Objective To investigate the clinical applications of plasma shock wave lithotripsy （PSWL） in the treatment of calculi via choledochoscope. Methods Between 2004 and 2009, 56 huge residual calculi (54 cases) were underwent PSWL via choledochoscope treatment in our hospital. Calculi size: diameter ≤10 mm in 9 calculi, 10 mm lt;diameter ≤15 mm in 24 calculi, 15 mm lt;diameter ≤20 mm in 17 calculi, and diameter gt; 20 mm in 6 calculi. Twenty four cases of these 54 patients had bile duct stricture. Procedure: Firstly found the calculus, and then the lithotriptor wire was introduced to the place 0.5-1.0 mm far away from the calculus surface through choledochoscope channel, and powered on, fired, destructed. Results Forty-eight cases of 54 patients were cured by PSWL with 1 times, 2 cases with 2 times, 2 cases with 3 times, and 2 cases with 4 times. Shock 4-300 times were exported per PSWL, with an average of 65 times. Crushing each stone needed shock for 4-680 times, with an average of 77 times. The calculi were ruptured in different degrees by PSWL, of which 20 cases were completely ruptured. All calculi were completely extracted. Except one case with bile duct stricture was found a small amount of bile duct bleeding during operation, all other patients had no operation complications. Conclusion PSWL technique plays an important role in lithotripsy. It is easy to deal with intrahepatic impacted calculi by PSWL, especially the pigment stones with rough surface.
目的 探讨经胆道镜联合钬激光碎石治疗肝内外胆管难取性结石的价值。方法 纤维胆道镜窥视下用钬激光碎石治疗肝内外胆管难取性结石29例，观察临床效果。结果 经1～3次胆道镜下钬激光碎石治疗，28例患者结石全部取尽，1例未完全取净，成功率为96.55%（28/29）； 近期无胆道出血、漏胆、黄疸等并发症发生。26例获得随访，随访时间6～20个月，平均13个月，未发现结石复发及胆管狭窄。结论 经胆道镜钬激光碎石是一种治疗肝内外胆管难取性结石简便、安全及有效的方法。
【摘要】 目的 探讨良性前列腺增生（benign prostatic hyperplasia，BPH）伴膀胱结石的有效腔内治疗方法。〖HTH〗方法 2003年6月-2009年12月，使用F26号电切镜外鞘作为撑开器，气压弹道和（或）钬激光粉碎膀胱结石，经尿道前列腺电切术 （transurethral resection of the prostate，TURP） 治疗BPH伴膀胱结石86例。患者年龄58～83岁，平均68.6岁；病程2～8年，平均5.2年。术前患者国际前列腺症状评分（international prostate symptom score，IPSS）为（24.6±3.9）分，生活质量（5.7±0.6）分；前列腺重量（46.5±6.8） g，剩余尿量（185±58） mL，最大尿流率（5.7±2.3） mL/s。 结果 86例均一次手术成功。碎石时间为16~58 min，平均38 min；前列腺电切时间40~100 min，平均65 min。术中无并发症发生。术后 5~8 d拔除尿管，平均6.5 d。术后4 例出现前尿道狭窄，经治疗后痊愈。54例获随访，随访时间2~6个月，平均3个月。术后2个月，54例最大尿流率升至（18.5±4.1） mL/s，剩余尿量下降至（16±22） mL，IPSS评分下降至（7.8±1.6）分，生活质量（2.5±0.3）分，与术前比较差异均有统计学意义（Plt;0.01）。 结论 经尿道碎石术和TURP一次性治疗BPH伴膀胱结石安全、有效、经济。【Abstract】 Objective To explore an effective endourologic treatment method for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with bladder calculi. Methods From June 2003 to December 2009, ballistic or holmium laser lithotripsy by outer sheath resectoscope and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were performed on 86 patients with BPH and bladder calculi. The patients aged 58 to 83 years old, averaging at 68.6 years. Duration of their disease course ranged from 2 to 8 years, averaging 5.2 years. Before surgery, the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) was 24.6±3.9; the score of quality of life (QOL) was 5.7±0.6; prostatic weight was (46.5±6.8) g; residual urine (RU) volume was (185±58) mL; and the peak urine flow rate (Qmax) was (5.7±2.3) mL/s. Results The operations were completed successfully in all cases with a mean lithotripsy time of 38 min (16-58 minutes) and a mean TURP time of 65 min (40-100 minutes). No complications occurred during the operation. Urethral catheter was withdrawn 5-8 days after operation, with a mean period of 6.5 days. Four patients had anterior urethral stricture after operation, but recovered through treatment. Fifty-four patients were followed up for 2 to 6 months with an average follow-up time of 3 months. Two months after the operations, IPSS decreased to 7.8±1.6; Qmax increased to (18.5±4.1) mL/s; RU decreased to (16±22) mL and QOL was 2.5±0.3. Compared with preoperative conditions, the differences were all statistically significant (P＜0. 01). Conclusion Transurethral lithotripsy combined with TURP is an effective, safe and economical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia with bladder calculi.
目的:探讨微创治疗BPH并发膀胱结石的方法。方法:应用气压弹道碎石术联合TURP治疗BPH并发膀胱结石26例。结果:24例一次成功,1例一期碎石,二期行TURP;1例中转开放手术。结论:气压弹道碎石术联合TURP治疗BPH并发膀胱结石创伤小,恢复快,安全高效。
目的:探讨急性上尿路梗阻性肾功能衰竭的治疗方法。方法:采用输尿管镜检查,酌情钬激光碎石,放置双J管内引流治疗32例急性上尿路梗阻性肾功能衰竭患者。结果:术后患者血清BUN、SCr均明显下降,尿量不同程度恢复,结石排净率90.6%(29/32)。结论:对于上尿路结石梗阻性急性肾功能衰竭的患者,急诊输尿管镜下钬激光碎石,疗效确切,创伤小,可同时处理双侧输尿管结石。
ObjectiveTo explore the perioperative nursing mode for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MethodsA total of 866 patients with PCNL having undergone lithotripsy between January 2012 and December 2013 in our hospital were included in our study. Before surgery, they received position training, health education and psychological nursing. After surgery, patients received an integral medical wound care and pipeline management, as well as management of infectious shock and intercostal neuralgia. At the same time, we gave them dietary guidance and other health guidance. ResultsAll the patients were successfully discharged from hospital. Postoperative infection rate was 2.4%, septic shock rate was 0.2%, bleeding rate was 2.2%, urinary leakage rate was 1.5%, the rate of pneumothorax was 0.6%, subcutaneous emphysema rate was 0.3%, and intercostal neuralgia rate was 0.6%. The average hospital stay was (11.2±2.8) days. ConclusionThe innovative nursing mode and techniques have great significance on the success of PCNL surgery.
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones>1 cm. MethodsWe electronically searched PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, WanFang, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIP database (by the end of July 2015) to collect randomized controlled trials involving PCNL vs. URL for the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones> 1 cm. The quality of those trials were assessed. Data were extracted and analyzed with RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsSix randomized controlled trials were finally obtained after screening. A total of 487 patients were included for a Meta-analysis. The results showed that, as compared with the control group (URL), the patients in the trial group (PCNL) had the following features: ① There was a remarkable improvement of stone clearance rate [RR=1.20, 95% CI (1.09, 1.33), P=0.000 3].② There was no statistical difference in postoperative fever rates, urinary tract perforation rates [RR=1.73, 95%CI (0.43, 7.00), P=0.45; RR=1.02, 95%CI (0.11, 9.37), P=0.99], but the incidence of hematuria was higher [RR=1.99, 95%CI (1.09, 3.62), P=0.03], and the mean operative duration was longer [WMD=30.03 minutes, 95%CI (10.04, 50.02) minuntes, P=0.003].③ The mean hospitalization stay was delayed by an average of 3.73 days [WMD=3.73 days, 95%CI (3.02, 4.44) days, P<0.000 01]. ConclusionPCNL is better than URL in the stone clearance rate, while patients in the PCNL group have to stay in the hospital much longer, and should bear longer mean operative duration.