2.50, 95%CI 2.05 to 3.03, P<0.000 01), higher permanent hypocalcemia (OR=3.11, 95%CI 1.82 to 5.30, P<0.000 1), and lower recurrence (OR=0.66, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.93, P=0.02). But there were no significant differences between two groups in transient laryngeal nerve palsy or permanent laryngeal nerve palsy. ConclusionTT+PCND is safe and feasible for treating stage cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma when its indications are strictly controlled. However, due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to verify the abovementioned conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (F-EVAR) and chimney endovascular aortic repair (Ch-EVAR) in treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JRAAA).MethodsThe databases including the PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, etc. were searched to collect the randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and non-RCTs about the F-EVAR versus Ch-EVAR for the JRAAA. The retrieval time was from inception to November 2019. The studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data were extracted and the quality was evaluated by 2 reviewers independently. Then the meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan 5.1 software.ResultsA total of 9 non-RCTs involving 536 patients were included, 315 of whom were in the F-EVAR group, 221 of whom were in the Ch-EVARF group. The results of meta-analysis showed that: Compared with the F-EVAR group, the Ch-EVAR group had a higher incidence of type Ⅰ endoleak [OR=0.31, 95%CI (0.12, 0.85), P=0.02] and a lower incidence of target organ injury [OR=2.96, 95%CI (1.30, 6.72), P=0.010]. But there were no differences in the technical success rate, vascular restenosis, re-intervention rate, and 30 d mortality between the 2 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsBoth F-EVAR and Ch-EVAR are safe and effective treatments for JRAAA. F-EVAR has a relative low incidence of type Ⅰ endoleak, but a relatively high incidence of target organ damage. However, for the limitation of quantity and quality of the included studies, this conclusion still requires to be further proved by performing large scale and high quality RCTs. It suggests that doctors should choose a best therapy for patients with JRAAA according to an integrative disease assessment.
Objective To systematic evaluate the efficacy and safety of the endovascular aortic repair （endovascular stent placement） and open operation in treatment of acute Stanford type B aortic dissection. Methods The literatures about clinical controlled trials of endovascular aortic repair and open operation in treatment of acute Stanford type B aortic dissection that were included in CNKI， Wanfang data， VIP， Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of the Cochrane Library， OVID， Pubmed Medline， EBSCO， EMBASE， Springer Link，Science Direct， and other databases from January 1991 to January 2013 were retrieved by computer. RevMan 5.1 software were used to analyze the clinical trial data. Results Eight trials （5 618 patients with acute Stanford type B aortic dissection） were included in the analysis.There was statistically significant difference of the 30 d mortality after operation between the endovascular repair group and the open operation group， which endovascular repair group was significantly better than the open operation group〔OR=0.55，95% CI （0.46-0.65）， P＜0.000 01〕. In addition， there were significant difference between the incidence of stroke 〔OR=0.57， 95% CI （0.39-0.84）， P=0.005〕， respiratory failure 〔OR=0.64， 95% CI （0.53-0.78）， P＜0.000 01〕， and cardiac complications 〔OR=0.49，95% CI （0.38-0.64），P＜0.000 01〕，which endovascular repair group was better than the open operation group. However，endovascular repair could not improve the postoperative outcomes of paraplegia〔OR=1.30，95% CI （0.82-2.05），P=0.26〕 and acute renal failure 〔OR=0.86，95% CI （0.41-1.80），P=0.69〕. Conclusion Endovascular repair for treatment acute Stanford type B aortic dissection is preferred method.
Objective To study the related risk factors for recurrence of venous thromboembolism （VTE）. Methods The literatures about the related factors for recurrence of VTE were searched. The relationships between the factors and recurrence of VTE were determined by meta-analysis. Results A total of 12 literatures were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that factors such as males， age＜50 years old， malignant tumor， and antiphospholipid syndrome related with the recurrence of the first VTE after treatment， but there were no correlation between the recurrence of VTE， the type of first VTE， and causes of VTE. Conclusions The recurrence of VTE correlate with various factors. In order to avoid the recurrence of VTE， the patients with the risk factors for recurrence of VTE should be appropriate to extend the duration of anticoagulation