ObjectiveTo evaluate the application of stereotactic electrode implantation on precise epileptogenic zone localization. MethodRetrospectively studied 140 patients with drug-resist epilepsy from March 2012 to June 2015, who undergone a procedure of intracranial stereotactic electrode for localized epileptogenic zone. ResultsIn 140 patients who underwent the ROSA navigated implantation of intracranial electrode, 109 are unilateral implantation, 31 are bilateral; 3 patients experienced an intracranial hematoma caused by the implantation. Preserved time of electrodes, on average, 8.4days (range 2~35 days); Obseved clinical seizures, on average, 10.8 times per pt (range 0~98 times); There were no cerebrospinal fluid leak, intracranial hematoma, electrodes fracture or patient death, except 2 pt's scalp infection (1.43%, scalp infection rate); 131 pts' seizure onset area was precisely localized; 71 pts underwent SEEG-guide resections and were followed up for more than 6 months. In the group of 71 resection pts, 56 pts were reached Engel I class, 2 were Engel Ⅱ, 3 was Engel Ⅲ and 10 were Engel IV class. ConclusionTo intractable epilepsy, when non-invasive assessments can't find the epileptogenic foci, intracranial electrode implantation combined with long-term VEEG is an effective method to localize the epileptogenic foci, especially the ROSA navigated stereotactic electrode implantation, which is a micro-invasive, short-time, less-complication, safe-guaranteed, and precise technique.
ObjectivesPost-encephalitic epilepsy could be of great chance of pharmaco-resistant, even surgery may not achieve seizure free. The aim of this study is to mapping epileptogenic area of pharmaco-resistant post-encephalitic temporal lobe epilepsy, to find whether "temporal plus" epilepsy is the main type and its surgery outcome, based on stereo-EEG(SEEG) study.MethodWe retrospectively studied 15 patients with pharmaco-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy. Scalp EEG, seizure semiology, MRI, FDG-PET, and SEEG were reviewed for all patients. According to epileptogenic area which was analysed by SEEG, 15 patients were divided into 2 groups, temporal lobe epilepsy(TLE) group and temporal plus epilepsy(TPE) group. Clinical characteristics were compared with each group, by t-test or Fisher exact test when data needed.ResultsThere were 8 patients in TLE group, with 6 mesial TLE, 1 lateral TLE, 1 mesial-lateral TLE. And 7 patients in TPE group. Age of seizure onset (P=0.548), duration of epilepsy (P=0.099), age of remote encephalitis (P=0.385), type of semiology (P=0.315) and lateralization of MR lesions (P=1.000), interictal FDG-PET hypometabalism (P=1.000) or intracranial implantation (P=0.619) were of no statistically difference between TLE group and TPE group. Surgery was performed in all patients. Better outcome was obtained in TLE group(5/8 class Ⅰ), and poor was in TPE group(3/7class Ⅰ).ConclusionMesial-TLE and temporal plus epilepsy were common types of pharmaco-resistant post-encephalitic TLE. There was no way to differentiate clinically, except by SEEG. Mesial-TLE had a better outcome after surgery, but temporal plus epilepsy did not.
Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is widely used to record the electrical activity of patients' brain in clinical. The SEEG-based epileptogenic network can better describe the origin and the spreading of seizures, which makes it an important measure to localize epileptogenic zone (EZ). SEEG data from six patients with refractory epilepsy are used in this study. Five of them are with temporal lobe epilepsy, and the other is with extratemporal lobe epilepsy. The node outflow (out-degree) and inflow (in-degree) of information are calculated in each node of epileptic network, and the overlay between selected nodes and resected nodes is analyzed. In this study, SEEG data is transformed to bipolar montage, and then the epileptic network is established by using independent effective coherence (iCoh) method. The SEEG segments at onset, middle and termination of seizures in Delta, Theta, Alpha, Beta, and Gamma rhythms are used respectively. Finally, the K-means clustering algorithm is applied on the node values of out-degree and in-degree respectively. The nodes in the cluster with high value are compared with the resected regions. The final results show that the accuracy of selected nodes in resected region in the Delta, Alpha and Beta rhythm are 0.90, 0.88 and 0.89 based on out-degree values in temporal lobe epilepsy patients respectively, while the in-degree values cannot differentiate them. In contrast, the out-degree values are higher outside the temporal lobe in the patient with extratemporal lobe epilepsy. Based on the out-degree feature in low-frequency epileptic network, this study provides a potential quantitative measure for identifying patients with temporal lobe epilepsy in clinical.
ObjectiveTo explore the advantages and disadvantages of using two intracranial EEG (iEEG) monitoring methods—Subdural ectrodes electroencephalography (SDEG)and Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG), in patients with “difficult to locate” Intractable Epilepsy. MethodsRetrospectively analyzed the data of 60 patients with SDEG monitoring (49 cases) and SEEG monitoring (11 cases) from January 2010 to December 2018 in the Department of Neurosurgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical. Observe and statistically compare the differences in the evaluation results of epileptic zones, surgical efficacy and related complications of the two groups of patients, and review the relevant literature. ResultsThe results showed that the two groups of SDEG and SEEG had no significant difference in the positive rate and surgical resection rate of epileptogenic zones, but the bilateral implantation rate of SEEG (5/11, 45.5%) was higher than that of SDEG (18/49, 36.7%). At present, there was no significant difference in the postoperative outcome among patients with epileptic zones resected after SDEG and SEEG monitoring (P>0.05). However, due to the limitation of the number of SEEG cases, it is not yet possible to conclude that the two effects were the same. There was a statistically significant difference in the total incidence of serious complications of bleeding or infection between the two groups (SDEG 20 cases vs. SEEG 1 case, P<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the total incidence of significant headache or cerebral edema between the two groups (SDEG 26 cases vs. SEEG 2 cases, P<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage, subcutaneous fluid incision, and poor healing of incision after epileptic resection (SDEG 14 cases vs. SEEG 0 case, P<0.05); there were no significant differences in dysfunction of speech, muscle strength between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionSEEG has fewer complications than SDEG, SEEG is safer than SDEG. The two kinds of iEEG monitoring methods have advantages in the localization of epileptogenic zones and the differentiation of functional areas. The effective combination of the two methods in the future may be more conducive to the location of epileptic zones and functional areas.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical electrophysiology, seizure symptomatology, multimodal imaging characteristics and epileptogenic zone location of the temporal -parietal -occipital junction (TPOJ) epilepsy.MethodsThe seizure symptomatology, head MRI, PET-CT and their fusion manifestations, long-range scalp video EEG monitoring results of 6 cases of TPOJ epilepsy patients from March 2015 to August 2018 were analyzed retrospectively in the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, and the value of localization of epileptogenic zone was analyzed, and the role of multi-modal evaluation based on SEEG in localization of epileptogenic zone was discussed.ResultsThe first symptoms: 2 of 6 patients were complicated visual hallucination; 3 were head eye deflection (2 were opposite to epileptogenic focus, 1 was ipsilateral); 1 was excessive movement. EEG of scalp: the epileptogenic potentials in intermittent period were all multi -brain regions, but could be lateralized; in seizure period, the electroencephalogram was diffuse in 4 cases, without lateralization, and could be lateralized in 2 cases (1 case was the beginning of one hemisphere, 1 case was the beginning of one posterior head). Imaging findings: MRI was negative in 2 cases, post-traumatic soft focus in 2 cases, and FCD in 2 cases; after fusion of MRI and PET-CT, low metabolic areas in a large area including TPOJ could be found. Six patients were implanted with stereotactic electrodes, and the epileptogenic focus could be identified by EEG monitoring after implantation.ConclusionFor TPOJ epilepsy, the manifestations of premonitory and multimodal images at the onset of seizure can provide important clues for the lateralition of epileptogenic zone; scalp EEG and the first symptoms except premonitory can only provide reference clues; multimodal evaluation based on stereoelectroencephalogram can accurately locate the onset of seizure.