Objective To investigate the effectiveness of tunnel osteogenesis technique combined with locking plate in the treatment of aseptic non-hypertrophic nonunion of femoral shaft. MethodsThe clinical data of 23 cases of aseptic non-hypertrophic nonunion of femoral shaft treated with tunnel osteogenesis technique combined with locking plate between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analysed. There were 17 males and 6 females with an average age of 41.4 years (range, 22-72 years). There were 22 cases of closed fracture and 1 case of open fracture. The types of internal fixation at admission included intramedullary nail in 14 cases and steel plate in 9 cases. The number of nonunion operations received in the past was 0 to 1; the duration of nonunion was 6-60 months, with an average of 20.1 months. Among them, there were 17 cases of aseptic atrophic nonunion of the femoral shaft and 6 cases of dystrophic nonunion. Twenty-two cases were fixed with 90° double plates and 1 case with lateral single plate. The operation time, theoretical blood loss, hospitalization stay, nonunion healing, and postoperative complications were recorded. Harris hip function score, Lysholm knee function score, lower extremity function scale (LEFS), and short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36) were used at last follow-up to evaluate hip and knee functions. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the relief of pain at 1 day after operation and at last follow-up. ResultsThe average operation time was 190.4 minutes, the average theoretical blood loss was 1 458.4 mL, and the average hospitalization stay was 8.2 days. All the 23 patients were followed up 9-26 months, with an average of 18.2 months. The healing time of nonunion in 22 patients was 3-12 months, with an average of 5.6 months. There were 8 cases of limb pain, 8 cases of claudication, 6 cases of limitation of knee joint movement, and 2 cases of limitation of hip joint movement. At last follow-up, the imaging of 1 patient showed that the nonunion did not heal, accompanied by pain of the affected limb, lameness, and limitation of knee joint movement. At 1 day after operation, the VAS score of 23 patients was 6.5±1.8, the pain degree was good in 7 cases, moderate in 12 cases, and poor in 4 cases; at last follow-up, the VAS score was 0.9±1.3, the pain degree was excellent in 21 cases and good in 2 cases, which were significantly better than those at 1 day after operation (t=12.234, P<0.001; Z=–5.802, P<0.001). At last follow-up, the average Harris hip function score of 22 patients with nonunion healing was 94.8, and the good rate was 100%; Lysholm knee function score averaged 94.0, and the excellent and good rate was 90.9%; LEFS score averaged 74.6; SF-36 physical functioning score averaged 85.0 and the mental health score averaged 83.6. ConclusionTunnel osteogenesis technique combined with locking plate in the treatment of aseptic non-hypertrophic nonunion of femoral shaft has a high healing rate and fewer complications, which can effectively relieve pain and improve lower limb function and quality of patients’ life.
Objective To explore the value of electromagnetic navigation interlocking intramedullary nail in the treatment of femoral shaft fracture. Methods Between July 2012 and October 2013, 53 cases of femoral shaft fracture were treated. There were 40 males and 13 females, aged 16-52 years (mean, 38.3 years). The causes of injury were traffic accident in 28 cases, falling from height in 11 cases, falling in 7 cases, crush injury in 4 cases, and other in 3 cases. Of 53 cases, there were 3 cases of open fracture (Gustilo I degree) and 50 cases of closed fracture. Fracture was located in the proximal femur in 17 cases, middle femur in 29 cases, and distal femur in 7 cases. According to Winquist classification, 7 cases were rated as type I, 8 cases as typeⅡ, 22 cases as typeⅢ, and 16 cases as type IV; according to AO classification, 18 cases were rated as type 32-A, 28 cases as type 32-B, and 7 cases as type 32-C. The time from injury to operation was 3-11 days (mean, 5 days). Distal interlocking intramedullary nail was implanted using electromagnetic navigation. Results The distal locking nail operation with interlocking intramedullary nail was successfully completed under electromagnetic navigation; the one-time success rate of distal locking nail operation reached 100%; and the locking nail time was 5.0-9.5 minutes (mean, 7.0 minutes). Healing of incision by first intention was obtained after operation, and no complication of skin necrosis, infection, and sinus tract occurred. Fifty-three cases were all followed up 5-12 months (mean, 9 months). One case had hip pain and weaken middle gluteal muscle strength, and the symptoms disappeared after removing the nail. During the follow-up period, no broken nails, nail exit, infection, or re-fracture occurred. All fractures achieved clinical healing, and the healing time was 8-22 weeks (mean, 14.5 weeks). In 49 patients followed up 8 months, the Lysholm score was excellent in 44 cases, good in 4 cases, and acceptable in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 98%. Conclusion Electromagnetic navigation system is safe and reliable, with the advantages of high positioning accuracy, short operation time, and no radiation, the clinical application of the system for distal locking nail operation can obtain excellent short-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo investigate the biomechanical influence of the oblique locking plate on the fixation of femoral shaft fracture. MethodsForty imitation artificial femur model with mechanical properties similar to human femur were selected and randomly divided into groups A, B, C, and D, 10 in each group; the femur fracture model was made by transverse osteotomy at 15 cm and 17 cm below the lesser trochanter of the femur and fixed with locking plate with 12 holes and cortical bone screws. The plate was placed in the middle of the longitudinal axis of the femur in group A, and was placed at 5, 10, and 15° angle axis in groups B, C, and D respectively. The axial compression, three-point bending, torsion tests were carried out to measure the strain. ResultsWith the compressive load and bending load increasing, the medial and lateral strains were significantly increased in each group (P<0.05); but no significant difference was found in strains under compressive load and bending load among 4 groups (P>0.05). With increasing torque, the strain was significantly increased in each group (P<0.05). At 10 N·m torque, there was no significant difference in the strain values among 4 groups (P>0.05); the strain value was significantly higher in groups C and D than groups A and B (P<0.05) and in group D than group C (P<0.05) at torque of 20 and 50 N·m, but no significant difference was found between groups A and B (P>0.05). ConclusionUnder different stress, the strain will be significantly increased when the plate is placed at >10° angle axis.
ObjectiveTo review the history, current situation, and progress of augmentation plate (AP) for femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation.MethodsThe results of the clinical studies about the AP in treatment of femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation in recent years were widely reviewed and analyzed.ResultsThe AP has been successfully applied to femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation since 1997. According to breakage of the previous nailing, AP is divided into two categories: AP with retaining the previous intramedullary nail and AP with exchanging intramedullary nail. AP is not only suitable for simple nonunion, but also for complex nonunion with severe deformity. Compared with exchanging intramedullary nail, lateral plate, and dual plate, AP has less surgical trauma, shorter healing time, higher healing rate, and faster returning to society. However, there are still some problems with the revision method, including difficulty in bicortical screw fixation, lack of anatomic plate suitable for femoral shaft nonunion, and lack of postoperative function and quality of life assessment.ConclusionCompared with other revision methods, AP could achieve higher fracture healing rate and better clinical prognosis for patients with femoral shaft nonunion. However, whether patients benefit from AP in terms of function and quality of life remain uncertain. Furthermore, high-quality randomized controlled clinical studies are needed to further confirm that AP are superior to the other revision fixations.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and reconstruction nail with minimally invasive technique for ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures in young and middle-aged patients. Methods Sixty-nine young and middle-aged patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures were treated between January 2000 and August 2010, and their data were analyzed retrospectively. Of them, fractures were fixed by reconstruction nail in 44 cases (reconstruction nail group) and by PFNA in 25 cases (PFNA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, weight, injury cause, fracture type, or disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, blood loss, fracture healing time, complications, and functional outcomes were compared between 2 groups to evaluate the effectiveness. Results The operation time and blood loss in the PFNA group were significantly less than those in the reconstruction nail group (P lt; 0.05). The follow-up time was 12-38 months (mean, 20 months ) in the PFNA group and was 12-48 months (mean, 22 months) in the reconstruction nail group. No complication occurred as follows in 2 groups: wound infection, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, breakage of the implants, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, or serious rotation and shortening deformity of lower limbs. In the PFNA group and the reconstruction nail group, 1 patient underwent technical difficulty in nail implant and 7 patients underwent technical difficulty in proximal locking screw, respectively; 3 patients and 6 patients had intra-operative iatrogenic fracture of femoral shaft, respectively; and delayed union of femoral shaft was observed in 1 patient and 2 patients, respectively. The complication rate was 20% (5/25) in the PFNA group and 34% (15/44) in the reconstruction nail group, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.538, P=0.215). No significant difference was found in fracture healing time between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in Harris hip score and Evanich knee score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion PFNA or reconstruction nail with minimally invasive technique is a good method to treat ipsilateral femoral shaft and extracapsular hip fractures, but the PFNA is superior to the reconstruction nail because of simple operation.
There were several methods, such as free single and folded fibulae autograft, composed tissue autograft, however, it is still very difficult to repair long segment bone defect. In December 1995, we used free juxtaposed bilateral fibulae autograft to repair an 8 cm of femoral bone defect in a 4 years old child in success. The key procedure is to strip a portion of the neighboring periosteal sleeve of juxtaposed fibulae to make bare of the opposite sides of the bone shafts, suture the opposite periosteal sleeves, keep the nutrient arteries, and reconstruct the blood circulation of both fibular by anastomosis of the distal ends of one fibular artery and vein to the proximal ends of the other fibular artery and vein, and anastomosis of the proximal ends of the fibular artery and vein to lateral circumflex artery and vein. After 22 months follow up, the two shafts of juxtaposed fibulae fused into one new bone shaft. The diameter of the new bone shaft was nearly the same as the diameter of the femur. There was only one medullary cavity, and it connected to the medullary cavity of femur. This method also cold be used to repair other long segment bone defect.