目的：比较肝胆手术后两种腹腔引流管的应用效果。方法：将我院2005年5月～2007年3月间行肝脏手术病人106例随机分为实验组(57例)和对照组（49例），实验组采用自制双套管持续负压冲洗引流，对照组采用传统的单腔腹腔引流管引流，分析、比较两组引流的疗效。结果：采用双套管负压冲洗引流的病人发生引流管堵塞3例，隔下感染及积液4例，采用传统的单腔腹腔引流管引流的病人发生引流管堵塞12例，隔下感染及积液15例，差异有统计学意义（Ｐ＜0.05）。结论：肝脏手术后应用双套管持续负压冲洗引流在防止引流管堵塞、隔下感染疗效优于传统的单腔腹腔引流管引流。
ObjectiveTo investigate the correlation between perioperative blood transfusion and hepatic postoperative infection. MethodsOne hundred and thirty patients undergoing hepatic operation were analyzed retrospectively on the relation of perioperative blood transfusion with postoperative infective morbidity and mortality in the period 1989-1999. The patients were divided into blood transfused group and nontransfused group. The major or minor hepatectomy was performed in 53 patients with hepatic malignancy and benign diseases. ResultsIn the blood transfused group, the infective morbidity and perioperative mortality rate was 38.5% and 16.7% respectively, significantly higher than those in nontransfused group (11.5% and 3.8% respectively), P＜0.05. The total lymphocyte count was lower in transfused group than that in nontransfused group. The postoperative antibiotics used time and length of hospital stay were (9.7±4.2) days and (18.7±13.1) days respectively in transfused group than those in nontransfused group (5.3±2.3) days and (12.7±5.2) days respectively. ConclusionThe results suggest that hepatic postoperative infective morbidity and mortality are related with perioperative blood transfusion. Any strategy to reduce blood loss in liver surgery and decrease blood transfusion would be helpful to lower postoperative infective morbidity.
From march 199 to marxh 1994, 25 patients sustained acute gastroduodenal muncosal hemorrhage after liver surgery of 1519 cases in this hospital. Among all patients, 24 cases were primary liver carcinoma with hepatocirrhosis and one was cavernous hemangioma of the liver gt;all were treated by non-operative method, including nutritional support, liver function protection, blood transfusion and infusion to increase the blood volume and administration of hemostatic and antagonist of H2-receptor or H+/K+ATP enyme. Twenty one patients recovered and 4 deaths were cases of severe hepatocirrhosis. The result indicates that there is a direct relationship between acute gastroduodenal mucosal lesions and hepatic cirrhosis. The severer the degree of hepaticcirrhosis and the worse the general condition after surgery is the more severely the liver function impaired, there will be more chance of developing acute gastricmucosal erosion and bleeding.
ObjectiveThe Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) model and its Portsmouth (P-POSSUM) modification are used extensively to predict post-operative mortality and morbidity in general surgery. The aim was to analysis the predictive value of these models in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery. MethodsEligible articles were identified by searching such electronic databases as PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2013), Science Citation Index, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM from 1991 to October 2013. Each study was assessed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then data were extracted, pooled, and analyzed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis Version 2. ResultsTen studies were included. The morbidity analysis included five studies and 683 patients on POSSUM with a weighted O/E ratio 0.71 (95%CI 0.60 to 0.81). The mortality analysis included seven studies with 1 291 patients on POSSUM and six studies with 1 793 patients on P-POSSUM. Weighted O/E ratios for mortality were 0.42 (95%CI 0.27 to 0.57) for POSSUM and 0.74 (95%CI 0.53 to 0.95) for P-POSSUM. ConclusionPOSSUM significantly overestimates postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery. Compared with the original POSSUM, P-POSSUM is more accurate for predicting post-operative mortality. Modifications to POSSUM and P-POSSUM are needed for audit in hepatobiliary surgery.