Objective To identify an evidence-based treatment for an elderly patient with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Clinical problems were presented on the basis of the patient’s conditions, and evidence was collected from the NGC (2000 to 2009), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), TRIP Database, PubMed (1966 to 2009) and CBM (1978 to 2009). Treating strategies were formulated in terms of the three-combination principle (best evidence, the doctor’s professional knowledge and the patient’s desire). Results Three guidelines and sixteen studies were included. The current evidence indicated that surgery was the preferred solution to intertrochanteric fractures of the elderly patient. The sliding hip screw (SHS) appeared superior to others. There was insufficient evidence to support the routine use of closed suction drainage in orthopedic surgeries. Early surgery was associated with shorter hospital stay and improved mortality. Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced infections. In order to lower the risk of venous thromboembolism, pharmacological prophylaxis should be carried out when the patient was admitted to hospital and be assisted with mechanical prophylaxis after surgery. Nutritional supplementation was conducive to the recovery of the patient. Rehabilitation ought to be performed as soon as possible. Considering the patient’s condition, the treatment option was established according to the available evidence and guidelines. Short-term follow-up showed a good outcome. Conclusion Through the evidence-based method, an individual treatment plan could obviously improve the treatment effect and prognosis.
:目的:探讨DHS+骨水泥治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法:回顾分析2001年1月～2006年4月48例70岁以上老年股骨粗隆间骨折病例的临床资料,对其骨折类型、骨质疏松程度、合并症及临床疗效进行分析。结果:本组术后32例获得1～4年随访,无螺钉松动、髋内翻、感染或骨折延期愈合,髋关节功能评价优良率93％。结论:DHS+骨水泥治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折具有手术时间短、创伤小、内固定牢靠、符合生物力学分配、能早期得到功能锻炼、减少术后并发症等优点;适合各种类型老年股骨粗隆间骨折的治疗。
Objective To investigate the influence of the integration of fracture treatment and exercise rehabilitation on the effectiveness in the patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur. Methods Between January 2007 and December 2009, 3 873 patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur were surgically treated in 56 hospitals. Of them, 1 970 cases were treated with rehabilitation training according to scale of safety assessment of early exercise rehabilitation of patients with fractures (trial group), 1 903 cases were treated with traditional rehabilitation training methods (control group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, fracture type, internal fixation type, or postoperative safety score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All the patients were followed up 13-49 months (mean, 30.5 months). There was no significant difference in the incidences of bone nonunion, delayed union, and systemic complication between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05); significant differences were found in the incidences of incision complication, deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity, and the overall complication between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). At 6 and 12 months after operation, the trial group was significantly better than the control group in the recovery of hip motion, curative effectiveness classification, and the excellent and good rate (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur guided by the integration of fracture treatment and exercise rehabilitation can apparently improve the prognosis and reduce the incidence of complications.
Forty cases of intertrochanteric fractures of femur were treated with percutaneous nonmetallic external fixator. The patients were followed up for 6 months to 3 years, and the fractures were all united without coxa vara or shirtening deformities. There was no mortality in this series. This method had the advantages ofbeing simple, save time and effort, less traumatic and early ambulation. The design of the apparatus tallied with the biomechanics of the neck and shaft of the femur.
Objective To investigate the development of dynamic hipscrew (DHS) internal fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. Methods The latest relevant articles were reviewed extensively, including biomechanics and clinical application research. Results DHS is the effective selection for the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures, especially by the innovation of DHS structure, operative manipulation.Conclusion Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures with DHS is still a gold level, but strict selection of patients, proficiency operation and invasive manipulation are the most essential principles.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of InterTan in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Between April 2009 and July 2009, 57 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture were treated with InterTan. There were 33 males and 24 females with an average age of 68 years (range, 45-88 years). The locations were left side in 31 cases and right side in 26 cases and all fractures were closed fractures. According to Association for Osteosynthesis/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, there were 23 cases of type 31-A1, 27 of type 31-A2, and 7 of type 31-A3. The disease duration was 2 to 8 days with an average of 3.3 days. The data of operative time, blood loss, perioperative blood transfusion, hospital ization day, fracture heal ing time, and Harris hip score were recorded. Results The operative time and the blood loss were (74.5 ± 19.7) minutes and (148.8 ± 79.6) mL, respectively. There were significant differences in the operative time and the blood loss among the AO/OTA subgroups (P lt; 0.05). Twenty-five patients required a blood transfusion and the transfusion volume was (264.0 ± 90.7) mL. The average hospital ization days were 7 days (range, 6-9 days). Thirty-five patients were followed up 12 to 15 months (13.3 months on average). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed within (2.8 ± 0.8) months. The heal ing time of fracture was (2.4 ± 0.6), (2.9 ± 0.9), and (3.8 ± 0.5) months in 31-A1 subgroup, 31-A2 subgroup, and 31-A3 subgroup, respectively. There was no significant difference in heal ing time of fracture between 31-A1 subgroup and 31-A2 subgroup (P gt; 0.05), and there were significant differences between 31-A3 group and 31-A1 subgroup, 31-A2 subgroup (P lt; 0.05). No shortening, cut-out, varus malposition, femoral shaft fracture, or implant failures was found. The Harris score at the final follow-up was 84.5 ± 8.2 with an excellent and good rate of 80% (15 cases of excellent, 13 of good, 6 of fair, and 1 of poor). Twenty patients (57%) recovered the walking abil ity. Conclusion The new intertrochanteric antegrade nail of InterTan can be used to treat femoral intertrochanteric fractures with good cl inical outcomes, high union rate, and less compl ications.
Objective To investigate the effect of treatment with proximal femoral nail (PFN) on femur intertrochanteric fractures in the old. Methods A retrospective study of 62 patients with femur intertrochantericfractures treated with PFN from October 2001 to September 2003 was carried out.The data of operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, wound drainage, postoperative complications, healing time, and hip function were recordedand compared with previous literature so as to evaluate the effect. Results All patients were followed up for 8-22 month(13.6 months on average). Intraoperative fracture occurred again in 2 cases. Two patients died of brain embolism and pulmonary infection respectively. Heterogeneous ossification occurred in 2 cases. Hip varus occurred in 1 case. Extra hip anteversion occurred in 1 case. The effect of other cases was satisfactory. The operative time was 76.5±29.1 min, the mean blood loss was 385.7±98.4 ml, the wound drainage was 45.5±21.7 ml, and the healing time was 13.2±3.8 weeks. According to the Sanders post-trauma hip function assessing system, the excellent and good rate was 89.6%. Conclusion The application of PFN is characterized by short operative time, less blood loss, stable fixation, so it is an effective way to treat femur intertrochanteric fracture in the old.
目的 比较股骨近端抗旋髓内钉（PFNA）与动力髋螺钉（DHS）两种方法内固定治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。 方法 2007年1月－2011年1月分别采用PFNA、DHS治疗高龄股骨间粗隆骨折（EvansⅠ～Ⅳ型）共68例，其中PFNA组36例，平均年龄81.5岁；DHS组32例，平均年龄82.3岁。两组患者在年龄、性别、骨折分型、合并症以及受伤至手术时间方面比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05），有可比性。 结果 术后68例患者均获随访，随访时间6～26个月。与DHS组比较，PFNA组手术时间短、术中出血少，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；PFNA组骨性愈合时间短，但两组差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。术后DHS组出现1例髋内翻、1例拉力螺钉切出股骨头颈，PFNA组出现1例主钉退钉，两组术后并发症发生率比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。术后1年PFNA组髋关节Harris评分显著高于DHS组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。 结论 PFNA与DHS两种固定方法的骨性愈合时间短、术后并发症少、髋关节功能恢复好，是治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的良好方式，尤其是PFNA能减少手术时间和术中出血量，手术创伤小，对高龄且不能耐受较大手术者可作为一种首选术式。