west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "经尿道前列腺电切术" 15 results
  • Application of Suprapubic Needle Aspiration of Bladder in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

    目的 探讨前列腺体积>60 mL的前列腺增生症患者的手术安全性,提高部分合并尿道狭窄前列腺增生症患者的手术实施率。 方法  2009年3月-2010年3月,行耻骨上膀胱穿刺引流下经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗前列腺增生58例。年龄54~93岁,平均72岁,病程8个月~12年,平均7.2年;前列腺体积35~128 mL,平均78 mL;国际前列腺症状评分24~35分,平均30.2分 ;最大尿流率1.2~4.8 mL/s,平均1.8 mL/s;残余尿量84~210 mL,平均160 mL。术前无尿潴留28例。 结果 58例顺利完成手术,其中2例伴包膜穿孔,9例前尿道狭窄者通过去外鞘电切镜完成手术。所有患者切除前列腺组织体积18~86 mL,平均58 mL;术中冲洗液为5%葡萄糖液,用量18 600~42 500 mL,平均23 500 mL;手术时间45~185 min,平均70 min。术后病理检查均示良性前列腺增生,术后住院时间3~8 d,平均5 d。术后患者最大尿流率为18~46 mL/s,平均32 mL/s。 结论 耻骨上膀胱穿刺引流能降低膀胱内压,减少水、糖分吸收,增加手术安全性,提高了部分合并前尿道狭窄的前列腺增生患者的手术几率。

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:16 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Pneumatic Lithotripsy Combined with TURP in the Treatment of Bladder Calculi with Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

    目的:探讨微创治疗BPH并发膀胱结石的方法。方法:应用气压弹道碎石术联合TURP治疗BPH并发膀胱结石26例。结果:24例一次成功,1例一期碎石,二期行TURP;1例中转开放手术。结论:气压弹道碎石术联合TURP治疗BPH并发膀胱结石创伤小,恢复快,安全高效。

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:56 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • The Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) Treatment of Highrisk Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (Report of 62 Cases)

    目的:探讨经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗高危良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的术中、术后常见并发症的原因、预防及治疗,提高手术安全性和有效性。方法: 回顾性分析62例高龄合并心肺疾患的前列腺增生症患者行经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)的临床资料。结果: 62例排尿困难症状均改善,其中1例出现暂时性尿失禁,2月后好转,尿路感染7例,消炎治疗后好转,5例出现肉眼血尿,做对症处理后血尿消失,无输血病例,无经尿道电切综合征(TURS)发生。结论:采用TURP是良性前列腺增生症安全有效的外科治疗方法,疗效满意,并发症少,安全性高,住院时间短,费用低。

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:04 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Efficacy and Safety of Simultaneous Transurethral Resection of Bladder Cancer and Prostate in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review

    ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of simultaneous transurethral resection of bladder cancer and prostate (TURBT+TURP) in the treatment of bladder cancer with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP from inception to January 2015, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies investigating the efficacy and safety of TURBT with TURP in the treatment of bladder cancer with BPH. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk bias of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results3 A total of 3 RCTs (n=137) and 10 retrospective cohort studies (n=998) were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the simultaneous resection group and the control group in the overall recurrence rate (RCT:OR=0.55, 95% CI:0.24 to 1.24, P=0.15; retrospective cohort study:OR=0.78, 95% CI:0.60 to 1.01, P=0.06), postoperative recurrence rate in the prostatic fossa/urethra (RCT:OR=1.40, 95% CI:0.28 to 7.60, P=0.68; retrospective cohort study:OR=1.36, 95% CI:0.49 to 3.74, P=0.55), progression rate (OR=0.93, 95% CI:0.53 to 1.61, P=0.79) and overall perioperative complication rate (RCT:OR=0.35, 95% CI:0.08 to 1.55, P=0.17; retrospective cohort study:OR=0.1.75, 95% CI:0.44 to 6.98, P=0.43). ConclusionCompared with only TURBT or sequential TURBT and TURP, simultaneous TURBT and TURP do not increase the overall recurrence rate, postoperative recurrence rate in the prostatic fossa/urethra, progression rate and overall postoperative complication rate. However, due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, larger sample size and higher quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparison between Transurethral Enucleation and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

    目的 比较经尿道前列腺剜除术(TUEP)与经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)的疗效。 方法 2010年11月-2011年3月,收治前列腺增生(BPH)患者58例,分别采用TUEP(30例)、TURP(28例)治疗。患者年龄55~87岁,平均73岁;病程1~12年,平均5年。术前常规行直肠指检前列腺光滑无结节;经直肠前列腺彩色超声多普勒检查,测得前列腺体积为50~80 mL,平均62 mL;血清前列腺特异性抗原<10 ng/mL。 结果  TUEP组术中出血量、术后冲洗时间均短于TURP,切除前列腺组织体积大于TURP组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后拔除尿管后发生暂时性尿失禁TUEP组1例,TURP组发生2例,两组比较差异无统计学意义;两组均无永久性尿失禁发生。 结论 TUEP与TURP相比较,TUEP手术疗效好,出血少、恢复快,且并发症少。

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:16 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Efficacy and safety of 1 470 nm laser vaporization vs. transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis

    ObjectivesTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1 470 nm laser vaporization vs. transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of 1 470 nm laser vaporization vs. TURP for BPH from inception to October 22nd, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 6 RCTs and 4 non-RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: 1 470 nm laser vaporization was superior to TURP in reducing intraoperative bleeding (MD=−103.87, 95%CI −148.08 to −59.65, P<0.000 01), hospital stay (MD=−3.82, 95%CI −4.35 to −3.28, P<0.000 01), postoperative indwelling catheter time (MD=−2.24, 95%CI −3.45 to −1.02, P=0.000 3), postoperative hemoglobin (MD=−1.63, 95%CI −3.14 to −0.12, P=0.03) and rate of secondary hemorrhage (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.48, P=0.002). There were no significant differences in operative time, bladder irrigation time, transient urinary incontinence and urethral stricture, IPSS Score and Qmax at 3 months after operation between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that 1 470 nm laser vaporization is superior to TURP in reducing intraoperative bleeding and secondary hemorrhage. It may be more suitable for prostate surgery in anticoagulant or coagulative dysfunction patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.

    Release date:2019-06-24 09:18 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 经尿道前列腺电切及膀胱结石碎石术中膀胱内气体爆炸一例

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • A Clinical Analysis on Transurethral Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

    【摘要】 目的 探讨经尿道等离子双极电切术(PKRP)治疗前列腺增生的安全性及临床疗效。 方法 2009年2-12月,采用PKRP治疗前列腺增生患者76例,记录手术时间、手术疗效及术后并发症。 结果 患者手术时间35~130 min,平均55 min。术中失血60~150 mL,均未输血。手术切除前列腺质量18~72 g。无直肠和膀胱穿孔,无电切综合征(TURS)及闭孔神经反射发生,无一例发生真性尿失禁,无死亡。术后随访2~6个月,IPSS评分平均为9分,最大尿流率平均为16.7 mL/s。 结论 PKRP是治疗前列腺增生的理想方法之一。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) on benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods A total of 76 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia from February to December 2009 were treated with PKRP. The operative duration, therapeutic effect and postoperative complications were observed and recorded. Results The operative duration ranged from 35 to 130 minutes (average 55 minutes).The intraoperative blood loss was 60-150 mL, and no one needed transfusion.The prostate gland excised weight was 18-72 g. There were no intestinal and bladder perforation, no transurethral resection syndrome (TURS) or obturator nerve reflex occurs, and no urinary incontinence or death.IPSS score was nine and the maximal average uroflow was 16.7 mL/s during the 2-6 month follow-up. Conclusion PKRP is one of the ideal methods treating benign prostatic hyperplasia, especially for high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

    Release date:2016-09-08 09:51 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • The Perioperative Nursing Care of TURP

    摘要:目的:探讨良性前列腺增生经尿道前列腺电切术围手术期的护理经验。方法:回顾性分析96例良性前列腺增生患者临床资料。结果:96例患者手术顺利,围手术期经周密的护理,疗效满意,无明显并发症。结论:周密的手术期护理对经尿道前列腺电切术治疗老年良性前列腺增生十分重要。Abstract: Objective: To investigate the perioperative nursing care of transurethral prostatic resection (TURP). Methods: The data of 96 TURP cases were analyzed retrospectively. Results: All the operations were performed successfully, and there were no obvious complications among the patients with precise nursing care. Conclusion: It is very important for precise nursing care to the patients who underwent TURP.

    Release date:2016-08-26 03:57 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 经尿道前列腺电切术后尿道狭窄原因分析及预防措施

    目的:探讨经尿道前列腺电切术后发生尿道狭窄的原因及预防措施。方法: 回顾分析我院2001年6月至2008年6月施行的456例诊断为良性前列腺增生症经尿道前列腺电切术的临床资料和术后随防资料。结果:456例中术后1~24个月发生尿道狭窄22例,占4.8%,其中尿道外口狭窄5例,阴茎阴囊连接部狭窄2例,尿道膜部狭窄9例,球部尿道狭窄1例,前列腺部尿道狭窄2例,膀胱颈口挛缩狭窄3例。结论: 尿道狭窄为经尿道前列腺电切术后常见并发症之一,术中操作轻柔、尽可能切净增生腺体、避免过度电凝止血、术后留置导尿管时间不宜过长、预防泌尿系感染是防止尿道狭窄的重要措施。

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:04 Export PDF Favorites Scan
2 pages Previous 1 2 Next

Format

Content