ObjectiveTo compare attitudes of nursing undergraduates to patients with mental illness before and after learning psychiatric nursing course and provide evidence for the improvement of teaching of the course. MethodsStigma scale to patients with mental illness was used as a questionnaire for collecting data, which was conducted on nursing undergraduates taking psychiatric nursing course between March and June 2012. Paired t-test was used to compare the differences between students' attitudes before and after learning the course. ResultsSignificant difference was found for danger factor (P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in the social isolation factor and social ability factor before and after the psychiatric nursing course (P>0.05). ConclusionPsychiatric nursing course has a great influence on students' evaluation of the danger of patients with mental illness which reduces the discrimination against the patients.
目的 调查抑郁症患者疾病应对方式现状，为心理护理干预提供科学依据。 方法 采用问卷调查方式对四川大学华西医院心身障碍病房2012年4月－10月住院的220例抑郁症患者进行一般资料及疾病应对方式调查，并就调查结果进行分析。 结果 抑郁症患者应对方式平均得分（31.5 ± 6.8）分；生活自理能力、兴趣爱好、健康状况及经济状况与应对方式总分存在相关关系（P值分别为0.007、0.000、0.036、0.028）。 结论 抑郁症患者普遍存在应对不良，其生活自理能力、兴趣爱好、健康及经济状况可能是影响抑郁症发展的相关因素。
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of S-amlodipine versus amlodipine, and 2.5 mg S-amlodipine versus 5.0 mg S-amlodipine in treating hypertension.MethodsMedline, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about S-amlodipine for hypertension till January 2018. Two reviewers independently reviewed the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included RCTs. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.ResultsAll together 16 RCTs involving 3 946 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: (1) S-amlodipine vs. amlodipine: the levels of reduction in intima-media thickness [mean difference (MD)=–0.21 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) (–0.35, –0.07) mm, P=0.003], pulse pressure [MD=–5.90 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa), 95%CI (–8.57, –3.23) mm Hg, P<0.000 1], systolic pressure [MD=–5.08 mm Hg, 95%CI (–9.61, –0.55) mm Hg, P=0.03], and diastolic pressure [MD=–4.60 mm Hg, 95%CI (–7.82, –1.39) mm Hg, P=0.005] were all higher in the S-amlodipine group than in the amlodipine group, and the incidence of adverse event [relative risk=0.55, 95%CI (0.40, 0.77), P=0.000 4] was lower in the S-amlodipine group. But no significant differences were found in changes of left ventricular posterior wall thickness, heart rate, blood pressure variability between the two groups. (2) 2.5 mg S-amlodipine vs. 5.0 mg S-amlodipine: the levels of reduction in systolic pressure [MD=4.17 mm Hg, 95%CI (2.23, 6.11) mm Hg, P<0.000 1] and diastolic pressure [MD=1.84 mm Hg, 95%CI (1.17, 2.52) mm Hg, P<0.000 01] were higher in the 5.0 mg S-amlodipine group than in the 2.5 mg S-amlodipine group, but no significant difference was found in the incidence of adverse event between the two groups. None of the primary outcomes was analyzed because they were not reported by any one of the included studies.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that S-amlodipine is slightly superior to amlodipine in reducing intima-media thickness which could indirectly reflect the effect of interventions on endpoint outcome measures, blood pressure, pulse pressure, and the incidence of adverse event. 5.0 mg S-amlodipine is slightly superior to 2.5 mg S-amlodipine in reducing blood pressure, though comparable with the latter in the effect on incidence of adverse event. The effect of S-amlodipine on all the primary outcomes is unclear because none of the included studies reported on those. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.
目的 探讨精神科心身病房优质护理服务模式及效果。 方法 2010年7月起心身病房加入优质护理活动，通过了解患者对优质护理的需求，结合精神科专业特色，从培训和提高护理人员业务能力着手，实行医护共同交班制、共同查房制、开展思维纠正和行为训练、加强康复指导等措施建立优质护理服务模式，并对优质护理的效果以满意度进行评价。 结果 患者对优质护理的希望与要求集中反映在主动热情服务、沟通好、康复治疗效果好等方面；实施优质护理服务后，患者、医生及护士的满意度均有不同程度上升。 结论 心身病房开展优质护理服务，能有效满足患者的需求和体验，提高护士的专科护理技能，达到患者、医生、护士共同满意的良好效果。
Objective To investigate the level and influencing factors of perceived HIV stigma and discrimination among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). Methods By using convenience sampling method, 123 patients were recruited from the department of infectious diseases in a tertiary hospital in Chengdu from April to May in 2017. Berger HIV stigma scale was used to measure the level of perceived HIV stigma. Results The mean score of Berger HIV stigma scale was 113.72±17.890, which revealed a middle to upper level. Among the four subscales, the score of disclosure concerns (3.07±0.462) was the highest, while the score of negative self-image (2.70±0.494) was the lowest. Multiple regression analysis showed that gender and self-perceived health status were the influencing factors of perceived HIV stigma. Conclusions The level of perceived HIV stigma among PLWHA is from middle to upper level. Female gender and poor self-perceived health status are associated with a higher level of perceived HIV stigma. Individualized interventions are required in order to reduce the level of HIV stigma.
ObjectiveTo investigate the estimated prevalence of depression and its associated factors among inpatients in the Department of Oncology in general hospitals. MethodsOn October 29th, 2013, we surveyed all hospitalized patients from the Department of Oncology in West China Hospital, Sichuan University. The questionnaire on patients’ demographic characteristics and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were combined to form one questionnaire to investigate the incidence of depression in hospitalized patients in general hospitals and its influencing factors. ResultsWe gave out 546 questionnaires and retrieved 528 with a retrieval rate of 96.6%. Seven questionnaires had 15 or more empty items and were deleted. The final number of valid questionnaires was 521, with a validity rate of 95.4%. The estimated prevalence of depression among inpatients from the Department of Oncology was 32.8% (171/521). Risk factors for depression in patients in the Department of Oncology included female gender [OR=1.550, 95%CI (1.034, 2.325), P=0.034] illiterate and primary school education [OR=2.534, 95%CI (1.329, 4.832), P=0.005] and annual household income lower than 10 000 RMB [OR=1.850, 95%CI (1.056, 3.243), P=0.032]. A total of 135 patients had suicidal risks, among whom 90 (52.6%) had depression, and Spearman correlation analysis showed that suicidal risk was moderately and positively correlated with PHQ-9 scores (r=0.558, P<0.001). ConclusionsThe estimated total prevalence of depression is high in hospitalized patients in the Department of Oncology, especially in female, low educational level and low family income patients. We must pay more attention to the mental health of cancer patients, evaluate depression and suicidal tendency carefully and provide psychological service timely.