ObjectiveTo explore effect of α-adrenoceptor on modulating water of lung in severe acute pancrea-titis (SAP) rat. MethodsThe SD rats were randomly divided into sham operation group (n=5) and SAP group,the SAP group was divided into subgroups of SAP-4 h (n=5) and SAP-24 h (n=5).SAP model was made by injecting taurocholate into bilopancreatic duct.The wet-to-dry ratio,alveolar fluid clearance (AFC),and AFC affected by α1-adrenoceptor inhibitor-prazosin and α2-adrenoceptor inhibitor-yohimbine separately or together were measured in the lungs.The α1-adrenoceptor and α2-adrenoceptor mRNA expressions in the lungs tissues were measured by real-time PCR. Results① The wet-to-dry ratios in the SAP-4 h group and SAP-24 h group were obviously decreased as compared with the sham operation group (P<0.05),which in the SAP-24 h group was significantly lower than that in the SAP-4 h group (P<0.05).② The AFCs in the SAP-4 h group and SAP-24 h group were obviously increased as compared with the sham operation group (P<0.05).The AFCs in the SAP with α1-adrenoceptor inhibitor-prazosin or α2-adrenocpetor inhibitor-yohimbine or prazosin combined with yohimbine were all obviously decreased as compared with the SAP group (P<0.05).③ The α1 adrenoceptor and α2 adrenoceptor mRNAs in the SAP-4 h group and SAP-24 h group were obviously increased as compared with the sham operation group (P<0.05). ConclusionAFC might be modulated by α-adrenoceptor in SAP rat.
【摘要】 目的 比较靶控诱导后Shikani喉镜、Macintosh直接喉镜和GlideScope®视频喉镜插管时的应激反应。 方法 选取2008年12月-2009年2月期间ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ级、拟于全身麻醉下行择期颅内占位病变切除术的患者30例，随机分为Shikani喉镜组（S组）、Macintosh直接喉镜组（M组）与GlideScope®视频喉镜组（G组）。靶控异丙酚和瑞芬太尼诱导，分别采用上述3种喉镜行经口气管插管。记录患者的心率、血压，计算心率收缩压乘积（RPP）。 结果 3组插管时间、心率、血压和RPP比较差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。S组和M组插管后心率、血压及RPP均较插管前显著升高（Plt;0.05），而G组插管后的心率、60~300 s时的收缩压、平均动脉压和RPP与插管前比较，差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。 结论 3种喉镜进行经口气管插管时具有相似的血流动力学反应，GlideScope®视频喉镜更有利于循环稳定。【Abstract】 Objective To compare the hemodynamic responses of orotracheal intubations with GlideScope® videolaryngoscope, Macintosh direct laryngoscope, and Shikani optical stylet after target-controlled-infusion (TCI). Methods Thirty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Ⅰ-Ⅱ, scheduled for elective intracranial mass lesion surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated equally to Shikani optical stylet group (group S) Macintosh laryngoscope group (group M), and GlideScope® videolaryngoscope group (group G). After the patients became unconscious by TCI induction of propofpol and remifentanil, the endotracheal intubation were carried out through above three laryngoscope. The heart rate (HR), blood pressure and rate pressure product (RPP) were recorded. Results The differences of intubation time, HR, blood pressure and RPP in three groups were not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05). After intubation, the HR, blood pressure and RPP of group S and M were obviously higher than those before intubation (Plt;0.05); while there was no obvious change on the HR, systolic pressure at 60-300 s, mean arterial pressure and RPP of group G compared before intubation (Pgt;0.05). Conclusions There are similar hemodynamic responses in the three laryngoscope. GlideScope® is more advantageous to cycle stability.
ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of norepinephrine on pulmonary vessel pressure in animal model of septic shock. MethodsTwelve health mongrel dogs were randomly divided into a control group (n=5, intravenously injected with normal saline 1 mL/kg) and an endotoxin group(n=7, intravenously injected with lipopolysaccharide 1 mg/kg). When the systemic blood pressure decreased by more than 40% of baseline before administration, the dogs in two groups were intravenously injected with NE 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0μg·kg-1·min-1. The interval of each dose was more than 10 minutes. The changes of the pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), pulmonary venous pressure (PVP), and systemic arterial rressure (SAP) were recorded and compared between two groups. ResultsIn the control group, PAP didn't change significantly after administration (P < 0.05), however, PVP increased obviously after NE administration in dose of 2.0 and 5.0μg·kg-1·min-1 (P < 0.05), and SAP increased obviously after NE administration in dose of 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0μg·kg-1·min-1 (P < 0.01). In the endotoxin group, PAP increased obviously after NE administration in dose of 2.0 and 5.0μg·kg-1·min-1 (P < 0.05), while PVP didn't change significantly (P > 0.05), and SAP increased obviously after NE administration in dose of 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0μg·kg-1·min-1 (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in SAP (P < 0.05), not in PAP and PVP (P > 0.05), between two groups after NE administration at dose of 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0μg·kg-1·min-1. The PVP/SAP and PAP/SAP values didn't change significantly after administration in the control group (P > 0.05). In the endotoxin group, the PVP/SAP and PAP/SAP values increased significantly after LPS administration, and decreased slightly after NE administration in dose of 2.0 and 5.0μg·kg-1·min-1 (P < 0.05). ConclusionsNE administration in septic shock can not increase the angiotasis of the pulmonary vein. NE administration in dose of 2.0 and 5.0μg·kg-1·min-1 can cause the increase of PAP and SAP, but the increase of PAP is lower than the increase of SAP.
Objective To discuss the effect of continuous phenylephrine infusion and single-dose phenylephrine injection on puerpera undergoing spinal and epidural combined anesthesia and the infant outcomes. Methods A total of 50 patients scheduled for selective cesarean section under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia were selected as the study subjects between July 2015 and June 2016. They were randomly allocated into two groups with 25 in each. Group CII underwent continuous phenylephrine infusion [0.5 μg/(kg·min)] immediately after anesthesia to adjust the blood pressure, while group CON accepted single-dose phenylephrine injection (50 μg) after anesthesia when systolic pressure was lower than 90 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) or when the decrease of mean arterial pressure (MAP) was higher than 20% of the base value. The infusion of phenylephrine was stopped after the fetus was taken out. MAP, cardiac output, cardiac index (CI) at the time when the patient went into the delivery room (T1), before anesthesia (T2), 1 minute after anesthesia (T3), 3 minutes after anesthesia (T4), 10 minutes after anesthesia (T5), and delivery (T6) were recorded. Blood gas analysis of fetal umbilical arterial blood was carried out and neonatal Apgar score was recorded. Results Hemodynamics was more stable in group CII compared with group CON. Heart rate at T4 and T5, and cardiac output at T5 and T6 in group CON were significantly lower than those in group CII (P<0.05). The neonatal umbilical arterial blood pH value, base excess and HCO3－ were all significantly lower, while partial pressure of carbon dioxide was significantly higher in group CON than group CII (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with single-dose phenylephrine injection, continuous phenylephrine infusion has more stable hemodynamics, and exert less effect on maternal and infant outcomes for patients undergoing cesarean section under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia.
ObjectiveTo review the research progress of adrenergic β-antagonists on wounds and diabetic chronic cutaneous ulcers healing in recent years, and to investigate its application prospect in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).MethodsThe latest literature about the role of adrenergic β-antagonists in wounds and diabetic chronic cutaneous ulcers healing was extensively reviewed, and the mechanisms of adrenergic β-antagonists for wounds and its potential benefit for DFU were analyzed thoroughly.ResultsThe adrenergic β-antagonists can accelerate the wound healing. The possible mechanisms include accelerating re-epithelialization, promoting angiogenesis, improving neuropathy, and regulating inflammation and growth factors, etc. At present clinical research data showed that the adrenergic β-antagonists may be an adjuvant treatment for diabetic chronic cutaneous ulcers.ConclusionAdrenergic β-antagonists maybe promote the healing of wounds and diabetic chronic cutaneous ulcers. However, more long-term follow-up and high-quality randomized control studies are needed to further verify their efficacy and safety for DFU.
Objective To assess the efficacy of medical expulsive therapy for ureteral calculi with tamsulosin. Methods We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) Database, The Cochrane Library and Chinese Journal Full-text Database from 1995 to September 2006, as well as the proceedings of urological scientific conferences from 2000 to 2006. Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) comparing tamsulosin and other therapies for ureteral calculi among adults were included. Data were extracted by two reviewers independently and synthesized by STATA 9.0 software. Results A total of 16 studies involving 1521 patients with distal or juxtavesical ureteral calculi were included. Compared with conservative therapy, tamsulosin showed higher expulsion rate [RR 1.50, 95%CI (1.20 to 1.87), Plt;0.0001], shorter expulsion time [SMD –1.29, 95%CI (–2.27, –0.31)] and fewer patients requiring ESWL or ureteroscopy [RR 0.40, 95%CI (0.27, 0.59), Plt;0.05]. Compared with conservative therapy, the combination of tamsulosin plus deflazacort also showed higher expulsion rate [RR 1.59, 95%CI (1.31, 1.93)], shorter expulsion time [SMD –0.8, 95%CI (–1.18, –0.42)] and fewer patients requiring ESWL or ureteroscopy [RR 0.13, 95%CI (0.06, 0.31), Plt;0.05]. Compared with deflazacort alone, the combination of tamsulosin plus deflazacort demonstrated similar expulsion rate [RR 1.31, 95%CI (0.78, 2.23), P=0.31], but significantly reduced the dosage of analgesics [SMD 15.20, 95%CI (14.98, 15.52)] and decreased the proportion of patients requiring ESWL or ureteroscopy [RR 0.09,, 95%CI (0.02, 0.47), Plt;0.05]. Compared with deflazacort plus nifedipine, the combination of tamsulosin plus deflazacort showed higher expulsion rate [RR 1.20, 95%CI (1.07, 1.35), P=0.002], but similar expulsion time [SMD –1.34, 95%CI (–3.47, 0.79)] and proportion of patients requiring ESWL or ureteroscopy [RR 0.34, 95%CI (0.05, 2.22), Pgt;0.05]. As for side effects, tamsulosin-based treatment and conservative therapy were comparable (Pgt;0.05). Conclusions Tamsulosin has a beneficial effect on the expulsion of ureteral calculi, especially for distal and juxtavesical ureteral calculi. Tamsulosin-based medical expulsive therapy at the dosage of 0.4mg daily is effective and safe for patients with distal ureteral calculi. More large-scale studies are required to define the efficacy of combination therapy of tamsulosin plus deflazacort.
Objective To systemically review the efficacy and safety of dopamine versus norepinephrine in patients with septic shock. Methods Database searches of MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, VIP, CNKI, and CBM (from the date of database establishment to June 2011) were conducted. Additional studies for collecting relevant data were retrieved via both references of articles and direct contact with authors. Prospectively, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of dopamine compared with norepinephrine therapy in septic shock patients were selected. The quality of included trials was assessed and relevant data were extracted. Then statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1. Results Nine trials with 3 179 participants were included. The results of meta-analysis showed: compared with norepinephrine, dopamine was associated with a significant 12% elevation in the risk ratio of in-hospital death events of septic shock patients (RR=1.12, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.21, P=0.002). The risk of arrhythmias in dopamine group was 2.63-fold than that in norepinephrine group (RR=2.63, 95%CI 1.51 to 4.55, P=0.000 6). The cardiac index of septic patients in dopamine group was higher than that in norepinephrine group (MD=0.42, 95%CI 0.21 to 0.63, Plt;0.000 1). No significant difference could be found in the heart rate (MD=17.05, 95%CI –0.71 to 34.81, P=0.06) and mean arterial pressure (MD= –0.87, 95%CI –24.97 to 7.62, P=0.30). Conclusion Findings from this meta-analysis suggest that compared with dopamine, norepinephrine significantly reduces both 28-day mortality of septic shock patients and incidence rate of arrhythmias. Norepinephrine is better than dopamine in aspects of efficacy and safety.
To quantitatively measure the α1-adrenergic receptors and select the suitable conditions of receptor-ligand binding assay. Radioligand binding analysis was used to measure the concentration of α1-adrenergic receptors, and the measuring conditions were selected, respectively. Under the selected conditions, the α1-adrenergic receptors in lier plasma membranes of 8 nonhepatopathy subjects were measured.Under such suitable conditions as ３H-prazosin concentration 0.1-2.0nmol/L, incubating temperature 37℃, reaction time 20 minutes and seperating free ligand from system with double layer of filter paper, the binding of 3H-prazosin to α1receptors from 8 nonhepatopathy subjects were saturable with a high affinity. The Bmax, Kd, RMC and Hill coefficient were 142.1±14.1 fmol per milligram of protein, 0.2382±0.0548 nM, 739.0±167.6 fmol per gram of liver and 0.90±0.03, respectively.The suitable conditions may be very important for measuring α1-adrenergic receptors in human liver plasma membranes, which should be considered in hepatopathy studies.