west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "耳穴贴压" 2 results
  • 金玄痔科熏洗散配合耳穴贴压治疗混合痔术后疼痛的疗效观察

    目的观察金玄痔科熏洗散配合耳穴贴压治疗混合痔术后疼痛的临床疗效。 方法选取2013年1月-7月186例住院混合痔术后患者作为治疗组,2013年8月-12月123例住院混合痔术后患者作为对照组。治疗组予金玄痔科熏洗散熏洗坐浴,开水1 500 mL冲开后先熏洗后坐浴,15~20 min/次,2次/d。对照组采用1︰5 000高锰酸钾熏洗坐浴两组均从术后第1天开始治疗直至伤口愈合。对两组疼痛积分、疼痛时间和疗效进行观察和比较。 结果术第1天两组疼痛积分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后第3、5天治疗组疼痛积分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组与对照组术后疼痛持续时间分别为(3.6±1.3)、(5.4±1.4) d,差异有统计学意义(t=11.553,P<0.001)。治疗组和对照组总有效率分别为95.70%、70.73%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=37.794,P<0.001)。 结论金玄痔科熏洗散配合耳穴贴压治疗混合痔术后疼痛较高锰酸钾熏洗坐浴效果更明显。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effect of Auricular Pressure Therapy for Simple Obesity in Adult: A Meta-analysis

    ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of auricular pressure therapy for simple obesity in adult. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2015), PubMed, Web of Science, MEDⅡNE (Ovid), CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang Data databases to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of auricular pressure therapy for simple obesity from inception to March 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 17 RCTs involving 1 246 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:(1) Compared with the blank control group, the auricular pressure therapy group was superior in weight reduction (MD=-2.50, 95%CI -3.53 to -1.47, P<0.01), BMI reduction (MD=-1.50, 95%CI -2.52 to -0.48, P=0.004), and waist circumference reduction (MD=-3.20, 95%CI -4.38 to -2.02, P<0.01); (2) Compared with the placebo control group, the auricular pressure therapy group was superior in weight reduction (MD=-1.39, 95%CI -1.46 to -1.31, P<0.01), BMI reduction (MD=-0.65, 95%CI -0.91 to -0.38, P<0.01), body fat percentage reduction (MD=-0.58, 95%CI -0.67 to -0.49, P<0.01), and waist circumference reduction (MD=-2.34, 95%CI -4.23 to -0.46, P=0.01); (3) There were no significant differences between the auricular pressure therapy group and the body acupuncture group in weight reduction, BMI reduction, and waist circumference reduction (all P values >0.05); (4) Compared with the body acupuncture group, the auricular pressure combined with body acupuncture group was superior in BMI reduction (MD=-1.67, 95%CI -2.48 to -0.85, P<0.01); (5) Three RCTs reported adverse reactions including cyanotic skin, erythema near auricular pressure etc., and all adverse reactions were mostly mild and recovered after treatment. ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that auricular pressure therapy for simple obesity is superior to placebo and blank control, but similar to body acupuncture; the auricular pressure combined with body acupuncture is superior to body acupuncture alone in BMI reduction. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content