Mitral regurgitation has high morbidity and mortality. The application of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) has provided more options for the management of primary and secondary mitral regurgitation. With the accumulation of operator experience, the improvement of equipment, and the optimization of intraoperative imaging, TEER can be applied to more complex or critically ill patients. The incidence of TEER-related adverse events is low, but some complications that may occur are potentially dangerous. TEER-related complications and their treatment methods are the guarantee of safe and effective operation. This article discusses the main possible complications of TEER and the corresponding management strategies.
Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is at present a well established interventional procedure for the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR). Echocardiography is an essential imaging modality for peri-interventional assessment of TEER. Pre-procedural echocardiographic assessments, which include grading of MR severity, determining MR etiology and mechanisms, and analyzing mitral valve morphology, helps to determine patient eligibility and plan the procedure. Echocardiography is also indispensable in intra-procedural guidance, such as atrial septum puncture, advancing the device to the target position, and leaflets capture. In addition, echocardiography is important in immediate result evaluation, complication detection and patient follow up after the procedure.
ObjectiveTo utilize a rapid health technology assessment to evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of the MitraClip device for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and the CRD databases were electronically searched to collect clinical evidence and economic evaluations on the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of the MitraClip device for patients with severe MR from inception to May 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies; then, descriptive analyses and data summaries were performed. ResultsA total of 33 studies, involving 4 HTA reports, 3 RCTs, 16 systematic reviews or meta-analyses, and 10 economic evaluations were included. In the evidence comparing MitraClip and surgery, most of the literature showed that the MitraClip group had higher postoperative residual MR, fewer blood transfusion events, and fewer hospital days. We found no significant treatment effects on 30-day adverse events and mortality, and the 1-year and above survival rate. In the evidence of MitraClip versus medical therapy alone, all included studies showed that MitraClip benefited mid-term and long-term survival and reduced the incidence of subsequent cardiac hospitalizations. Economic evaluations showed that the clinical benefits were cost-effective in the setting of their health service systems. ConclusionThe available high-grade clinical evidence shows that MitraClip is effective and safe to some extent, and has cost-effectiveness compared with traditional treatment in other countries. However, the real-world effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the MitraClip need to be tested in the Chinese population and health-care setting.
Mitral regurgitation is the most common heart valvular disease at present. In the past, mitral regurgitation was mainly treated by surgical mitral valve repair or replacement. However, with the progress of transcatheter interventional techniques and instruments in recent years, transcatheter mitral valve interventional therapy has gradually shown its advantages and benefited patients. The purpose of this article is to review the progress of transcatheter mitral valve intervention in this year, and to provide prospects for the future of transcatheter mitral valve treatment.
Transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has become an essential treatment option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation at high or prohibitive surgical risk. However, the surgical devices and procedural steps of the surgery are intricate, and there is currently a lack of standardized TEER procedures in China. Based on existing evidence and the accumulated experience in clinical practice, this article briefly introduces the definition, indications, contraindications, and surgical devices of TEER. It also provides a systematic and detailed elaboration on the procedural steps, key technical points, complications, and their management measures, offering guidance for the standardized implementation and widespread adoption of TEER in clinical practice in China.
Over the past 20 years, transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has become an important treatment option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) who are at high surgical risk. Initially, several landmark clinical studies established the basis of TEER for primary and secondary MR, but they only involved clinically stable patients with appropriate mitral valve anatomy. With the increasing experience of interventional therapy, the iteration of equipment and the improvement of intraoperative imaging technology, the scope of use of TEER has been continuously expanded, and its indications have been continuously expanded to more complex mitral valve lesions and clinical situations. Therefore, in clinical practice, selecting the appropriate device according to the individual anatomical characteristics of the patient can minimize MR and complications, thereby optimizing immediate and long-term prognosis. This article mainly introduces the pathogenesis and related mechanisms of MR, the main TEER devices and their clinical evidence, the limitations of TEER, and the future development direction.
Transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has become an important treatment opinion for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) at high risk for surgery. The devices and procedural techniques of TEER are complex and require excellent team cooperation. However, there is still a lack of standardized clinical pathways in China. Based on the latest evidence, the expert group wrote this clinical pathway to guide and optimize TEER therapy in clinical practice. It demonstrates the following key issues of clinical concern: (1) TEER team building; (2) preoperative clinical evaluation of TEER patients; (3) imaging assessment before TEER procedure; (4) standardized procedures for TEER; (5) TEER for complex MR; (6) the standard process of perioperative comprehensive management; and (7) full life-cycle rehabilitation and follow-up. This clinical pathway might be helpful to facilitate the standardized development of TEER therapy and application, and promote the improvement of management and life quality for patients with MR.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the differences in efficacy and outcomes between patients with functional mitral regurgitation (SMR) and degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) treated with mitral edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using MitraClip. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), CNKI, Wanfang database, and VIP database were searched in computer. Relevant literature from the database from its establishment to January 2024 was covered. Literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment for the included studies were performed independently by two researchers. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata18.0 software. ResultsFourteen papers were finally included, including 6 707 patients, including 4 161 patients in the SMR group and 2 241 patients in the DMR group. Meta-analysis results showed that patients in the SMR group had a higher 1-year all-cause mortality rate [OR=1.53, 95%CI (1.30, 1.81), P<0.01, I2=0%] and 1-year readmission rate for heart failure [OR=1.9, 95%CI (1.60, 2.26), P<0.01, I2=0%] after MitraClip treatment than the DMR group patients. Postoperative mitral transvalvular pressure difference [SMD=-0.47, 95%CI (-0.65, -0.30), P<0.01, I2=51%] was lower in patients in the SMR group than in those in the DMR group, and the incidence of subsequent secondary open-heart surgery [OR=0.41, 95%CI (0.20, 0.83), P=0.01, I2=0%] was lower in patients in the SMR group. ConclusionThe results of Meta-analysis showed that after MitraClip treatment, patients in the SMR group showed better efficacy in the short term, but the medium- and long-term efficacy was not as good as that of patients in the DMR group. The specific type of mitral regurgitation should be considered when choosing a MitraClip treatment strategy to more accurately predict efficacy and prognosis.