Abstract： Objectives To evaluate the early and mid-term follow-up outcomes of “one-stop” hybrid coronary revascularization strategy for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods From June 2007 to December 2009, 104 consecutive patients underwent “one-stop”hybrid coronary revascularization in Fu Wai Hospital. There were 93 male patients and 11 female patients with mean age of （61.8±10.2）years（ranging from 35 to 81 years）. All the patients had multivessel coronary artery disease including left anterior descending （LAD）coronary artery stenosis, and underwent “one-stop”hybrid coronary revascularization. “One-stop”hybrid procedure was first performed through a lower partial sternotomy at the second left intercostal space. The distal anastomosis of in situ left internal mammary artery （LIMA）to LAD graft was completed. Angiography was performed immediately to confirm patency of the LIMA graft after closure of the thorax. A 300 mg loading dose of clopidogrel was administered through a nasogastric tube after confirmation of LIMA graft patency. Intravenous unfractionated heparin was administered to obtain an activated clotting time of greater than 250 s. Then percutaneous coronary intervention（PCI）was performed on the non-LAD lesions. Results All the patients underwent“one-stop”hybrid coronary revascularization including grafted LIMA to LAD，and one hundred and ninety one drug eluting stents and three bare metal stents were used for other non-LAD lesions. No death event occurred during surgery and in hospital. All the patients were followed up for a mean duration of 1.5 years. There was no myocardial infarction, neurologic event or death occurred during follow-up except one patient with stent stenosis who was treated by PCI. Conclusion “One-stop” hybrid coronary revascularization is a feasible and safe alternative for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
ObjectiveTo retrospectively analyze the surgical treatment of Stanford type A aortic dissection after coronary artery stenting, and to explore the surgical techniques and surgical indications. MethodsClinical data of 1 246 consecutive patients who underwent operations on Stanford type A aortic dissection from April 2016 to July 2019 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection after coronary artery stenting were enrolled. ResultsFinally 19 patients were collected, including 16 males and 3 females with an average age of 54±7 years ranging from 35 to 66 years. There were 11 patients in acute phase, 15 patients with AC (DeBakey Ⅰ) type and 4 patients with AS (DeBakey Ⅱ) type. In AC type, there were 10 patients receiving Sun's surgery and 5 patients partial arch replacement. Meanwhile, coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 7 patients and mitral valve replacement in 1 patient. Stents were removed from the right coronary artery in 4 patients. In this group, 1 patient died of multiple organ failure in hospital after operation combined with malperfusion of viscera. Eighteen patients recovered after treatment and were discharged from hospital. The patients were followed up for 30 (18-56) months. One patient underwent aortic pseudoaneurysm resection, one thoracic endovascular aortic repair, one emergency percutaneous coronary intervention due to left main artery stent occlusion, and one underwent femoral artery bypass due to iliac artery occlusion. ConclusionIatrogenic aortic dissection has a high probability of coronary artery bypass grafting at the same time in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection after coronary artery stenting. Complicated type A aortic dissection after percutaneous coronary intervention should be treated with surgery aggressively.
New functional evaluation methods for coronary artery lesions have received widespread attention at home and abroad. As a new functional evaluation technique, the clinical value of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) in the accuracy and feasibility of diagnosing myocardial ischemia caused by coronary artery stenosis has been confirmed in many clinical trials. Compared with the traditional gold standard fractional flow reserve (FFR) for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis, QFR has the advantages of simple operation, time-saving and low cost. This article reviews the comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of FFR and QFR and the progress of clinical research, aiming to explore whether QFR may replace FFR as a functional evaluation method of coronary artery disease and guide clinical blood circulation reconstruction.
Objective To compare and analyze the early- to mid-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) combined with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the treatment of significant aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods The data of patients with significant AS and CAD who underwent surgical treatment at Central China Fuwai Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2018 to July 2023 were collected. These patients were divided into a TAVR+PCI group and a SAVR+CABG group according to the operation method. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to select patients with close clinical baseline characteristics, and the early- to mid-term outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results A total of 272 patients were enrolled, including 208 males and 64 females, with a mean age of 64.16±8.24 years. There were 47 patients in the TAVR+PCI group and 225 patients in the SAVR+CABG group. After 1∶1 PSM, 32 pairs were selected. There was no statistical difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the SAVR+CABG group, the TAVR+PCI group had significantly shorter operative time, mechanical ventilation time, ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay, and less intraoperative bleeding, and significantly lower postoperative transfusion and complete revascularization rates (P<0.05). The differences in the rates of postoperative in-hospital death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and other complications between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05), and the differences in the rates of severe perivalvular leakage, death, or readmission in the mid-term follow-up were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion In patients with significant AS and CAD, the early- and mid-term rates of death and complications were similar between those treated with TAVR+PCI and SAVR+CABG, and TAVR+PCI is a safe alternative to SAVR+CABG.
目的总结分析经左胸微创冠状动脉旁路移植术（MIDCAB）与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）联合应用治疗冠状动脉多支血管病变的初步临床经验。 方法回顾性分析郑州市第七人民医院2013年1月至2014年11月共16例多支冠状动脉病变冠心病患者的临床资料，其中男10例、女6例，年龄46～73（58.4±9.7）岁，采用“分站式”复合技术（Hybrid）进行心肌再血管化。 结果16例患者手术均顺利完成，无围手术期死亡，PCI时行冠状动脉造影提示冠状动脉吻合口通畅，随访3～22（14.0±8.6）个月，临床症状缓解，恢复正常工作及生活。 结论“分站式”复合技术治疗冠状动脉多支血管病变近期效果满意，长期效果有待进一步随访。
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become one of the main treatments for severe aortic stenosis. However, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often required in elderly patients who combine with coronary artery disease. This paper reports a case of one-stop TAVR+PCI operation for a 71-year-old male patient with left main bifurcation lesions and severe aortic stenosis. During the procedure, first of all, the coronary arteries were assessed by angiography, and the pigtail catheter was implanted in the left ventricle after the straight guidewire transvalved successfully; then PCI was performed on the diseased coronary arteries; finally, the stenosis of aortic valve was treated with TAVR. After operation, the hemodynamics of the patient was stable and symptoms were significantly improved, showing a good clinical effect of one-stop operation of TAVR+PCI.
Objective To explore the effects of aggressive lipid lowering therapy and its influence on cardiovascular events using lipitor (20 mg daily) for Chinese people after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods We did a double-blind and randomized controlled trial. From July 2005 to June 2006, 120 patients with PCI procedure who were discharged from the Shanghai Chest Hospital were randomly divided into aggressive lipid lowering group (atorvastatin 20 mg daily, n=60) and an ordinary lipid lowering group (atorvastatin 10 mg daily, n=60). The trial treatment was administered from the day of PCI to the third month after PCI. Atorvastatin at 10 mg daily was then used until one year after PCI. Blood biochemistry, cardiovascular events and drug adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results Among the 120 patients, 5 discontinued treatment and 4 more withdrew from the study. Therefore 115 and 111 were included in our main analyses [Comment from Mike: it is not ITT if the 5 who discontinued treatment are excluded] and a per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The reduction in TG and the increase in HDL-C were similar between the two groups (Pgt;0.05), but the reductions in LDL-C and TC were significantly different between the two groups (Plt;0.05). This was observed from the beginning of follow-up to the third month after PCI. In the PP analysis, the percentage of patients whose LDL-C met the predefined requirement at the third month in the 20 mg group was significantly higher than in the group receiving the lower dose (87.03% vs. 70.17%, P=0.031). A similar result was also obtained if the patients who withdrew were retained in the analysis (P=0.044). The change in C reaction protein (CRP) from baseline at the first and the third month was significantly different between the two groups (Plt;0.05), but become relatively stable at the sixth month (Pgt;0.05). The mean follow-up duration was 6.5±3.0 months in the higher dose group, with 1 case of recurring angina pectoris and 1 case of revascularization were identified. It was 7.2±3.6 months in the 10 mg daily group, with 3 cases of recurring angina pectoris, 1 case of nonfatal myocardial infarction, 2 cases of revascularization and 1 case of sudden cardiogenic death. The difference in the Kaplan-Meier event curves was of borderline statistical significance from the fourth month (P=0.048). Drug adverse reactions were mild and myopathy was not identified in any patients. Conclusions After PCI procedure, the use of atorvastatin 20 mg daily for aggressive lipid lowering was safe and effective.
Objective To systematically review the angiographic predictors of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods The PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data, and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect observational studies on the angiographic predictors of CTO-PCI from inception to December 18, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 36 studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the angiographic predictors of CTO-PCI included calcification (OR=1.92, 95%CI 1.49 to 2.47, P<0.01), occlusion length≥20mm (OR=1.80, 95%CI 1.26 to 2.57, P<0.01), bending>45° (OR=2.19, 95%CI 1.56 to 3.08, P<0.01), blunt stump (OR=1.53, 95%CI 1.08 to 2.16, P<0.01), ostial lesions (OR=2.27, 95%CI 1.34 to 3.85, P<0.01), proximal cap ambiguity (OR=2.27, 95%CI 1.40 to 3.68, P<0.01), side branch at proximal cap (OR=1.65, 95%CI 1.27 to 2.16, P<0.01), and J-CTO score≥3 (OR=2.53, 95%CI 1.53 to 4.16, P<0.01). Conclusion Current evidence indicates that calcification, occlusion length ≥20mm, bending>45°, blunt stump, ostial lesions, proximal cap ambiguity, side branch at proximal cap, and J-CTO score≥3 are the angiographic predictors of CTO-PCI. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and safety of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD).MethodsA total of 50 patients with MVCAD who underwent HCR technique in our heart center from May 2016 to April 2019 were included in this study (a HCR group), including 38 patients who underwent two-stage HCR and 12 patients one-stop HCR. There were 39 males and 11 females, with an average age of 62.4 (46-82) years. Another 482 patients who underwent conventional median incision under off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) at the same period were selected as control (an OPCAB group), including 392 males and 90 females, with an average age of 64.2 (48-84) years. The safety and feasibility of HCR were evaluated and compared with conventional OPCAB technique.ResultsThere was no perioperative death in both groups. Compared with the OPCAB, HCR was associated with shorter operation time, less chest tube drainage, lower requirement of blood transfusion, shorter mechanical ventilation time and shorter postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events during the follow-up of 6 to 36 months between the two groups.ConclusionHCR provides favorable short and mid-term outcomes for selected patients with MVCAD compared with conventional OPCAB.