目的观察吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术(procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids，PPH)治疗老年女性患者直肠前突的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析我科2004年10月至2010年8月期间经PPH治疗的63例老年女性直肠前突患者的手术经过及术后疗效。结果本组63例患者手术均顺利，手术时间13～35 min (平均21 min)，住院时间3～7 d (平均5 d)，无直肠阴道瘘、肛周脓肿等并发症发生。术后2周均行肛门指诊，2例有轻度炎症，给予对症治疗1周后炎症消失。3例吻合钉未完全脱净，少量残留，给予取出残钉后不适症状消失。术后随访0.5～5年（平均3年），随访率为95.24%(60/63),临床症状完全消失61例，治愈率为96.83%； 症状好转2例，对好转的2例行排粪造影检查，前突均明显减轻，且便秘症状较前有所缓解。结论PPH治疗老年女性直肠前突安全、有效，便秘症状缓解明显，是一种适合临床应用的手术方式。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of repairing rectovaginal septum with graft of fascia flap with blood vessels. Methods From August 2004 to August 2006, 12 female patients with rectocele were treated,aging 49-73 years. The disease course was from 5 to 30 years(mean, 5.6 years). All patients suffered dysporia. X-rayfilms showed severe rectocele (≥30 mm), or with the descendent perineum syndrome(≥40 mm), and inner pendant rectal mucosa (3 cases) and/or narrow anal canal (9 cases).The size of fascia flap ranged from 15 cm×3 cm to 18 cm×5 cm. Results The bleeding amount was 800 ml in 2 cases, and 500 ml in 10 cases. All fascia flaps survived. In the 12 patients, 11 had a primary wound healing(Stage Ⅰ), 1 had a delayed wound healing(Stage Ⅱ). The donor sites healed at Stage Ⅱ. Twelve patients could defecate normally 46 days after surgery. The legs edema occurred in 2 cases, urinary retention combined with infection occurred in 1 case. And all recovered completely after treatment. Eleven patients were followed up for 6 to 12 months. Digital anorectal examination showed prerectal pouch disappearance, glaze surface and good elasticity. Xray films and CT showed that the rectocele disappeared. Conclusion The operation of repairing rectovaginal septum with graft of fascia with blood vessels can effectively recover anatomy of rectovaginal septum and its normal biological function.
目的 观察吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术（PPH）治疗直肠前突所致便秘的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析我科2008年1月至2012年1月期间经PPH治疗的104例女性直肠前突致便秘患者的手术经过及术后疗效。结果 本组104例均手术顺利，手术时间13～35min，平均21min；住院时间3～7d，平均4.5d；无直肠阴道瘘、肛周脓肿、肛门狭窄等并发症发生。术后2周均常规行肛门指检，3例局部轻度炎症，给予抗炎对症治疗后症状消失。5例吻合口局部吻合钉未完全脱落，给予取出后不适症状消失。术后随访1～5年（平均3年），随访率为97.12%（101/104），临床症状完全消失99例，治愈率为95.19%；症状好转5例，该5例行排粪造影检查，直肠前突均明显减轻，且便秘症状明显缓解。结论 PPH治疗女性直肠前突所致便秘安全、有效，便秘症状缓解明显，是一种适合临床应用的手术方式。
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids （PPH） and Block repair procedure for rectocele．Methods A retrospective study of 62 patients with surgical treatment for rectocele was analyzed．The patients were divided into PPH group （n=32） and Block group （n=30） according to the different operation procedure．The symptoms score of improvement of the patients after surgery was compared between the two groups， including operation time，intraoperative blood loss， postoperative pain score， required analgesic times， postoperative complications，hospitalization time，and hospitalization expenses．Results The symptoms of constipation of patients in two groups was significantly improved afer operation．Comparing one month with three months of Longo’s obstructed defecation syndrome （ODS） score after the operation，there was no significant difference in the PPH group（P＞0.05）， but significant difference in the Block group（P＜0.01）．Although the expenses of the PPH group was much higher than that of the Block group （P＜0.01）， the outcomes of the PPH group were much better than those of the Block group （P＜0.01）， including the postoperative Longo’s ODS score of one month and three months，operation time，intraoperative blood loss， postoperative pain score，required analgesic times，and hospitalization time．Two cases of lightly postoperative incontinence occurred in the PPH group，but completely recovered after three months in the clinical follow-up．Conclusions The PPH is as safe and effective as Block repair procedure for rectocele. The short time effect and lower recurrence rate of the PPH are better than those of the Block repair procedure．
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids （PPH） combined with Shaobei injection in treatment for obstructed defecation syndrome （ODS） caused by rectocele. Methods Seventy-two female patients with rectocele from December 2009 to January 2011 in this hospital were divided into PPH combined with Shaobei injection group （36 cases） and only PPH group （36 cases）. The Longo ODS score was performed on week one，month one，month three，and month six after operation，respectively；pain was evaluated， complications such as urine retention，postoperative bleeding，and anal function were observed；hospital stay and recovery work time were recorded in two groups. Results All patients were followed up for 6 months，there were no significant differences in complications，hospital stay，and the Longo ODS score on week one and month one after operation between two groups （P＞0.05）. But the Longo ODS score of the PPH combined with Shaobei injection group on month three and month six after operation were significantly lower than those of the only PPH group （P＜0.05）. Conclusion PPH combined with Shaobei injection has a better efficacy as compared with only PPH，and at least as safe as only PPH.
目的评价痔上黏膜环切术（PPH)加芍倍注射术治疗中重度（排粪造影检查提示突出深度大于16 mm）直肠前突的疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2006年12月至2010年9月期间应用PPH加芍倍注射术治疗的45例中重度直肠前突患者的临床资料，分析其手术时间、住院时间及复发和并发症发生情况。结果本组患者手术时间为(18.8±2.2) min （15～25 min），住院时间为(7.2±0.6) d (6～8 d)。术后随访(12.3±6.6)个月(6～30个月)。34例(75.6%)排便费力、肛门堵塞、下坠等不适症状完全缓解; 10例(22.2%)症状明显缓解，有轻度肛门下坠感，可忍受; 1例(2.2%)术后排便困难症状缓解，但肛门下坠感明显，6个月后缓解。1例(2.2%)于术后25个月再次出现排便费力症状，排粪造影检查提示直肠前突深度为17 mm(术前34 mm)。45例患者术中及术后均未发生大出血、直肠狭窄、直肠阴道瘘等并发症。结论PPH加芍倍注射术治疗中重度直肠前突具有创伤小、术后恢复快、疗效显著、并发症少等优点，但是患者术后养成良好的排便习惯很重要。
Objective Both stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) and vaginal bridge repair are new operative techniques for treatment of rectocele transanal and transvaginal, respectively. In this study we observe the clinical outcomes for STARR as compared with vaginal bridge repair procedure. Methods The clinical data of 31 patients with obstructive defecation syndrome from January 2007 to May 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to different operative approach: STARR group (n=18) and bridge repair suture group (n=13). The clinical outcomes observed were operative time, blood loss, length of stay, cost of hospitalization, complication and the improvement of obstructed defecation syndrome. Results There was no difference in the age and severity in the patients of two groups. Evaluation of the clinical outcomes showed 16 (88.9%) patients in the STARR group and 6 (46.2%) in the bridge repair suture group reported improvement in symptoms (P=0.017). STARR had a shorter operative time (24.6 min vs. 33.2 min， Plt;0.01), less estimated blood loss (3.9 ml vs. 16.2 ml， Plt;0.01), more costly (10 743 yuan vs. 3 543 yuan, Plt;0.01) and a higher anal incontinenc rate but reversible. The length of stay was similar (average 6 d). Conclusion The stapled transanal rectal resection procedure is more superior to the vaginal bridge repair suture for improvement of obstructed defecation syndrome from rectocele, however, it has a higher cost and some patient with reversible slight anal incontinence after surgery.
Objective To explore the medium- and long-term clinical effects of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) combined with Block operation for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Methods Clinical data of 187 patients with ODS caused by rectocele (RE) who received PPH+Block operation or pure PPH operation in The Chaoyang City Central Hospital from Mar. 2011 to May. 2013, were collected retrospectively, in which 95 patients underwent PPH+Block operation (PPH+Block group) and 92 patients underwent PPH operation (PPH group). Compared the postoperative Longo’s score, postoperative clinical effect, operative effect, and recurrence rate between the 2 groups. Results ① The postoperative Longo’s score: the postoperative Longo’s scores of the PPH+Block group were both lower than those of the PPH group at 1- and 3-year after operation (P<0.05). ② Postoperative curative effect: the total effective rate of the PPH+Block group and the PPH group were both 100%, but the clinical effect of the the PPH+Block group was better than that of the PPH group (Z=–10.15, P<0.05). ③ Operative effect: there was no statistical significance on operative time, intraoperative blood loss, returned to normal activity time, hospital stay, and postoperative visual analogy score (VAS) between the 2 groups (P>0.05). In addition, there were no statistical significance on the incidences of urinary retention, hematochezia, exhaust anal incontinence, and anal fissure between the 2 groups (P>0.05), but the incidence of urgent or high anal straining feeling in the PPH+Block group was significantly higher than that of the PPH group (P<0.05). ④ Medium- and long-term recurrence rate: the recurrence rate of 1-year after operation was similar between these2 groups (P>0.05), but the recurrence rate of 3-year after operation in the PPH+Block group was significantly lower than that of the PPH group (P<0.05). Conclusions The medium clinical effect has no obvious difference between PPH+Block and PPH operation, but the long-term recurrence rate of the former is lower than that of the latter, and the medium- and long-term effect is stable in PPH+Block operation for ODS caused by RE.