Objective To evaluate of the valgus stability of the elbow after excision of the radial head, release of the medial collateral ligament (MCL), radial head replacement, and medial collateral ligament reconstruction.Methods Twelve fresh human cadaveric elbows were dissected to establish 7 kinds of specimens with elbow joint and ligaments as follow:①intact(n=12)； ②release of the medial collateral ligament(n=6)；③ excision of the radial head(n=6)；④excision of the radial head together with release of the medial collateral ligament(n=12)；⑤radial head replacement(n=6)；⑥medial collateral ligament reconstruction(n=6)；⑦radial head replacement together with medial collateral ligament reconstruction(n=12). Under two-newton-meter valgus torque, and at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 degrees of flexion with the forearm in supination, the valgus elbow laxity was quantified: All analysis was performed with SPSS 10.0 software.Results The least valgus laxity was seen in the intact state and its stability was the best. The laxity increased after resection of the radial head. The laxity was more after release of the medial collateral ligament than after resection of the radial head (Plt;0.01). The greatest laxity was observed after release of the medial collateral ligament together with resection of the radial head, so its stability was the worst. The laxity of the following implant of the radial head decreased. The laxity of the medial collateral ligament reconstruction was as much as that of the intact ligament (Pgt;0.05). The laxity of the radial head replacement together with medial collateral ligament reconstruction became less.Conclusion The results of this studyshow that the medial collateral ligament is the primary valgus stabilizer of the elbow and the radial head was a secondary constraint to resist valgus laxity.Both the medial collateral ligament reconstruction and the radial head replacement can restore the stability of elbow. If the radial head replacement can notbe carried out, the reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament is acceptable.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of Halo-vest in treatment of unstable upper cervical spine. Methods From March 1997 to October 2002, 16 cases of unstable upper cervical spineswere treated and immobilized by Halovest, aged from 14 to 53 years. There were 3 cases of isolated Jefferson fractures, 4 cases of isolated Hangman fractures and 1 case of Anderson type Ⅱ fracture. The 8 cases were immobilized for 3-4 months by Halovest. There were 3 cases of old odontoid fractures with dislocations treated by occipitocervical plate fixation and fusion, 1 case of C1 malignant tumor by posterior resection and internal fixation, 2 cases of C2 malignant tumor by anterior resection, fusion, and internal fixation; these cases were immobilized by Halo-vest during surgery. There were 1 case of C2,3 tuberculosis were treated by anterior debridement and fusion, and 1 case of gooseneck deformity by anterior decompression, fusion and screw fixation after resection of C2-7 , the 2 cases were immobilized for 3 months by Halo-vest.Of 16 cases, there were 8 cases accompanied with spinal cord syndrome. Results Fifteen cases were followed up 6 months to 5 years. Anterior arch ununion and posteriorarch osseous healing occurred in 1 case of Jefferson fracture. Other fractures and embedded bones became osseous fusion. One case of C2 malignant tumorrecurred 8 months after operation. Spinal cord syndrome of all patients disappeared. Conclusion Halo-vest immobilization is an effective method for conservative treatment and stable reconstruction of unstable upper cervical spine.
A total of 12 cases of old facet dislocations of cervical spine treated between december 1988 and 1993 were analyzed in order to evaluate the efficacy of various surgical modalities. In this series, there were 8 males and 4 females, with ages ranged from 16 to 50 years old (averaged 37.8 years old). The duration from injury to admission to our hospital was ranged from 1 to 8 months (averaged 3.7 months). Dislocation levels were as follows: C3,4 in 1 case, C4,5 in 4 cases, C5,6 in 4 cases and C6,7 in 3 cases. Unilateral facet dislocation was in 7 cases and bilateral facet dislocation in 5 cases. Neurological status on admission was as follows: spinal cord and nerve root lesion in 5 cases, nerve root lesion alone in 5 cases and neurologically intact in 2 cases. Besides all facets receiving facetectomy and iliac bone graft, other four kinds of adjuvant treatments were used, including internal fixation by stainless wires laminae or spinous processes in 4 cases, Luque rod in 1 cases, anterior fibrolysis combined with posterior laminoplasty in 1 cases and sustained skull traction without internal fixation in 6 cases. The reduction efficacy from postoperative stustained skull traction was better and the stainless wires fixation ranked the next. The patients only suffering from the nerve root lesion recovered better, but those who had spinal cord combined with nerve root lesion recovered badly. In conclusion, for the treatment of old facet dislocation, it is necessary to resect the facet and graft with iliac bone.
Objective To discuss the stabil ity and practical ity of temporomandibular joint replacement by establ ishing goats artificial temporomandibular joint replacement model. Methods Six healthy mature goats were selected, the male and female being half and weighing 35.3-37.0 kg. According to the parameters from X-ray films of goat’ s temporomandibular joint and the shape of the same kind goat’s skull, the total temporomandibular joint prosthesis was prepared. The one side temporomandibular joints of six goats were replaced by prosthesis randomly as the experimental group (n=6, fossa and condyle according to replacement location) and the other side by titanium plate as the control group (n=6). At 4,8, and 12 weeks, the histological observation, scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation were carried out for observing structural changes in the interface. The mechanical test and histochemistry test were used for observing the combination degree of interface and the alkal ine phosphatase (ALP) activity. Results All animals were al ive to the end of experiment with normal open mouth, good recovery of masticatory function, and normal eating. At 4, 8, and 12 weeks, implants were stable in 2 groups without loosening. The histological observation and SEM observation showed the amount of osteoblasts in interface increased over times. There were significant differences in the shearing force and the ALP activity between fossa in experimental group and control group at 4 weeks (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between other groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The total temporomandibular prosthesis has good stabil ity in temporomandibular joint reconstruction of goat after replacement.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy between medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair and MCL reconstruction in multi-ligament injury. MethodsThirty-one patients with MCL rupture and multi-ligament injury of knee joint were treated between August 2008 and August 2012, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Of 31 patients, 11 cases underwent MCL repair (repair group), and 20 cases underwent MCL reconstruction (reconstruction group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass, injury side, injury cause, and preoperative knee Lyshlom score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, range of motion, and medial joint opening between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative knee subjective function and stability were compared between 2 groups. ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention, and no postoperative complication occurred. All patients were followed up 2-4 years (mean, 3.2 years). At 2 years after operation, the IKDC subjective score, Lyshlom score, and range of motion were significantly increased in 2 groups when compared with preoperative ones (P < 0.05). The range of motion of reconstruction group was significantly better than that of repair group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in IKDC subjective score and Lyshlom score between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The medial joint opening was significantly improved in 2 groups at 2 years after operation when compared with preoperative one (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionBoth the MCL reconstruction and MCL repair can restore medial stability in multi-ligament injury, but MCL reconstruction is better than MCL repair in range of motion.
【Abstract】 Objective To determine the three-dimensional stabil ity of atlantoaxial reconstruction withanterior approach screw fixation through C2 vertebral body to C1 lateral mass and Gall ie’s technique (ASMG) for C1,2instabil ity. Methods Twenty-five human cadaveric specimens (C0-3 ) were divided randomly into 5 groups (n=5). Thethree-dimensional ranges of motion C1 relative to C2 were measured under the five different conditions：the intact state group (group A), type II odontoid fracture group (group B), posterior C1,2 transarticular screw fixation group (group C), ASM group (group D) and ASMG group (group E). The three-dimensional ranges of motions C1 relative to C2 by loading ± 1.5 Nm were measured under the six conditions of flexion/extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right axial rotation. The obtained data was statistically analyzed. Results In each group, the three-dimensional ranges of motion C1 relative to C2 under the six conditions of flexion/extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right axial rotation were as follows: in group A (8.10 ± 1.08), (8.49 ± 0.82), (4.79 ± 0.47), (4.93 ± 0.34), (28.20 ± 0.64), (29.30 ± 0.84)°; in group B (13.60 ± 1.25), (13.80 ± 0.77), (9.64 ± 0.53), (9.23 ± 0.41), (34.90 ± 0.93), (34.90 ± 1.30)°; in group C (1.62 ± 0.10), (1.90 ± 0.34), (1.25 ± 0.13), (1.37 ± 0.28), (0.97 ± 0.14), (1.01 ± 0.17)°; in group D (2.03 ± 0.26), (2.34 ± 0.49), (1.54 ± 0.22), (1.53 ± 0.30), (0.80 ± 0.35), (0.76 ± 0.30)°; in group E (0.35 ± 0.12), (0.56 ± 0.34), (0.44 ± 0.15), (0.55 ± 0.16), (0.43 ± 0.07), (0.29 ± 0.06)°. Under the six conditions, there were generally significant differences between group A and other four groups, and between group B and groups C, D and E (P lt; 0.001), and between group E and groups C, D in flexion/ extension and left/right lateral bending (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between group E and groups C, D in left/right axial rotation (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion In vivo biomechanical studies show that ASMG operation has unique superiority in the reconstruction of the atlantoaxial stabil ity, especially in controll ing stabil ity of flexion/extension and left/right lateral bending, and thus it ensures successful fusion of the implanted bone. It is arel iable surgical choice for the treatment of the obsolete instabil ity or dislocation of C1, 2 joint.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of core stabilization exercise with unstable support surface on rehabilitation of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture.MethodsFrom January 2018 to January 2020, 66 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were selected as the research objects. All patients were treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty. After operation, they were randomly divided into intervention group and control group by random number table method, with 33 cases in each group. Both groups were given routine rehabilitation intervention after operation, while the intervention group was given core stabilization exercise with unstable support surface at the same time. The vertebral height, shape, stability and gait of the two groups were compared 1 day before operation and 1 day after rehabilitation training.ResultsThere was no significant difference in gender, age, injured vertebral body, course of osteoporosis, years of education and marital status between the two groups (P>0.05). Before surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in the height ratio of the front edge of the injured vertebra, middle height ratio of the injured vertebra, back convex Cobb angle, track length when eyes were open, track length when eyes were closed, Romberg rate, track length per unit time when eyes were open, track length per unit time when eyes were closed, Romberg rate per unit time, deviation of the center of gravity on X-axis when eyes were open, deviation of the center of gravity on X-axis when eyes were closed, deviation of the center of gravity on Y-axis when eyes were open, deviation of the center of gravity on Y-axis when eyes were closed, stride length, step frequency or comfortable pace between the two groups (P>0.05). After training, the height ratio of the front edge of the injured vertebra [(79.26±12.15)% vs. (72.26±13.36)%], middle height ratio of the injured vertebra [(82.11±10.26)% vs. (75.64±9.56)%], back convex Cobb angle [(9.87±7.10) vs. (14.41±2.36)°], track length when eyes were closed [(1856.29±457.16) vs. (2358.48±786.45) mm], Romberg rate [(1.32±0.29)% vs. (1.87±0.54)%], track length per unit time when eyes were closed [(33.45±3.26) vs. (41.55±4.69) mm], Romberg rate per unit time [(1.41±0.30)% vs. (1.95±0.77)%], deviation of the center of gravity on X-axis when eyes were open [(11.06±1.36) vs. (16.54±2.22) mm], deviation of the center of gravity on X-axis when eyes were closed [(11.15±0.96) vs. (23.31±3.06) mm], deviation of the center of gravity on Y-axis when eyes were open [(12.57±1.84) vs. (15.56±2.06) mm], deviation of the center of gravity on Y-axis when eyes were closed [(15.69±2.05) vs. (18.96±3.56) mm], stride length [(0.57±0.12) vs. (0.49±0.10) m], step frequency [(1.09±0.29) vs. (0.94±0.20) step/s] and comfortable pace [(0.35±0.12) vs. (0.29±0.10) m/s] of the intervention group were better than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the track length when eyes were open or track length per unit time when eyes were open between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionIn patients with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures, core stabilization exercise with unstable support surface on the basis of conventional rehabilitation interventions after surgery can effectively restore the height and shape of the vertebral body, and improve the stability and gait to a certain extent.
Objective To evaluate the biomechanical stability of a newly-designed Y type pedicle screw (YPS) in osteoporotic synthetic bone. Methods The osteoporotic synthetic bone were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20). A pilot hole, 3.0 mm in diameter and 30.0 mm in deep, was prepared in these bones with the same method. The YPS, expansive pedicle screw (EPS), and bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw (CICPS) were inserted into these synthetic bone through the pilot hole prepared. X-ray film examination was performed after 12 hours; the biomechanical stability of YPS, EPS, and CICPS groups was tested by the universal testing machine (E10000). The test items included the maximum axial pullout force, the maximum running torque, and the maximum periodical anti-bending. Results X-ray examination showed that in YPS group, the main screw and the core pin were wrapped around the polyurethane material, the core pin was formed from the lower 1/3 of the main screw and formed an angle of 15° with the main screw, and the lowest point of the inserted middle core pin was positioned at the same level with the main screw; in EPS group, the tip of EPS expanded markedly and formed a claw-like structure; in CICPS group, the bone cement was mainly distributed in the front of the screw and was dispersed in the trabecular bone to form a stable screw-bone cement-trabecular complex. The maximum axial pullout force of YPS, EPS, and CICPS groups was (98.43±8.26), (77.41±11.41), and (186.43±23.23) N, respectively; the maximum running torque was (1.42±0.33), (0.96±0.37), and (2.27±0.39) N/m, respectively; and the maximum periodical anti-bending was (67.49±3.02), (66.03±2.88), and (143.48±4.73) N, respectively. The above indexes in CICPS group were significantly higher than those in YPS group and EPS group (P<0.05); the maximum axial pullout force and the maximum running torque in YPS group were significantly higher than those in EPS group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the maximum periodical anti-bending between YPS group and EPS group (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with EPS, YPS can effectively enhance the maximum axial pullout force and maximum rotation force in the module, which provides a new idea for the design of screws and the choice of different fixation methods under the condition of osteoporosis.
The influence on the wrist stability following ulnar head resection (Darrach s procedure)was studied. A series of X-ray films and arthrography of the wrist joint were taken before and after ulnar head re- section. The results showed that after ulnar head resection the radial deviation increased 3 degree(Plt;0.01). and the ulnar deviation 11.92 degree (Plt;0.001). The position of the lunate remained unchanged. Arthrography of the wrist joint demonstrated that 11 specimens had injury of the triangular fibrocartilage.The stability of the wrist joint would no doubt be certainly affected following the ulnar head resction.